Features
” Against All Odds”: The Enduring Legacy of Louis Armstrong
by Dahami Samarathunga
During my college days, I had a neighbor who would enthusiastically blast his ‘Louis Armstrong’ AKA ‘Satchmo,’ collection on weekend afternoons. He was eager to share his refined musical taste with the entire neighbourhood. While the noise often tempted me to confront him, I believe it was our friendly small talk and his wife’s warm, endearing smile, which I’d receive just before heading off to class, that managed to dissuade me from taking up the disturbance of the loud music with him. I always thought their house was a testament to a bygone era, with its picket fence and asphalt shingles, resembling a perfectly preserved snapshot of a bygone age.
Although, I appreciates jazz, his loud music often felt like an intrusion into a quiet neighbourhood. Like many of my generation, my exposure to Armstrong’s music was limited to occasional snippets, like bits from ‘What a Wonderful World’ on TV commercials. I couldn’t fathom how someone my age could find relevance in jazz composed nearly a century ago. To make matters worse, with a mountain of assignments, research papers, theses, and exams piling up, I was already at my wit’s end, and was simply in no mood to hear ‘I want a big butter and bread man” every other weekend.
However, after my neighbours’ passing last October, I felt compelled to listen to a lot of Satchmo’s work work and soon I discovered why he peaked as high as he did. He was a trailblazer without an equal, often dubbed as one of the most influential forefathers of jazz and scat singing. Armstrong was a colossus of musical innovation, whose groundbreaking artistry, infectious attraction and enduring legacy have continue to inspire and delight audiences across generations, cementing his status as an iconic legend in the pantheon of American music.
Beyond his mastery of the trumpet, his revolutionary techniques and his much-loved gravelly voice, it was Louis Armstrong’s infectious grin, quick wit, and general demeanour that truly set him apart from others. His was a warm and humorous personality that won him a multitude of fans and captured the hearts of millions worldwide. His ability to connect with people through his music, humour, and charisma has cemented his legacy as a beloved entertainer and a timeless icon in the world of jazz.
Born into dire poverty in 1901, Armstrong grew up mostly under his grandmother’s care. He lacked the simple joys of life as a child and suffered malnutrition. In the early 1900’s despite his grandmother’s ambitions for him, being of African descent was a major setback and at the age of seven, he was forced to work selling newspapers or vegetables on the street. At age 11, he had quit school and joined a quartet of boys who sang on the streets for money. After few months of work, he saved enough to buy a used cornet with which he taught himself to play.
During their street performances, Louis and friends would come into contact with many different musicians who played in ‘Storyville Honky Tonks.’ It was here that one of towns best known trumpeters, Bunk Johnson, noticed Armstrong’s raw talent and taught him a variety of techniques to refine his already impressive skills. Johnson invited Armstrong to attend his concerts, paving the way for the young prodigy’s future success.
During this time, Louis lived with his mother and sister and worked for the Karnoffskys’, a local family of Lithuanian Jews. He often helped the family with their two children, Morris and Alex, and did chores around the house. Many believe his fondness for the Jewish faith came from this connection revealed in his memoir ‘Louis Armstrong + the Jewish Family in New Orleans, LA’. Working for the Karnoffskys’ and singing Russian lullabies to put the children to sleep inspired him to ‘sing from the heart’.
As a young boy, Louis Armstrong generally steered clear of trouble, but on New Year’s Eve in 1912 an impetuous act of firing a blank into the air with his stepfather’s gun led to his arrest. As a result, he spent the night in a lock-up and the New Orleans Juvenile Court sentenced him to detention at the Colored Waif’s Home the next day. The home, run by the strict Captain Joseph Jones, was akin to a military camp, with discipline enforced through corporal punishment.
Ironically, it was within those walls that Louis discovered his true passion. The home’s brass band captivated him, as he longed to join its ranks. But the band director was initially hesitant, wary of his troubled past and feared the repercussions of accepting a ‘gun-toting kid from Storyville’ into the band. But Louis’ continued persistence eventually worked as he not only became a member of the band but its leader. It was said that Peter Davis, who became Armstrong’s first teacher was highly impressed with not only his ability, but also his creative mind. And with this band, the 13-year-old Armstrong caught the eye of the likes of Kid Ory.
After being released from detention around 1914, Louis met one of his idols, New Orleans cornet star, Joe “King” Oliver. Oliver was pleased teach and share his skill with upcoming artists and took Louis under his wing, eventually making him his protégé. By 1918, Armstrong had played in brass bands and riverboats in New Orleans, and travelled with the band of Jazz pianist Fate Marable who played on board a steamboat plying up and down the Mississippi River.
Marable was highly impressed with Armstrong’s music and encouraged him and other members of his band to learn sight reading of music. Armstrong would later recounted this time as a crucial part of his career. He described it as his introduction to formal education in music saying it was as though he and his fellow bandsmen were “going to the University” with wider exposure to work with written arrangements.
By the age of 20, Armstrong had already honed his skills to become a proficient sight-reader of music and a pioneering jazz performer renowned for his extended trumpet solos that showcased his unique personality and style. He also began to sing during his performances, adding another dimension to his artistry. In 1922, Armstrong made a pivotal move to Chicago, joining King Oliver’s Creole Jazz Band at the prestigious Lincoln Gardens, a blacks-only venue.
Despite his age, Armstrong’s talent earned him a coveted spot as Oliver’s as second cornet artiste, a huge feat considering his amateur status. Shortly after, news of the young prodigy’s performances spread like wildfire, attracting a diverse audience of music enthusiasts, including future jazz legends Benny Goodman and Bix Beiderbecke who would sneak into the dance hall to experience Armstrong’s magic.
After leaving New Orleans in 1922, Armstrong spent three years playing in jazz ensembles in Chicago and Harlem. He was largely content to be a journeyman musician, but his second wife, pianist Lil Hardin believed he was simply too talented not have a band of his own considering his growing popularity. In 1925, while Armstrong was performing in New York, Hardin went behind his back and secured a deal with Chicago’s Dreamland Café to advertise and use him as a featured artiste.
She even demanded his being billed as “The World’s Greatest Trumpet Player.” Despite Armstrong’s’ hesitation, many believed it was a clever entrepreneurial decision on his wife’s part as this marketing gimmick eventually played out in his favour. It turned out to be the best move of his career, as a few days after arriving in Chicago, Armstrong was given the permission to make his first recordings under his own name by ‘OKeh Records’ – a monumental moment in his career.
Between 1925 -1928, Armstrong and his backup bands, the Hot Five and Hot Seven, went on to release over dozen records that introduced the world to his improvisational trumpet solos and trademark scat singing – all commercial successes. The legendary Hot Five and Hot Seven bands captured not only Armstrong’s development as a fine Jazz soloist, but showcased superiority to his peers and many other artists before his time. His “Struttin with Some Barbecue,” “Cornet Chop Suey” and “Potato Head Blues” were often regarded as three masterpieces where he seemingly switched from the mellower-sounding cornet to the trumpet winning the highest critical praise. His efforts at hitting the higher notes was considered revolutionary at the time.
Asked in an interview to discuss the secret of his success and what distinguished him and his peers from the then current crop of artists, Armstrong replied, “I don’t know what they did. I don’t know where they blew it from.” He added, “That’s their business, but if they sounded good I don’t care where it came from.
You understand? Music is music.” Asked about the future of jazz, he expressed confidence that it would remain secure as long as the sanctity of music was upheld. Responding to a question of changing his style to suit younger audiences, he said, “No, why should you change your music, Mozart didn’t change. Bach didn’t change.” When the interviewer stated that some might find that strategy to be a bit regressive, Armstrong countered, “We never did worry about styles, there ain’t no such thing as styles in music. There ain’t but two kinds of music, good or bad. That’s all.”
Despite his phenomenal success, many often-overlooked the chapter of relentless racism in his career which he and fellow artists of colour endured in the industry. This, ironically, was a stark contrast to the joyfulness in his music . Critics noted that he was often singled out among African American artists during the tumultuous 1940s-1950s, with some labelling him an “Uncle Tom” due to his perceived acquiescence of discrimination, in contrast to figures like Malcolm X and Muhammad Ali who vocally denounced the US government’s handling of racial issues. While some believed Armstrong’s restrained approach was driven by a fear of backlash and career repercussions – which was a legitimate concern given the industry’s predominantly white ownership – his actions nevertheless remained a testament to his strength and perseverance in the face of adversity.
In Sacha Jenkins’ documentary ‘Louis Armstrong’s Black and Blues’ , revealed a rare interview where Armstrong reminisced on the discrimination he faced in the industry, from being heckled by an audience member who yelled ‘I don’t like Negros’ to his face ‘ to being disrespected on a film set in a manner which he believed ,no white artist would ever tolerate.
Armstrong also said in his usual humorous manner how he got last laugh at the encounter he had on the movie set, adding he even harangued them on ‘where to stick their movie’. And as a man who was born less then a half century after the abolition of slavery, it was no less of a miracle that Armstrong reached levels of fame and success that could rival the likes off Frank Sinatra or Bing Crosby, who were both studio darlings.
Louis Armstrong also bridged the generational gap by collaborating with younger artists, notably Ella Fitzgerald, with whom he released the iconic album, “Ella and Louis,” in 1956. This masterpiece showcased the duo’s undeniable chemistry and offered a powerful representation of black Americans in the 1950s, emphasizing the importance of unity and solidarity in the face of segregation. In late 1963, Louis Armstrong (and his All Stars ) recorded “Hello, Dolly!”, a title track for an upcoming musical project.
Although Armstrong himself had low expectations for the song, it became a massive hit when the show premiered on Broadway making “Hello Dolly!” reach number one on the charts, surpassing two songs by The Beatles at the height of ‘Beatlemania in 1964’, making Armstrong the oldest musician in American history to have a number one song at 62 years of age. His crossover appeal continued with his starring role in the film adaptation of “Hello, Dolly!” in 1969, where he shared the screen with Barbra Streisand, further cementing his status as a generational icon. Critics believed these projects demonstrated Armstrong’s ability to transcend age and genre boundaries, leaving an indelible mark music and American cultural heritage.
Shorty before his death on July 6, 1971, in February Armstrong played a two‐week engagement at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel. When asked about his return to the scene he said, “I’m going back to work when my treaders get in as good shape as my chops.” Showing audiences that the ‘showman’ in him hasn’t died out despite his rapid decline of health.
“If anybody was Mr. Jazz it was Louis Armstrong. He was the epitome of jazz and always will be. He is what I call an American standard, an American original,” Jazz icon Duke Ellington once said. Critics believe it was a testament to his prodigious talent, innovative spirit, and iconic image that were inextricably linked with the genre of jazz, making him an embodiment of that art form. His legacy continues to inspire generations of musicians, from , Frank Sinatra, Ella Fitzgerald, Billie Holiday to modern virtuosos like Jon Batiste. And, though, the state of Jazz is in no state of a disarray, its current state is a far cry from its former glory, leaving many to ponder if there will ever be another artist who can match the success and enduring influence of Louis Armstrong.
Regina Bain, executive director of Armstrong’s house museum in Corona, lauded him for his unwavering perseverance and resiliency in the face of intense backlash from social critics. ‘Despite enduring racial terror that affected his life and well-being, he continued to push forward,’ she said. ‘While no one, including Armstrong, deserves such treatment, his ability to overcome obstacles and achieve legendary status is a testament to his remarkable talent and strength.’
His influence strictly went beyond nearly a century of jazz to include everyone from Leonard Bernstein to the Rolling Stones, and his imprints extended far beyond jazz, with his momentum serving as an inspiration for many artists in popular music still to this day . And as J.D. Allen once aptly put it, ‘All roads lead back to Pops,’ nodding to Armstrong’s enduring impact as a once-in-a-generation icon.
(The writer is a Sri Lankan living in Toronto, Canada. She may be contacted at dahamisamarathunga44@gmail.com)
Features
Samarawickrama’s rise gives Sri Lanka a second pillar
Harshitha Samarawickrema was 14 when Sri Lankan women’s cricket first pricked the national consciousness. She had already been playing cricket for her school, Gothami Balika Vidyalaya, but had largely pursued cricket merely for the sake of playing a sport, and also because she had enjoyed watching the men’s team play. But watching Sri Lanka defeat England in a thriller at the 2013 World Cup stirred up a deeper yearning.
“I’d watched all of the matches at that World Cup actually – that was the first time those kind of matches were telecast,” Samarawickrama said once. “That’s when I decided I was going to play and win matches for Sri Lanka one day.”
That victory against England was a new dawn for Sri Lanka’s women for two reasons. First up it was the highest-profile victory on their ledger until then, marking an unexpected high point in a World Cup in which little was generally expected of the team. But it also marked the rocket-powered arrival of Chamari Athapaththu, who top-scored with 62 to help set up the chase.
Thirteen years later, Samarawickrama has not only fulfilled her promise to herself, she has also helped Sri Lanka bring to life the promise of that 2013 campaign. Athapaththu, who has since has become the superstar around which Sri Lanka’s cricket orbits, has never known a more consistent batting collaborator than Samarawickrama. In T20Is, the pair have put on 1,202 runs together – easily the best for Sri Lanka. Though both are lefties who revel in pressure, that’s about where the similarities end – Athapaththu having grown up idolising the big-hitting of Sanath Jayasuriya, while Samarawickrama had been a disciple of the Kumar Sangakkara school of left-handed batting. (Samarawickrama still tries to replicate that famous bent-kneed cover drive, though she invariably sprinkles a little of of her own flair to the endeavour.) Oppositions have found this combination difficult to contend with, Athapaththu commanding through the legside and brutal on errors of length, while Samarawickrama flits around the crease and carves boundaries through cover and point.
It has been clear for years now that Sri Lanka’s chances in pretty much any match depend primarily on Athapaththu runs. But Samarawickrama’s advance as a T20 batter has now opened up a new frontier in the team’s batting performance. Ideally, what Sri Lanka want is not merely big runs from their captain, but a strong partnership between Athapaththu and Samarawickrama. In victories, the Athapaththu-Samarawickrama stand averages 41.38.
More tellingly, a good Samarawickrama innings has become as reliable a predictor of a strong Sri Lanka showing as a good Athapaththu innings. In T20I wins, Athapaththu averages 40.18 and strikes at 131, in comparison to 17.94 and a strike rate of 94 in losses. Samarawickrama’s corresponding numbers are even more stark. In Sri Lanka victories, Samarawickrama averages 44.08 with a strike rate of 109. In losses those numbers are 16.94 and 87. Other Sri Lanka batters have leveled up in recent years too – Kavisha Dilhari, Nilakshika Silva and Hasini Perera having become more frequent contributors, while 20-year-old Vishmi Gunaratne has also showed promise. But 11 years into her international career, Samarawickrama now has a serious body of work.
Samarawickrama had been modest in the shortest format in 2025, but she arrives at the Women’s T20 World Cup 2026 having had a good six months. Against Bangladesh in April, Samarawickrama had cracked 61 off 35, then 49 off 29, in back-to-back matches that Sri Lanka won (Samarawickrama was top-scorer on both occasions). This was in addition to having put up good numbers in the ODI series that preceded the T20Is. Her 36 not out off 34 in a comfortable warm-up win against Netherlands suggests she is still riding on that form.
This is the first T20 World Cup in which serious runs are expected of Samarawickrama, and if history is much to go by, she is not the sort to be daunted by occasion. Samarawickrama’s finest moments as a Sri Lanka cricketer had come in their most-celebrated win of all, in the Asia Cup final of 2024, against India. Typically, that chase of 166 in Dambulla had been propelled by an 87-run Athapaththu-Samarawickrama stand, but when Athapaththu was dismissed, Samarawickrama ensured she remained at the crease until the winning moments, hitting 69 not out off 51, ultimately collecting the Player-of-the-Match award.
If 2013 was a new dawn inspiring a fresh generation of Sri Lanka cricketers, 2024 was the year in which the team hammered its stake into the ground, breaking through into an entirely new galaxy of recognition and acclaim at home. Frequently batting in the shadow of Athapaththu, but always charting her own path, Samarawickrama has grown into a leader.
[Cricinfo]
Features
US’ anti-migrant stance set to intensify tensions in Western camp
The announcement by the US authorities of an anti-migrant stance during a recent commemoration in France of the epochal D-Day Landings of June 6, 1944, ought to strike impartial observers as a supreme irony. Whereas what should have been expected was a vibrant celebration of the beginning of the process of Western Europe freeing itself decisively from Nazi or fascist control during the crucial stages of World War Two, this was not to be.
What the world heard instead was a call to contemporary Western Europe to arm itself against a seemingly rising and threatening migrant presence in the region. In other words, the migrant must be despised and ‘shown the door’.
Instead of a commemoration that rejoiced in the flourishing of liberal democracy and its values what one got was a strong affirmation of fascism and racial chauvinism. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth vented his spleen against the migrant or foreigner presence in Europe reportedly thus: ‘Sadly today different European beaches are stormed by different dangerous ideologies.’ To ‘beaches in Spain and Italy and Greece and Bulgaria, boats and men arrive. When will European capitals do something about that invasion?’
While at the outbreak of World War Two it was Nazi Germany that was doing the invading and bringing some principal European countries under its suzerainty, this time around we are being given to understand that it’s migrants to the West who are seeking to colonize the latter. It goes without saying that such inflammatory rhetoric would have the deleterious effect of keeping racial tensions alive in the West and jeopardize all possibilities of the countries concerned cementing and maintaining social stability.
The Trump administration gives the impression of taking a leaf from the politically underdeveloped regions of the South to keep the US polity stable and united. In South Asia, for instance, we are not short of ambitious demagogues who use what is referred to as the ‘race card’ to gather unto themselves a following and thereby further their political fortunes. By seeking to stir and sustain anti-migrant hysteria, the Trump administration is also essentially replicating Nazi Germany’s policy of anti-Semitism. That is, fascism is very much alive in the US under President Trump.
Such efforts at churning racial hysteria at this juncture in the US should not come as a surprise. For all intents and purposes, the Trump administration is nowhere near achieving its aims in West Asia, for instance, in the short term. It has failed to bring Iran down to its knees, as it hoped to do, but is adopting the expedient of keeping the world guessing and confused on what it is doing in the region, since it cannot withdraw from the theatre in a hurry without losing face.
While perhaps working out an escape strategy the Trump administration it seems, is hoping to maintain its following at home intact and silent by playing on their racial biases and insecurities. Hence, the anti-foreigner campaign.
Simultaneously, the Trump administration will need to keep a close eye on how economic pressures on the domestic front are panning out. Anti-administration sentiments first break to the surface at meal tables. On this score, the news cannot be good because the average US family’s spending power ought to be shrinking on account of rising energy and oil prices. Consequently, it would not be a bad idea to keep the attention of the US consumer diverted by adeptly playing ‘the race card’; once again, lessons from intellectually bankrupt Southern politicians are coming in handy.
To be sure such comparisons many politicians in vibrantly democratic countries would find quite unflattering. But the stark truth is that racism cannot be tolerated in civilized societies and those politicians who resort to it risk being branded as racists of the first degree. In fact they could be seen as being on par with the likes of German dictator Adolph Hitler and his close collaborators.
However, on the question of migrant policy the Trump administration would likely be at polar opposites with the most vibrant of liberal democracies of the West. This will be the case with the UK, France and Italy for instance. The latter continue to keep their doors open to legal migrants and they are likely to view a virtual blanket ban on migrants as reprehensible.
Moreover, in the foremost democracies of the West debates are vibrantly ongoing on the need to keep racism or any hint of it completely outlawed in the public plane. There is the case of the UK, for instance, where the authorities continue to emphatically pinpoint their adherence to the principle of anti-racism in the conduct of public affairs.
One proof of the above was the parliamentary debate relating to the killing of 18-year-old Henry Nowak in Southampton. Police handling of the victim came in for sharp scrutiny by particularly the opposition in the House of Commons but there seemed to be a consensus over the main political divide that the matter should not be politicized.
Moreover, the UK authorities stressed in the House the government’s strict adherence to the policy of non-racism. It was also pointed out that British institutions set up to manage racism at the national, county and neighbourhood levels, for example, were very much intact. In fact, Sri Lanka could gain considerably by studying and implementing locally, legislation modeled on the relevant UK laws if it is in earnest when it speaks of ‘reconciliation’.
Accordingly, it is highly unlikely that Western Europe would ‘cave in’, so to speak, to US pressure on issues related to migration. The liberal democracies of Western Europe in particular would remain for the foreseeable future migrant-welcoming, multi-ethnic and plural democracies.
Nor is it likely that Western Europe would be passively receptive to US demands that it drastically increases its defense spending to meet the latter’s aims. Within the Western fold the EU is remaining committed to backing Ukraine, for instance, in its ongoing armed resistance to the Russian invasion and it is not giving any indication of being deferent to US pressure.
However, although tensions would continue to bristle within US-Western Europe relations on the above and numerous other matters of contention it would be far too premature to announce a parting of company between the two sections of the West. In that sense, the post-World War Two order remains essentially intact. There are still many things in common between the two, particular on the economic plane, that will ensure the continuance of the partnership.
Features
A decade among Yala’s ghosts of gold
The first rays of dawn creep over the ancient rocks of Yala. The Indian Ocean glimmers in the distance, and the wilderness slowly awakens. Somewhere amid the scrub jungle, a pair of amber eyes scans the landscape.
For wildlife conservationist and leopard researcher Milinda Wattegedara, moments such as these have defined more than a decade of dedication to one of Sri Lanka’s most iconic creatures—the Sri Lankan leopard.
What began as fascination evolved into a remarkable conservation journey that has transformed the understanding of Yala’s leopard population and placed Sri Lanka firmly on the global wildlife research map.
“Long before I ever lifted a camera, leopards had already captured my imagination,” says Wattegedara. “What fascinated me was not merely their beauty but the complexity of their lives—their hunting strategies, movements, reproductive behaviour and their remarkable ability to adapt to changing environments.”
That fascination led to the birth of the Yala Leopard Diary in 2013, an ambitious long-term project dedicated to documenting individual leopards and unraveling the mysteries surrounding their lives.
For many visitors, a leopard sighting is a fleeting thrill. For Wattegedara and his team, every encounter is a chapter in an ongoing scientific story.
“Each photograph was never the end of an encounter,” he explains. “It was the beginning of deeper questions. How did a particular leopard use the landscape? How did its behaviour change with the seasons? What environmental pressures shaped its decisions?”
These questions drove years of meticulous fieldwork. Every sighting was carefully recorded with details including location, habitat, behaviour, date and time. Photographs were analysed to identify individual animals through unique spot patterns, allowing researchers to distinguish one leopard from another with remarkable accuracy.
What followed was groundbreaking.

YF77 “Shelly” pauses in quiet observation, embodying the alertness
and grace that define Yala’s leopard population.
From 2013 to 2026, the Yala Leopard Diary identified an astonishing 189 individual leopards within the Yala Block 1. The research revealed a leopard density of approximately 0.524 leopards per square kilometre, making Yala one of the highest leopard-density landscapes ever recorded anywhere in the world.
Such findings have elevated Yala’s status among global wildlife researchers.
Nestled between the Indian Ocean and a mosaic of habitats, ranging from rocky outcrops to dense scrub forests, Yala offers an ecological stage unlike any other.
Here, leopards are photographed silhouetted against ocean horizons, perched atop ancient granite formations, resting on tree branches and stalking prey across sunlit grasslands.
The images tell stories of extraordinary lives.
There is Haminee, a devoted mother navigating the challenges of raising cubs in a competitive landscape. There is Lucas, one of Yala’s most frequently documented males, striding confidently across the Gonalabba Plains with the vast ocean forming an unforgettable backdrop.
There is Ruki demonstrating the species’ incredible strength by hoisting prey onto branches, and Shelly, quietly surveying her surroundings in a moment of feline vigilance.
Together, these individuals have become familiar characters in a living wilderness drama.

YM31 “Ruki” secures prey on a branch, illustrating the remarkable strength and coordination of the Sri Lankan leopard.
Recognising the immense value of long-term documentation, Wattegedara joined forces with fellow researchers Dushyantha Silva, Raveendra Siriwardana and Mevan Piyasena to establish the Yala Leopard Centre in 2020.
Located at the Palatupana entrance to the Yala National Park, the centre is believed to be the world’s first information facility dedicated exclusively to leopards.
“The centre serves as a repository of knowledge, accumulated through years of observation and research,” Wattegedara says. “Our goal is to connect visitors with the science behind conservation and foster a deeper appreciation of these magnificent animals.”
The project’s impact extends far beyond Sri Lanka’s borders.
Research arising from the Yala Leopard Diary has been published in internationally recognised scientific journals. One study introduced an innovative framework for identifying individual leopards, while another documented an extraordinary and previously unrecorded case of a leopard cub being consecutively adopted by two different adult females—first a relative and later an unrelated leopardess.
The discovery attracted international scientific attention and highlighted the complexity of leopard social behaviour.
Yet for Wattegedara, the most important lesson remains one of humility.
“One conclusion has become increasingly clear,” he reflects. “Our understanding of these leopards remains far from complete. We are only beginning to understand how they live, adapt and persist in one of Sri Lanka’s most dynamic protected landscapes.”

YF15 “Hope” descends Rukvila Rock at dawn, showcasing the agility and adaptability of Yala’s leopards.
His words underscore an essential conservation truth: the more we learn about nature, the more mysteries emerge.
As Sri Lanka navigates growing environmental challenges, the Yala Leopard Diary stands as a shining example of what sustained observation, scientific curiosity and public engagement can achieve.
Beyond the stunning photographs and remarkable sightings lies something even more valuable—a growing body of knowledge capable of informing future conservation decisions and ensuring that future generations inherit a wilderness where leopards continue to roam free.
For more than a decade, Wattegedara and his colleagues have followed the tracks of Yala’s elusive predators through dust, rain and scorching heat.
Their work has revealed that every leopard has a story, every sighting has significance and every photograph can contribute to conservation.
And perhaps, most importantly, it has reminded us that the golden ghosts of Yala still have many secrets left to share.
By Ifham Nizam
-
Features7 days agoPower crept into the Sangha and is now tearing it apart
-
Features7 days agoKondachchi wind farm and battery storage project to boost energy security, says Power Ministry Secretary
-
News5 days agoWomen’s T20 World Cup 2026 warm-up: Chamari Athapaththu’s 94 helps Sri Lanka beat Pakistan
-
Features7 days agoSaudi Arabia sets new benchmark in Hajj management as 1.7 million pilgrims complete sacred journey
-
News6 days agoAsst. Manager, security officer arrested over Rs 30 mn snatch at Horana PB branch
-
Editorial4 days agoProbe Sallay’s complaint
-
News5 days agoLankan-Canadian inducted to Toronto Sports Hall of Fame
-
News2 days agoLocal firms move millions of dollars overseas for phantom imports: Govt.
