Latest News
This year’s Budget has covered all sectors – Prime Minister
Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya stated that this year’s Budget covers all sectors of the country, and that the Government does not act based on short-term personal agendas or interests.
The Prime Minister made these remarks in Parliament on November 8, while commenting on the Appropriation Bill presented for the year 2026.
Addressing further, the Prime Minister stated,
If the Members of Parliament, setting aside the divisions, had truly listened to the President’s Budget speech, they would have realized that there were many valuable lessons and insights to be learned from both the speech and the proposals contained within the Budget.
Behind the contents, proposals, and statistics of the Budget lies a deeply meaningful message. I urge everyone to take the time to understand that message properly.
This budget speech as well as the budget itself. demonstrates how results can be achieved and how a nation can progress through a politically disciplined governance and visionary leadership when formulating policies involves proper planning and when formulating laws as well as governing them with discipline take place to achieve defined goals and that is what is truly important right now.
This is the second budget of the current government. Our first Budget was presented in April 2025. When we assumed office, there was uncertainty how long it will take for us to recover from this considering the state of the country and the international platform at that time as well as the shattered ideas of the people. It was that time this Government came into power.
With taking over a collapsed nation, the government presented its first budget in April. The figures presented yesterday cover the period from April to September, as that budget was applicable only for nine months. The full expenditure will only be visible by December.
Within the plan to stabilize the country, the President demonstrated successful governance through financial discipline, something that must be appreciated. Regardless of political differences, we can now move forward collectively, identifying and addressing shortcomings together.
Already, within the six months of implementing the first budget, we have shown more than 50% progress. The government expects this figure to grow even further by December 31. Since many projects only began implementation in September, viewing the progress from that perspective will give us a more accurate picture.
We must remember that we have reached this stage after taking over a fallen nation. The Opposition now acknowledges that the Treasury has managed to maintain savings. The government is maintaining fiscal discipline, and none of this has happened by chance. These are the results of visionary leadership, a lesson we must recognize and appreciate.
We can also take pride in the fact that, unlike previous governments, we did not fill state institutions with people when we assumed power. We made no mass replacements. Though even some of our own party members criticized us for that, we wanted to prove that with proper leadership, clear vision, and structured planning, the existing public service can deliver results. Of course, there is room for improvement with greater efficiency and better performance.
The reason for the significant relief to the public service, and giving away the second installment from January as well as increasing the allowances and other benefits is to increase greater efficiency and productivity. Funds have been allocated for this purpose in the budget.
Our goal is to transform the public service into one that is efficient, democratic, and goal-oriented. Compared to January 2025, we can already see progress in this process. We are confident that by 2026, there will be even greater advancement with more structured and result-driven development. We are not working for short-term or personal political gain, but collectively, as a team, for the long-term development the nation needs. This marks a significant transformation that can only be understood when one remembers the condition of the country we took over.
Shared understanding that this journey toward planned, collective national progress understood by both the government and by public officials and the people has shared to seeing these results. This is a process that cannot be compared simplistically with previous governments. The difference and the ongoing transformation must be properly understood.
We are not acting based on personal agendas, ministerial egos, or political motives. We are implementing a coordinated, team-based plan developed with the nation’s needs in mind. All 159 of us in the government understand our respective responsibilities and are committed to fulfilling them to ensure the success of the overall plan.
I believe that the Opposition has studied our policy framework in depth perhaps more than we have memorizing page numbers and paragraphs. I remind them fondly that this is our five-year plan. We have a long-term vision for the country.
Five years from now, in the next election, we will debate our progress on public platforms.
Today, the Opposition accuses us of threatening democracy and the multiparty system. I would like to ask them where exactly has democracy been endangered? We are operating by fully respecting Parliament’s financial authority. Is enforcing the law an act against democracy? Is applying the law equally to everyone undemocratic?
Now, you have all come together from various parties. When many parties merge into one, that is when the multiparty system is truly at risk. Therefore, if there is a threat to multiparty democracy today, it arises from the Opposition itself from its inability to protect and represent its own parties effectively before the people.
The government has no desire, nor time, to abolish the multiparty system. We came to power not for the Opposition, but for the people to rebuild the nation and fulfill the people’s aspirations. As we pursue that goal, politics itself is changing. The expectations of the people from politics are changing. This is the greatest transformation taking place, a change in the country’s political culture. The people will not return to the old ways. Unless the Opposition understands this new political culture and adapts to it, they will not be able to grasp the true nature of this transformation.
It must also be emphasized that no sector or social group has been neglected or excluded in this budget. The government has carefully identified the key national challenges and the vulnerable social groups that need protection. Within one year, we have presented a clearly structured, logically planned program addressing immediate issues while also setting out long-term strategies for sustainable solutions. Therefore, it is impossible to claim that anything significant has been ignored.
With the country now stabilized, this budget focuses on the next step followed by how to ensure growth, how to manage the surplus funds in the Treasury effectively for the people’s benefit, and how to prevent another economic crisis.
[Prime Minister’s Media Division]
Latest News
Myanmar votes as military holds first election since 2021 coup
Polls have opened in Myanmar’s first general election since the country’s military toppled Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi’s democratically elected government in a 2021 coup.
The heavily restricted election on Sunday is taking place in about a third of the Southeast Asian nation’s 330 townships, with large areas inaccessible amid a raging civil war between the military and an array of opposition forces.
Following the initial phase, two rounds of voting will be held on January 11 and January 25, while voting has been cancelled in 65 townships altogether.
“This means that at least 20 percent of the country is disenfranchised at this stage,” said Al Jazeera’s Tony Cheng, reporting from Myanmar’s largest city, Yangon. “The big question is going to be here in the cities, what is the turnout going to be like?”
In Yangon, polling stations opened at 6am on Sunday (23:30 GMT, Saturday), and once the sun was up, “we’ve seen a relatively regular flow of voters come in,” said Cheng.
“But the voters are generally middle aged, and we haven’t seen many young people. When you look at the ballot, there are only few choices. The vast majority of those choices are military parties,” he said.
The election has been derided by critics – including the United Nations, some Western countries and human rights groups – as an exercise that is not free, fair or credible, with anti-military political parties not competing.
Aung San Suu Kyi, who was deposed by the military months after her National League for Democracy (NLD) won the last general election by a landslide in 2020, remains in detention, and her party has been dissolved.
The pro-military Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) is widely expected to emerge as the largest party.
The military, which has governed Myanmar since 2021, said the vote is a chance for a new start, politically and economically, for the nation of 55 million people, with Senior General Min Aung Hlaing consistently framing the polls as a path to reconciliation.
Dressed in civilian clothes, the military chief cast his ballot shortly after polling stations opened in Naypyidaw, the country’s capital. He then held up an ink-soaked figure and smiled widely.
Voters must dip a finger into indelible ink after casting a ballot to ensure they do not vote more than once.
He told reporters afterwards that the elections are free and fair, and the vote was not tarnished because it is being held by the military.
The state-run Global New Light of Myanmar, in an opinion piece on Sunday, said the poll would open a new chapter and “serve as bridge for the people of Myanmar to reach a prosperous future”.
Earlier, it reported that election observers from Russia, China, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Cambodia, Vietnam, Nicaragua and India have flown into the country ahead of the polls.
But with fighting still raging in many areas of the country, the UN’s Special Rapporteur on Myanmar, Tom Andrews called on the international community to reject the military-run poll.
“An election organised by a junta that continues to bomb civilians, jail political leaders and criminalise all forms of dissent is not an election – it is a theatre of the absurd performed at gunpoint,” Andrews said in a statement.
“This is not a pathway out of Myanmar’s crisis. It is a ploy that will perpetuate repression, division and conflict,” he said.
The civil war, which was triggered by the 2021 coup, has killed an estimated 90,000 people, displaced 3.5 million and left some 22 million people in need of humanitarian assistance.
According to the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners, more than 22,000 people are currently detained for political offences.
In downtown Yangon, stations were cordoned off overnight, with security staff posted outside, while armed officers guarded traffic intersections. Election officials set up equipment and installed electronic voting machines, which are being used for the first time in Myanmar.
The machines will not allow write-in candidates or spoiled ballots.
Among a trickle of early voters in the city was 45-year-old Swe Maw, who dismissed international criticism.
“It’s not an important matter,” he told the AFP news agency. “There are always people who like and dislike.”
In the central Mandalay region, 40-year-old Moe Moe Myint said it was “impossible for this election to be free and fair”.
“How can we support a junta-run election when this military has destroyed our lives?” she told AFP. “We are homeless, hiding in jungles, and living between life and death,” she added.
The second round of polling will take place in two weeks’ time, before the third and final round on January 25.
Dates for counting votes and announcing election results have not been declared.
Analysts say the military’s attempt to establish a stable administration in the midst of an expansive conflict is fraught with risk, and that significant international recognition is unlikely for any military-controlled government.
“The outcome is hardly in doubt: a resounding USDP victory and a continuation of army rule with a thin civilian veneer,” wrote Richard Horsey, an analyst at the International Crisis Group in a briefing earlier this month.
“But it will in no way ease Myanmar’s political crisis or weaken the resolve of a determined armed resistance. Instead, it will likely harden political divisions and prolong Myanmar’s state failure. The new administration, which will take power in April 2026, will have few better options, little credibility and likely no feasible strategy for moving the country in a positive direction,” he added.

[Aljazeera]
Latest News
Interment of singer Latha Walpola at Borella on Wednesday [31st]
Family sources have confirmed that the interment of singer Latha Walpola will be performed at the General Cemetery Borella on Wednesday (31 December).
Foreign News
Ex-Malaysia PM Najib Razak given 15-year jail term over state funds scandal
Former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak has been jailed for 15 years for abuse of power and money laundering, in his second major trial for a multi-billion-dollar state funds scandal.
Najib, 72, was accused of misappropriating nearly 2.3 billion Malaysian ringgit ($569m; £422m) from the nation’s sovereign wealth fund 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
On Friday afternoon a judge found him guilty in four charges of abuse of power and 21 charges of money laundering.
The former PM is already in jail after he was convicted years ago in another case related to 1MDB.
Friday’s verdict comes after seven years of legal proceedings, which saw 76 witnesses called to the stand.
The verdict, delivered in Malaysia’s administrative capital Putrajaya, is the second blow in the same week to the embattled former leader, who has been imprisoned since 2022.
He was handed four 15-year sentences on abuse of power charges, as well as five years each on 21 money laundering charges. The jail terms run concurrently under Malaysian law.
On Monday, the court rejected his application to serve the remainder of his sentence under house arrest.
But the former prime minister retains a loyal base of supporters, who claim that he’s a victim of unfair rulings and who have showed up at his trials calling for his release.
On Friday, dozens of people gathered outside the court in Putrajaya in support of Najib.
The 1MDB scandal made headlines across the world when it came to light a decade ago, embroiling prominent figures from Malaysia to Goldman Sachs and Hollywood.
Investigators estimated that $4.5bn was siphoned from the state-owned wealth fund into private pockets, including Najib’s.
Najib’s lawyers claim that he had been misled by his advisers – in particular the financier Jho Low, who has maintained his innocence but remains at large.
But the argument has not convinced Malaysia’s courts, which previously found Najib guilty of embezzlement in 2020.
That year, Najib was convicted of abuse of power, money laundering and breach of trust over 42 million ringgit ($10m; £7.7m) transferred from SRC International – a former unit of 1MDB – into his private accounts.
He was sentenced to 12 years in prison, but saw his jail term halved last year.
The latest case concerns a larger sum of money, also tied to 1MDB, received by his personal bank account in 2013. Najib said he had believed the money was a donation from the late Saudi King Abdullah – a claim rejected by the judge on Friday.
Separately Najib’s wife, Rosmah Mansor, was sentenced to ten years in jail in 2022 for bribery. She is free on bail pending an appeal against her conviction.
The scandal has had profound repercussions on Malaysian politics. In 2018 it led to a historic election loss for Najib’s Barisan Nasional coalition, which had governed the country since its independence in 1957.
Now, the recent verdicts has highlighted fissures in Malaysia’s ruling coalition, which includes Najib’s party United Malays National Organisation (UMNO).
Najib’s failed house arrest bid on Monday was met with disappointment from his allies but celebrated by his critics within the same coalition.
Malaysia’s Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim called for politicians on all sides to respect the court’s decisions.
Former Malaysian lawmaker Tony Pua told the BBC’s Newsday programme that the verdict would “send a message” to the country’s leaders, that “you can get caught for corruption even if you’re number one in the country like the prime minister”.
But Cynthia Gabriel, founding director of Malaysia’s Center to Combat Corruption and Cronyism, argued that the country has made little headway in anti-corruption efforts despite the years of reckoning after the 1MDB scandal.
Public institutions have not been strengthened enough to reassure Malaysians that “the politicians they put into power would actually serve their interests” instead of “their own pockets”, she told Newsday.
“Grand corruption continues in different forms”, she added. “We don’t know at all if another 1MDB could occur, or may have already occurred.”
(BBC)
-
News5 days agoMembers of Lankan Community in Washington D.C. donates to ‘Rebuilding Sri Lanka’ Flood Relief Fund
-
News3 days agoBritish MP calls on Foreign Secretary to expand sanction package against ‘Sri Lankan war criminals’
-
News6 days agoAir quality deteriorating in Sri Lanka
-
News6 days agoCardinal urges govt. not to weaken key socio-cultural institutions
-
Features5 days agoGeneral education reforms: What about language and ethnicity?
-
News5 days agoSuspension of Indian drug part of cover-up by NMRA: Academy of Health Professionals
-
Opinion6 days agoRanwala crash: Govt. lays bare its true face
-
News6 days agoCID probes unauthorised access to PNB’s vessel monitoring system
