News
Indonesia’s bid to woo investors complicated by ‘sex ban’ code
Medan, Indonesia– For years, Indonesia has strived to present itself as a welcoming investment destination, to rival neighbours Vietnam and Malaysia.
In 2016, during his first term in office, Indonesian President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo announced the opening up of dozens of industries to foreign investment in what he termed a “big bang” of economic liberalisation.Six years later, the Southeast Asian country’s controversial new criminal code – which has been blazed across international headlines, since its adoption earlier this month, due to its ban on sex outside of marriage – is raising questions about Jakarta’s commitment to fostering an open and welcoming business environment.
In Indonesia, opinion remains divided on whether the revised criminal code, which includes prohibitions on blasphemy, cohabitation, sorcery and insulting the government, helps or hurts Jakarta’s sales pitch to the world.
The Indonesian Employers Association (APINDO) has raised concerns about several sections of the code, including penalties for corporate crime, that will have a “broad impact”, and the recognition of customary law.
“For the business sector, the implementation of this customary law shall create legal uncertainty and make investors reconsider investing in Indonesia,” APINDO said in a statement provided to Al Jazeera.
APINDO also said the ban on non-marital sex will “do more harm than good, especially for the business sector engaged in tourism and hospitality”.Other industry figures have brushed off such concerns.
“Currently the government is still implementing the new criminal code. Of course, there will be some pros and cons, but there will be a three-year period before it is applied in real life,” Clement Gultom, Managing Director of Boraspati Tour and Travel, in Medan, told Al Jazeera.
“As such, I am more inclined to choose not to be aggressive towards the new criminal code,” Gultom said, adding that lawyers and activists could apply for a judicial review of the code, through the Supreme Court, if necessary.
Khairul Mahalli, Chairman of the North Sumatra Chamber of Commerce and Industry, expressed similarly upbeat sentiments.
“The function of the government is as a regulator and the function of businesses is as an operator,” he said. “We need to support the government and make sure that the new laws are coordinated at all levels of governance.”
Mahalli said bodies, such as the Chambers of Commerce, would be instrumental in connecting foreign businesses, with local partners, and ensuring the smooth continuation of businesses, after the code comes into effect.
“For now, the world of business, in Indonesia, has not been affected and is a world of opportunity,” he said.
The revised code – a complete overhaul of the code from 1918, when Indonesia was a Dutch colony – had been controversial for years, before its passage, sparking nationwide protests, in 2019. Then, as now, critics feared it would violate basic human rights and erode Indonesia’s democratic freedoms.The changes come as Indonesia has been making strides in its bid to attract investment, which includes a target of attracting $89bn in foreign investment next year.
Indonesia’s foreign direct investment (FDI) rose 63.6 percent, on a yearly basis, in the third quarter of 2022, hitting $10.83bn, according to the Investment Minister, Bahlil Lahadalia.China, Japan and Singapore were the biggest sources of investment, which was mainly driven by the development of resources processing – part of the country’s wider strategy to add value to its minerals.
Some environmental activists have suggested the revised code, far from dissuading investors, will embolden those who wish to exploit fragile ecosystems.Arie Rompas, a campaigner at Greenpeace Indonesia, said he believed the code had been ratified for the benefit of foreign investment and to silence critical voices.
“Investors will be happy because articles on environmental crime have been made easier, which is to say that environmental crimes have been made more difficult to prove in Court,” Rompas told Al Jazeera.
Rompas said many of the new laws, that critics say will restrict dissent and protest, are likely to be used against those who criticise foreign investment, particularly projects that threaten the environment.
“The potential for criminalisation actually threatens local communities and activists if they protest or criticise projects, considered strategic by the government, in cooperation with outsiders,” he said.
“This criminal code was designed to strengthen the spirit of colonialism’s legacy of exploiting natural resources, damaging the environment and silencing critical voices in civil society.”
The new criminal code places restrictions on “organising a march, rally or demonstration” and includes penalties of up to six months in prison for anyone found to have caused “a disturbance to the public interest, trouble, or riots in the community”.Other articles make insulting public authorities, and state institutions, a crime, punishable by up to 18 months in prison.
Usman Hamid, Director of Amnesty International Indonesia, said the Batang Toru Dam project, a $1.6bn China-funded hydropower business, run by Jakarta-based PT North Sumatra Hydro Energy, is an example of the kind of projects the government hopes to protect with the criminal code.The project, which began in 2017, has been controversial, from the start, due to what activists say is the threat it poses to the local Tapanuli orangutan population. Source: Al Jazeera
News
US sinks Iranian warship off Galle returning from Indian naval exercise
Of 180 member crew, 30 rescued by Sri Lanka Navy
Iran warship IRIS Dena (F75), returning home after participating in the Indian International Fleet Review, and MILAN 2026 international naval exercises, has been sunk off Sri Lanka. The US, Russia and Iran were among 74 participants.
Speculation is rife that the US attacked the vessel in international waters as part of the continuing offensive action under Operation Epic Fury, launched on 28 February. Before the attack in the Indian ocean, President Trump declared that the Iranian Navy Headquarters and nine Navy vessels had been destroyed.
The ill-fated Moudge-class frigate participated in the Indian exercises with the US Navy’s Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Pinckney (DDG-91) and the Marshal Shaposhnikov, a Udaloy-class frigate of the Russian Navy. Sri Lanka also participated in the exercises. SLNS Sagara and Israeli built Fast Missile Vessel Nandimithra represented Sri Lanka. Forty two warships and submarines and 29 aircraft had been involved.
At the time of the attack, the domestically built vessel was crewed by 180 officers and men.
The US Embassy here did not respond to The Island media query whether the US sank IRIS Dena . The Island was unable to get in touch with Iranian Ambassador in Colombo Alireza Delkhosh though he earlier indicated his availability later in the day.
Minister of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Employment and Tourism, Vijitha Herath, told the Parliament yesterday that the Sri Lanka Navy and the Sri Lanka Air Force had acted in less than an hour of receiving the distressed signal at 5.08 am.
According to the Minister, the first naval craft was dispatched by 6 am, followed by a second vessel at 7 am, while Air Force units joined the mission, including the deployment of a surveillance aircraft to support search operations.
Approximately 180 personnel were believed to have been on board the stricken vessel. Of them, around 30 were reported to be in critical condition.
“To save the lives of those 30 persons, we intervened immediately,” Minister Herath said, adding that the rescued crew members were being transported to Karapitiya Hospital for urgent medical treatment. Some had already arrived by the time of his statement.
SLPP MP Namal Rajapaksa asked whether the Iranian ship had been attacked within Sri Lanka’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).
Responding to questions raised by Opposition MPs, including NDF Badulla District MP Chamara Sampath Dassanayake, who alleged that the Iranian vessel may have been struck in Sri Lankan waters, the Minister said the ship had been outside Sri Lanka’s maritime boundary when it issued the distress call.
MP Dassanayake queried whether the frigate had been hit as part of the ongoing military escalation involving the United States and Israel against Iran. There was no immediate confirmation from the government regarding the cause of the emergency.
Minister Herath stressed that Sri Lanka’s intervention was guided solely by humanitarian considerations and international obligations.
“We are bound by the International Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue (SAR) of 1979, which we have signed,” he told Parliament.
Under the convention, a signatory state is required to respond to maritime emergencies, regardless of nationality, the cause of the incident, or whether it occurs beyond its own territorial waters.
“According to this convention, if a vessel, or its crew, encounters danger beyond our territorial limits, we are obligated to intervene and protect those lives on humanitarian grounds,” Minister Herath said, adding Sri Lanka had acted immediately to prevent loss of life and had taken all urgent and necessary measures as a responsible state.
The Minister noted that the incident highlighted broader regional security vulnerabilities in maritime safety amid escalating tensions in the region. “A regional military situation would also have an impact on our country. The government’s position is that a negotiated solution must be pursued,” he said.
He also disclosed that President Anura Kumara Dissanayake had held a telephone discussion on Tuesday night with the leadership of the United Arab Emirates regarding the evolving regional situation.
Rescue operations were continuing at the time of going to press.
By Saman Indrajith and Shamindra Ferdinando
News
Justice Kumudini complains of male domination at senior levels, absence of a woman head of BASL
Judge of the Supreme Court Justice Kumudini Wickramasinghe has recently presented a stark analysis of the legal profession’s gender disparity, noting that in spite of women entering the legal field in substantial numbers, their representation dwindles at senior levels. She has highlighted critical statistics and the fact that only two women currently serve in the Supreme Court, none in the Court of Appeal, and that there has never been a woman President of the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL).
“Inclusive leadership is not satisfied by entry-level participation,” Justice Wickramasinghe said. “It concerns who occupies the apex of institutional authority, who shapes doctrine, who speaks for the profession. These figures are not merely statistics; they are indicators of work yet unfinished.”
Justice Wickramasinghe said so at a seminar organised on the eve of International Women’s Day by the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL), in collaboration with the Sri Lanka Women Lawyers’ Association (SLWLA). She underscored the need to address the systemic barriers preventing women from reaching the apex of the legal profession. Justice Wickramasinghe addressed the gathering as the Chief Guest.
BASL President Rajeev Amarasuriya, in his address, framed inclusivity not as charity or tokenism, but as “structural fairness.” He raised an important question being ‘who bears the responsibility of inclusivity’ and addressed the vital role of leadership in inclusivity. Furthermore, Amarasuriya challenged the profession to address the “gap between what we see coming into the profession and what we see at the top,” and clarified that such disparity did not stem from a lack of competence or commitment but from deep rooted practices and structural issues.
A dynamic panel discussion, moderated by Attorney-at-Law Tanushka Gunawardane, explored the multifaceted nature of inclusive leadership. The panel featured Justice Wickramasinghe, Constitutional Council Member Professor Wasantha Seneviratne (joining online), Senior Instructing Attorney Shiranthi Gunawardhana, and corporate leader Yanina Weerasinghe.
Professor Wasantha Seneviratne distinguished between mere representation and true participation, stating that inclusion becomes meaningful only when women have the “agency and authority to make decisions.” She emphasised that inclusive leadership is both a moral obligation and a pragmatic governance strategy.
Senior Instructing Attorney Shiranthi Gunawardhana shared personal anecdotes from her 50-year career, urging senior lawyers to act as mentors rather than gatekeepers. She stressed the importance of creating space for young female lawyers by offering flexibility and support to help them balance professional and personal responsibilities.
Yanina Weerasinghe, Head of Legal at Brandix, argued that true inclusion is measured by influence, not optics. “Diversity is being present; inclusivity is being influential,” she explained, warning against tokenism and calling for “cerebral opportunities” where women are selected, based on talent, and given a genuine voice in decision-making.
Justice Wickramasinghe addressed the relationship between judicial hierarchy and inclusion, asserting that authority and accessibility can coexist. “A judge can be firm in decisions while remaining approachable,” she said, adding that power exercised with transparency and humility strengthens, rather than weakens, institutional legitimacy.
The seminar also heard from Dilani Yatawaka, Managing Director/CEO of Ideal Motors, who shared her perspective as a female leader in the male-dominated automotive sector. She reinforced the critical role of supportive superiors and societal encouragement to enable women to ascend the career ladder while managing family responsibilities.
BASL Women Lawyers’ Professional and Career Development Committee Chair Indika Nagaratne Koththagoda in her welcome address said that the distinguished gathering was honoured to have Her Ladyship Justice Kumudini Wickramasinghe, Judge of the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka, as the Chief Guest and a key panellist and also welcomed the other panellists Attorneys-at-Law Professor Wasantha Seneviratne, Ms. Shiranthi Gunawardena and Yanina Weerasinghe for agreeing to share their insights on the subject during the ensuing panel discussion to be moderated by Attorney-at-Law Ms. Tanushka Gunawardane.
In her closing remarks, Nalani Manatunga, Co-Chairperson of the BASL Women Lawyers’ Professional and Career Development Committee, challenged the audience to reflect on the true meaning of leadership. “A position gives authority, but leadership gives direction,” she said. “Inclusive leadership is not about occupying space; it’s about creating space. Let our leadership not be measured by the chairs we occupy, but by the doors we leave open.”
News
No qualified printer to head Government Printing Department
A crisis was prevailing at the Government Printing Department due to the absence of a permanent Government Printer, Parliament was told yesterday, raising concerns over confidentiality, quality control and national security.
NDF MP Ravi Karunanayake demanded to know what steps the government had taken to fill the long-standing vacancy at the department, describing the situation as a serious administrative lapse.
“The Government Printing Department is a very important and closed service category institution. However, it has been functioning without a permanent Government Printer for some time,” Karunanayake said.
The MP pointed out that the department handles highly sensitive material, including documents related to defence and national security, as well as other classified publications.
“The non-availability of a permanent Government Printer affects the quality, confidentiality and sustainability of the work there. Has the Government conducted an audit on the possible issues arising from this situation? What immediate action has been taken to resolve this crisis?” he asked.
Responding on behalf of the Government, Prime Minister Dr Harini Amarasuriya said the vacancy had been filled on a temporary basis following a Cabinet decision.
She said an experienced officer from the Sri Lanka Administrative Service had been appointed on contract as Acting Government Printer to ensure operational continuity and maintain security standards in relation to sensitive printing tasks.
The Prime Minister acknowledged that the issue reflected broader systemic weaknesses in public service recruitment and professional development that had persisted for years.
“To bridge these gaps, the Government is initiating specialised training programmes and offering international scholarships for high-performing students to build future technical capacity,” she said.
Chief Government Whip and Health and Mass Media Minister Dr Nalinda Jayatissa said that under existing service minutes, more than two decades of experience were required for an officer to qualify for the top post, and that there were currently no internal candidates eligible for appointment.
He said that the department was facing a leadership crisis and administrative instability due to the lack of a permanent, qualified Government Printer.
By Saman Indrajith
-
Features4 days agoBrilliant Navy officer no more
-
Opinion7 days agoJamming and re-setting the world: What is the role of Donald Trump?
-
Features7 days agoAn innocent bystander or a passive onlooker?
-
Opinion4 days agoSri Lanka – world’s worst facilities for cricket fans
-
Business7 days agoAn efficacious strategy to boost exports of Sri Lanka in medium term
-
Business1 day agoCabinet nod for the removal of Cess tax imposed on imported good
-
Features4 days agoA life in colour and song: Rajika Gamage’s new bird guide captures Sri Lanka’s avian soul
-
Features5 days agoOverseas visits to drum up foreign assistance for Sri Lanka
