News
Lankan Easter attacks need open discussion
Church leaders should name the people who benefitted from ‘grand political plot’
(UCAN) Investigations into the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks in Sri Lanka have made little progress. There have been endless cover-ups helping the perpetrators go scot-free.The attacks on churches in Katuwapitiya, Colombo Kochchikade and Batticaloa, and three hotels claimed the lives of nearly 270 and injured more than 400.
Successive governments have preferred to engage in the blame game when it comes to delivering justice to the victims and their families.The Church in Sri Lanka has been knocking on all doors to bring the perpetrators of the Easter carnage to justice. However, it has not gotten anywhere.
Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith of Colombo has been lending his voice to get justice for the victims. In March, he told the UN Human Rights Council that the attacks were a “grand political plot.”
Six months after the bombings, former president, Gotabaya Rajapaksa, ran for the presidency promising justice to the victims of the Easter atrocities and won with a thumping majority.Initially, Church officials including Cardinal Ranjith backed Rajapaksa, but later voiced disappointment over the lack of progress in the probe, giving rise to his accusations that the attacks had a political or electoral motive.
The bombings in Sri Lanka could have been averted if the government of the day, headed by President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe had acted on intelligence inputs. But the former president and ex-prime minister have washed their hands and have been blaming each other for the attacks.
Earlier this week, during a meeting with Acting President Wickremesinghe, the head of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Sri Lanka (CBCS), Bishop Harold Anthony Perera of Kurunegala raised the following point: If intelligence agencies had tipped off the government of the impending attacks why wasn’t the information passed on to the Catholic Church?
During their meeting, Bishop Perera also reminded the president about the responsibility on the part of the government to deliver justice to the victims, their families and the Church.Shedding light on the complacency of the government, Bishop Perera told the president that some of the key suspects have ended up as state witnesses.Already, Wickremesinghe appears to be safe. At the end of last month, the Supreme Court decided not to proceed with a petition filed against him over the Easter Sunday attacks because of the constitutional immunity given to presidents.
The order was issued by a seven-member Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya.But former president, Sirisena, seems to be in trouble.On Sept 16, a Sri Lankan court named him a suspect in the terror bombings and asked him to appear in court on Oct 14. Sirisena has filed a petition challenging the summons issued against him.
The magistrate’s court in Colombo’s Fort area issued the order while hearing a private complaint filed by Father Cyril Gamini Fernando, a member of the National Catholic Committee for Justice for Easter Sunday attack victims.This is not the first time Sirisena has been blamed for the attacks. In May 2019, a parliamentary panel, tasked with probing the Easter bombings, accused Sirisena of “actively undermining” security systems, which resulted in serious lapses ahead of the attacks.
In February 2021, a Presidential Commission of Inquiry said that Sirisena and his intelligence chiefs should be prosecuted for their failure to prevent the bombings, which are attributed to a radical Islamist network in Sri Lanka.Seventy-one-year-old Sirisena, however, has denied any prior knowledge.
The presidential commission also found a host of other defense officials, including former police chief, Pujith Jayasundera, and former defense secretary, Hemasiri Fernando, guilty of ignoring intelligence warnings. The panel recommended criminal action against Sirisena and others. However, no criminal cases were filed against them.
Ousted president, Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who succeeded Sirisena, came under pressure to act against his predecessor. He, however, refused to act as Sirisena occupied a vital position in the ruling coalition.
On the third anniversary of the terror attacks this year, then prime minister, Mahinda Rajapaksa, vowed that the government would not rest until the perpetrators were arrested. A month later, he and Gotabaya were forced to leave office in May following massive protests against their mismanagement of the nation’s economy.Last year, in a letter to the government, the Church sought legal action against Sirisena for negligence.
The Church leaders in Sri Lanka, at least by now, have their own doubts about the political ambitions that failed to prevent the Easter attack. They should name the people who benefitted from the attacks and speak out about their well-founded doubts that need investigation.Shying away from speaking their mind fearing political repercussions will only help politicians to exploit the vulnerable sensitivity of the Church leaders. The sooner the Church leaders open up, the better for the Church in Sri Lanka.
News
Removing monk’s robes matter for Sangha to decide: Mahanayake Theras
The Mahanayaka Theras of all Nikayas have protested against Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) General Secretary Ven. Galagodaaththe Gnanasara Thera, who is serving a prison sentence for contempt of court, being produced before court in civilian attire.
In a letter to the Commissioner General of Prisons, the Mahanayaka Theras have said they were surprised and concerned by the decision to remove the monk’s robes.
The letter has been signed by Most Ven. Thibbotuwawe Sri Siddhartha Sumangala Thera of the Malwatu Chapter, Most Ven. Warakagoda Sri Gnanarathana Thera of the Asgiri Chapter, Most Ven. Karagoda-Uyangoda Maithri Murthi Thera of the Amarapura Maha Nikaya and Most Ven. Makulawe Sri Wimala Thera of the Ramanna Maha Nikaya.
The Mahanayaka Theras have said they respect the Constitution and the judicial process, but maintained that removing a monk’s robes or ending his status as a member of the Buddhist Order is a matter that should be decided by the Maha Sangha.
They have said the relevant Sangha Council has not determined that Ven. Gnanasara Thera committed a Parajika offence or any other offence warranting his removal from the Buddhist Order.
The Mahanayaka Theras have also referred to Regulation 550 of the Prison Standing Orders, which they say stipulates that convicted prisoners should not be taken to court in prison uniform and should be allowed to wear the type of clothing they normally wore before their conviction. In the case of a Buddhist monk, they have said, this means his monastic robes.
They also referred to the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, which provide for prisoners taken outside prison to be allowed to wear their own clothing or other unobtrusive clothing.
The Mahanayaka Theras have requested the Commissioner General of Prisons to allow Ven. Gnanasara Thera to wear his robes when appearing in court and to maintain his status as a monk while he remains in prison.
Prisons authorities have said that the clothing decision was made under prison regulations, and the Prisons Department has stated that prisoners serving sentences of more than three years are required to wear prison-issued clothing when produced before court.
News
NDB fraud Rs 60mn more than reported
The Committee on Public Finance has said that the actual losses suffered by the NDB bank are much more than what was initially reported. When compared with the initial disclosure made by NDB on 6 April 2026, the reported amount of the fraud had increased by Rs. 0.4 billion, from Rs. 13.2 billion to Rs. 13.6 billion, the committee said.
When compared with the amount disclosed by NDB on 26 June 2026, based on the interim report dated 22 June 2026, the additional amount of fraud is Rs. 60 million.
The has committee issued the following statement: The Committee on Public Finance recently summoned officials of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka to Parliament to inquire into the financial irregularities identified at NDB Bank and the final audit report relating to the matter.
The Committee meeting, chaired by Member of Parliament Dr. Harsha de Silva, discussed irregularities identified in NDB Bank’s financial statements, shortcomings in the audit process, and the relevant audit reports.
The meeting was attended by Deputy Ministers Chathuranga Abeysinghe, Dr. Kaushalya Ariyaratne, and Nishantha Jayaweera, as well as Members of Parliament Attorney-at-Law Rauff Hakeem, Ravi Karunanayake, Ajith Agalakada, Nimal Palihena, Wijesiri Basnayake, M.K.M. Aslam, Champika Hettiarachchi, and Attorney-at-Law Lakmali Hemachandra.
The Committee also focused on the findings of the investigation conducted by the Sri Lanka Accounting and Auditing Standards Monitoring Board (SLAAMB), as well as the findings revealed through the investigation conducted by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP. In particular, the Committee inquired into the failure of the external auditors to identify irregularities in NDB Bank’s financial statements.
The accountability of senior management with regard to corporate governance and risk management in relation to the financial irregularities was also discussed.
As a significant proportion of NDB Bank’s shares are held by institutions representing public and state funds, the Committee also considered the potential impact of such financial irregularities on public funds and the general public.
The Committee also discussed the progress made by LankaPay in establishing a centralized fraud monitoring system to prevent fraud within the financial system. The need to strengthen fraud monitoring systems at the individual bank level to monitor transactions carried out within each bank was also emphasized.
Accordingly, the following observations are included in the final audit report concerning the financial irregularities at NDB Bank:
1. The audit covers the period from 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2026. The audit report specifically identifies the financial impact arising from fraudulent transactions amounting to Rs. 13,639,664,684 (Rs. 13.6 billion).
2. According to the disclosure made on 29 September 2026, the financial impact arising from the fraudulent transactions is as follows:
· Rs. 1.5 billion for the period prior to 1 January 2025;
· Rs. 9.6 billion during 2025; and
· Rs. 2.5 billion for the quarter ended 31 March 2026.
3. Compared with the initial disclosure made by NDB on 6 April 2026, the reported amount of the fraud has increased by Rs. 0.4 billion, from Rs. 13.2 billion to Rs. 13.6 billion. Compared with the amount disclosed by NDB on 26 June 2026, based on the interim report dated 22 June 2026, the additional amount of fraud is Rs. 60 million.
4. The final audit report has also confirmed the previous disclosures that no customer accounts were affected as a result of the fraud incident.
5. The report has identified several governance failures at NDB relating to the processing of CEFT transactions, user-level activities within the Core Banking System, and the management of user credentials and access information. In addition, shortcomings have been identified in several operational areas, including transaction monitoring, daily account reconciliation, financial compliance, internal audit, branch network management, and operational risk management.
The audit report has made comprehensive recommendations to strengthen the control mechanisms, governance structures, and processes relating to the above-mentioned activities of the bank.
News
President orders review of laws on treatment of imprisoned monks
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has ordered the formation of a committee to review the laws and regulations on how Buddhist monks serving prison sentences are treated, including the procedures that apply when they are taken out of prison.
He revealed this at a special meeting with Maha Sangha representatives held yesterday (8) at the Presidential Secretariat. The meeting was called after concerns were raised over how Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera was treated when he was taken from prison to court.
The committee will recommend amendments to existing laws and, where needed, new prison standing orders and regulations. Its members will be drawn from the Attorney General’s Department, the Ministries of Justice, Public Administration, and Buddha Sasana, Religious and Cultural Affairs, and the Department of Prisons, including the Commissioner General of Prisons. It has been given two weeks to review the current legal provisions and submit its recommendations. The President added that any changes specific to Buddhist monks would be made in consultation with the Maha Sangha.
Outlining the legal background, the President said prison administration was governed by the Prisons Ordinance of 1877, along with the regulations and standing orders issued under it. That framework mostly addressed prisoners in general, he said, and had few provisions dealing specifically with Buddhist monks.
The meeting was attended by senior Maha Sangha members representing the Siyam, Amarapura and Ramanna Nikayas, along with Minister of Buddhasasana, Religious and Cultural Affairs Hiniduma Sunil Senevi and Minister of Justice Harshana Nanayakkara.
-
Features5 days agoThe first woman in the foreign service or Ceylon Overseas Service it was then called
-
News4 days agoGeneva takes up Sallay’s case and govt. ignores opportunity to answer accusations
-
Editorial6 days agoFuelling discontent and protest
-
Foreign News6 days agoTen injured after car crashes into rugby supporters in Australia
-
Latest News6 days agoTharindu Rathnayake, bowlers secure Asian Games Bronze for Sri Lanka
-
News5 days agoNearly 20 Iranian tankers stranded off Lanka amid US sanctions
-
Features4 days agoSri Lanka Cricket Bill: Governance reform is not yet a cricket strategy
-
News5 days agoLanka enters new phase of prosecutions as hurdles clear
