News
Speaker reaffirms rejection of no-faith motion against Deputy Minister of Defence
Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne yesterday (25) informed the Houset that he was not in a position to accept the no-confidence motion submitted by the Opposition against Deputy Minister of Defence, Major General (retd.) Aruna Jayasekara by a group of MPs. He claimed parliament procedures did not provide for such a motion.
The motion was signed by the Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa and 31 other members representing the opposition.
At the commencement of the House sittings yesterday, Speaker Wickramaratne said he had already announced his decision pertaining to the no-confidence motion and his decision could not be challenged according to Standing Order 76(1).
The Speaker said he had decided to clarify his decision on the motion again.
Text of the Speaker’s statement: “I wish to make this announcement in furtherance to the announcement made by me on 08.09.2025 on the Motion titled the ‘No-Confidence Motion’, submitted by a group of 32 Members of Parliament in the Opposition including the Leader of the Opposition in Parliament, on 12.08.2025 against Major General (retd.) Aruna Jayasekera, MP, Deputy Minister of Defence.
“At the outset, I wish to remind this House the Standing Order 76(1) which states that the Speaker in Parliament shall be responsible for the observance of the rules of order in Parliament and his/her decision upon any point of order shall not be open to appeal and shall not be reviewed by Parliament except upon a substantive motion made after notice.
“However, considering the queries raised in Parliament, I wish to further substantiate the factors highlighted in the previous announcement for ruling the said Motion out of Order.
“The 1978 Constitution of Sri Lanka and the Standing Orders of Parliament are silent on moving a No-Confidence Motion against an individual Cabinet Minister, Deputy Minister or any other holder of portfolios. The only existing provision on No-Confidence Motions is the Article 49(2) of the Constitution which provides only to move a No-Confidence Motion against a Government.
“However, No-Confidence Motions have been moved against the Prime Minister, Individual Ministers of the Cabinet of Ministers, notwithstanding the said silence in the Constitution and the Standing Orders, thus questioning the legal basis of such precedence.
“It is noted that, in the parliamentary context, the Speaker, Deputy Speaker, Deputy Chairman of Committees, Leader of the House of Parliament, Chief Government Whip, Leader of the Opposition, and Chief Opposition Whip are considered Parliamentary office-bearers, and that a substantive Motion of this nature may appropriately be brought against them.
“I wish to emphasize that in the international context, No-Confidence Motions have been allowed only in respect of the Government/ Council of Ministers as a whole (Erskine May, ‘Treatise on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament’, 25th Ed. and M.N. Kaul and S.L. Shakdher, ‘Practice and Procedure of Parliament’, 8th Ed.). Further M.N. Kaul and S.L. Shakdher highlight that a Motion of No-Confidence can be moved only against the Council of Ministers as a whole and not against any individual Minister as per the Indian constitutional provisions regarding the collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers to the Lok Sabha.
“Similarly, the Articles 42, 43 and 44 of the Constitution of Sri Lanka, provides for the collective and individual ministerial responsibility of the Cabinet of Ministers.
“In Sri Lanka at present, Deputy Ministers have been appointed under Article 46(1) of the Constitution to assist the Ministers of the Cabinet of Ministers. However, the Ministers of the Cabinet of the present Government acting under Article 46(2) of the Constitution, have not delegated any power or duty pertaining to any subject or function to the Deputy Ministers. Nevertheless, I wish to place on record that the Deputy Ministers function in terms of Standing Order 32(2) on behalf of the Ministers, in compliance of Article 46(1) of the Constitution and read with Article 74 of the Constitution.
“Due to aforesaid reasons, I rule that the Motion is out of order in terms of Standing Order 27(3).
“In the alternate, I wish to note that incidental criticism of conduct of Members of Parliament or particularly to Members in their capacity as office holders in the House of Commons including the Speaker is permitted only through a substantive Motion (Erskine May, ‘Treatise on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament’, 25th Ed.), and in the UK practice censure Motions can be tabled criticizing a Government policy or a Minister. M.N. Kaul and S.L. Shakdher (‘Practice and Procedure of Parliament’, 8th Ed.) states that Censure Motions can be moved against the Council of Ministers or an individual Minister or a group of Ministers for their failure to act or not to act or for their policy and may express regret, indignation or surprise of the House at the failure of the Minister or Ministers.
“Accordingly, I wish to inform this House to explore the possibility of submitting a substantive Motion instead of the current Motion in issue, in view of the national importance of the matters relating to the Easter Sunday Attack stated therein and as opined by the Attorney General, the specific facts in the Motion has no direct bearing to the cases pending before Courts.”
News
Hatton National Bank donates Rs. 100 Million to the ‘Rebuilding Sri Lanka’ Fund
The ‘Rebuilding Sri Lanka’ Fund, launched to support communities affected by Cyclone Ditwah and to facilitate national recovery efforts, continues to attract generous support from local and international organizations, the business community and philanthropists.
In this context, Hatton National Bank has contributed Rs. 100 million to the Fund. The cheque was presented on Tuesday (16) at the Presidential Secretariat by the Bank’s Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer, Damith Pallewatte, together with Chief Operating Officer Sanjaya Wijemanna, to Secretary to the President Dr. Nandika Sanath Kumanayake.
News
Post-Ditwah recovery efforts: Rs. 190 bn needed to restore roads and bridges countrywide
Officials of the Ministry of Transport and Highways and Urban Development yesterday said that due to the destruction of roads and bridges across the country by Cyclone Ditwah, the Road Development Authority alone had incurred a loss of approximately Rs. 75 billion.
The officials said the restoration of disaster-hit roads and bridges would require approximately Rs. 190 billion.
This was disclosed at the meeting of the Sectoral Oversight Committee on Infrastructure and Strategic Development, convened to discuss the nature of the Ditwah disaster and the measures to be taken to assess the resulting social, economic, and environmental damage. The meeting was held recently (11) in Parliament under the Chairmanship of Member of Parliament S.M. Marikkar.
During the meeting, officials of the Ministry of Transport and Highways and Urban Development pointed out that as a result of the disaster situation, 316 roads and 40 bridges, under the purview of the Road Development Authority, had been damaged.
However, the Chair of the Committee pointed out that assessments regarding damage to railway lines and regional roads across the country had not yet been carried out. The Chair further emphasised the importance of the Ministry taking the lead in formulating a mechanism to provide financial allocations for the rehabilitation of regional roads.
Accordingly, the officials informed the Committee that it was currently expected to obtain a loan of Rs. 2 billion from the World Bank, and that funds required to carry out these rehabilitation works were also expected to be obtained from several other institutions.
Meanwhile, officials of the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) informed the Committee that the CEB had incurred a loss of approximately Rs. 20 billion due to recent natural disasters. It said discussions are underway to obtain a loan from the World Bank for this purpose. Commenting on this, the Chair of the Committee advised the CEB officials to obtain these funds as a grant rather than as a loan. He emphasised the importance of securing the funds as a grant, as obtaining them as a loan could result in an increase in electricity bills for consumers.
In addition, officials informed the Committee that Lanka Electricity Company (Pvt.) Ltd. had incurred an estimated loss of Rs. 252 million due to the Ditwah disaster. Officials representing the company further stated that since the expenditure required for the repair work could be covered with budgetary allocations already provided to them, no additional loan or grant was required.
Officials also informed the Committee that the National Water Supply and Drainage Board had incurred an estimated loss of Rs. 5.6 billion due to the disaster. The Secretary of the Ministry of Housing, Construction and Water Supply informed the Committee that 156 water supply schemes of the National Water Supply and Drainage Board were damaged, and that all of them had now been restored. The Secretary further informed the Committee that arrangements were being made to obtain the funds required for rehabilitation as a grant from the Asian Development Bank.
Accordingly, emphasising the importance of preparing plans to face potential future disasters, the Chairman of the Committee said the Sectoral Oversight Committee on Infrastructure and Strategic Development was ready to provide necessary support to the relevant ministries and officials for this purpose.
Members of Parliament Nalin Bandara Jayamaha, Ajith P. Perera, and Asitha Niroshana Egodavithana, along with a group of officials, were present at the discussion.
News
Siddhalepa takes authentic Lankan Ayurveda medicine to UK through a collaborative
The expansion of Sri Lankan Ayurveda in the United Kingdom was marked a few days ago at the Sri Lanka High Commission in London, with the official launch of the Siddhalepa & Ayurveda Medical UK Collaborative. The occasion brought together dignitaries, Ayurvedic and medical professionals, wellness industry leaders, and members of the Sri Lankan and British communities to celebrate the formation of a strategic partnership aimed at improving access to authentic Sri Lankan Ayurveda medicine in the UK.
Delivering the welcome remarks, Dr Roshan Jayalath, Director of Ayurveda Medical UK, outlined the collaborative’s commitment to strengthening clinical standards, preserving cultural integrity, and enhancing global recognition of Sri Lanka’s rich medical heritage. Addressing the gathering, Sri Lanka’s High Commissioner in London, Nimal Senadheera, underscored the initiative’s significance in promoting Sri Lanka’s cultural legacy, deepening bilateral relations, and creating new opportunities for cooperation in the fields of Ayurveda and wellness. He reaffirmed the High Commission’s support for initiatives that elevate Sri Lanka’s international profile.

Joining the event virtually from Sri Lanka, Asoka Hettigoda, Chairman of the Siddhalepa Group, spoke of the company’s 200-year Ayurvedic lineage, its 90-year commercial history, and its standing as a global leader in authentic Ayurveda. This was followed by a presentation by Mrs. Shevanthie Goonesekera, titled The Origins of Siddhalepa, which traced the brand’s evolution and its enduring contribution to Sri Lanka’s cultural heritage.
Directors Prof Vijay Nayar and Dr Prag Moodley outlined the collaborative’s vision for a structured, clinically responsible model of Ayurveda practice in the UK, while Dr Vani Moodley spoke on Ayurvedic diagnostic principles and the philosophy underpinning the “Signs of Life” approach.

By Sujeeva Nivunhella
in London
-
Business6 days agoCabinet approves establishment of two 50 MW wind power stations in Mullikulum, Mannar region
-
News6 days agoGota ordered to give court evidence of life threats
-
Features6 days agoCliff and Hank recreate golden era of ‘The Young Ones’
-
Features6 days agoSri Lanka and Global Climate Emergency: Lessons of Cyclone Ditwah
-
Latest News7 days agoSri Lanka squad named for ACC Men’s U19 Asia Cup
-
Editorial6 days agoExperience vs. Inexperience
-
News6 days agoWFP scales up its emergency response in Sri Lanka
-
News6 days agoSpecial programme to clear debris in Biyagama
