Connect with us

News

Opposition move to take up motion against President defeated

Published

on

By Saman Indrajith

The Opposition’s move to suspend Standing Orders and take up a motion yesterday censuring President Gotabaya Rajapaksa failed.

The Opposition parties demanded that the motion be taken for debate by suspending the Standing Orders but as the government disagreed the matter was put to the vote and defeated by a majority of 51 votes.

As per the results of the vote, the Opposition parties will have to wait several days more to take the motion for debate in the House.

At the commencement of the business of the House, the Opposition parties asked the Chair to take up the motion of censure against President Gotabaya Rajapaksa.

Leader of the House Minister Dinesh Gunawardena pointed out that the

motion had been submitted very

late, and it should be on the Order Paper of Parliament for at least five days to be taken up for debate in the House. The time period has been stipulated by the Standing Orders, Gunawardena pointed out, adding that therefore the motion of censure could not be taken up for the debate now.”

Chief Opposition Whip SJB Kandy District MP Lakshman Kiriella called on the Speaker to give a ruling on the matter and take the motion for debate. “As per the Article 42 of the Constitution the President is responsible to Parliament. He should come here and provide responses to the questions because he is duty bound to do so. We have a motion of censure to show that the President is guilty of dereliction of his duties and shirking his responsibilities 35 times during the recent past. We need time to debate this. It is the duty of the Speaker to allow this. The Speaker should respect the Westminster System.”

TNA MP Sumanthiran proposed to suspend the Parliament Standing Orders to take up the censure motion.

Sumanthiran’s proposal was seconded by Chief Opposition Whip SJB MP Lakshman Kiriella.

Leader of the House Minister Gunawardena opposed the move and requested a vote to stop the proposal.

Minister Gunawardena said that the motion could be debated at a later date without suspending the standing orders.

The Opposition’s proposal was then put to the vote.

The Government secured 119 votes, while the opposition obtained 68 votes.

Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe also voted with the Government to defeat the proposal.

MP Sumanthiran found fault with Prime Minister Wickremesinghe for siding with the ruling party.

MP Sumanthiran condemned Prime Minister Wickremesinghe, stating that the country was now aware who was attempting to protect the President.

Pointing out that the debate would only result in a motion of censure, MP Sumanthiran said that the President would not lose his job by the motion being taken up for debate.

“Your names have been displayed on the board today. The country now knows who is protecting the President, who does not. Absolutely shameless conduct by the Prime Minister and those on the government benches,” he said.

Sumanthiran Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe had agreed to the motion of censure when the latter was in the Opposition.

“MP Wickremesinghe wanted to see the draft and I sent it to him on the 26 April. He vetted it. He suggested that the draft be sent to Galle Face protesters to obtain their consent as well,” the MP said.

Stating that the draft had been sent to the protesters at Galle Face, the TNA MP said their consent had been obtained.

MP Sumanthiran also pointed out that at the time the Prime Minister had also issued two statements revealing that he will vote in favour of the Motion expressing displeasure over the President’s conduct.

He questioned why Wickremesinghe had changed his stance and had failed to vote in favour of the motion as previously announced.

“What games is he playing? The only thing that has changed between that day and today is that he has got a job as Prime Minister,” MP Sumanthiran said.

The TNA MP said Wickremesinghe had compromised his principles.

MP Sumanthiran added that the Prime Minister who was asking for support from the Opposition when he didn’t have the support of his own people on the government benches.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Child abuse crisis: 108,000 complaints reported in 10 years

Published

on

More than 108,000 complaints of child abuse had been received by the National Child Protection Authority (NCPA) between 2015 and 2025, Women and Child Affairs Minister Saroja Savithri Paulraj told Parliament yesterday.

Responding to a question raised by Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa under Standing Order 27/2, the Minister said 4,421 child abuse cases were pending before High Courts as of April 30 this year, with indictments already filed against the accused.

She said the NCPA was working with 47 Police Child and Women Protection Bureaus under the Police Children and Women Abuse Prevention Division to expedite the hearing and conclusion of these cases.

The Minister said measures were also being taken to protect child victims during legal proceedings by introducing a system to record their evidence through video in a safe and child-friendly environment, thereby reducing the need for them to appear in court.

She said discussions were underway with the Ministries of Health and Mass Media and other relevant institutions to establish nine provincial video evidence recording units.

by Saman Indrajith ✍️

Continue Reading

News

CA dismisses  writ petition seeking postponement of A/L exam

Published

on

The Court of Appeal yesterday dismissed a writ petition seeking to postpone the 2026 G.C.E. A/L Examination by two months.

The petition, filed by a group of students due to sit the examination for the first and second time, sought an order delaying the examination, which is scheduled to commence next month.

The Court announced its decision after considering submissions made in support of the application and declined to grant leave to proceed with the petition.

As a result, the 2026 G.C.E. Advanced Level Examination will be held as scheduled in August.

Continue Reading

News

Bimal’s remarks on MP’s conduct spark heated exchange in Parliament

Published

on

Leader of the House and Minister Bimal Rathnayake yesterday criticised the conduct of MP Archchuna Ramanathan in Parliament, describing the behaviour of certain lawmakers as “uncivilised, disgraceful and indecent”, while a heated exchange followed between government and opposition members.

Rathnayake made the remarks when Ramanathan attempted to raise a point of order during parliamentary proceedings.

“This parliament has one or two members who behave in a very uncivilised, disgraceful manner. We tolerate them because one of them is mentally ill,” Rathnayake said.

He alleged that Ramanathan had insulted even members of the Tamil community.

“The things he says may not be heard through the microphone, but the four walls of this Parliament are witnesses,” Rathnayake said, adding that Ramanathan’s conduct was not limited to Parliament.

He claimed that the Jaffna District Coordinating Committee meeting could not be held due to Ramanathan’s behaviour and said MP Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam had written to the Speaker stating that he could not sit near him.

The Speaker intervened during the exchange, warning Ramanathan not to behave in a manner that would turn Parliament into “a joke”. He also said the MP had previously addressed him in an insulting manner.

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa criticised the manner in which Rathnayake and the Speaker had addressed the matter, saying MPs should not be spoken to improperly and urging members to follow parliamentary Standing Orders.

Ramanathan, responding to the remarks, said: “I may be a psycho, but I am not a homosexual.”

by Saman Indrajith ✍️

Continue Reading

Trending