Connect with us

Features

Crossovers from the SLFP to the UNP during the lead-up to 2021 elections

Published

on

On an inpection tour with MP Salinda Dissanayake

I too was at the President’s House when a small group of Cabinet Ministers were invited for dinner by CBK to discuss the changing political scenario in the light of Minister Hakeem’s increasingly erratic behaviour. Among those present were Kadirgamar, Mangala, Maithripala Sirisena and me. We first discussed Hakeem’s possible options. It was clear that he had struck a bargain with his Royal College friend Ranil.

Hakeem had got a scare at the last election [2000] when he nearly lost his seat in the Kandy district. It was no secret that Dr. Mahroof, the SLFP leader of Kandy Muslims, – had worked against him. In fact it was rumoured that Hakeem had lost in the first count and that a last minute appeal to Balapatabendi -CBK’s secretary-had helped him to clear the hurdle by a narrow margin. On the other hand if he was a candidate with the elephant symbol he had a better chance of being returned. [Subsequent results have confirmed this thesis].

Also he was wooed by Milinda Moragoda who had a reputation as a successful interlocutor. Rauf was proud of his Royal College education as a scholarship holder from Galagedera. He shared that pride with Ranil who too had a soft spot for Royalists. There may have been many other perks which were discussed. But we did not know his actual game plan. Should he be sacked from the Cabinet before he makes a grandiose exit or should we play for time in view of our narrow majority in Parliament, was the question.

Lunch at Sugala Devi Weva

Ideas were being tossed to and fro when Kadirgamar suddenly got up and went to the phone to address his high level contact who was the editor of a Sunday newspaper. He was told that Hakeem was about to resign with a publicity splash to embarrass the government. That helped to clear our collective mind and CBK decided to dismiss him forthwith. Her Secretary was asked to draft the necessary papers.

Then we explored the possibility of detaching Ferial Ashraff and a few of her minions from the Muslim Congress group. A problem arose because Ferial was in “purdah” or isolation because of her husband’s death. No male could meet with her. However there was a glimmer of hope as CBK could meet her, woman to woman. I do not know whether CBK did meet her or not but such a meeting became redundant because on the following day the full complement of MC members, including Ferial, visited Ashraff ‘s grave to honour their late leader and presumably get his good wishes from on high for an alliance with the UNP which he had resolutely opposed when he was in the land of the living. [Later Ferial left Hakeem and contested under the SLFP].

Probably according to a preordained plan Ranil then called for a vote of confidence secure in the knowledge that we could not muster a majority. As an alternative it was suggested that we could go for a referendum on the proposed new constitution which had been approved by Ranil. But this was abandoned because we were not sure whether the UNP would honour its agreement to back it.

Since we were now a minority in the House it became imperative that we get the support of the JVP if we were to continue in power. Mangala and Anura who were asked to negotiate did not have a difficult brief After their anti-UNP tirades it was scarcely possible for the JVP to look on while the UNP formed a government. Further they were not ready for another election so soon after 2000 when they had won 16 seats. Their solution was to extend their support to us for one year subject to some conditions, especially that the Cabinet should be restricted to 20 members.

Inspection of Uma Oya

This was agreed to and a new Cabinet was sworn in. Among the 20 members so selected I was assigned the portfolio of Education and Higher Education. I was to take over from Susil Premajayantha who was relegated to Deputy Minister status overnight. Anyway a change was on the cards in the Education Ministry since Susil and the Secretary Tara de Mel, who had CBK’s ear, did not get on. While appointing me to this prestigious post CBK told me that this was the Ministry she would have chosen for herself had she not been the President.

I knew it was a subject close to her heart and felt honoured to be selected when many of the former Ministers were being reduced to Deputy Minister status. But there was not much I could achieve since my tenure as Education Minister lasted only four months [August 2001 to December 2001]. Since Tara de Mel made a distinctive contribution in this field I wrote a very favourable review of her book on education. It contains much that we would have achieved had I remained in that Ministry for a longer time.

A signature initiative of the CBK administration from 1994 to 2005 was the attempt to reform the education system of the country. The free education system was in crisis largely because the demographics of population growth had put a strain on the resources which could be made available to this sector. However because it was a “sacred cow” in our political animal farm, politicians were loath to make the necessary changes demanded by our growing economy and the transformation of concepts of education which were the hallmarks of a modern society and culture.

From the start the President took the bold step of paying special attention to the subject of education. What were the areas that were identified for special attention? They were “education quality improvement, teaching of English, forms of assessment, compulsory education, primary education, reorganization of school management, counseling and career guidance, media and education technology university admissions and education legislation”

It was estimated that during the 1996-1997 period 14 percent of the children in the age five to 14 category did not attend school. The reasons identified were poverty, the need to help their parents, caring for siblings, household work and lack of documentation like birth certificates which were needed for school admission. As a result of Ministry intervention the introduction of the free midday meal and the provision of stationary helped in increasing enrollment. Regarding primary education “It was to be child centered and not teacher centered. Emphasis will be on developing the child’s mind, skills, attitudes and abilities through an activities based programme”.

Another focus of interest was the grade five scholarship examination. Says Tara, “Preparation for sitting the two papers in the exam began as early as when the child was in Grade three since parents were keen to enter good schools in urban settings. Although the competition was not as severe as now and although the tuition industry and tuition lobby was not as strong as today, yet tuition teachers held sway in the run up to the exam”. The apotheosis of ‘tuitiondom’ came when Mahinda Rajapaksa appointed a tuition master as the Minister of Education.

Free education has become a joke today because even the poorest parent has to beg, borrow or steal to pay for tuition. A crucial change was recommended by the education authorities. They recommended that teaching of English from grade three and making English a core subject for GCE “O” level. But this suggestion was shot down by the Cabinet. Says Tara, “After lengthy discussion only a few Cabinet Minister endorsed the proposal. They included ministers Lakshman Kadirgamar, Mangala Samaraweera and Sarath Amunugama.”

What I do remember is that it was a difficult time when we could not even attend a school prize giving without a scare of a terrorist attack. When her old school St Bridget’s invited CBK to be the chief guest at their prize giving Anura and I had to hang around in the hall with the guests for three hours till CBK was given security clearance to attend.

Crossovers

The political atmosphere after the 2000 reshuffle was one of despondency. Many seniors who held cabinet rank had to be satisfied with posts of deputy minister owing to the insistence of the JVP. SB Dissanayake who was a livewire and CBK’s early supporter, fell out with her and was busy canvassing PA members for a crossover to the UNP. As I was informed much later many of the mudalalis who were offended by CBK’s refusal to pander to their requests spent freely to subvert her regime. One such

businessman later told me that to ensure secrecy he bought tickets for representatives of the rebels and the UNP leaders to travel to Singapore for their discussions. [This became a habit among parliamentary conspirators later on.]

On hearing of these conspiracies CBK removed SB from the post of Secretary of the SLFP – a post she had canvassed for him earlier, breaking all rules – and appointed Maithripala Sirisena instead. She publicly apologised to Maitri for opposing him earlier. It was a motley crew that left the Government which included SB, GL Peiris, Bandula Gunawardena, Mahinda Wijesekera, Ediriweera Premaratne, Wijekoon, Ananda Munasinghe and surprisingly Wijepala Mendis who was angry that he was not given a portfolio. However with this move the government again lost its majority and CBK dissolved Parliament and called for elections to be held on December 5, 2001.

2001 Elections

With the crossover of 13 members of the SLFP, including several Ministers, the CBK administration lost its majority in Parliament. Several solutions were considered including the luring of members of the Opposition by engineering a countervailing crossover to the government ranks by offering them “plums” of office. This was rejected by CBK. Another option was to call on Ranil to take over as PM. This was considered seriously by CBK but finally she decided to dissolve Parliament and go for another election because she was persuaded by party bigwigs that we could be returned with a bigger majority.

About this time I met her as Education Minister to discuss our calender of public examinations. Many of them were scheduled to be held in December. CBK listened patiently to my submissions and laughingly replied that examinations will have to be postponed because the general election will be held about that time. That was the first intimation I had that she had made up her mind to go for a fresh election. My view was that Ranil should be asked to form a government because the voting public will punish us for going for another election so soon which will be an admission of our failure to govern.

The constant reversals in the war in the northern theatre, the ailing economy and the undercutting of CBK by her own party leaders were taking their toll. We could not face this election with confidence.

The general election was fixed for December 5, 2001 just 14 months since the previous election. Unlike in the past the momentum was with Ranil and the UNP. I entered the fray again from Kandy district. As Minister of Education I had high visibility and it was not difficult for me to be confident of being returned. A large number of teachers and teachers unions supported me and undertook house to house canvassing on my behalf. But it became apparent that the public service and the police were turning to the UNP thereby joining the gathering storm against us.

In addition to the above mentioned crossovers, several others also chose to contest in 2001 under the UNP banner. Lakshman Kiriella and Sarath Munasinghe who had been considered “true blues” went to the UNP. Thondaman too joined a UNP-led coalition. These shenanigans had their amusing side. Jeyaraj Fernandopulle proclaimed that he too was crossing over. But he discovered that his “bete noir” Wijepala Mendis had also crossed over to the UNP. He created a drama by getting his supporters to climb a roof and “in response to their wishes” came back to the SLFP.

Mahinda Rajapaksa whose sympathies were with the defectors [They all came back when he became leader] declared that he on principle would not leave the SLFP come what may. Anura Bandaranaike, with his early opponents out of the SLFP, decided to come back to the family firm. It was in such a confused state that the public again went to the polls and punished the SLFP for its inability to hold on to its 2000 victory.

The UNP led coalition won the election and Ranil exulted that he had broken the hoodoo of losing elections under his leadership. The national results were as follows;

United National Front

– [45. 6 percent] 96/109 seats. People’s Alliance – [37. 1 percent] 66/77 seats

Ianatha Vimukthi Peramuna

– [9. 1 percent] 13/16 seats Tamil United Front – [3. 8 percent] 14/15 seats. Muslim Congress – [1. 1 percent] 4/5 seats. (The second figure is after adding on National List seats)

It was clear that with the support of the TULF and SLMC the UNP could muster a majority in Parliament. But they did not have a majority of their own which was their Achilles heel.

The results for the PA in Kandy was as follows; Anuruddha Ratwatte – 102,906

Sarath Amunugama

– 78,100

Thilina Tennekone –

51,542

M. Aluthgamage

– 50,618

I had increased my vote substantially [by over 10,000] while all the others had reduced votes when compared to their 2000 performance. This was a reason for some satisfaction as I contemplated a long innings in the Opposition. It did not bother me very much since CBK remained the President and we could rebuild the PA after the people’s verdict. She appointed me a Presidential Advisor on Irrigation and I set about planning to use the President’s discretionary funds for promoting water management. Irrigation Engineers helped me by booking me into their circuit bungalows and the new Minister of Irrigation, Jayawickreme Perera, did not object.

There was a rule that farmers had to pay for their water connections. This was counter productive and I used the President’s Fund to pay for those connections for the poorest farmers. We prioritized Hambantota district and I was able to help Chamal Rajapaksa whose base was among the farmers of the district. Chamal and I are good friends and I urged him to contest the Presidency after Mahinda bowed out. The Rajapaksa family selfishly overlooked his claims and paid the price for it with the Gota debacle.

(Excerpted from Volume 3 of the Sarath Amunugama autobiography) ✍️



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Building a sustainable future for Sri Lanka’s construction industry

Published

on

Sri Lanka’s construction industry has long been a central pillar of sustainable development. From roads and bridges to homes, schools, and hospitals, construction shapes the country’s physical landscape and supports economic progress. As the nation continues to rebuild and modernise, the demand for construction materials and infrastructure keeps rising. However, this growth also brings a significant environmental cost. Cement, steel, bricks, aggregates, and timber all require energy, resources, and transportation, contributing to carbon emissions and environmental damage. If Sri Lanka continues with traditional construction practices, the long-term impact on the environment will be severe.

The encouraging news is that Sri Lanka has many opportunities to adopt more sustainable construction practices while still maintaining the highest standards of quality and safety. Sustainable construction does not mean weaker buildings or lower standards. It means using sustainable materials, reducing waste, improving design, and choosing methods that protect the environment. Many countries have already moved in this direction, and Sri Lanka has the potential to follow the same path with solutions that are practical, affordable, and suitable for local conditions.

A promising option

One promising option is the use of Compressed Earth Blocks (CEB), which are different from the concrete blocks commonly used in Sri Lanka for the past 25 years. CEBs are made from soil mixed with a small amount of stabiliser and pressed using machines. Unlike traditional fired clay bricks, CEBs do not require high-temperature kilns, which consume large amounts of firewood or fossil fuels. This makes CEBs a low-carbon alternative with a much smaller environmental footprint. In Sri Lanka, CEBs are already used in eco-resorts, community housing projects, and environmentally focused developments. They offer good strength, durability, and thermal comfort, making them suitable for many types of buildings. By expanding the use of CEBs, Sri Lanka can reduce energy consumption, lower emissions, and promote locally sourced materials.

Recycled aggregates also offer significant potential for sustainable construction. These materials are produced by crushing concrete, demolition waste, and construction debris. In Sri Lanka, recycled aggregates are already used in road construction, particularly for base and sub-base layers. They are suitable for non-structural building work such as pathways, garden paving, drainage layers, landscaping, and backfilling. Using recycled aggregates reduces the need for newly quarried rock and aggregates, decreases landfill waste, and lowers transportation emissions. With proper quality control and standards, recycled aggregates can become a reliable and widely accepted material in the construction industry.

Timber and sustainability

Timber is another important area where sustainability can be improved. In the past, timber for construction was often taken from natural forests, leading to deforestation and loss of biodiversity. Today, this approach is no longer sustainable. Instead, the focus must shift to legally sourced timber from managed plantations. Sri Lanka’s plantation-grown teak, jak, and kubuk can provide high-quality, legally sourced timber for construction while protecting natural forests and supporting rural economies. Using plantation timber ensures that harvesting is controlled, trees are replanted, and the supply chain remains legal and ethical.

Beyond materials, sustainable construction also involves better design and planning. Buildings that are designed to maximise natural ventilation, daylight, and energy efficiency can significantly reduce long-term operating costs. Simple design improvements such as proper orientation, shading devices, roof insulation, and efficient window placement can reduce the need for artificial cooling and lighting. These measures not only lower energy consumption but also improve indoor comfort for occupants. Sri Lanka’s tropical climate offers many opportunities to incorporate passive design strategies that reduce environmental impact without increasing construction costs.

Waste reduction is another key component of sustainable construction. Construction sites often generate large amounts of waste, including concrete, timber offcuts, packaging, and soil. By adopting better site management practices, recycling materials, and planning construction sequences more efficiently, contractors can reduce waste and save money. Proper waste segregation and recycling can also reduce the burden on landfills and minimise environmental pollution.

Promoting sustainable construction

Public projects such as schools, hospitals, and government buildings can play a leading role in promoting sustainable construction. When government projects adopt greener materials and designs, the private sector follows. This creates a positive cycle where environmentally responsible choices become the industry standard. Public sector leadership can also encourage local manufacturers to produce sustainable materials, improve quality standards, and invest in new technologies.

Sri Lanka also carries a proud and remarkable history in construction, with achievements that continue to inspire the world. The engineering brilliance behind Sigiriya, the advanced urban planning of Polonnaruwa, the precision of the Aukana Buddha statue, and the sophisticated water management systems of ancient tanks and reservoirs all demonstrate the deep knowledge our ancestors possessed. These historic accomplishments show that innovation is not new to Sri Lanka; it is part of our identity. As the world moves toward 2050 with increasing sustainability challenges, Sri Lanka can draw strength from this heritage while embracing modern technologies and sustainable practices. With the combined efforts of skilled professionals, industry experts, academic researchers, and strong government support, the country can introduce new systems that improve efficiency, reduce environmental impact, and strengthen resilience. By working together with determination and sharing knowledge across generations, Sri Lanka’s construction industry can build a future that honours its past while leading the way in sustainable development.

Foundation of sustainable development

Sri Lanka’s construction industry has always been a foundation of sustainable development. Today, it also has the chance to take a leading role in sustainability. By choosing sustainable materials, reducing waste, improving design, and supporting responsible sourcing, the country can build a future that is both modern and environmentally responsible. Sustainability is essential for Sri Lanka’s long-term goals of reducing carbon emissions and limiting the impacts of global warming. As Sri Lanka moves forward, the construction industry must embrace sustainability not only as an environmental responsibility but also as an opportunity to create stronger, smarter, and more resilient buildings for future generations. Sri Lanka has the talent, the heritage, and the technical capacity to shape a more sustainable future, and with the right national direction, the construction industry can become a model for the region. If professionals, policymakers, and communities work together with a shared vision, the country can transform its construction sector into one that protects the environment while supporting long-term progress.

About the Author: P.G.R.A.C. Gamlath Menike,

BSc (Hons) Quantity Surveying (University of Reading, UK), MSc Quantity Surveying (University College of Estate Management, UK), MCIArb, Doctoral Student, Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, is a Senior Quantity Surveyor: Last Project (2022 -2025) Hong Kong International Airport Terminal 2 Construction Project, Gammon Engineering Construction (Main Contractor).

By P.G. R. A. C. Gamlath Menike

Continue Reading

Features

Palm leaf manuscripts of Sri Lanka – 1

Published

on

Palm leaf manuscripts

Palm leaf manuscripts have been in existence in Sri Lanka since ancient times. The two oldest palm-leaf manuscripts found in Sri Lanka today are the Cullavagga Pâli manuscript of the H. C. P. Bell collection, which is held at the Library of the National Museum, Colombo, and the Mahavagga Pâli manuscript in the University of Kelaniya collection. Photocopies of both are available at the Library of the University of Peradeniya. Both are dated to 13 century. Cullavagga manuscript has wooden covers richly decorated in lac with a design of flowers and foliage.

Karmmavibhâga

However, the oldest known Sinhala palm leaf manuscript in the world is the Karmmavibhâga which was found in a Tibet monastery in 1936 by the Indian scholar Rahul Sankrityayan. Rahul Sankrityayan, (1893–1963) former Kedarnath Pandey, was an Indian polymath, who searched out rare Buddhist manuscripts on his travels abroad. Sankrityayan visited Sri Lanka as well. Vidyalankara Pirivena is mentioned.

Sankrityayan visited Tibet several times to collect manuscripts from the Buddhist monasteries there. In May 1936 on his second visit to Tibet, Sankrityayan visited the Sa-skya monastery. The Chag-pe-lha-khang Library in this monastery was specially opened for Sankrityayan.

He stated in his autobiography that when the clouds of dust which greeted this rare opening of its doors had subsided, they beheld rows of open racks where volume on volume of manuscripts were kept. “After rummaging around, I came across palm-leaf manuscripts. They were not wrapped in cloth, but were tied between two wooden planks with holes through them.” Sankrityayan found several important manuscripts he had been looking for, in that collection.

Sankrityayan catalogued fifty-seven manuscripts bound in thirty-eight volumes. The thirty-seventh volume was written in the Sinhala script. Sankrityayan records that this volume contained ninety-seven palm- leaves each of which measured 18 1/4 by 1 1/4 in. (46 x 3 cm.) and that there were seven lines of writing on each folio.

According to Sankrityayan, these Sinhala texts originally belonged to a Sri Lankan monk called Anantaśrî who had come to Tibet in the time of ŚSrî Kîrttidhvaja (Kirti Sri Rajasinha). Analysts noted that Sankrityayan does not give the source of this information and the manuscript makes no mention of Anantaśrî.

Sankrityayan had taken with him to Tibet, one Abeyasinghe, (Abhayasimha) to help him with copying manuscripts. They made hand-copies of the important manuscripts. Abhayasimha had copied about 250 to 350 strophes each day. But he fell ill due to the extreme cold and was sent home in June. Abeyasinghe had written letters home during his stay in Tibet.

Photographs of the manuscripts found during Sankrityayan’s expeditions in Tibet are preserved at the National Archives in Colombo. There is also a copy in Vidyalankara pirivena library The Historical Manuscripts Commission In its 1960/1961 report, drew attention to this manuscript, known as Sa-skya Codex, describing it as “a unique document.” (Annual Report of the Government Archivist 1960/61, 1963)

Sinhala scholar P.E.E. Fernando examined photographs of the Sa-skya Codex at the request of the Historical Manuscripts Commission and assigned it to the 13th century. The Historical Manuscripts Commission, dated it to either twelfth or the thirteenth century.

The Historical Manuscripts Commission observed that this manuscript was of great value for the study of the development of the Sinhala script. Ven. Meda Uyangoda Vimalakîrtti and Nähinne Sominda in their edition of the Karmmavibhâga published in 1961 agreed that the Sa-skya Codex represented an early stage in the evolution of the Sinhala language.

Mahavamsa

The Mahavamsa is considered a unique historical document. There is nothing like it in South Asia, and probably all Asia, with the exception of China. Mahavamsa provides a historical account of events, with emphasis on chronology and dating. This, it appears, was rare at the time.

However, Mahavamsa is not a political history, though that is the popular perception of it. It is a religious history. It was written to record the introduction and entrenchment of Buddhism in the country. Other Buddhist countries, such as Cambodia, Burma and Thailand value the Mahavamsa for this reason. They held copies of the Mahavamsa and used events from it in their temple frescoes.

But Mahavamsa is also an important reference source for reconstructing the political history of Sri Lanka. Political and social facts are included in the Mahavamsa narrative when describing religious events, and this makes the Mahavamsa important for historians. This tradition of history writing, beginning with the earlier Sihala Attakatha and Dipawamsa, it is suggested, started in Sri Lanka in 2nd or 3rd BC.

Today, the Mahavamsa has become a major source of historical information, not only for dating kings, temples and reservoirs, but also for reconstructing ancient Sinhala society. The fact that Kuveni was seated beside a pond, spinning thread has been used to indicate that there was water management and textiles long before Vijaya arrived. Dutugemunu (161-137 BC) paid a salary to the workers building the Maha Thupa. This shows that money was used at the time.

Copies of the Mahavamsa have been treasured and looked after in Sri Lanka for centuries. They have been copied over and over again. The manuscripts were held in temple libraries because the subject of the Mahavamsa was the entrenchment of Buddhism in Sri Lanka.

The Mahavamsa manuscripts did not pop up suddenly during British rule as people seem to think. The British did not ‘discover’ the Mahavamsa. It was there. When the British administration started to take interest in the history of the island, the sangha would have directed them to the Mahavamsa, in the same way that they directed HCP Bell to the ruins in Anuradhapura and the Sigiriya frescoes. HCP Bell did not discover those either.

The British administrators saw the value of the Mahavamsa and copies were sent to libraries abroad. The Bodleian library, Oxford has a well preserved Mahavamsa manuscript, taken from Mulkirigala, which Turner used for his translation. Cambridge has two Mahavamsa manuscripts. The two copies at India Office library, and the copy in East India Library are probably in the British Library today. The Royal Library, Copenhagen, has a copy, consisting of 129 sheets, 12 lines to a leaf, written in good handwriting.

In Sri Lanka there are several copies of the Mahavamsa in the Colombo Museum Library. One copy, known as the ‘Cambodian Mahavamsa ‘is in Cambodian script. University of Peradeniya has at least three copies.

It is interesting to note that the Mahavamsa was known to the Sinhala elite and some had copies in their private libraries. The Historical Manuscripts Commission of the 1930s said in its first report that five copies of the Mahavamsa and a 19th century copy of the Dipawamsa were found in private collections.

The temple libraries had many copies of the Mahavamsa. Some were of very high quality. Wilhelm Geiger had looked at the copies held at Mahamanthinda Pirivena, Matara and Mulkirigala vihara. Asgiriya, Nagolla Vihara and Watagedera Sudarmarama Potgul vihara, Matara, are three of the many libraries that held copies of the Mahavamsa.

Sirancee Gunawardene examined the copy at Mahamanthinda Pirivena, Matara, very closely. She says that it is a very old manuscript. According to its colophon, the manuscript was first copied 400 years ago. It is in a very good state of preservation. It has 232 folios. Each 50 cm long 6.25 wide. Nine lines on each side, in Pali metric verse.

The writer of the manuscripts said that his version was an improvement on the copy. He wrote, “I will recite the Mahavamsa which was compiled by ancient sages. [their version] was too long and had many repetitions. This version is free from such faults, easy to understand and remember. It is handed down from tradition, for arousing serene joy and emotion’ .

The Mahamanthinda manuscript records the continuous history of 23 dynasties from 543 BC to 1758 AD. It refers to the principle of hereditary monarchy as 39 eldest sons of reigning monarch succeeded their fathers to the throne. It highlights the fact that fifteen reigned only for one year, 34 for less than four years, 22 kings were murdered by their successors, 6 were killed during battles, 4 committed suicide, 11 were dethroned.

Mahawansa  as a World Heritage document

An ola manuscript of the Mahavamsa, held in the Main Library of the University of Peradeniya has been recognised by UNESCO as a part of World Heritage. UNESCO announced In 2023 that it has included the Mahavamsa as one of the 64 items of documentary heritage inscribed in the UNESCO’s Memory of the World International Register for 2023. The manuscript is dated to the early 19 century.

The certificate declaring the Mahawansa as a world heritage document was handed to the Chancellor of Peradeniya University by UNESCO Director General, who visited the University in 2024 specially to do so. She also unveiled a plaque marking the declaration.

The story began much earlier. The National Library of Sri Lanka and the Ministry of Buddha Sasana had jointly appointed a 6-member committee headed by Prof Malani Endagamage, to find the best preserved copy of the Mahavamsa in Sri Lanka. This would have been in 2000 or so. For two years, this team had examined copies from over 100 temples nationwide.

Temples around the country yielded copies, crumbling to well-preserved, reported Sunday Times. There was one from the Ridi Vihara that almost made the cut, but four other copies were shortlisted. One from the Dalada Maligawa, Kandy and three manuscripts from the Main Library of the University of Peradeniya. Three academics from the University’s History Department, Professors K.M. Rohitha Dasanayaka, Mahinda Somathilake and U.S.Y. Sahan Mahesh examined the three Peradeniya manuscripts

Dasanayaka said, “We poured over the copies together, and it became clear that one copy stood out. While the other two had numerous inconsistencies, this one, written in a curvy hand, was neat and beautiful. After more than two centuries, the manuscript was still very attractive, with a ‘flaming cinnamon orange’ cover and elegant lettering.

The first section of the manuscript ends with Mahasen (274–301 AD), written by the monk Mahanama. The second part ends at 1815. The author is given as Ven. Thibbotuwawe Buddharakkhita but he was dead by 1815. The final part was probably done by an acolyte. He has done a very neat job, seamlessly adding his bit, concluded Dasanayake.

This manuscript was acquired by the Library of University of Peradeniya when K. D. Somadasa, was the Librarian (1964 – 1970). It is held in the Main Library and its Accession Number is 277587.

National Library & Documentation Services Board of Sri Lanka, which administers the National Library of Sri Lanka submitted a nomination to UNESCO on behalf of this manuscript. UNESCO responded positively to the application.

UNESCO said the Mahavamsa was recognized as one of the world’s longest unbroken historical accounts, presenting Sri Lanka’s history in a chronological order from the 6th century BCE. The authenticity of the facts provided in the document has been confirmed through archaeological research conducted in Sri Lanka and India.

It is an important historical source in South Asia, said UNESCO. It was the first of its kind in South Asia, initiating a mature historiographical tradition. It has contributed singularly to the identity of Emperor Asoka in Indian history. The existence of a number of manuscripts of the Mahavamsa in several countries as well as the transliteration and translation of the text to several Southeast Asian and European languages stand testimony to its immense historical, cultural, literal, linguistic and scholarly values, .” UNESCO press release said.

Further, UNESCO found that this manuscript was correctly conserved at the University Library. The university and its library maintained high standards in safeguarding the palm-leaf manuscripts, preventing deterioration, declared UNESCO. (Continued)

REFERENCES


https://archives1.dailynews.lk/2021/02/25/local/242520/ola-leaf-mahavamsa-be-declared-world-heritage

Sirancee Gunawardana Palm leaf manuscripts of Sri Lanka . 1977 p 41,44-47 , 253 290 292, ,

N. E. I. Wijerathne Methods, Techniques and Challenges in Deciphering the Sa-skaya Codex. Vidyodaya Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (2025), Vol. 10 (01) https://journals.sjp.ac.lk/index.php/vjhss/article/view/8571/6001

First report of the Historical Manuscripts Commision.1933 SP 9 of 1933. p . 53, 95, 96

https://journals.sjp.ac.lk/index.php/vjhss/article/view/8571/6001https://www.austriaca.at/0xc1aa5572%200x00314cc3.pdf

 https://leftword.com/creator/rahul-sankrityayan/

 https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianHistory/comments/1oc5tc2/in_his_autobiography_meri_jeevan_yatra_rahul/

 https://www.sundaytimes.lk/230910/plus/in-search-of-the-perfect-mahavamsa-531513.html

 https://www.dailymirror.lk/breaking-news/Mahawansa-declared-a-world-heritage/108-287528

 https://mfa.gov.lk/en/visit-of-unesco-dg/

 https://sundaytimes.lk/online/education/UNESCO-ready-to-support-digitalisation-of-Ola-leaf-books/290-1146314

 https://media.unesco.org/sites/default/files/webform/mow001/53_131%252B.pdf

by KAMALIKA PIERIS

 

Continue Reading

Features

A new Sherlock Holmes novel

Published

on

Tales of Mystery and Suspense – 1

“The House of Silk” is set in a grim Victorian winter, and moves from Baker Street to a luxurious suburban villa, from dingy pubs to elegant London clubs, from a correction school for boys high on a hill to Dr Silkin’s House of Wonders, which provided noisy low life entertainment. Holmes and Watson went there in search of the House of Silk, a name they had heard when looking into the death of one of Holmes’ Baker Street irregulars (slum children who ferreted out information for him) .

I do not think highly of sequels to books written by highly regarded writers, though I must admit that this dislike is based on just a few samples. But while in England I was given by my former Dean, with a forceful recommendation, a book about a Sherlock Holmes mystery, supposedly written by Dr Watson. I began on it soon after I got back home, and found it difficult to put down, so I suppose I will not look on Anthony Horowitz as an exception to my rule. I may even look out for his efforts at continuing the adventures of James Bond, though I suspect Fleming’s laconic style will be less easy to emulate.

“The House of Silk” is set in a grim Victorian winter, and moves from Baker Street to a luxurious suburban villa, from dingy pubs to elegant London clubs, from a correction school for boys high on a hill to Dr Silkin’s House of Wonders, which provided noisy low life entertainment. Holmes and Watson went there in search of the House of Silk, a name they had heard when looking into the death of one of Holmes’ Baker Street irregulars (slum children who ferreted out information for him). They had asked Holmes’ brother Mycroft for help in finding what and where this was, but he had warned them off, having been himself told by someone very senior in government that it might involve those in very high positions, and further inquiries might prove dangerous.

Needless to say, Holmes does seek further, and is lured to an opium den where he is drugged, to be found outside with a gun in his hand and the body of a girl beside him, the sister of the murdered boy Ross. A passer-by swears he had seen Holmes fire the shot, and the owner of the opium den and a customer swear that Holmes had taken too much opium and left the den in a demented condition. A police inspector who had been passing promptly arrests Holmes and Watson, and even their old acquaintance Inspector Lestrade finds it difficult to get access to him.

Watson eventually gets to see him when he is in the infirmary, after he has been told by a mysterious man that Holmes was going to be murdered before his case could be taken up. The man said he had earlier tried to get Holmes to investigate the House of Silk by sending him a white silk ribbon, such as had later been found tied round the hand of the murdered boy. But, as a criminal himself, he said, he could not reveal more, though he himself was horrified by the business of the House of Silk, which gave criminality a bad name, which is why he wanted it all stopped.

Holmes escapes from the infirmary, with a little help from the doctor whom he had once assisted earlier, right under the nose of the nasty Inspector Harriman. He then joins up with Watson, and having with the help of Lestrade overcome the men designed to kill him at Dr Silkin’s House of Wonders, he sets off, with an even large posse of policemen, to the House of Silk.

After much suspense, the habitues of the House of Silk are arrested, the Inspector having broken his neck in the course of a chase downhill, having fled when his misdeeds were exposed. The mastermind claims that he will not face a trial because of the important people involved, but instead falls down a staircase while in prison and breaks his neck. One of the noblemen involved commits suicide, but another, and the medical man who had sworn he saw Holmes kill the young lady, get off without charge.

But then we revert to the original story, which had involved an art dealer who came to Holmes because he was being followed by someone he thought was an American gangster out for revenge. This was because he had shipped some pictures to an American buyer, and these had been destroyed when a train was held up by an Irish gang and the coach with the safe in it dynamited. The buyer and the dealer had got a private agency to investigate, and this had ended with the gang being killed in a shootout, though one of the twins who led it had escaped. The buyer had subsequently been killed, and Mr Carstairs feared that the twin who survived had followed him to England.

Holmes and Watson went to Carstairs’ house, where they met his wife, whom he had met on the boat back from America, and his sister. Their mother had died some months earlier, when gas had filled her room after the flame had gone out. It transpired that there had been a break in, and some money and a necklace stolen from a safe, and it was in tracing these, through a pawnbroker, that Holmes and Watson had found the American murdered in the hotel where he had been staying.

The leader of the irregulars had come to tell Holmes that they had traced the man to the hotel, and Ross had been left on guard. He seemed terrified when Holmes and Watson and Carstairs turned up, but said he had seen nothing. When the boys had been dismissed, and the room opened up, the man was found dead, the murderer obviously having gained entrance through a window.

Holmes assumed the boy had seen someone he recognized, but he could not be traced, until he was found dead, horribly tortured. The silk band around his wrist then led Holmes to pursue the House of Silk. One of the boys at the school where Ross had been mentioned that he had a sister at a pub, and she, when confronted, asked in fear if they were from the House of Silk and then, having lunged at Watson with a knife, ran off – herself only to be found dead outside the opium den, which prompted the arrest of Holmes.

After the drama at the House of Silk, Holmes and Watson go to the Carstairs household, where he explains exactly what had taken place, identifying the murdered man as not a member of the gang but the head of the private agency which had investigated them. As my Dean told me, Horowitz then ties up all the loose ends with consummate skill, connecting with a fine thread all the malefactors, of various kinds.

Continue Reading

Trending