News
BASL calls for independent, transparent probe into Negombo Prison tragedy
The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has welcomed the government’s decision to appoint an independent committee headed by a retired Supreme Court Judge to investigate the recent violence at Negombo Prison, but it has stressed that public confidence would depend on the inquiry being conducted independently, impartially, transparently and without delay.
Issuing a statement signed by BASL President Rajeev Amarasuriya and Secretary Nalin De Silva, the Association said the investigation must establish the complete sequence of events that led to the prison violence, determine whether any unlawful acts or omissions contributed to the tragedy, identify failures in prison administration, security or oversight, and recommend institutional reforms to prevent similar incidents in the future.
“The true measure of accountability will lie not only in identifying responsibility for what has occurred, but also in ensuring that the conditions which gave rise to this tragedy are comprehensively addressed so that such incidents do not recur,” the BASL has said.
Full text of the statement: The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) expresses its profound concern regarding the tragic incidents that occurred at Negombo Prison between 5th and 7th July 2026, which reportedly resulted in the loss of 27 lives, including 7 prison officers, and with over 100 persons injured.
The BASL unequivocally condemns all acts of violence, irrespective of the source from which they arise. Violence within places of detention undermines the Rule of Law, threatens public confidence in the administration of justice, and places at risk the lives of prisoners, prison officers and all others entrusted with the management of correctional institutions.
It has also been reported that tense situations have also arisen in several other prisons. Therefore, the relevant stakeholders must take all necessary measures to ensure the safety and security of both prison officers and inmates in all prisons.
In the immediate aftermath of this tragedy, when emotions are understandably heightened, it is the duty of the State to take all necessary precautions and positive measures to ensure the safety, security and well-being of both prisoners and prison officers, to prevent any further violence, and to ensure that all detention facilities continue to be managed in accordance with the Rule of Law and with full respect for the dignity and rights of every person.
There have also been reports regarding difficulties encountered by statutory oversight bodies in carrying out their lawful functions. These matters, if established, raise serious concerns and should form part of the independent investigation.
The BASL notes the Government’s decision to appoint an independent committee headed by a retired Judge of the Supreme Court to inquire into these incidents. While this is a welcome step, public confidence will ultimately depend upon the inquiry being conducted independently, impartially, transparently and expeditiously. It should establish the full sequence of events, determine whether any unlawful acts or omissions contributed to the tragedy, identify any failures in prison administration, security or oversight, and make recommendations aimed not only at fixing responsibility but also at preventing the recurrence of similar incidents through meaningful institutional reform.
The findings of the inquiry should be made public, subject only to such limitations as may be necessary in the interests of justice or national security.
Any person found to have engaged in criminal conduct or official misconduct, whether a prisoner, prison officer or any other person, must be held accountable in accordance with the law and afforded due process.
Equally, those who have been injured must receive prompt and adequate medical care, and appropriate support should be extended to the families of those who lost their lives.
This tragedy must not be viewed as an isolated incident. Rather, it is symptomatic of longstanding structural deficiencies within Sri Lanka’s prison system and the broader administration of criminal justice.
The BASL reiterates that persons deprived of their liberty do not forfeit their fundamental rights or their inherent dignity. Many persons presently held in remand custody have not been convicted of any offence and continue to enjoy the presumption of innocence until proven guilty by a court of law.
At the same time, and importantly, prison officers perform an essential public function under extremely difficult circumstances and are entitled to safe working conditions, adequate resources, facilities and institutional support.
The State bears the responsibility of ensuring the safety, security and welfare of both prisoners and prison officers alike, while ensuring that all persons in custody are treated in accordance with the Constitution and Sri Lanka’s legal obligations.
The events at Negombo also serve as a reminder of the urgent need to address chronic prison overcrowding which requires more than expanding prison capacity. It calls for a broader review of remand practices, the timely disposal of criminal cases, the appropriate use of bail, greater reliance on non-custodial sentencing where suitable, strengthened rehabilitation programmes, improved prison infrastructure, adequate staffing, and modern prison management.
The BASL therefore calls upon the relevant authorities to ensure a credible and transparent investigation into these incidents, to hold all those responsible accountable in accordance with the law, and to treat this tragedy as a catalyst to implement meaningful and lasting reforms to Sri Lanka’s prison and criminal justice systems.
The true measure of accountability will lie not only in identifying responsibility for what has occurred, but also in ensuring that the conditions which gave rise to this tragedy are comprehensively addressed so that such incidents do not recur.
The BASL extends its deepest condolences to the families of all those who lost their lives and wishes a full and speedy recovery to those who were injured. The BASL remains committed to supporting measures that strengthen the Rule of Law, protect human dignity, and promote a fair, humane and effective system of justice.
Latest News
Sri Lankan singer Mariazelle Goonetilleke passes away at the age of 68
It has been reported quoting family sources that veteran singer Mariazelle Goonetilleke has passed away this morning (10) at the age of 68
She had been receiving treatment at the Kalubowila Teaching Hospital.
News
Sallay’s wife further complains to HRC over continuing violation of husband’s FRs by CID
The wife of retired Major General Suresh Sallay has lodged a further complaint with the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka (HRCSL), alleging that her husband’s fundamental rights continue to be violated as Criminal Investigation Department (CID) officers prevent him from having confidential consultations with his lawyer while he is under detention at the National Hospital.
In a letter addressed to the HRCSL Chairman on Thursday, Mrs. S.B.M.S.B. Sallay has said the latest complaint was filed in relation to an earlier complaint concerning the detention and treatment of her husband.
Full text of the letter: I, Mrs. S.B.M.S.B. Sallay, respectfully write to lodge this further complaint in relation to my earlier complaint bearing reference H RC-HO-1 103-26, concerning the detention and treatment of my husband, Retired Major General Suresh Sallay.
I wish to bring to the attention of the Commission a further serious violation of his fundamental rights that occurred on 08 July 2026 during a consultation between my husband and his Attorney-at-Law, Mr. Asith Siriwardena, while my husband remains under detention and is receiving treatment at the National Hospital.
I am informed by his Counsel that he is presently permitted to consult with my husband only once a week for a period of approximately twenty minutes. During the consultation held on 08 July 2026, officers of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) stationed at the Cardiac Coronary Care Unit of the National Hospital informed Counsel that they had received instructions from higher authorities that my husband should not be permitted to meet with his
legal counsel in private. Consequently, the officers remained present throughout the consultation and refused to permit a confidential lawyer-client meeting.
This conduct constitutes a grave infringement of my husband’s fundamental right to communicate privately and confidentially with his legal counsel. Confidential communication between an accused or detainee and his lawyer is an indispensable safeguard of the right to legal representation, the right to prepare his defence, and the right to a fair trial. The denial of confidential legal consultations undermines these fundamental protections guaranteed under the Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka and the applicable provisions governing persons detained under the Prevention of Terrorism Act.
The confidentiality of communications between a lawyer and client is also a well-recognized principle under international human rights law and forms an essential safeguard against arbitrary detention, coercion, and unfair legal proceedings.
In view of the foregoing, I respectfully request the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka to urgently intervene and take all necessary steps within its statutory mandate to:
1. Ensure that my husband is afforded immediate and unrestricted confidential access to his legal counsel without the presence or supervision of law enforcement officers;
2. Inquire into the instructions allegedly issued by higher authorities requiring CID officers to remain present during lawyer-client consultations;
3. Direct the relevant authorities to cease any practice that interferes with confidential legal consultations; and
4. Take such further action as the Commission considers appropriate to safeguard my husband’s constitutional and human rights.
This complaint is made as a further complaint to Complaint No. H RC-HO-1103-26, and I respectfully request that it be placed on the same file and considered together with my previous complaints.
I respectfully seek the Commission’s urgent intervention in this matter.
News
SC upholds Commercial HC ruling that Weerawansa violated intellectual property rights of JVP
The Supreme Court yesterday (9) upheld a Colombo Commercial High Court order directing former Minister Wimal Weerawansa to pay Rs. 1 million in damages to Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) General Secretary Tilvin Silva for violating intellectual property rights.
A three-member Supreme Court bench dismissed in its entirety an appeal filed by Weerawansa challenging the earlier Commercial High Court ruling.
The case was instituted by Silva, who alleged that Weerawansa had violated provisions of the Intellectual Property Act by publishing his book “Neththa Wenuwata Aththa” (“Truth Instead of Lies”), which contained the JVP’s political ideology and official party documents without authorisation.
The Supreme Court also affirmed the order restraining the publication and distribution of the book in its existing form. However, the court ruled that the book could be republished if the 60-page section identified as infringing intellectual property rights was removed.
-
News5 days agoSingapore-based Buddhist monk marks nearly four decades of humanitarian service
-
News6 days agoFreedom 250: US Embassy celebrates America’s 250th Independence Day through magic of American cinema
-
News4 days agoAI concerned over proposed SL military deployment in Haiti
-
News7 days agoUNEP support pledged to strengthen Sri Lanka’s Environmental Priorities
-
Midweek Review2 days agoUnexpected focus on ‘pieces of tin’ worn by military men
-
Features5 days agoThe NPP’s New Challenge: Balancing Easter Lawfare and Economic Welfare
-
Latest News3 days agoNyamhuri and Ngarava stun Bangladesh by defending 141
-
Latest News6 days agoUkrainian suspect hunted by police after Monaco bomb attack was ‘disguised as a man’
