News
NGOs fire heavy salvo against govt., coinciding with 48th Geneva sessions
A civil society grouping in a statement issued yesterday (13) strongly criticised the government over its human rights record. The statement was issued by over two dozens activists hours after the 48th sessions of the Geneva- based UNHRC commenced.
Identifying themselves as the Civil Society Platform (CSP), the group launched a scathing attack over accountability issues and post-war issues, including what they claimed was continuing harassment of the civil society.
Sri Lankan Collective for Consensus (SLCC), comprising representatives of several civil society groups, earlier held talks with the government. Among the government representatives were President Gotabaya Rajapaksa and Foreign Minister Prof. G.L. Peiris.
The CSP said that while the group acknowledged the efforts made by the government to meet the Covid-19 challenge, its action and inaction since has only exacerbated the challenges faced by the people. At the same time, increasing authoritarianism and militarisation, including the COVID-19 “response and the culture of impunity have eroded civic space and undermined the protection of human rights. The re-imposition of a state of emergency on the pretext of addressing food distribution is an additional concern. Resorting to promulgation of Emergency Regulations in an arbitrary manner further concentrates unrestrained power in the hands of the executive and is not conducive to democratic, inclusive and transparent decision making regarding the public good. It creates an environment in which the human rights of citizens can be further curtailed and even violated.
The group raised the government allegedly depriving the civil society the freedom to operate.
“In recent months we have witnessed an alarming shrinking of civic space in Sri Lanka. This is in a context of heightened surveillance and threats to, and harassment of human rights defenders, survivors and families of victims, such as the families of the disappeared, who advocate for protection of human rights and truth and justice. The government and its affiliates have also demonized the work of non-governmental organisations through multiple means and presented them as potential threats to national security.
“This is against the backdrop of the National Secretariat for Non-Governmental Organisations (NGO Secretariat), being brought once again within the purview of the Ministry of Defence in December 2019, and steps being taken to draft legislation to reportedly curb the activities of civil society organisations. In addition, since December 2019 state officials at the district and divisional level have brought into effect cumbersome informal and arbitrary rules by which civil society organisations have to abide to obtain approval and implement their projects. Furthermore, during meetings with NGOs at the district level, officers of the NGO Secretariat have been abusive and used disrespectful language when addressing personnel from civil society organisations. Cabinet ministers continue to use the term NGOs in a hostile manner, perpetuating the anti-NGO culture reminiscent of the repressive era when NGOs faced intimidation and threats both from the State and unidentified entities.
We note with concern the cabinet decision to replace the Voluntary Social Service Organizations (Registration and Supervision) Act No. 31 of 1980 as amended (VSSO Act). Civil society concerns in this regard which the NGO coalition working on this issue shared with the NGO Secretariat have gone unaddressed. The government’s engagement with civil society on the proposed law should not be cosmetic but meaningful and take into account the legitimate concerns of civil society. Furthermore, any new law must not restrict the rights of civil society organisations to work freely on issues of human rights and transitional justice or place undue impediments to their functioning.
The group raised the following issues in its statement:PTA, Freedom of Expression, Transitional Justice, Enforced Disappearances and Missing Persons, Arbitrary Use of Quarantine Regulations, failure on the part of the government to build confidence among the minorities and independent commissions. The group demanded an acceptable solution to the ethnic conflict, condemn the inordinate delay in investigating 2019 Easter Sunday carnage, delay in introducing reforms to the Muslim marriage and Divorce Act and burial rights for Covid-19 victims.
The following endorsed the statement:
1. Families of the Disappeared
2. Centre for Policy Alternatives
3. IMADR- Asia Committee
4. Right to Life Human Rights Centre
5. Women and Media Collective
6. Rights Now for Collective Democracy
7. Centre for Society and Religion
8. Women’s Action Network
9. Mothers and Daughters of Lanka
10. Centre for Women and Development – Jaffna
11. Law and Society Trust
12. AHAM Humanitarian Resource Center(AHRC), Trincomalee
13 Rural Development Foundation
14. Institute for Social Development
15. Janawabodha Kendraya
16. Web Journalist Association of Sri Lanka
17. Eastern Social Development Foundation
18. Human Elevation Organisation
19. National Fisheries Solidarity Movement
20. National Fisher Women’s Federation
21. Mannar Women’s Development Federation
22. Malarum Mottukal Women’s Collective
23. Alliance for Minorities
24. Rule of Law Forum
25. Food First Information and Action Network – Sri Lanka
26. International Centre for Ethnic Studies
27. Mannar Social and Economic Development Organization
28. Citizens Committee Human Rights Centre –Gampaha
29. Sri Vimukthi Fisher Women Organization
30. Centre for Human Rights and Development
Individuals
1. Dr Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu
2. Dr. Gehan Gunatilleke
3. Dr Nimalka Fernando
4. Dr Mario Gomez
5. Dr Sakunthala Kadirgamar
6. Rev Rohan De SIlva
7. Mr Britto Fernando
8. Ms Shreen Saroor
9. Ms Ambika Sathkunanathan
10. Mr Philip Dissanayake
11. Ms Kumudhini Samuel
12. Mr. Godfrey Yogarajah
13. Mr Prabodha Ratnayake
14. Mr Ameer Faaiz
15. Mr. Thilak Kariyawasam
16. Ms Saroja Sivachandran
17. Mr Aruna Shantha Nonis
18. Ms Bhavani Fonseka
19. Mr Ruki Fernando
20. Mr Periyasami.Muthulingam
21. Mr Gowthaman Balachandran
22. Mr Sudarshana Gunawardana
23. Mr Freddy Gamage
24. Mr Abdul Ramees
25. Ms Sumika Perera
26. Ms Marreen Srinika Nilasini
27. Mr Asanka Abeyrathna.
28. Ms Mahaluxmy Kurushanthan
29. Mr Herman Kumara
30. Mr Jehan Jegatheesan
31. Mr.Yartan Figurado
32 Mr Shantha Pathirana
33Ms A.D. Rajani
34 Ms M.Kusum Silva
35 Mr Vinoth Anthony
News
Environmentalists warn Sri Lanka’s ecological safeguards are failing
Sri Lanka’s environmental protection framework is rapidly eroding, with weak law enforcement, politically driven development and the routine sidelining of environmental safeguards pushing the country towards an ecological crisis, leading environmentalists have warned.
Dilena Pathragoda, Managing Director of the Centre for Environmental Justice (CEJ), has said the growing environmental damage across the island is not the result of regulatory gaps, but of persistent failure to enforce existing laws.
“Sri Lanka does not suffer from a lack of environmental regulations — it suffers from a lack of political will to enforce them,” Pathragoda told The Sunday Island. “Environmental destruction is taking place openly, often with official knowledge, and almost always without accountability.”
Dr. Pathragoda has said environmental impact assessments are increasingly treated as procedural formalities rather than binding safeguards, allowing ecologically sensitive areas to be cleared or altered with minimal oversight.
“When environmental approvals are rushed, diluted or ignored altogether, the consequences are predictable — habitat loss, biodiversity decline and escalating conflict between humans and nature,” Pathragoda said.
Environmental activist Janaka Withanage warned that unregulated development and land-use changes are dismantling natural ecosystems that have sustained rural communities for generations.
“We are destroying natural buffers that protect people from floods, droughts and soil erosion,” Withanage said. “Once wetlands, forests and river catchments are damaged, the impacts are felt far beyond the project site.”
Withanage said communities are increasingly left vulnerable as environmental degradation accelerates, while those responsible rarely face legal consequences.
“What we see is selective enforcement,” he said. “Small-scale offenders are targeted, while large-scale violations linked to powerful interests continue unchecked.”
Both environmentalists warned that climate variability is amplifying the damage caused by poor planning, placing additional strain on ecosystems already weakened by deforestation, sand mining and infrastructure expansion.
Pathragoda stressed that environmental protection must be treated as a national priority rather than a development obstacle.
“Environmental laws exist to protect people, livelihoods and the economy,” he said. “Ignoring them will only increase disaster risk and long-term economic losses.”
Withanage echoed the call for urgent reform, warning that continued neglect would result in irreversible damage.
“If this trajectory continues, future generations will inherit an island far more vulnerable and far less resilient,” he said.
Environmental groups say Sri Lanka’s standing as a biodiversity hotspot — and its resilience to climate-driven disasters — will ultimately depend on whether environmental governance is restored before critical thresholds are crossed.
By Ifham Nizam ✍️
News
IGP warns cops against presenting hampers or gifts to superiors
IGP Priyantha Weerasooriya has issued a letter, warning police officers against presenting gifts to senior officers during festivals or special occasions.
The letter, dated December 24, notes that some officers have reportedly offered hampers to senior officers during events such as the New Year and Sinhala and Hindu New Year, and some senior officers have accepted them.
The IGP has stressed that no officer should present hampers to him or any other senior police officer under any circumstances, and that senior officers must not accept such gifts.
Instead of in-person visits or physical gifts, officers have been instructed to convey their greetings through phone calls or WhatsApp messages, with personal visits deemed unnecessary.
News
Ravi K urges slash of politicians’ perks to fund national relief and reconstruction
NDF MP Ravi Karunanayake has called for the savings from MPs’ insurance coverage and allowances to be redirected to a relief fund for the public.
Addressing a press conference in Colombo on Thursday, Karunanayake stressed that the coverage reserved for MPs should be withdrawn and the funds transferred to a welfare and disaster relief fund. He mphasised that money allocated for double-cab vehicles for politicians should also be diverted to the national reconstruction fund at this critical time.
Highlighting the country’s ongoing economic and crisis situation, Karunanayake said that public representatives and senior state institutions must make significant sacrifices, and the perks and insurance benefits of MPs should be used for the welfare of the people.
He underlined that the task of rebuilding the country must start with the politicians themselves.
Commenting on state institution inefficiencies, he stated:
“Bonuses and allowances paid to officials of loss-making institutions such as SriLankan Airlines must be immediately stopped. Those funds should be redirected for the welfare of ordinary citizens currently under severe hardship—this is the responsibility of the government.”
Regarding Sri Lanka’s current foreign currency reserves, Karunanayake pointed out that, relative to their expenditure, there is no mechanism in place to replenish them—a serious problem. He urged that export performance be increased rapidly. He also suggested that renewable energy be used instead of oil-based electricity generation to save foreign exchange.
Karunanayake further revealed that, given the country’s ongoing disaster conditions, sufficient foreign aid has not yet been received. He recalled that the sixth tranche of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) was due to be received in December and stated that obtaining relief in installments would be more beneficial to the country than seeking emergency loans.
On dealing with the IMF, he added:
“Even if the IMF comes through under Ranil Wickremesinghe, we must ensure we engage properly and clearly with them. We must stick to our terms and execute them without confusion or compromise.”
-
News5 days agoMembers of Lankan Community in Washington D.C. donates to ‘Rebuilding Sri Lanka’ Flood Relief Fund
-
News3 days agoBritish MP calls on Foreign Secretary to expand sanction package against ‘Sri Lankan war criminals’
-
News6 days agoAir quality deteriorating in Sri Lanka
-
News6 days agoCardinal urges govt. not to weaken key socio-cultural institutions
-
Features5 days agoGeneral education reforms: What about language and ethnicity?
-
News5 days agoSuspension of Indian drug part of cover-up by NMRA: Academy of Health Professionals
-
News6 days agoCID probes unauthorised access to PNB’s vessel monitoring system
-
Opinion6 days agoRanwala crash: Govt. lays bare its true face
