News
Aragalaya group candidate justifies Hasina’s ouster, denies role in JVP’s plan to march on Parliament in 2022
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Presidential candidate Nuwan Bopage has strongly defended the ouster of Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. Appearing on ‘Salakuna’ on Hiru, Monday (12) night, Attorney-at-Law Bopage emphasised that the people had chased away PM Hasina as she had pursued an IMF-led agenda inimical to her country.
Bopage said so when Hiru anchor Chamuditha Samarawickrema, while referring to a spate of recent media reports, asked him whether the US had influenced the long serving Bangladeshi leader over her government’s refusal to accommodate US military base on their territory. Hasina has alleged US involvement in her ouster.
Bopage said that such claims could have been accepted if the deposed leader hadn’t implemented IMF programmes at the expense of the people, murdered four workers and moved court against 23,000 others, not subjected Bangladesh to Indian influence and annihilated the Opposition through dictatorial means.
Comparing Hasina’s rule with that of Gotabaya Rajapaksa, the leading Front Line Socialist Party (FSP) activist said that the people had forced the latter to flee as he ruined the economy.
The panel of Hiru journalists reminded Bopage that Bangladesh had erupted in June this year following the Supreme Court reinstating a 30% government job quota for descendants of the freedom fighters.
Bopage acknowledged that the dispute over job quota controvesy had sparked riots..
The US State Department has denied the former Bangladeshi leader’s accusations.
Jana Aragala Sandhanaya, comprising a section of those involved in the March-July 2022 protest campaign against Gotabaya Rajapaksa, has fielded Bopage as its candidate. When Hiru asked how Jana Aragala Sandhanaya could field him as it was yet to receive Election Commission recognition, Bopage said that he would contest on the ticket of Samajawadi Janatha Sansadhaya.Acknowledging the JVP had been involved in Aragalaya, from the very beginning, the top spokesman for the breakaway JVP faction said that they weren’t involved in the alleged bid to seize control of Parliament.
Commenting on Jathika Jana Balawegaya heavyweight Lal Kantha’s recent declaration that Aragalaya could have taken over the Parliament if the so-called Galle Face protest leaders threw their weight behind the move, thereby advanced the operation to the next stage, Bopage insisted that wasn’t a collective decision taken by those who executed the ‘Gotagogama’ campaign.
Bopage alleged that the JVP, in spite of being part of Aragalaya, was acting on its own. According to him, there had been an ‘operation committee’ at the Galle Face site that comprised 60 to 100 persons. Responding to another query, Bopage said there hadn’t been a leader though there were many groups. Bopage identified Samajawadi Shishya Sangamaya, Viplawawadi Shishya Sangamaya, Youth for Change and Samajawadi Tharuna Sangamaya as some of the groups involved in the ‘operations committee.’
Bopage denied Chamuditha Samarawickrema’s assertion that the JVP and the FSP were the most active in Aragalaya. The presidential candidate said that the UNP and its breakaway faction SJB as well as many other groups worked in unison for the regime change operation. Bopage claimed that MP Patali Champika Ranawaka’s people, too, had been there.
Bopage denied accusations that the JVP, FSP and other political parties and groups exploited genuine grievances of the hapless and public protest campaign to engineer externally-backed regime change operation. The lawyer said that their primary objective had been to send Gotabaya Rajapaksa home, cause collapse of what he called the Rajapaksa family rule and the third objective was to advance Aragalaya.
The presidential candidate struggled to explain the composition of the decision-making body of their party. Hiru questioned the legality of Bopage’s selection as the composition of the decision-making body remained debatable.
Bopage said that political parties moved in about a week after the public launched Galle Face protest, on April 9, just over a week after the violent incidents outside the then President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s private residence at Pangiriwatte, Mirihana.
Asked to explain the Aragalaya strategy after President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s ouster, Bopage said that they planned to call for a conference with ‘some representation’ from Parliament and representatives of Aragalaya, as well as public representation, with the objective of formulating of a new Constitution.
Bopage said that the Constitution would have been subjected to a referendum.
Responding to a barrage of questions regarding their strategy, Bopage said that the ‘operations committee’ never planned to take control of the Presidential Secretariat and the Prime Minister’s Office. Bopage asserted that the JVP operated alone while denying there was a plan to move into the Supreme Court. Moving to Rupavahini, too, hadn’t been planned, Bopage said, while denying any talks with the JVP regarding the move against Parliament.
Bopage claimed that they intervened at some places to keep the operation in line with the agreed agenda. The lawyer pointed out that the Parliament couldn’t be dissolved by taking control of it.
Bopage said that the UNP quit Aragalaya as soon as their leader Ranil Wickremesinghe received premiership on May 12, 2022.
Latest News
Sun directly overhead Pomparippu, Anuradhapura, Mihinthale, Galenbindunuwewa, Agbopura and Serunuwara about 12:11 noon today (11)
On the apparent northward relative motion of the sun, it is going to be directly over the latitudes of Sri Lanka from 05th to 15th of April in this year.
The nearest areas of Sri Lanka over which the sun is overhead today (11th) are Pomparippu, Anuradhapura, Mihinthale, Galenbindunuwewa, Agbopura and Serunuwara about 12:11 noon.
News
Opposition NCM against Energy Minister defeated
A no-confidence motion brought by the Opposition against Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody was defeated in Parliament yesterday by a majority of 104 votes.At the end of the debate, 49 members voted in favour of the motion, while 153 voted against it.
The motion, submitted to the Speaker on 19 March, was signed by Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa, SJB MPs, and other Opposition members.
It accused Minister Jayakody of failing to ensure the procurement of adequate and quality coal for the Lakvijaya Coal Power Plant in Norochcholai, alleging that such negligence amounted to a breach of ministerial responsibility over a critical national energy asset.
The motion also cited ongoing legal proceedings against the Minister, noting that he has been indicted by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption and produced before the Colombo High Court under Section 70 of the Bribery Act, in connection with alleged acts of corruption during his tenure as Procurement Manager of the Ceylon Fertiliser Company Limited.
The motion read: Vote of No Confidence against Kumara Jayakody, Minister of Energy,— Whereas the Provision in Section 6 of the Part III of the Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament which states that: “The Members shall on all occasions act in accordance with the public trust entrusted with them and shall always behave with probity and integrity, including the use by them of any public resources.” has been violated; And whereas the following rules of conduct set out in Section 9 of the Part V of the Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament have prima facie been breached, namely:- “(a) to be conscience; (c) to act so as to merit the trust and respect of the people; (e) to hold themselves accountable for the conduct and duties for which they are responsible;” And whereas it is observed that the Minister has failed, in his capacity as a Minister of the Cabinet of Ministers, to discharge the fundamental duties incumbent upon him in accordance with Article 28 of the Constitution;
And whereas it is established that the Minister of Energy has failed to discharge his primary duty of ensuring the procurement of adequate and good quality coal for the Norochcholai Lakvijaya Coal Power Plant;
And whereas such gross negligence in overseeing a critical national energy asset constitutes a fundamental breach of ministerial responsibility;
And whereas the Minister of Energy has failed to carry out the subjects and functions vested in him by the Notification of Gazette Extraordinary No. 2412/08 of 25th November 2024 of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, including taking necessary steps to reduce the losses at the institutional management level and technical damages that occur to the electricity generation and distribution system and reduction of costs for generating electricity and removal of uncertainties during generation;
And whereas the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption has filed formal indictments before the Colombo High Court against the incumbent Minister of Energy under Section 70 of the Bribery Act (Chapter 26) for the offence of “corruption” in connection with acts of corruption allegedly committed while he was serving as the Procurement Manager of the Lanka Fertilizer Company;
And whereas, in light of the foregoing, the Minister of Energy has irretrievably forfeited the confidence of Parliament and the people of Sri Lanka by causing losses to public finances, endangering national energy security, corruptly mishandling the procurement process, being subjected to active judicial proceedings for the offence of “corruption”, and betraying the Government’s own “anti-corruption mandate”, and his continued tenure as the Minister of Energy is contrary to the public interest, the rule of law, and the principles of good governance;
That this Parliament resolves that it has no confidence in the competence of Kumara Jayakody, Minister of Energy to function as a Minister of the Cabinet of Ministers any longer.”
by Saman Indrajith
News
Chinese Ambassador assures Lanka China will not allow a fuel crisis to develop here
Chinese Ambassador to Sri Lanka Qi Zhenhong yesterday assured that China would not allow a fuel crisis to arise in Sri Lanka, under any circumstances, reaffirming Beijing’s continued support to the country.
The Ambassador made these remarks addressing the media after attending a dry ration distribution programme for 350 low-income families at Sri Chandananda Buddhist College, at Asgiriya, in Kandy.
Highlighting the longstanding ties between the two countries, Ambassador Qi said China has consistently stood by Sri Lanka and remains ready to extend assistance whenever required.
Amid concerns over global energy disruptions, stemming from the ongoing Middle East conflict, he noted that several countries are already facing difficulties, but stressed that China is prepared to support Sri Lanka at any time.
He said that any potential fuel shortage in Sri Lanka could be managed with the involvement of China’s Sinopec.
Reiterating Beijing’s commitment to Sri Lanka’s economic recovery and development, the Envoy also expressed hope that the current ceasefire in the Middle East would hold, while assuring that China stands ready to respond to any future developments and assist Sri Lanka as needed.
By SK Samaranayake
-
Features6 days agoRanjith Siyambalapitiya turns custodian of a rare living collection
-
News6 days agoGlobal ‘Walk for Peace’ to be held in Lanka
-
News4 days agoLankan-origin actress Subashini found dead in India
-
News2 days agoAG: Coal procurement full of irregularities
-
Business1 day agoIsraeli attack on Lebanon triggers local stock market volatility
-
Features6 days agoBeyond the Blue Skies: A Tribute to Captain Elmo Jayawardena
-
Features6 days agoAspects of Ceylon/Sri Lanka Foreign Relations – 1948 to 1976
-
Business2 days agoHayleys Mobility introduces Premium OMODA C9 PHEV
