Connect with us

News

Active Learning as a Foundation of Civility

Published

on

Prime Minister Dudley Senanayake unveiling her Photo at Good Shepherd Convent Active Learning as a Foundation of Civility

By Chandra Fernando,
Educational Consultant USA

“Sleep not when others speak, sit not when others stand, speak not when you should hold your peace, walk not on when others stop.”

This is one of the 110 Rules of Civility and Decent Behaviour George Washington, as a young student, had to copy as an exercise in penmanship. They were composed by French Jesuits in 1595 and translated into English in 1640.

As a teacher and teacher trainer, I have recently become acutely aware of the lack of civility in the present day in many countries and societies of the world. This is especially concerning due to young people’s attitudes towards one another, political discourse, and the lack of respect for others in modern society. Moral and social development seems to be lacking in general and there is little respect for social niceties. Many think it is alright to speak your mind no matter how much offense it may cause to others.

This brings me to a system of education which has been in existence for 117 years in Asia, Europe, Australia, North and South America and Africa. It was developed by one of the first women physicians in the world, Dr. Maria Montessori. Her method demonstrates the universality of human development which involves moral and social growth from birth to young adulthood. It prepares young people for their unknown future by providing an education for life, and gives students the potential to change the world for the better.

The Montessori method accentuates the positive, regards everyone as being equally valuable, respects all cultures, and provides young people with opportunities to explore and discover our common humanity.

Civility is a code of decency. It is the work of the will and intellect. However, it is the work of the heart as well. In its totality, civility helps one appreciate one’s own identity and personality without demeaning others. It is about the common good, service to the whole community and society. It involves respect, politeness, good manners of behaviour and self-regulation of one’s own words and actions.

Dr. Montessori and her son Mr. Mario Montessori landing in Sri Lanka 1944

Grace and Courtesy

Montessori education instills in students, “Lessons of Grace and Courtesy” as core tenets of conduct, practices or habits. These lessons are aligned with such human tendencies as activity, exploration, adaptation and language.Grace is the manner in which we value ourselves. It is looking in the mirror. It is self- awareness. Courtesy deals with the manner in which we respect others, the ways in which we connect to others.

Civility may be defined as a combination of both. Montessori practitioners regard civility as a combination of social and moral development involving respect, consideration of others and a large amount of self-regulation of our own behaviour and attitude. When we internalize these values, they provide us with a sense of serenity and well-being.

Children in Montessori classrooms all over the world practice lessons of grace and courtesy at each developmental level: birth to 6 years, 6 to 12 years and 12 to 18 years. The young Montessori toddler internalizes her culture by responding to the love, language, and customs of her environment. Grace is forming within this little human being through interaction, modelling and sensitivities. In the next level, in childhood, she continues to make great strides through her involvement in the environment: through interactions with peers and role models, through peer teaching, and individual and group lessons in the multi age classroom which acts as a microcosm of our world.

In the next level of development from age 12 to 18 years, the adolescent explores avenues of a just society through social interactions and moral education gained from research of historical data and current events. Finally, the university student is able to absorb cohesive parts of society such as language, religion, and customs which define the personality she builds for experiencing the mission of humankind.

In Montessori’s words:

“A great social mission that will ensure the child justice, harmony and love remains to be accomplished. And this great task must be the work of education, for this is the only way to build a new world and to bring peace.”

The year 2024 marks the 117th anniversary of the first Montessori classroom in Rome, Italy, and the 80th anniversary of the first Montessori teacher training course in Sri Lanka. In 1944, at the invitation of the Colombo Teachers Union, Dr. Maria Montessori, accompanied by her son, Mario, landed in Sri Lanka to train more than 300 teachers on the premises of Good Shepherd Convent, Kotahena. This institution is now the AMI Montessori Centre housed at St Bridget’s Convent, Colombo 7.

August 31st is Maria Montessori’s birthday. She dedicated her whole life to the welfare of children all over the globe. She received many accolades from many individuals and organizations and was nominated for the Nobel Peace prize in 1949, 1950, and 1951.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

INS Airavat makes port call in Colombo

Published

on

By

The Indian Naval Ship (INS) Airavat arrived at the Port of Colombo for Operational Turnaround on 01 Jun 26. The visiting ship was welcomed by the Sri Lanka Navy (SLN) in compliance with time-noured naval traditions.

INS Airavat is a Landing Ship Tank, commanded by Commander IP Patil.

During their stay in the island, the ship’s crew is scheduled to take part in a series of professionally enriching events and camaraderie-building programmes organised by the Sri Lanka Navy.

The Indian naval personnel will also tour several historic and prominent tourist attractions across the country before the ship concludes her deployment.

Continue Reading

News

BASL asks govt. to abandon plan to raise retirement ages of CA and SC judges

Published

on

… tells Prez such arbitrary change neither necessary nor desirable

The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has urged President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to abandon the controversial plan to increase the retirement age of the judiciary, including the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.

In a statement issued by the BASL President Rajeev Amarasuriya and its Secretary Nalin de Silva, the BASL pointed out that the proposed increase of the retirement age of the judiciary would undermine the independence, integrity, dignity, and public confidence in the Judiciary, which is essential for the maintenance of the Rule of Law and democratic governance in Sri Lanka.

The text of the BASL statement: “The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (hereinafter referred to as “BASL”) notes with grave concern reports in the public domain that the Government is considering the introduction of an amendment to the Constitution to increase the age of retirement of Judges of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.

It is the considered view of the BASL that the age of retirement of the judges of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court which has stood at 63 years and 65 years respectively from the promulgation of the 1978 Constitution, should not be changed arbitrarily and that such a change is neither necessary nor desirable.

To do so will result in the loss of public confidence in the integrity of the legal system and of the Government’s commitment to preserve and protect the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary. Members of the public are likely to question the motives of the Government in bringing in a Constitutional amendment solely for this purpose.

Your Excellency is no doubt aware that the cadre of the Judges of the Court of Appeal was increased from 12 to 20 Judges (including the President of the Court of Appeal) and that of the Supreme Court from 11 to 17 Judges (including the Chief Justice) by the 20th Amendment to the constitution certified on 29th of October 2020. With such enhancement, workwise, there cannot be a real requirement to extend the retirement ages of these judges.

Your Excellency is aware that altering the retirement age of judges of the apex courts would have to be done through a Constitutional amendment. For many years Sri Lanka’s Constitution has been subject to ad hoc amendments, sometimes in order to cater to the political needs of the government in power and often contrary to the interests of the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary and the judiciary.

Extending the retirement age of the sitting Judges of these Courts at this point of time is likely to be viewed by the public as a blatant attempt to interfere with the judiciary. We believe that to go ahead with such an ad hoc move will also be an affront to the Honourable Judges of those courts.

If the Government goes ahead with such a move it will set a dangerous precedent for future Governments too to introduce ad hoc amendments to the Constitution in respect of the functions of the Judiciary.

The independence of the Judiciary and the public confidence reposed in it, are indispensable pillars of the Rule of Law and the democratic framework of our Republic. In that regard, it is of paramount importance that the Judiciary must not only remain independent in fact, but must also be seen by the public to be wholly independent, impartial, and free from even the slightest perception of influence, favour, accommodation, or impropriety.

The Bar Association of Sri Lanka is therefore constrained, in the discharge of its duty to uphold and safeguard the Rule of Law and the independence of the Judiciary, to respectfully express its serious concern regarding any such proposed amendment, which is neither in the interests of the Judiciary and nor of the people.

In the circumstances, the BASL respectfully urges Your Excellency not to proceed with any proposed constitutional amendment seeking to increase the retirement age of the members of the Judiciary including Judges of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.

We remain confident that Your Excellency will give due consideration to the importance of preserving and protecting the independence, integrity, dignity, and public confidence in the Judiciary, which is essential to the maintenance of the Rule of Law and democratic governance in Sri Lanka.”

Govt. declines to respond

A member of the Cabinet yesterday declined to comment on the BASL’s letter to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake. The Minister said that he wouldn’t comment for the time being.

Continue Reading

News

New US tariffs proposed on 60 countries, including Sri Lanka

Published

on

12.5% additional duties on goods imported from Colombo

The US has proposed additional duties of 10% or 12.5% on imports from 60 economies, including Sri Lanka, over their alleged failure to curb trade in ‌goods made with forced labour.

The proposal made by US Trade Representative’s (USTR) office in terms of Section 301 unfair trade practices investigation to be released, news agencies reported, pointing out that the Trump administration was seeking to rebuild its emergency tariffs, which were struck down by a US Supreme Court decision in February.

The USTR said it determined that it would impose 10% duties related to ⁠the forced labour investigation on imports from Canada, Ecuador, the European Union, Indonesia, Mexico, Pakistan, Argentina, Bangladesh, Cambodia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan and Britain.

The trade agency said it would impose additional duties of 12.5% on the remaining 45 countries that were investigated.

“The failure of our most important trading partners to address the importation of goods made with forced labour is unacceptable,” US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a statement. “This creates a dynamic where American workers are forced to compete globally on an unlevel playing field.”

According to the trade agency, the USTR found that Sri Lanka has failed to impose and effectively enforce a forced labour import prohibition.

The USTR noted that the results of its investigation indicate that the acts, policies and practices of Sri Lanka related to the failure to impose and effectively enforce a forced labour import prohibition are unreasonable and burden or restrict US commerce.

Accordingly, it has proposed to impose 12.5% additional duties on goods imported from Sri Lanka.

The USTR said it also was proposing a textile mechanism that would allow for a certain volume of apparel and textile imports ‌to ⁠enter the US at a reduced tariff rate, though the duties and volumes were not disclosed.

The announcement comes ahead of the July 24 expiration of a 10% temporary tariff imposed by the Trump administration on February 20, the day the Supreme Court struck down US President Donald Trump’s tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

On Monday, the USTR proposed ⁠a 25% duty on many Brazilian goods as a result of a Section 301 investigation into the country’s digital trade practices and preferential tariffs. The trade agency is also expected to soon unveil the findings of another major Section 301 probe into ⁠the buildup of excess industrial capacity in 16 trading partners, including China.

In the forced labour findings, the USTR said it would exempt from the tariffs a number of products, including energy, rare earths and certain ⁠other metals, beef, coffee, certain fruits and vegetables, pharmaceuticals, organic chemicals and aircraft parts.

The USTR said it would accept public comments on the proposed tariffs and other remedies through July 6, with a public hearing scheduled for July 7.

Continue Reading

Trending