Connect with us

News

UNP challenges NPP move to amend Vihara – Devalagam Act

Published

on

The UNP yesterday said that the government did not have the power to establish a Dharma Court. According to the Constitution, neither the executive, the legislature nor the judiciary had the power to interpret the Dharma, it added. The power to pass laws on disciplining the clergy had been granted to Parliament in terms of Article 105 of the Constitution, the UNP said, emphasising that the ultimate powers lay with the committees of the respective sects.

The UNP said so in response to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s recent speech that a concept paper had been submitted for amending the Vihara – Devalagam Act and the Cabinet had approved it. The President further stated that he had held a discussion with the Registrar, the Commissioner for Buddhist Affairs and the Attorney General. It is not known whether he discussed the matter with the Buddhist MPs in the Opposition.

Excerpts of the statement issued by former President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s Office: ” President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has recently publicly agreed to a call to take the same measures as previous kings in cases where the Buddhist religion is distorted under the guise of Dhamma.

Over our history we have seen some kings kill the Sangha during their reigns. The JVP also killed the Sangha in the same way during the years 1987-89.Kotikawatte Saddhatissa, Weltota Pangnadassi, Beligalle Mahinda, Kumbagoda Gnanaloka, Athurugiriya Pangnatissa, Soragune Pangnasara, Pelpola Dharmapala, Kandy Dhammarakkhitha and many other monks are included in the list of the JVP’s assassinations.

Apart from shedding the blood of the Buddha, the greatest sin that Buddhists can commit is the killing of the Sangha.  The JVP has not apologised for the killings. Is it moral for the President to accept this invitation without first taking this step?

In addition to killing the Sangha, the JVP also looted valuable historical items from the monasteries and temples.

The JVP has never accepted that Buddhism should be given priority politically. The JVP has always acted against Buddhism.

A major question that arises from this is whether the JVP, which has a history of killing monks, can do such a thing after taking power. What is the hidden motive here?

Mr. J. R. Jayewardene took steps to include a separate chapter in the 1978 Constitution to take necessary measures for monks who behave undisciplined and engage in crimes.  Provisions were made for the establishment of a Sangha Court to decide on the discipline of monks.

What did the NPP government done during the Sinhala and Tamil New Year? It disrupted all the auspicious signs. While the whole world was celebrating Vesak Poya on May 1st, the Vesak Poya day in Sri Lanka was postponed to a later date in order to hold political rallies.

There is no objection to taking action against unruly monks. But there is a procedure for how to discipline monks. Cabinet papers related to this should be prepared and presented to the Maha Sangha led by the Mahanayaka Theros and then a decision should be taken. Everything should be carried forward according to the existing tradition in the country.

The President has also expressed his views on taking monks to court. He has expressed such views without understanding the tradition. Taking wrong-doing monks to court in their robes is not something that only happened yesterday. Thalduwe Somarama and Mapitigama Buddharakkhita were presented to court wearing their robes for the assassination of Mr. Bandaranaike and later their robes were removed. This is not limited to monks. Father Mathew Peiris first came to court for legal proceedings wearing his robe. Accordingly, the monks who are currently acting in an undisciplined manner must also follow the same procedure that was implemented earlier.

The President mentioned in his speech that a concept paper was submitted for amending the Vihara – Devalagam Act and the Cabinet agreed to it. The President further stated that he had held a discussion with the Registrar, the Commissioner for Buddhist Affairs and the Attorney General. It is not known whether he had discussed this matter with the opposition Buddhist parliamentarians. This work has all been done only by the government without any consultation.

The government does not have the power to establish a Dharma Court. According to the Constitution, neither the executive, the legislature nor the judiciary have the power to interpret the Dharma. The power to pass laws on disciplining the clergy has been given to Parliament under Article 105 of the Constitution. However, the final powers lie with the committees of the respective sects. At present, this work has been done by the cabinet, officials and a handful of monks of a government that does not accept Buddhism.

The temples with the most assets and properties today are in the monasteries and temples that fall under the Vihara – Devalaya Village Act.  It is no secret that the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) is taking the position that these temples should be taken under government control. There is a strong suspicion that the Dharma Court is being created for this purpose.

An organized program to destroy Buddhism is being implemented today through government-affiliated social media. A section of civil society is also involved in it. What is always happening today is the marginalization of the Buddhist monastic-lay opinion.In the President’s speech, a reference was also made to the holding of the World Buddhist Congress in this country under the current government.

Such a situation is also indicated in the Vasala Sutta.

“Na jaccha vasalo hoti,

Na jaccha hoti brahmano;

Kammana vasalo hoti,

Kammana hoti brahmano”

Its Sinhala meaning is as follows.

“One is not a householder by birth.Nor is one a Brahmin by birth.One becomes a householder or a Brahmin by one’s actions.”



News

Sajith rejects Jt. Opp. protest sabotage claim; SJB TU chief demands remedial action  

Published

on

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Alleging that the Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) had betrayed the joint protest campaign, planned on 24 Sept., at Polduwa junction, against the enactment of the 22nd Amendment without securing public approval at a referendum, SJB trade union leader Ananda Palitha emphasised that SJB and Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa should take remedial measures to restore the alliance against the NPP government.

Responding to The Island queries, the trade union activist said that he spoke on behalf of the vast majority of the SJBers who felt betrayed by the sudden declaration made by Colombo District SJB lawmaker S.M. Marikkar that they didn’t expect Opposition political parties’ participation, except that of the UNP.

Pointing out that at the behest of Premadasa, MP Marikkar belittled those who had pledged on 17 Sept. to join the SJB-led protest, Palitha emphasised the Opposition leader should be held responsible for restoring the shattered alliance. Palitha warned that the NPP, which was rapidly moving on a dictatorial path, would be the beneficiary of such treacherous actions.

When The Island raised the allegations pertaining to the 24 Sept. protest, Colombo District MP Premadasa said there was no basis for such claims. MP Premadasa called the accusations directed at him ‘rubbish.’

Palitha said that the pathetic failure on the part of the Opposition to genuinely challenge the authoritarian NPP should be examined, taking into consideration the government following an agenda almost 100 percent against the election pledges. Except the much touted anti-corruption campaign, the NPP reneged on all its election promises.

Recalling massive rice imports after having promised to stop the same in the run up to the national elections in 2024, Palitha alleged that the utterly corrupt NPP created an artificial shortage to enable import of large stocks of salt for their benefit. Massive earnings were made through commissions, Palitha said, urging the SJB to reiterate its commitment to the 17 Sept. pledge. According to him, the SJB’s irresponsible action sabotaged the joint Opposition agreement reached on the eve of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake completing two years in Office.

Palitha said that the disruption of a genuinely joint protest, at the last moment, caused irreparable harm to the Opposition. The unexpected eleventh hour declaration made by the SJB upset their efforts to organise a large scale two-day protest on 24 and 25 Sept. Palitha emphasised the responsibility on the part of the SJB leadership and its top management to spearhead an all-out campaign against the government. The former petroleum sector employee said that a strong and transparent campaign could undermine the NPP within as a section of its parliamentary group was deeply dismayed by the current policies and strategies.

Palitha, in his capacity as the trade union leader, invited the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) to join the trade unions’ protest on 25 Sept. to intensify pressure on the government. BASL President Rajeev Amarasuriya told The Island that they didn’t accept that invitation.

Former SLPP Kalutara District MP Sanjeewa Edirimanna said that the SJB was far more keen to organise a large-scale protest to counter the SLPP’s highly successful Anuradhapura rally held on 12 September than a genuine joint protest against the 22nd Amendment or the government. Edirimanna said that they realised that the SJB would probably join a joint protest campaign only after organising a gathering to counter the SLPP. According to him, the SJB hadn’t been honestly interested in a joint protest campaign. Instead, it sought to resist possible challenges from rival political parties, he said.

An aide to UNP leader and former President Ranil Wickremesinghe said that though the SJB announced they were welcome to join the 24 Sept. protest, the party never received an invitation. The official said that some UNPers joined the protest on their own though the party neither directed supporters to join or boycott the event. As the Janathawadi Joint Opposition decided against participating for want of formal invitations, the UNP, as part of that group, decided not to join the 24 Sept. protest.

Continue Reading

News

Police remove Thileepan statue in Jaffna

Published

on

Pictures grabbed from video footage show policemen removing the Thileepan statue in Nallur yesterday

By Norman Palihawadane

Police have removed a memorial statue of former LTTE member Rasaiah Parthipan, alias Thileepan, from the Thileepan Memorial Square in Nallur, Jaffna, following the conclusion of commemorative events, marking the 39th anniversary of his death.

The statue was removed in the early hours of yesterday (27), a day after the final day of the commemoration was held at the site.

CCTV footage from the memorial reportedly shows police officers removing the statue and taking it away in a vehicle.

Tamil National People’s Front (TNPF) Secretary and MP Selvarasa Gajendran alleged that more than 15 police officers arrived at the site, without prior notice, entered the premises wearing footwear, and forcibly removed the statue.

The reason for the removal and the legal basis for the police action had not been officially announced as of yesterday.

Thileepan, a former political wing leader of the LTTE, died in September 1987, after undertaking a hunger strike in Nallur, while making several demands of the Indian Government.

The memorial events, marking the 39th anniversary of his death, were held at the site on Saturday (26). A statue had been erected at the location in connection with the commemoration.

Continue Reading

News

NPP, Lal agree to disagree

Published

on

Lal

 By Shamindra Ferdinand

NPP Executive Committee member Lal Wijenayake said that he would continue with the ruling party though he disagreed with the 22nd Amendment, sans a referendum. That position wouldn’t be changed, lawyer Wijenayake said, adding that he would continue to support whatever action taken by the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) to highlight the damaging consequences of the new amendment.

Wijenayake said so in response to The Island query whether he could continue with the NPP after having opposed the 22nd Amendment. When pressed for clarification, Wijenayake revealed that he received an opportunity to discuss the issue at hand with NPP and JVP leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake.

Declaring that he couldn’t reveal what transpired in his meeting with President Dissanayake, Wijenayake said the status quo would remain.

“They wouldn’t seek my removal from the party,” he said, adding he would remain in the Executive Committee, regardless of his unchanged position on the 22nd Amendment. Wijenayake ruled out the possibility of him joining joint Opposition protests against the government.

NPP General Secretary Dr. Nihal Abeyseinghe told The Island that those who urged the ruling party to allow its members to vote, according to their conscience, should know the entire government parliamentary group accepted the need for the 22nd Amendment. Yes, they voted according to their conscience, the Kalutara District lawmaker said, underscoring that regardless of the split in the NPP over the 22nd Amendment, the vote proved otherwise.

Of the 159-member NPP group, 158 voted for the controversial amendment where three Opposition MPs skipped the vote. Ravi Karunanayake and Faizer Musthapha of the New Democratic Front (NDF), led by Ranil Wickremesinghe, were among them. The other absentee Nayana Wasalathilake represents the SJB.

The NDF, which contested under the ‘Gas Cylinder’ symbol secured, five seats at the last parliamentary polls. The remaining three members, Anuradha Jayaratne, Rohitha Abeygunawardena and Chamara Sampath Dassanayake, voted against the 22nd Amendment.

Continue Reading

Trending