Opinion
Lift ‘Lockdown’ – Open economic activities
by Dr. Pradeep Kariyawasam
Former Chief Medical Officer of Health, Colombo
Most citizens will wonder why I am asking for the lifting of the so-called ‘Lockdown’ now when Health Authorities continue to reiterate that we are not yet out of the woods. Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social wellbeing, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, says the World Health Organization (WHO). Even during the current COVID-19 pandemic, while we are striving to eliminate this dreaded disease, it is a valid statement: It is ‘Health for all’ and not only for a group of people in our society, divided by religion, race, caste and societal status.
I had mentioned in a previous letter that a week-long island-wide curfew would have met the same target we have achieved with this type of Lockdown, during the past month or so. This Lockdown will not severely affect government servants, as most of them are at home, and every month, whether they work or not, their salary gets deposited in their bank accounts. In the private sector, a large number who worked in smaller enterprises have lost their jobs in the last two years. Similarly, a large number of vendors and small business holders have lost their income and closed down their businesses or are gasping for breath after 18 months of agony, trying to survive. What about the daily wage earners? Most of them may not be recipients of any social benefit and may not have any savings; to them, surviving is out of the question if this lockdown continues, as they are the people who suffer most from these closures. Some have resorted to begging by the roadside, others are going from house to house asking whether there are any household chores they could do for a few hundred rupees; but who wants to invite anyone to their homes these days!
I believe that except for the rich and upper-middle-class, all the others in this country have suffered a lot during the last one and half years, and they make up the vast majority of this country. Consequently, the physical, social and mental wellbeing of Lankans has suffered immensely, and needless to say, they are sick if we follow the definition of the WHO, and in that case, the vast majority in this country are sick!
Even with this kind of a mild lockdown, which looks like it is only affecting the lower rungs of our society, the number of infected and deaths due to COVID-19 goes down with each passing day. The rich and powerful carried out their activities without any hindrance, evident by the number of vehicles on the streets. Some went on vacation, even crossing provincial borders without being stopped, others went to Nuwara-Eliya or Kataragama, or booked hotels to stay there during this period. Indeed, they would not have carried the disease to those areas or brought the disease to Colombo, but the message they give to the ordinary citizen leaves much to be desired. It is due to this kind of behaviour that ordinary citizens in urban areas also roamed the streets during the lockdown, as it was very difficult to be crammed inside small houses or mid-level apartments, where five to six people live in 400 to 500 square feet. Therefore, a lockdown is practically impossible to implement in areas with economic constraints, and the best we could do is to concentrate on such areas when taking preventive action.
Alas, the old tried and tested preventive measure of ensuring community participation in disease control is a thing in the past in Colombo. The breakdown in communication between such communities and the health authorities is alarming, which was the reason for more than 100 deaths at home in Colombo this year. The real numbers should be available with the Epidemiology Unit, but unfortunately, information is not forthcoming and health authorities don’t seem to care. Civil societies and NGOs that took part in these activities physically are not to be seen, and that has contributed immensely to the failure of preventive measures. I have wondered why only tail end COVID-19 prevention activities, such as PCR and antigen testing and quarantining, are being focused on, while no real effort is made to prevent the spread of the disease by carrying out large scale awareness campaigns in vulnerable areas, imposing strict lockdown conditions in areas where new variant outbreaks take place; as it happened in Dematagoda where the spread of the Delta variant started; vaccinating people in vulnerable areas first, looking after their daily needs and putting in place a system to provide emergency relief to such areas.
We could have then stopped the Delta variant from spreading into other areas, and to other parts of the country. I do not understand it when health officials in Colombo say 50 percent of PCR samples are positive for the Delta variant and at the same time say that they have contained the spread of the disease. It is a pity that Colombo city so far has no qualified epidemiologist in their ranks, to analyze data, make proper decisions, and implement prevention and control measures.
The hit, the economy of the country took, is not reversible for a long time to come. We have to get economic activities running again from next week without waiting any longer if we don’t want to hit rock bottom. Factories, shops, bakeries, malls and garages should open under strict health guidelines, and the country should move forward again. How should we do that? Wearing a mask all the time, hand washing, maintaining social distance, not stepping out if one has at least one symptom, are the key to success. For this, every institution and each individual should contribute.
When considering the public service, only 20 percent of staff members should be allowed to report to work on a single day during the next few months, but top officials should report to work daily as otherwise, the system cannot function. This will ensure that at least one day a week everyone will be working. They should be advised to work longer hours on such days and to cover all priority work they are usually assigned. Once they report to work they will have to follow strict health guidelines, and government offices have to issue health protocols and implement the same.
Private sector organisations should also stick to the 20 percent quota of office staff, but factories and stores should be allowed to operate with the full team under strict health protocols. These protocols may vary depending on the functions of each organisation, nature of work carried out and the number of workers. Private transport should be arranged for all staff members, including labourers. This will not be an issue as there must be enough idling school vans due to school closure. Public transport should allocate only 50 percent of seats to passengers, at least for the next three months; and if the number of those who test positive further reduces to less than 1,000 per day, passengers may be accommodated according to the number of seats available, but no more. Shops and small-time trade should be allowed to open with minimum staff, and customers allowed inside should correspond to the floor area; at least a minimum of four to five square metres should be allocated per each customer entering such establishments.
The tourism sector should be allowed to function by getting tourists to travel in bubbles without hindrance and even by restricting access, to destinations of tourism value, for locals for some time. This is a very important measure to improve our economy. The testing facilities at the airport should be improved for locals as well as tourists, to allow the release of PCR test reports before they leave the airport.
No demonstrations, protests, gatherings of more than five people in public place should be allowed for at least the next three months and may be controlled using even emergency regulations. Vaccination programmes should be continued, and perhaps vaccinators can work in shifts to provide this service late into the night. A mobile vaccination drive is desirable in certain areas, rather than getting people to travel long distances and then wait in line. The excellent service rendered by the tri-forces and the police during the vaccination programmes in Colombo must be commended. All children above 12 should be vaccinated with a recognized vaccine, and schools should be reopened at least by November this year. PCR and antigen testing should be done only on those who display symptoms and their contacts, as I believe that carrying out random tests can only give us an estimation of the people who have contracted the disease, and is not an accurate sample of the total population. To achieve the latter, we will have to test all the people in the country within a day or two, but that is not practical. Consequently, random testing is a waste of money, time and resources.
The key to success in this endeavour is discipline. All authorities concerned must ensure that health protocols are followed, the number of meetings and gatherings are kept to a minimum, such activities are not allowed in public places and economic activities are carried out following maximum safety measures. The public must exercise individual responsibility in getting vaccinated not only for the sake of their safety but also for the safety of others, limiting unnecessary travel, looking out for neighbours in their hour of need and helping health personnel to carry out their duties.
There had been complaints against officials about pilfering vaccines and vaccinating for money, charging commissions for PCR testing, allocating certain hotels only for quarantined persons, and lately about playing favourites with funeral parlours when releasing bodies for cremation. These allegations should be inquired into, as there can’t be smoke without fire. We must encourage people to have faith in the ongoing activities, as otherwise, they will also not fall in line. The Delta variant will not be around forever. It will subside but come back one day in another form or variant. However, we should be better prepared to face it next time, by having in place preventive measures and getting all concerned to participate in this endeavour.
The silver lining of US tariffs for emerging economies:
In a world that thrives on interconnectedness, the imposition of U.S. tariffs has been widely discussed through the lens of negativity—trade wars, disrupted supply chains, and market turbulence. However, this narrow view fails to account for the opportunities that arise from such disruptions. While it’s easy to focus on the immediate challenges—rising costs, retaliatory measures, and financial volatility—emerging economies, especially those in Asia and South Asia, are beginning to see a silver lining.
The very disruptions caused by U.S. tariffs can open up pathways for growth, innovation, and strategic realignment. Rather than being passive victims of global trade tensions, countries like Sri Lanka can leverage these moments of upheaval as catalysts for economic renewal, stronger international partnerships, and greater resilience in the face of future global shifts. The silver lining of U.S. tariffs, therefore, lies in how emerging economies can transform these challenges into lasting opportunities for economic development and regional integration.
Traditionally seen as a blunt economic tool, tariffs have made a comeback, especially during and after the Trump administration. While much attention has focused on the negative impacts of tariffs—such as trade slowdowns, retaliatory tariffs, and market volatility—this view overlooks some of the potential positive outcomes, especially in the longer term. This article will explore the opportunities created by U.S. tariffs, particularly for emerging economies like Sri Lanka.
What Are Tariffs and Why Are They Imposed?
Tariffs are taxes placed on imported goods, making them more expensive for consumers. The United States has used tariffs as a way to address trade imbalances, protect domestic industries, and assert its influence on the global stage. For example, tariffs on steel and aluminum were meant to safeguard American manufacturing jobs, while tariffs on Chinese goods were part of broader efforts to correct trade deficits with China and challenge unfair trade practices.
The Immediate Consequences
of U.S. Tariffs
When tariffs are imposed, the immediate effects are usually negative for global trade. Countries that rely on exporting to the U.S. face reduced demand for their goods, which can lead to financial losses. Markets may experience increased volatility, stock prices may drop, and inflation could rise, especially in countries dependent on global supply chains.
For instance, countries like China have retaliated with their own tariffs, leading to a “trade war” that has disrupted global supply chains. As a result, businesses face higher costs and reduced profits, which can also affect consumers who pay more for goods.
The Longer-Term Effects: Economic Reshaping
Although tariffs create challenges, they also lead to changes that could benefit certain economies in the long run. For example, trade wars often force countries to rethink their supply chains. In response to U.S. tariffs, many multinational companies started seeking alternatives to China for manufacturing. This shift, known as the “China +1” strategy, has led to countries like Sri Lanka, Vietnam, and India seeing a rise in foreign investment and a growing role in the global supply chain.
Sri Lanka, with its strategic location and competitive labor costs, has become an attractive destination for businesses looking to diversify their production outside of China. Sri Lanka’s exports, such as tea and apparel, have seen increased demand as companies move their operations to places less affected by tariffs. This shift creates opportunities for countries like Sri Lanka to boost their industrial sectors, attract foreign capital, and integrate into regional trade networks.
The Role of Financial Volatility
One of the immediate reactions to tariffs is financial volatility, as global markets try to adjust to the uncertainty caused by trade conflicts. While this often results in market instability, financial volatility can also serve as a catalyst for broader economic reforms. In times of crisis, countries may be forced to improve their fiscal policies, strengthen their institutions, and diversify their economies.
For example, countries in the emerging world may use the pressure from tariffs to undertake structural reforms that make their economies more resilient. They may improve fiscal governance, attract more investment, and create a more diversified and stable economy. Over time, this can reduce their dependence on any single trading partner and help them weather future economic shocks.
Opportunities for Emerging Economies
Although U.S. tariffs present challenges for emerging economies, especially those that depend on exports to the U.S., they also provide opportunities for strategic realignment. With companies looking for alternatives to China, emerging economies can reposition themselves as attractive investment destinations.
Sri Lanka, for instance, has benefited from this shift in the global supply chain. As businesses look for stable alternatives to Chinese manufacturing, Sri Lanka has seen an increase in demand for its exports, such as textiles and tea. Additionally, foreign direct investment (FDI) in Sri Lanka has been growing, with companies looking to set up production facilities in countries that are less affected by tariff measures.
This shift is not just about attracting investment but also about repositioning a country within regional supply chains. Sri Lanka has the potential to become a key player in the Indian Ocean region, connecting Asia with Europe and Africa. By improving infrastructure, such as ports and digital networks, Sri Lanka can better integrate into global value chains and increase its export capacity.
Sri Lanka’s Response
to Global Shifts
For Sri Lanka, the global effects of U.S. tariffs present both a challenge and an opportunity. The country is currently dealing with debt restructuring, fiscal deficits, and economic instability. However, these global disruptions can be leveraged as a platform for domestic renewal.
Sri Lanka’s response to these shifts includes diversifying its export markets. By increasing trade with other regions, such as Southeast Asia, India, and the EU, Sri Lanka can reduce its reliance on any one country or market. Regional trade agreements like the South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA) can help strengthen Sri Lanka’s position in the global market and protect it from the volatility of global trade wars.
Additionally, Sri Lanka has used these global shifts as an opportunity to undertake important fiscal reforms. These reforms, including improving fiscal governance and enhancing investor confidence, can help the country become more resilient in the long term. By addressing internal structural issues, Sri Lanka can better navigate global economic shifts and position itself for sustainable growth.
The Role of Technology and Digitalisation
Technology plays an essential role in Sri Lanka’s strategy to capitalise on global economic changes. The digital transformation of industries, driven in part by U.S. tariffs and trade disruptions, opens new avenues for economic development. For example, Sri Lanka’s growing IT sector, combined with advancements in e-commerce and digital infrastructure, allows the country to offer a variety of services to global markets, including financial services, software development, and education.
By investing in digital infrastructure and embracing new technologies like artificial intelligence and automation, Sri Lanka can position itself as a leader in the regional digital economy. This technological upgrade can help Sri Lanka integrate more deeply into global value chains, boosting exports and creating new economic opportunities. Possible benefits from US tariffs include,
Short-Term Benefits
* Diversified Exports: Emerging economies gain market share by offering alternatives to Chinese products.
* Increased Demand: Tariffs on China boost demand for products from other regions.
* Boost in FDI: Countries attract more foreign investments as supply chains shift.
* Lower Competition: Protectionist measures reduce competition for domestic industries.
Medium-Term Benefits
* Industrial Upgrading: Local industries modernise, innovate, and become more productive.
* Policy Reforms: Financial instability prompts improvements in governance and policies.
* Supply Chain Integration: Economies join more resilient and diversified global supply chains.
* Regional Trade: Strengthened trade partnerships with neighbouring countries and regional organisations.
Long-Term Benefits
* Structural Growth: Policy changes create a more resilient and diversified economy.
* Technological Advancements: Focus on innovation positions economies as leaders in new industries.
* Geopolitical Influence: Adaptation to global changes boosts regional and international influence.
* Better Positioning in Global Value Chains: Emerging economies align with evolving global demands, securing a stronger role in global trade.
A Turning Point for Emerging Economies
While U.S. tariffs initially cause economic disruption, they can also serve as a wake-up call for emerging economies like Sri Lanka. By diversifying trade relationships, investing in technology, and undertaking necessary structural reforms, countries can turn these challenges into long-term growth opportunities. The global shifts triggered by U.S. tariffs provide a unique opportunity for countries like Sri Lanka to reinvent their economic models, enhance their resilience, and position themselves as key players in the evolving global economy.
In this era of trade wars and economic realignments, smaller nations no longer need to simply weather the storm. With the right policies, proactive strategies, and a focus on innovation, countries like Sri Lanka can not only survive the disruptions caused by U.S. tariffs but thrive in the new economic landscape.
(The writer, a senior Chartered Accountant and professional banker, is Professor at SLIIT University, Malabe. He is also the author of the “Doing Social Research and Publishing Results”, a Springer publication (Singapore), and “Samaja Gaveshakaya (in Sinhala). The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the institution he works for. He can be contacted at saliya.a@slit.lk and www.researcher.com)
The government did everything in its power to welcome Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the three days in April 4-6 he was in Sri Lanka. The country is known for its hospitality and the government exceeded expectations in its hospitality. There were children to greet the prime minister at the airport along with six cabinet ministers. There was a large banner that described the Indian prime minister in glowing terms. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake also conferred the Sri Lanka Mitra Vibhushana Award, the country’s highest award, to Prime Minister Modi in appreciation of friendship and cooperation. The role that the Indian government under him played in saving Sri Lanka from economic disaster three years ago would merit him nothing less. The gesture was not merely humanitarian; it was also an astute expression of regional leadership rooted in a philosophy of “neighbourhood first,” a cornerstone of Prime Minister Modi’s foreign policy.
India has a key role to play as a stabilising actor in South Asia, especially when regional neighbours falter under economic or political pressure. It has yet to reach its full potential in this regard as seen in its relations with Pakistan and Bangladesh. But with regard to Sri Lanka, India has truly excelled. Prime Minister Modi’s visit to Sri Lanka at this time carried symbolic weight beyond the economic and political. President Dissanayake, in his welcome speech, noted that Prime Minister Modi was the first foreign leader to visit after the new government came to power. By being the first to visit he conferred international importance to the newly elected Sri Lankan leaders. This early gesture conveyed India’s tacit endorsement of President Dissanayake’s government, an endorsement that can be especially valuable for a leader without a traditional elite background. The president also remarked on their shared political origins as both originally came into politics as outsiders to the traditional ruling establishments, creating a bridge between them that hinted at a broader ideological compatibility.
President Dissanayake showed his human touch when he first showed the Mitra Vibushana medal to Prime Minister Modi in its box, then took it out and placed it around the neck of the Indian leader. When the two leaders clasped their hands together and raised them, they sent a message of camaraderie and solidarity, an elder statesman with a long track record with a younger one who has just started on his journey of national leadership. Interestingly, April 5 the date on which the award was conferred was also the 54th anniversary of the commencement of the JVP Insurrection of 1971 (and again in 1987), in which anti-India ideology was a main feature. In making this award, President Dissanayake made the point that he was a truly Sri Lankan leader who had transcended his political roots and going beyond the national to the international.
FINDING TRUST
Six of the seven agreements signed during the visit focused on economic cooperation. These ranged from renewable energy initiatives and digital governance platforms to infrastructure investments in the plantation sector. Particularly noteworthy were agreements on the construction of homes for the descendants of Indian-origin Tamils and the installation of solar units at 5000 religious sites. Both these projects blend development assistance with a careful sensitivity to identity politics. These initiatives align with India’s strategic use of development diplomacy. Unlike China’s approach to aid and infrastructure which has been frequently critiqued for creating debt dependencies India’s model emphasises partnership, cultural affinity, and long-term capacity building.
The seventh agreement has to do with defence and national security issues which has been a longstanding area of concern for both countries. None of the agreements, including the seventh, have been discussed outside of the government-to-government level, though texts of the other six agreements were released during Prime Minister Modi’s visit. Several of the issues concerning economic agreements have been in the public domain eliciting concerns such as the possibility of personal information on Sri Lankan citizens being accessible to India through the digitisation project. However, little is known of the defence agreement. To the extent it meets the needs of the two countries it will serve to build trust between them which is the foundation on which dialogue for mutually beneficial change can take place.
In the past there has been a trust deficit between the two countries. Sri Lankans would be mindful of the perilous security situation the country faced during the time of the war with the LTTE and other Tamil militant organisations, when parts of the country were taken over and governed by the LTTE and the country’s territorial integrity was at stake. This was also a time when Indian military aircraft were deployed in Sri Lankan airspace without the Sri Lankan government’s consent in June 1987, which the Indian government justified as a humanitarian measure, and there were concerns about possible Indian military intervention on a larger scale. This was followed by the signing of the Indo-Lanka Peace Accord the next month in July 1987 which led to the induction of the Indian army as a peacekeeping force into Sri Lanka with government consent.
UNRESTRICTED FRIENDS
The history of Indian intervention in Sri Lanka’s ethnic conflict has given an impetus to Sri Lanka to look to other big powers to act as a counterbalance to India. In more recent years India has expressed its concern at naval vessels from China coming into Sri Lankan waters on the grounds of doing research which could be used against India. Sri Lanka’s engagement with China has strained ties with India, particularly when Chinese infrastructure investments, such as the Hambantota Port, appears to have the potential to serve dual civilian-military purposes. Given China’s growing global reach and its ambition to project influence through the Belt and Road Initiative, Sri Lanka’s geography makes it a critical hub in the Indian Ocean. Hopefully, with the signing of the defence agreement between India and Sri Lanka, these fears and suspicions of the past will be alleviated and soon come to an end.
The position that the government headed by President Dissanayake has taken is to be friends with all. The principle of “friendship with all, enmity with none” is not new, but the stakes are higher today, as global competition between major powers intensifies. India, by virtue of geography and history, will always be Sri Lanka’s first and most important partner. It was India, and not China, not the West, that provided an emergency economic lifeline when Sri Lanka’s foreign reserves evaporated in 2022. That support, amounting to over $4 billion in credit lines and direct aid, was delivered quickly and with minimal conditionality. It also demonstrated how regional proximity can enable faster, more context-aware responses than those offered by multilateral institutions.
The world has become a harsher and more openly self-interested one for countries, even ones that were thought to have indissoluble bonds. Sri Lanka’s biggest export markets are in the United States and European Union and it has received large amounts of economic assistance from Japan and China, though unfortunately some of the loans from China were used inappropriately by former Sri Lankan governments to create white elephant infrastructure projects. Burdened now with enormous debt repayments that bankrupted it in 2022, Sri Lanka continues to need economic resources and markets from around the world. President Dissanayake’s government will understand that closeness to India need not mean an exclusive relationship with it alone. In a multipolar world, friendship (and doing business) with all is both a virtue and a necessity. But among friends, there must always be a first —and for reasons of history, culture, religion, geography and strategic logic, that will be India.
by Jehan Perera
Only America could re-elect an extremist like Trump.
There are planned protests across the US today against President Donald Trump and his adviser billionaire Elon Musk.
More than 1,200 “Hands Off!” demonstrations have been planned by more than 150 groups – including civil rights organisations, labour unions, veterans, fair-election activists and LGBT+ advocates.
This includes a planned protest at the National Mall in Washington as well as locations in all 50 states.
They are in opposition to Trump’s actions: slashing the federal government, his handling of the economy and other issues.
Musk has played a key role in Trump’s second administration, leading efforts to downsize the federal government as head of the newly created Department of Government Efficiency.
Organisers hope these demonstrations will be the largest since Trump came to office.
Speaking of Musk, let’s see how Trump’s second term has impacted America’s richest men …?
Countries across the globe are planning their response, or lack thereof, to Donald Trump’s tariffs.
China responded to Trump’s 34% tariff with its own levy of the same percentage on US imports.
According to state news agency Xinhua, China has accused the US of using tariffs “as a weapon” to suppress Beijing’s economy.
The country’s foreign ministry added that the US should “stop undermining the legitimate development rights of the Chinese people”.
It also warned there were no winners from and no way out for protectionism.
China also claimed that the US tariffs violated World Trade Organization rules – rules it itself has broken a number of times.
Professor Wang Wen, trade expert at the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, spoke from Beijing to Kamali Melbourne. He outlined why he believed the tariffs would eventually benefit China, and why Beijing would “never yield” to the US president.
“The basic strategy of China’s tariff policy against Trump is to count on reciprocal rules and defend China’s national interest and dignity. China will never yield to Trump on the issue of tariff war,” he said.
However, Xi Jinping is no democratic leader either, given to expansionism by hook or crook.
China’s booming economy has opened up many opportunities to achieve its sinister objectives – massive investments which weaker economies fall into and become easy prey.
Sri Lanka is no exception. Caught in the middle are the smaller nations who are confused and worried how best to stay alive.
Sunil Dharmabandhu
Wales, UK
IPL 2025: Sensational Priyansh Arya condemns Chennai Super Kings to another loss
Heat index at ‘Caution level’ in Northern, North-central, Eastern, North-western, Western provinces and Monaragala district today [09]
IPL 2025: Marsh, Pooran outgun Kolkata Knight Riders in high-scoring thriller
-
Business2 days agoColombo Coffee wins coveted management awards
-
Business4 days agoDaraz Sri Lanka ushers in the New Year with 4.4 Avurudu Wasi Pro Max – Sri Lanka’s biggest online Avurudu sale
-
Features3 days agoStarlink in the Global South
-
Business5 days agoStrengthening SDG integration into provincial planning and development process
-
Business4 days agoNew SL Sovereign Bonds win foreign investor confidence
-
Sports6 days agoTo play or not to play is Richmond’s decision
-
Features3 days agoModi’s Sri Lanka Sojourn
-
Sports5 days agoNew Zealand under 85kg rugby team set for historic tour of Sri Lanka