Sports
A French Open without Rafael Nadal still has plenty of drama
The 2023 French Open is upon us and — spoiler alert — the event is going to have a markedly different vibe this year. Some familiar faces will be missing with the gigantic absence of Rafael Nadal for the first time since 2004, as well as former champions Simona Halep and Garbine Muguruza, along with the recent retirements of Serena Williams and Roger Federer. Notable names like Naomi Osaka, Andy Murray, Venus Williams, Nick Kyrgios, Emma Raducanu and Matteo Berrettini are also missing from the slate, so Roland Garros will be lacking some of its traditional star power.
But it won’t be lacking in talent, intense competition or compelling storylines.
The year’s second major is full of rising superstars like Iga Swiatek and Carlos Alcaraz, burgeoning new rivalries, young hopefuls seeking their first Grand Slam titles, and, not to mention, Novak Djokovic, who will be looking to make history in Paris.
Which players do you need to keep an eye on? What’s at stake for some of the game’s biggest names? Can anyone replace Nadal in the hearts and minds of fans at his favorite tournament? We try to answer all that and more ahead of Sunday’s opening-round matches.
After competing in every tournament since 2005 and winning a cool 14 titles along the way, Nadal has rightfully been dubbed the “King of Clay,” complete with his own statue on the grounds at Roland Garros. But all good things must come to an end. Nadal was forced to withdraw from his favorite event last week because of a hip injury sustained at the Australian Open in January. But Nadal, who also revealed the 2024 season would likely be his last on tour, did his best to keep things in perspective.
“Tournaments stay forever; players play and leave,” Nadal told reporters. “So Roland Garros will always be Roland Garros, with or without me, without a doubt. The tournament is going to keep being the best event in the world of clay, and there will be a new Roland Garros champion — and it is not going to be me. And that is life.”
Since winning the title in Paris during his debut at the event, Nadal has consistently been the favorite to hoist the trophy at the end of the fortnight, and it almost feels unnatural to be speaking of anyone else in this position. But for those curious, according to Caesars Sportsbook, the top five in order to win the men’s title are as follows: Alcaraz, Djokovic, Holger Rune, Jannik Sinner and Stefanos Tsitsipas.
While no one can replace Nadal, it will be fascinating to see who steps up in his absence and takes advantage of the opportunity.
Another Slam for Djokovic?
As a two-time champion at Roland Garros, and one of the few to defeat Nadal at the event, Djokovic is the de facto top contender for the title in the eyes of many. He proved as recently as 2021 that he has what it takes to win on the red clay, and he has more motivation than ever this time around.
Currently tied with Nadal for the most major titles by a male player in history at 22, Djokovic could break the tie to take sole possession of the men’s record, as well as tie Serena Williams’ record for the most Grand Slam titles in the Open era.
For a self-professed historian of the game like Djokovic, he is more than aware of what’s on the line, and, having just turned 36 and with a crop of young talent now contending for titles, he knows these opportunities can’t be taken for granted. (ESPN)
Djokovic hasn’t exactly played his best tennis as of late, however. In his three tournaments on clay, he went 5-3 and failed to advance past the quarterfinals in any event and withdrew from Madrid with a right elbow injury. While he recorded quality wins over Grigor Dimitrov and Cameron Norrie in Rome, he ultimately fell to Rune, 2-6, 6-4, 2-6, in the quarters. Despite the setbacks, Djokovic said he remained confident entering the French Open.
“I know I can always play better,” Djokovic said after the loss to Rune. “Definitely am looking forward to working on various aspects of my game, of my body, hopefully getting myself in 100% shape. That’s the goal.
“I always like my chances in Grand Slams against anybody on any surface, best-of-five. Let’s see how it goes.”
Djokovic would potentially face Alcaraz in the semifinals, in which case: get your popcorn ready. (ESPN)
Latest News
Ahmedabad to host IPL 2026 final on May 31
Latest News
Samson, Kartik, spinners set up Chennai Super King’s clinical win
Chennai Super Kings came into IPL 2026 with a dodgy look about their bowling attack. They lost three games straight where their bowlers picked up 10 for 588 at an economy rate of 11.37. Since then, there has been an absolutely stunning turnaround. Over the last seven games, CSK’s bowlers have scooped up 51 wickets – only Gujarat Titans (52) have more – at an economy rate of 8.15 – which no-one can match.
Given first use of a slow pitch, Akeal Hosein (4-0-19-1) and Noor Ahmad (3-0-22-2) took charge of proceedings. Delhi Capitals could only put up 155 for 7, which proved too little as the surface got better to bat on in the second innings. Sanju Samson, who has contributed 24% of CSK’s runs this year, finished things off with 87 not out off 52 balls. Kartik Sharma, growing in confidence, was alongside him, with 41 off 31.
Both captains expected the pitch to be slow. The scoring pattern of the first four overs confirmed it. Fifteen dot balls. Six boundaries. Three singles and a wicket with the batter trying to force the pace. In conditions where the ball comes onto the bat, KL Rahul and Pathum Nissanka might have been able to hit the gap with the shots they played off good length balls. On this one, as much as they tried, they just found the fielder. Worse, they found themselves having to hold their shape for longer and even that didn’t always work.
With two right-handed openers, CSK had no hesitation in handing the ball to Hosein. When Nissanka fell though, DC sent Nitish Rana out in an effort to either hit Hosein out of the attack or prevent him from coming on. This is how much of a no-no matching a left-arm spinner with a left-handed batter is. But CSK bucked tradition. They gave Akeal a third over. He provided Rahul’s wicket and in the end Rana got to face only one ball from Akeal. A dot ball. DC came out of the powerplay 37 for 2. Akeal finished with figures of 4-0-19-1, which is exceptional considering he bowled only one over outside the field restrictions.
Axar Patel has 33 runs this season. Twenty-six of those came in one innings. And his strike rate is 97. It is a massive drop. The DC captain was one of the bright spots last season, their fourth-highest scorer with 263 at a very healthy strike rate of 157. He was in the middle when his team needed to rebuild and his wicket – the third that CSK took in a space of 19 balls between overs 8 and 11 – had an impact on the total they put up.
DC’s first five wickets scored 69 off 66. Sameer Rizvi, Impact Player-ed in because this was definitely an emergency, and Tristan Stubbs together put on 65 off 42 balls. Stubbs seemed to be factoring in the slowness of the pitch into his movements much better, handling Noor’s mystery spin and Gurjapneet Singh’s extra bounce with ease. Rizvi at the other end showed how batters could play against Anshul Kamboj, one of the season’s best death bowlers. He knew Kamboj liked to come around the wicket and target the wide line with yorkers. So he moved across his stumps a little bit, sweeping, slicing and smashing him down the ground.
One part of this plan was premeditation – the movement across his stumps – the other was instinct. Rizvi consciously tried to keep his shot options open, and not just target leg side. Until this match, Kamboj from around the wicket in this IPL has been box office: 63 balls, 93 runs, three sixes, eight wickets. In this game, he struggled: 12 balls, 34 runs, five sixes, no wickets. Meanwhile, Jamie Overton, one of CSK’s best bowlers, bowled only one over and spent time off the field as well.
Being in the form of his life is one thing, but to go out there knowing he is his team’s best hope for runs and managing risk accordingly is something else. Samson has always had aura. Now he has the output. For the first three games this season, he made 22 runs at an average of 7.33 and a strike rate of 116. The next seven, he’s made 380 at an average of 95 and strike rate of 172.
The six he hit first ball against Axar highlighted that the pitch was no longer a problem. A little bit of rain while the match was going on had freshened it up, making the ball come onto the bat better. Even so, DC had threats. Lungi Ngidi returning from a head injury aced his match-up against Ruturaj Gaikwad, dismissing him for a third time in 17 balls for just 10 runs in T20 cricket.
Samson held fire initially. He was 22 off 22 at the eighth over. Ten balls later, he was on fifty. Eventually, he was even entertaining thoughts of a hundred. A highlight of his game was the way he took down spin – 12 off 10 against Axar with one six and 25 off 9 against Kuldeep Yadav with three sixes and a four. CSK won a 12 vs 11 game – because they didn’t even need the impact player – with 15 balls remaining and got a net run-rate boost that could be vital as the season nears the playoffs.
Brief scores:
Chennai Super Kings 159 for 2in 17.3 overs (Sanju Samson 87*, Urvil Patel 17, Kartik Sharma 41*; Axar Patel 1-25, Lungi Ngidi 1-30) beat Delhi Capitals 155 for 7 in 20 overs (Pathum Nissanka 19, KL Rahul 12, Nitish Rana 15, Karun Nair 13, Tristan Stubbs 38, Sameer Rizvi 40, Ashutosh Sharma 14; Akeal Hosein 1-19, Mukesh Choudhari 1-31, Noor Ahamed 2-33, Gurjapneet Singh 1-29, Jamie Overton 1-05) by eight wickets
[Cricinfo]
Sports
Dayasiri swings wildly without sighting the ball
Former Sports Minister Dayasiri Jayasekara doesn’t appear to be a great admirer of the recently appointed Cricket Interim Committee. During a television interview with Derana TV, he said that the current government must take responsibility if the newly-appointed panel failed to deliver.
MP Jayasekara has long been known as a man who shoots from the hip and at times, as a doomsday prophet, if his scathing criticism of the Hambantota Port project in the past is anything to go by.
In 2015, retired judge the late Prasanna Jayawardene formulated a comprehensive restructuring plan for Sri Lankan cricket, modelled along South African lines and SLC sought time from the ICC to implement these sweeping changes.
However, powerful cricketing figures within the government at that time sensed danger and convinced President Maithripala Sirisena to effect a Cabinet reshuffle. The Sports Ministry was shifted from the UNP to the SLFP.
Having switched his political alliance to the ruling party yet again, Dayasiri was brought in as Minister of Sports.
At his first interaction with the media, he left a strong impression. There was genuine optimism as he answered questions intelligently, spoke of the bigger picture and explained the legal framework required to drive reforms with striking clarity. Those present walked away convinced that he was the right man to take sports forward.
However, under his watch, reforms were stalled, fresh elections were called and SLFP strongmen returned to the helm of SLC. It was, without doubt an opportunity missed. Soon, the Minister of Sports found himself a prisoner of his own SLFP colleagues within government ranks.
From thereon, Dayasiri made a series of blunders. He became embroiled in a running battle with fast bowler Lasith Malinga, with their public spats repeatedly going viral across social media platforms.
Sri Lanka were touring India in 2017 and the limited-overs squad was preparing to fly to Delhi for the second leg of the tour. Dayasiri raised a storm, insisting that the Sports Minister’s approval had not been obtained before the team’s departure. Despite SLC apologising for the oversight, he demanded that the players return home and follow protocol. Appeals were made to the Minister over the phone by the players, but he refused to budge. The players were ordered to disembark. Those who doubt this episode can verify it with Thisara Perera, who captained the white ball team.
During his recent television interview, Dayasiri came out with a range of conspiracy theories, including claims of intervention by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi before Shammi Silva was asked to step down. With the world grappling with a crisis in the Gulf region, the leader of the world’s largest democracy surely has bigger fish to fry than meddling in another nation’s cricketing affairs.
The former Minister also questioned how newly appointed head coach Gary Kirsten would function alongside the Interim Committee, while casting aspersions on Justice Chithrasiri – whose recommendations on cricket governance are expected to come into force soon – branding him a government loyalist.
No government is without fault and criticism is both necessary and healthy. But Dayasiri, in this instance, appears to be swinging wildly without sighting the ball and his words are best taken with a pinch of salt.
by Rex Clementine
-
News7 days agoRooftop Solar at Crossroads as Sri Lanka Shifts to Distributed Energy Future
-
News2 days agoCJ urged to inquire into AKD’s remarks on May 25 court verdict
-
News6 days ago“Three-in-one blood pressure pill can significantly reduce risk of recurrent strokes”
-
News3 days agoUSD 3.7 bn H’tota refinery: China won’t launch project without bigger local market share
-
News6 days agoAlarm raised over plan to share Lanka’s biometric data with blacklisted Indian firm
-
News5 days agoTen corruption cases set for court in May, verdict ordered in one case – President
-
News4 days agoEaster Sunday Case: Ex-SIS Chief concealed intel, former Defence Secy tells court
-
News6 days agoUSD 2.5 mn fraud probe: Interdicted MoF official found dead at home
