Connect with us

News

SJB accuses govt of keeping university academics in the dark when preparing National Defence University Bill

Published

on

By Saman Indrajith

The SJB yesterday alleged that the government had kept the university academics in the dark when preparing the draft of the General Sir John Kotelawala National Defence University Bill.

Addressing the media at the Opposition Leader’s office in Colombo, Chief Opposition Whip and SJB Kandy District MP Lakshman Kiriella said: “There are around 4,000 university teachers in this country. None of them has been consulted by the government when drafting the KDU Bill. This is outrageous. The university teachers should have been consulted first. This bill has been prepared by the Defence Ministry officials. None of the academics have been informed or asked for their opinion in this matter.”

Kiriella said that if the proposed draft bill was passed the KDU would become a fee-levying university and it could open its branches countrywide. That would be the privatisation of university education. It would create a network of private universities countrywide.

“At present, the state universities are under the University Grants Commission. The proposed bill is planning to set up a similar mechanism to manage private universities.”

MP Kiriella said that apart from the privatisation, the higher education sector faced the threat of militarisation. “We see nothing wrong with the KDU training and providing education for the military personnel. In other countries, there are similar colleges which offer courses for the defence forces. They could train and educate individuals to become military doctors, lawyers and administrators. But the institute proposed by the controversial bill is different. It offers 15 to 20 courses which would pass out graduates for the jobs in the civil sector. That is totally against the original concept of the KDU. The UGC the decision makers are PhD holders. The KDU draft bill proposes a management committee for the same purpose. More than 80 percent of that committee are military personnel. Our question is whether the army officers have intellectual or academic qualifications to run universities”.

Asked to comment on remarks made by government ministers that the draft bill was a product of the previous government, the chief opposition whip said, “That is a lie. As far as I know the defence ministry was in the process of making such a draft but we did not bring it to Parliament.”

Asked whether the SJB was against amending the Universities Act of 1997 to suit the present-day needs, MP Kiriella said: :We are not against amending the existing universities act. We know that some of the provisions are obsolete and out of date. But when amending an act of parliament a government cannot do it according to its whims and fancies. It has to be discussed with all stakeholders. During our government we set up a parliament oversight committee system to create forums for such discussions. This government has done away with them. When drafting a bill affecting the universities, the government should discuss it with at least the university teachers. The process of drafting the KDU bill was wrong. It was made by the Defence Ministry and then sent to the Cabinet, which had it presented to Parliament. It should have been discussed with university teachers and their opinions should have been considered on the matter.”

Former Chairman of the Weligama Urban Council Rehan Jayawickrama also addressed the press.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Creditor receives USD 2.5 mn as Lankan public bears loss from theft of Treasury funds

Published

on

Amidst ongoing accusations that the theft of USD 2.5 mn (nearly 1 bn Rupees) from the Treasury hadn’t been properly investigated, The Island learns that the relevant payments had been made to the actual creditor on the instructions of the Finance Ministry.

Confirming the inquiries made by us, authoritative sources said that payments had been made to several accounts through the US banks. Earlier, Sri Lanka released funds to fake foreign accounts in spite of warnings regarding the suspicions about the process.

The funds were part of a bilateral debt repayment to Australia with a settlement due in September 2025. The payment was part of a $ 22.9 million debt settlement.

The lapses occurred in the wake of far reaching changes regarding the debt management functions. In terms of a particular condition of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Sri Lanka’s debt management functions that had been previously handled by the Central Bank were transferred to a new institution established under the General Treasury—the Public Debt Management Office (PDMO).

Sources said that regardless of the loss of USD 2.5 mn, Sri Lanka couldn’t have defaulted and therefore payments had been made.

Sources who closely followed the issue said that the government owed an explanation and public apology regarding the loss of USD 2.5 mn and how fresh payments were made.

Sources said that the USD 2.5 mn paid to fake accounts had been lost and could never be traced. CoPF Chairman Dr. Harsha de Silva has said that the NPP government has told the IMF that stolen USD 2.5 mn would be recovered from the public by introducing an amendment to the budget.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Former Minister Nalin raises defence of double jeopardy

Published

on

Nalin Fernando

The Court of Appeal  yesterday (18) postponed until June 25 the hearing of a petition filed by former Minister Nalin Fernando seeking the dismissal of an indictment brought against him by the Attorney General in connection with the controversial ‘Carrom Boards’ case.

The petition was taken up before a bench comprising Justices P. Kumararatnam and Pradeep Hettiarachchi.

Appearing for the petitioner, President’s Counsel Ali Sabry, instructed by Attorney-at-Law Ramzi Bacha, informed court that Fernando had already been convicted and sentenced to 30 years rigorous imprisonment in a case instituted by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) arising from the same incident.

Counsel argued that the Attorney General had subsequently filed a separate case based on the same set of charges and maintained that subjecting an accused person to a second prosecution for the same offence was contrary to law.

He submitted that preliminary objections on the issue had been raised before the Colombo High Court but were dismissed by the trial judge.

The petitioner has therefore sought a declaration from the Court of Appeal that the indictment filed by the Attorney General is unlawful and requested that the charges be set aside.

The court directed that the matter be called again on June 25, when the Attorney General is expected to present submissions on the petition.

The case stems from allegations that during the 2015 presidential election campaign, 14,000 carrom boards and 11,000 checkers boards were imported and distributed through Lanka Sathosa outlets for allocation to political offices of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, resulting in an estimated loss of Rs. 39 million to the State.

Based on those allegations, the Attorney General has instituted proceedings against Fernando before the Colombo High Court under the Public Property Act.

Continue Reading

News

UNP asks whether govt. obtained findings of FBI probe into 2019 Easter Sunday carnage

Published

on

The UNP yesterday called on the government to clarify whether it had sought access to evidence and documents gathered during a United States investigation into the 2019 Easter Sunday terrorist attacks.

In a statement, the UNP has recalled that then Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe requested the U.S. government to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the attacks immediately after they occurred, citing limitations in local investigative capacity. A similar request was also made during a telephone conversation with then U.S. President Donald Trump on April 22, 2019, the statement said.

According to the UNP, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) subsequently carried out an extensive investigation in collaboration with Sri Lankan agencies, including the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), Military Intelligence and the State Intelligence Service. The findings were later submitted to the Sri Lankan authorities and accepted by the relevant institutions.

The party noted that FBI Special Agent Merrilee R. Godwin had filed a 71-page affidavit before the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in November 2020 following a two-year investigation. A criminal case was later instituted in Los Angeles naming suspects who had already been taken into custody in Sri Lanka.

Pointing out that material collected during the U.S. investigation remains in the possession of the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice, the UNP has asked the government whether it formally requested access to those records after reopening investigations into the attacks.

The UNP has stressed the importance of making the documents available to Sri Lankan judicial authorities, arguing that they could assist efforts to establish the full circumstances surrounding the Easter Sunday attacks.

Continue Reading

Trending