Connect with us

News

DEW expects those formulating new Constitution to address NL issue

Published

on

…reiterates 99A didn’t pass Committee Stage

 

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Former General Secretary of the Communist Party D. E. W. Gunasekara says the nine-member committee of experts formulating the new Constitution should take remedial action in respect of the National List introduced in terms of the 14th Amendment with unauthorised sections inserted thereinto.

Gunasekera told The Island that the then Speaker E.L. Senanayake had inserted a section that hadn’t been approved by the House, at the Committee Stage. Obviously, the Speaker had done so at the behest of then UNP leader and President J.R. Jayewardene, Gunasekara said.

The veteran Communist, who once represented the Opposition in the Parliamentary Select Committee on Franchise and Elections, stressed that what the Speaker had ratified was certainly not the 14th Amendment endorsed by the Parliament. He said that no less a person than the late Prime Minister Ranasinghe Premadasa, who chaired the PSC, in response to query raised by Anil Moonesinghe, had assured Parliament that only those whose names appeared on the National Lists handed over to the Election Commissioner before a general election would be able to become appointed MPs.

The Island 

sought clarification from Gunasekera after a President’s Counsel, responding to our news report headlined Nagananda: Ranil’s re-entry inconsistent with Constitution with strap line ‘SC to be moved against allegedly unauthorized changes in 14-A’ said that when enacting legislation it didn’t matter whether it is in accordance with PSC (in this case PSC on Franchise and Elections) recommendations or not. The PC said: “The question is whether an amendment was moved at the committee stage and whether it was approved. If the constitutional provision is different from the Bill provision then the question is whether the amendment was moved. PSC recommendation is not relevant to the issue at hand.” 

According to Gunasekera, two of those who represented the PSC on Franchise and Elections are still members of parliament––MEP leader Dinesh Gunawardena and UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe, who re-entered parliament through the National List. They could easily reveal that Section 99A in the present Constitution hadn’t been passed at Committee Stage, he added.

Gunasekera said that attorney-at-law and civil society activist Nagananda Kodituwakku had moved the Supreme Court on his behalf in 2015 when the then President Maithripala Sirisena accommodated defeated candidates Vijith Vijithamuni Zoysa, S.B. Dissanayake, Mahinda Samarasinghe, Lakshman Yapa Abeywardena, Thilanga Sumathipala, Angajan Ramanathan and M.L.A.M. Hisbullah through the National List at the expense of those who were on the UPFA NL. Former CP General Secretary said that he had sought the SC intervention as he had been deprived of a NL slot.

However, almost all SC judges recused themselves from hearing the case and finally the then Chief Justice K. Sripavan dismissed the case.

Gunasekera said that the committee headed by Romesh de Silva, PC could easily check with Speaker’s Office whether Section 99A now in Constitution had been approved at the Committee Stage. Declaring that it was not a Herculean task, Gunasekera urged the five-member Election Commission, too, to verify that matter.

 Both Gunasekera and lawyer Nagananda Koditiwakku said that certified sections at issue could be obtained from the Office of the Speaker. The following is the relevant section approved by the Parliament: “Where a recognized political party or independent group is entitled to any seat under such apportionment, the Commissioner shall require the Secretary of such political party or group leader of such independent group to nominate persons, qualified to be elected as Members of Parliament, to fill such seats and shall declare elected as Members of Parliament, the persons so nominated. However, at the behest of the then President, Speaker included within brackets the following section which hadn’t passed the Committee Stage: “(Being persons whose names are included in the list submitted to the Commissioner of Elections under this Article or in any nomination paper submitted in respect of any electoral district by such party or group at that election.)”

Gunasekera said that the other significant change introduced by the Speaker at the President’s behest was the provision for political parties to name their NL members within a week after being informed in writing by the Election Commissioner the number of seats secured.

 Gunasekera said that he was really sorry he had not taken it up before 2015 general election. The veteran politician said that all political parties including CP could not absolve themselves of the responsibility for their failure to take remedial measures. Responding to another query, Gunasekera pointed out that Wickremesinghe’s swearing in as an MP was questionable as the party hadn’t named him within the stipulated week though he qualified  by being on the UNP Colombo District list.

Lawyer Koditiwakku said that he had recently written to Chairman of the Election Commission Nimal Punchihewa following the latter’s recent declaration (in response to a query raised by The Island) that there was no constitutional impediment to Basil Rajapaksa  entering parliament through the SLPP National List. Kodituwakku said that the former Minister hadn’t been in the SLPP National List or any district list therefore couldn’t enter parliament. Punchihewa said that the law (99A) was silent on appointments made after a NL member quit and there were previous instances of accommodating those not on the NL or  those who unsuccessfully contested the general election.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

India vs Pakistan match is a godsend for T20 World Cup hosts Sri Lanka

Published

on

By

The last time India and Pakistan played in Sri Lanka was in 2023 at the Asia Cup, when fans from both countries and the host nation thronged the R Premadasa Stadium in Colombo [Aljazeera]

Almost 30 years ago today, India and Pakistan formed a combined cricket team to take on Sri Lanka ahead of the 1996 Cricket World Cup in an unprecedented moment of unity in the sport’s history.

The two age-old rivals put aside their differences and came together in an act of solidarity to support a fellow South Asian team, who faced the threat of match boycotts in a tournament they had battled hard to host.

India versus Pakistan is the most highly marketed fixture at every multination tournament – the World Cup, Asia Cup or Asian Games – whether it’s a men’s, women’s or Under-19 event.

Few sporting events globally carry the weight and anticipation of an India-Pakistan cricket match. So, when Pakistan’s government ordered its team not to face India at the ongoing T20 World Cup, the tournament was briefly pushed into a state of chaos.

It also left Sri Lanka, the designated host of the fixture, holding its collective breath.

A week of negotiations led to a dramatic late U-turn by the Pakistani government and the match will now take place as scheduled on Sunday at the R Premadasa International Cricket Stadium in Colombo.

But what if the boycott had gone ahead? The impact could have been catastrophic, not just for Pakistan, but also for the International Cricket Council (ICC), as well as Sri Lanka.

With the crisis seemingly averted, the island nation stands poised to reap the benefits in its financial landscape, diplomatic standing and community.

The tourism and hospitality industry was one of the hardest hit during Sri Lanka’s financial meltdown and this match will see an enormous influx of fans from India and Pakistan coming into the country.

Hotels in and around Colombo were fully booked out well ahead of the tournament but the industry braced itself for heavy losses after Pakistan threatened a boycott.

“There’s been a massive impact since the boycott was announced,” Sudarshana Pieris, who works in Sri Lanka’s hospitality sector, told Al Jazeera.

“All major hotels in Colombo were fully booked by Indian travel agencies well ahead of the match and once the boycott was announced, we lost almost all of those bookings,” he said.

“But after Pakistan reversed their decision, hotel room rates shot up by about 300-400 percent at five-star establishments in Colombo.”

It’s not just hotels but several other local businesses – from street vendors to high-end restaurants – who are hoping for an increased footfall and spending over the weekend.

These short trips and the experiences they offer could influence visitors to extend their stay or return to Sri Lanka on holiday, long after the game has ended, in a potential long-term benefit to the industry.

Another relatively underestimated impact of the game would be the employment opportunities it creates, albeit temporarily, in the media, event management, security and transportation industries.

Asanka Hadirampela, a freelance journalist and broadcaster currently working as a Sinhala language commentator for the World Cup, recognises the marquee match as a great opportunity from a personal standpoint.

“This is my first World Cup as a broadcaster,” Hadirampela said.

“The India-Pakistan fixture is the biggest and most-watched game of the tournament. So to get to work on such a match is exciting and I consider it a special achievement.”

The lines are always blurred between sport and politics in South Asia.

So while the financial gains are expected to be significant, the fixture’s impact on the region’s geopolitical environment cannot go amiss.

Pakistan’s boycott, too, was explicitly political, as confirmed by the country’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif when he said that they were offering support to Bangladesh after the Tigers were kicked out of the tournament by the ICC.

The reversal of Pakistan’s decision, which they said came after requests to reconsider the boycott by several regional “friends”, was steeped in politics, too.

Sri Lanka’s President Anura Kumara Dissanayake reportedly had a phone conversation with PM Sharif, urging his government to rethink their decision to boycott the game as the successful staging of this encounter would not only position Sri Lanka as a capable host of global sporting events but also reinforce its standing as a neutral mediator in a region fraught with geopolitical complexities.

Sri Lanka and Pakistan have always maintained strong diplomatic relations, which have extended to the cricket field as well.

Sri Lanka were one of the first teams to travel to Pakistan following their 10-year ostracisation from international cricket, which came as a result of a terrorist attack targeting the Sri Lankan team in March 2009.

When Al Jazeera reached out to Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC), its vice president Ravin Wickramaratne confirmed that SLC did, indeed, reach out to the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) after the boycott was announced.

“We asked them to reconsider the decision,” Wickramaratne said.

“It [boycott] would have impacted Sri Lanka economically, whether directly or indirectly.

“We have always had a good relationship with the PCB and we have always supported them, so we’re happy with their decision.”

A little over 24 hours ahead of the match in Colombo, there is a sense of palpable excitement and a growing buzz around the fixture as it returns from the brink of cancellation.

As of Saturday morning, 28,000 tickets had been sold for the game but local organisers expect a capacity crowd of 40,000 to make it into the stands.

Come Sunday, thousands more will line the streets in and around Maligawatte, the bustling Colombo suburb that houses the famous Premadasa Stadium.

INTERACTIVE -STADIUMS- T20 MEN'S CRICKET WORLD CUP - 2026 - FEB3, 2026-1770220847
(Aljazeera)
Continue Reading

Business

“We Are Building a Stable, Transparent and Resilient Sri Lanka Ready for Sustainable Investment Partnerships” – PM

Published

on

By

Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya addressed members of the Chief Executives Organization (CEO) during a session held on Thursday [3 February 2026] at the Shangri-La Hotel, Colombo, as part of CEO’s Pearl of the Indian Ocean: Sri Lanka programme.

The Chief Executives Organization is a global network of business leaders representing diverse industries across more than 60 countries. The visiting delegation comprised leading entrepreneurs and executives exploring Sri Lanka’s economic prospects, investment climate, and development trajectory.

Addressing the gathering, the Prime Minister emphasized that Sri Lanka’s reform agenda is anchored in structural transformation, transparency, and inclusive growth.

“We are committed not only to ensuring equitable access to education, but equitable access to quality education. Our reforms are designed to create flexible pathways for young people beyond general education and to build a skilled and adaptable workforce for the future.”

She highlighted that the Government is undertaking a fundamental pedagogical shift towards a more student-focused, less examination-driven system as part of a broader national transformation.

Reflecting on Sri Lanka’s recent political transition, the Prime Minister stated:

“The people gave us a mandate to restore accountability, strengthen democratic governance, and ensure that opportunity is not determined by patronage or privilege, but by fairness and merit. Sri Lanka is stabilizing. We have recorded positive growth, restored confidence in key sectors, and are committed to sustaining this momentum. But our objective is not short-term recovery it is long-term resilience.”

Addressing governance reforms aimed at improving the investment climate, she said:

“We are aligning our legislative and regulatory frameworks with international standards to provide predictability, investor protection, and institutional transparency. Sustainable investment requires trust, and trust requires reform.”

Turning to the recent impact of Cyclone Ditwa, which affected all 25 districts of the country, the Prime Minister underscored the urgency of climate resilience.

“Climate change is not a distant threat. It is a lived reality for our people. We are rebuilding not simply to recover, but to build resilience, strengthen disaster mitigation systems, and protect vulnerable communities.”

Inviting CEO members to consider Sri Lanka as a strategic partner in the Indo-Pacific region, she highlighted opportunities in value-added mineral exports, logistics and shipping, agro-processing, renewable energy, pharmaceuticals, and innovation-driven sectors.

“We are not looking for speculative gains. We are seeking long-term partners who share our commitment to transparency, sustainability, and inclusive development.”

She further emphasized collaboration in education, research, vocational training, and innovation as essential pillars for sustained economic growth.

Concluding her address, the Prime Minister expressed appreciation to the Chief Executives Organization for selecting Sri Lanka as part of its 2026 programme and reaffirmed the Government’s readiness to engage constructively with responsible global investors.

The event was attended by the Governor of the Western Province,  Hanif Yusoof, and other distinguished guests.

[Prime Minister’s Media Division]

Continue Reading

News

Prez AKD congratulates BNP’s Tarique Rahman on B’desh election win

Published

on

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has extended his congratulations to the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and its leader, Tarique Rahman, following their landslide victory in Bangladesh’s parliamentary elections.

“Best wishes to the people of Bangladesh for reaffirming their faith in democracy, and congratulations to Mr. Tarique Rahman on leading the BNP in these elections. The results reflect the trust placed in him. I look forward to strengthening ties between our two nations,” President Dissanayake said, in a post on ‘X’.

The Bangladesh Nationalist Party won a landslide parliamentary election on Friday, securing a resounding mandate in a pivotal vote that is expected to restore political stability in the South Asian nation.

The parliamentary election held on Thursday was Bangladesh’s first vote since the 2024 Gen Z-driven uprising that toppled long-time premier Sheikh Hasina.

Opinion polls had given BNP an edge, and the party lived up to the forecasts, with the coalition it dominates winning 209 seats to secure an overwhelming two-thirds majority in the 300-member Jatiya Sangsad, or House of the Nation, Jamuna TV showed.

Soon after it won a majority in the overnight vote-count, the party thanked and congratulated the people and called for special prayers on Friday for the welfare of the country and its people.

Continue Reading

Trending