News
Bidding the Queen goodbye in typical British fashion!
By Dr Upul Wijayawardhana
Brits are known the world over for one thing––queueing, which they have developed to a fine art, the very antithesis of what we do in Sri Lanka! Perhaps, we lack the discipline of the British. Though Britain was once a society that depended on trust and honesty, unfortunately, it is no longer so, winds of change having had the adverse effect of moral degradation, not only in Britain but globally, too. But, if there is one thing that has not changed in Britain, it is queueing. Interestingly, even immigrants seem to embrace the British tradition of queueing, shedding the jostling tendencies inherited in their countries of birth. By the way, the word queue originates from the Latin word cauda, which means the tail. Americans, wanting to be different, call it a line which perhaps is simpler but, again, the beauty of English is in its complexity!
The demise of their much-loved Monarch has given the opportunity for Brits to show their tenacity for queueing in addition to demonstrating to the world their reverence and affection for the monarchy. Perhaps, what they value most is the continuity the monarchy provides which politicians miserably fail to do. Following the failed experiment of a republic in the 17th century, a happy compromise was reached; the Constitutional Monarch reigns but does not rule, and all rules being laid down by the parliament. The last absolute monarch was Charles I, who governed without parliament for over a decade setting off a train of events that led to his execution in 1649. The ‘Rump’ Parliament that followed was ineffective and after its dissolution in 1653, the Army Council appointed Oliver Cromwell as the Lord Protector of the “Commonwealth of England, Scotland and Ireland”. Due to the failures of Cromwell and his son, Richard, who succeeded him, the Rump Parliament was recalled leading to the restitution of the monarchy in 1660 with Charles II, the son of the executed king. There was wide speculation that Prince Charles may adopt a different regnal name to prevent harking back to these troubled times but was bold enough to succeed as King Charles III on the death of his beloved mother, Queen Elizabeth II.
The queue to pay last respects to the Queen started two days before Her Majesty’s Lying-in-State commenced at the Westminster Hall in the Palace of Westminster, in the evening of Wednesday 14th September. The first to join the queue was Vanessa Nanthakumaran of Sri Lankan origin, who stood in the queue, in pouring rain at times, for more than 50 hours before she could stand before the catafalque on which the Queen’s closed coffin lay draped in the Royal Standard. She told PA news agency that once in, she had curtsied, said prayers in her head and thanked the Queen for her great services. She added that the experience helped her to deal with the death of her husband in February. Thousands and thousands have followed her in a never-ending procession and will continue to do so till 6.30am on Monday 19th, the day of the funeral; an occasion like no other.
On Friday 16th, shortly after 9am, the entrance to the queue was closed as Southwark Park, which was the holding area at the end of the queue spanning just under 7 miles, was full. Reopening around 5pm, with a warning that the wait may be up to 24 hours and the night would be very cold, did not deter mourners from joining! However, many seem to have had a wait of around 13 hours. Therefore, the waiting times indicated in the government ‘queue tracker’ perhaps are a bit exaggerated to discourage too many joining. Still, even the minimum of six hours is a long wait and begs the question why so many are joining like this facing many hardships? To his credit, the famous ex-footballer David Beckham did not try to find his way in through influence but queued for 13 hours to pay his respects to the Queen.
Is it mass-hysteria like what happened following the accidental death of Diana, Princess of Wales, when there was a sudden outpouring of grief? Far from it. The Queen’s death, though sudden, was not unexpected. After all, she was 96 and there were visible signs of declining physical health since the death of her husband Prince Philip in April last year. It is very well known that the death of a spouse, specially of a long partnership as theirs, hastens the demise of the remaining spouse. However, she remained bright as a button mentally carrying out all her royal duties till the very end; wishing goodbye to her fourteenth PM and requesting the fifteenth to form a government on 6th September. Alarm bells started ringing when, the following day, she cancelled a Privy Council meeting even though it was to be conducted via Zoom. The following evening came the sad news of her demise which plunged the nation to sorrow.
Numerous interviews conducted by many TV stations giving almost continuous coverage provide the answers and the main reason is that they want to pay homage to Her Majesty for the selfless devoted service she rendered for seven decades. In fact, many comment: “What is a few hours inconvenience when you think of all her hard work for seventy years” What is often forgotten is that when Elizabeth became the Queen in 1952 UK was in pretty bad shape. Though it was able to defeat Nazi Germany, the coffers were empty due to the heavy cost of the war. Over seven decades, keeping pace with revolutions in technology, she has guided UK to prosperity and has made the Commonwealth a force to reckon with. Her popularity and influence spread far and wide which is shown by the large numbers that have flown from many countries to join the Brits, young and old, queueing to honour Her Majesty. Watching the live-feed from Westminster Hall, which I have been doing frequently, is absorbing, to say the least. Though at the beginning of the queue there is some joviality with new friendships developing and exchange of stories, as they approach Westminster Hall a sad silence pervades. As they reach the catafalque with sombre faces, some bow, some curtsy, some worship, some cross their hearts and an occasional flying-kiss is thrown too! When they come out, there are tears and smiles, everyone forgetting the tedium of the long wait. The ‘British Queue’ has been therapeutic and served the purpose bringing all together. Not that there were no hiccups; a man had been charged with sexual harassment and another for attempting to remove the Royal Standard from the coffin. Unsurprisingly, many have fainted while queueing, a few needing hospital admissions.
Though it is a security and logistic nightmare, hopefully everything will go according to plans drawn years ahead and approved by Her Majesty before her death. More world leaders would be assembled than on any previous occasion in addition to thousands of ordinary folks. We are bound to witness a sombre goodbye to the greatest of our era.
News
Ex-lawmakers group calls for IPU’s intervention to check “irregularities” in Parliament
Association of Former Members of Parliament of Sri Lanka has requested the Inter-Parliamentary Union to inquire into, what the group calls, institutional irregularities in Parliament.
The Association cited the decision taken by the Attorney General not to appear for Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremeratne, in a case filed in the Court of Appeal by sacked Deputy Secretary General of Parliament Chaminda Kularatne, to underscore the need for IPU’s intervention.
The following is the text of the letter signed by former JVP MP Premasiri Manage, on behalf of the Association: We write to Your Excellency on behalf of the Association of Former Members of Parliament of Sri Lanka, an independent body representing former legislators who have served the Parliament of Sri Lanka across successive administrations. The Association is committed to upholding democratic values, parliamentary traditions, institutional integrity, and the rule of law within Sri Lanka’s governance framework. It is with grave concern that we bring to your attention a series of developments that, in our respectful view, seriously undermine parliamentary democracy, administrative fairness, and institutional independence in Sri Lanka.
1. Unlawful Cancellation of Parliamentary Pensions
The present Government of Sri Lanka has, through actions that we consider both unlawful and unethical, cancelled the pension entitlements of former Members of Parliament. This decision appears to have been taken arbitrarily, without adherence to established legal principles, legitimate expectations, or due process, thereby undermining the dignity and security of those who have served in the national legislature.
2. Illegal and Malicious Interdiction of the Deputy Secretary General of Parliament
We wish to draw urgent attention to the interdiction of the Chief of Staff and Deputy Secretary General of Parliament, which raises serious concerns regarding abuse of authority and interference in administrative due process. According to material presently before the Court of Appeal of Sri Lanka (CA/Writ Application No. 109/2026), the interdiction:
• Was imposed through the Parliamentary Staff Advisory Committee (PSAC), which lacks lawful authority to exercise such disciplinary powers, rendering the action ultra vires;
• Was based on a preliminary inquiry conducted without proper legal mandate, thereby invalidating the process from its inception;
• Was not the result of an independent administrative determination, but was carried out following the direct personal intervention and influence of Speaker, Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne;
• Appears to have been driven by personal and retaliatory considerations, amounting to a malicious exercise of authority rather than a lawful disciplinary process.
Importantly, it is also noted that the Attorney General of Sri Lanka has withdrawn from appearing on behalf of the Hon. Speaker in the related proceedings, reportedly in view of serious procedural irregularities associated with the interdiction process. The Speaker has consequently retained private legal counsel. This development strongly indicates that serious legal and procedural defects exist in the interdiction process, further reinforcing concerns regarding its legality and propriety. It is therefore evident that the lawful disciplinary framework vested in the Secretary General of Parliament was bypassed, resulting in a serious violation of the principles of natural justice, institutional independence, and the rule of law.
3. Discrimination and Harassment within Parliamentary Administration
We are also deeply concerned by credible allegations of discrimination and harassment within the parliamentary administrative structure, which, in our respectful view, have arisen as a result of the interference of the present Speaker in the administrative affairs of Parliament, thereby undermining the independence of the parliamentary administration. These concerns include:
• Discriminatory conduct affecting senior officials, including the Deputy Secretary General;
• Harassment and discriminatory treatment of female staff members within Parliament;
• The resignation of one female officer due to such circumstances;
• Confirmed findings of harassment in respect of another female officer attached to the Information Technology Division, as established by a report submitted by a former High Court Judge.
These incidents indicate a disturbing pattern of administrative misconduct and a failure to ensure a safe, independent, and professional working environment within Parliament.
3. Broader Institutional Concerns
The above matters collectively raise serious concerns regarding:
• The erosion of the independence of parliamentary administration;
• Abuse of authority and concentration of power;
• Undermining of due process and established legal frameworks;
• A broader decline in adherence to democratic governance standards.
Request for Engagement
In light of the foregoing, we respectfully request that the Inter-Parliamentary Union:
1. Intervene and monitor the situation;
2. Call for reports and clarifications from the Speaker and senior parliamentary administration;
3. Facilitate independent review and observation of relevant judicial proceedings;
4. Promote accountability and restoration of institutional integrity within Parliament.
Given the IPU’s distinguished role in safeguarding parliamentary democracy and promoting good governance worldwide, we firmly believe that your timely engagement will contribute significantly to restoring institutional integrity and public confidence in Sri Lanka’s Parliament.
News
Power and Energy Minister, Ministry Secy resign over coal probe
Power and Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody and Ministry Secretary Prof. Udayanga Hemapala have resigned from their posts.According to the President’s Media Division (PMD), the two officials submitted their letters of resignation to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake this afternoon.
The resignations come in the wake of a Special Presidential Commission of Inquiry appointed to probe possible unlawful activity and financial irregularities in coal procurement and power generation.
The PMD said the decision was taken to ensure that the Commission’s work proceeds without interference or perceived influence from individuals holding office.
Minister Jayakody, in his resignation letter, noted that following the appointment of the Commission, he had requested that investigations into coal imports, since 2009, be referred to the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), describing it as part of the government’s anti-corruption mandate.
He added that the inquiry should be conducted independently and without bias, and said his continued presence in office could be perceived as an obstacle to the process.
Prof. Hemapala, in his resignation letter, said his decision was intended to facilitate the commencement of investigations and ensure a transparent and independent process, the PMD said.
The Special Presidential Commission was recently appointed to examine allegations of irregularities in coal imports and electricity generation over a prolonged period and to recommend corrective measures.
News
President appoints Commission to probe irregularities in coal imports from inception of Norochcholai
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake yesterday appointed a Presidential Commission of Inquiry to investigate alleged irregularities in coal imports and electricity generation, amid concerns over possible financial losses to the State.
The President’s Office said the Commission would examine transactions from the inception of coal-based power generation in Sri Lanka up to April 16, 2026, focusing on operations linked to the CEB-affiliated Lanka Coal Company (Pvt) Ltd., its successors, and private suppliers.
The three-member body is chaired by Supreme Court Justice Gihan Kulatunga, with Court of Appeal Justice Adithya Patabendige and High Court Judge Sanjeewa Somaratne as members. Former Ministry Secretary P.V. Bandulasena has been appointed Secretary to the Commission.
Appointed under the Special Presidential Commissions of Inquiry Act No. 07 of 1978, as amended, the Commission has been mandated to scrutinise procurement procedures, supply chains, quality testing, and operational processes connected to coal imports and utilisation.
The Commission has been tasked with the following mandates:
• To determine whether irregularities or illegal acts occurred in the procurement process for coal imports and to assess any resulting financial loss to the government.
• To investigate whether substandard coal was imported during the relevant period and to examine the entire associated workflow, including procurement, supply, quality testing, operational, and utility processes.
• To ascertain whether electricity generation using imported coal reached the expected levels of efficiency and productivity.
• To investigate whether legal or financial irregularities or illegal acts occurred during the power generation process if substandard coal was indeed utilized.
• To examine whether there were any breaches of expressed terms or conditions in these processes and, if so, whether measures such as withholding payments or other compensatory actions were taken.
• To identify the political authorities, government officials, officers of Lanka Coal Company (Pvt) Ltd, suppliers, or their agents responsible for any such incidents and to recommend future action to be taken against them.
• To propose measures to prevent the recurrence of such alleged malpractices or illegal acts in the future and to ensure proper governance and integrity.
In addition to the above, the Commission will also report on any other alleged malpractices or illegal acts related to coal importation and electricity generation, and recommend preventive measures to address such issues.
-
News6 days agoCEB orders temporary shutdown of large rooftop solar systems
-
Features6 days agoFrom Royal College Platoon to National Cadet Corps: 145 years of discipline, leadership, and modern challenges
-
Latest News6 days agoPNS TAIMUR & ASLAT arrive in Colombo
-
Features6 days agoCIA’s hidden weapon in Iran
-
Latest News5 days agoPrasidh, Buttler set up comfortable win for Gujarat Titans
-
News3 days agoPNS TAIMUR & ASLAT set sail from Colombo
-
Features6 days agoA Fragile Ceasefire: Pakistan’s Glory and Israel’s Sabotage
-
Latest News6 days agoHeat index likely to increase up to ‘Caution level’ at some places in the Northern, North-central, North-western, Western, Sabaragamuwa, Southern and Eastern provinces and Monaragala district
