Connect with us

Features

When does private become public? The blurry line in politics

Published

on

Sri Lanka’s political discourse is ablaze following the arrest of former President Ranil Wickremesinghe, accused of misappropriating approximately Rs. 16.9 million in public funds for a September 2023 London trip—allegedly to attend his wife’s university convocation, with no official meetings on his itinerary.

At first glance, the charge sounds simple enough: taxpayers’ money, a family trip, misuse. But politics, like life, is rarely that neat. This allegation raises deeper questions every citizen ought to reflect on: Is every movement of a Head of State automatically “official”? Or should leaders be judged by the same yardstick as private citizens, expected to pay out of pocket even when their position demands state resources? And at what point does the blending of personal and public duties become a matter of accountability?

The Entitlement of Office

A President, unlike you or me, cannot simply book an online ticket and slip through the airport unnoticed. Every journey is accompanied by a security convoy, diplomatic clearance, protocol officers, and logistical support. These arrangements are not luxuries—they are obligations of the State.

Whether the President is addressing the UN, meeting another head of state, or attending a family event, the government machinery moves with him. This is the nature of the office.

But here lies the tricky part: what if the trip contains a personal element? Should the public purse still bear the full expense?

When Precedent Speaks Louder

Sri Lanka is no stranger to blurred lines between personal and official travel.

Ranil Wickremesinghe’s case is now in the spotlight because it involved his wife’s convocation in London.

The current President recently came under scrutiny for deploying state security and official vehicles for visits to Thambuththegama, Anuradhapura, where his ailing mother was receiving treatment. Sympathetic though the situation was, questions were raised: should public resources be tied up for personal family visits?

During the recent election campaign, the President and several Cabinet ministers toured the country under the banner of the NPP and other parties. Official vehicles, security details, and government resources inevitably followed. Were these “official” or “political” trips?

These examples illustrate the same conundrum: private purposes wrapped in the unavoidable trappings of public office.

The Hard Numbers

Criticism grows sharper when numbers enter the conversation.

According to parliamentary disclosures, between 2010–2024, over Rs. 3,956 million was spent on overseas travel by Presidents and their entourages.

Mahinda Rajapaksa alone accounted for Rs. 3,572 million between 2010–2014, with his most expensive single year being 2013, when his trips cost the state Rs. 1,144 million.

Maithripala Sirisena spent Rs. 384 million (2015–2019).

Gotabaya Rajapaksa (2020–2022) spent Rs. 126 million.

Ranil Wickremesinghe (2023–2024) spent Rs. 533 million.

Anura Kumara Dissanayake (since Sept. 2024) has spent just Rs. 1.8 million on foreign travel. This claim has been contested by the Opposition, which insists that it should be much higher.

Placed in this context, the Rs. 16.9 million in question during Wickremesinghe’s London trip may look modest compared to Mahinda’s billion-rupee years—but it strikes a nerve because it appears tied to a purely personal occasion, not diplomacy or governance.

Drawing the Line

Legal experts have long wrestled with this blurred boundary. Ali Sabry, the former Minister of Foreign Affairs, has argued that it is nearly impossible to draw a perfect line between official and private conduct in the life of a political leader. A President or Minister remains a public figure 24 hours a day. Even their private movements require state protection and resources.

As many lawyers and scholars highlight, what matters is not whether private and public overlap, but whether the overlap is done in good faith or in abuse of power.

Did the leader intentionally divert public money for personal enrichment? Or did state expenditure arise naturally because of the responsibilities of office? This distinction is crucial.

Point of No Return: From Warplanes to the Rubicon

The phrase “Point of No Return” carries two powerful origins — one modern, one ancient.

In aviation, it refers to the exact point in a long flight when an aircraft no longer has enough fuel to turn back. Beyond that, the pilot must press on, no matter what the risks ahead. During World War II, bomber crews often faced this calculation: once beyond the point of no return, there was no choice but to fly into enemy territory, even if weather worsened or defences thickened.

But in ancient history, the phrase finds its political metaphor. In 49 BC, Julius Caesar crossed the Rubicon River with his army, an act forbidden by Roman law. By doing so, he made civil war inevitable. The die was cast, retreat impossible. That moment became the classic symbol of a political point of no return — a decision so consequential that there is no path back.

When drawing on this dual imagery: the pilot who cannot turn back, and Caesar who, once across the Rubicon, changed history irreversibly. The argument is that, there is a danger that Sri Lanka’s institutions may cross a point where constant abuse of privilege and weak ethical standards make it impossible to rebuild public confidence.

Relating this to today’s controversies, including the Ranil Wickremesinghe London trip:

If every act that blends private and public is condemned as “misuse,” then the public ceases to differentiate between abuse of office and incidental costs of high office.

Once citizens treat all acts as corrupt, Sri Lanka itself crosses a Rubicon — a point of no return where cynicism permanently replaces trust.

Lessons from Past Presidents

Sri Lanka has seen this debate before:

Mahinda Rajapaksa faced criticism for the size of his delegations abroad and use of state funds for family members’ travel.

Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga was questioned overuse of the Presidential aircraft for both official and semi-official trips.

Even J.R. Jayewardene in the 1980s was accused of blurring official travel with family commitments.

None of these cases were ever clearly resolved, partly because Sri Lanka lacks strict guidelines on how to classify official versus private expenses. The vacuum leaves the door open to selective outrage, often driven more by politics than by principle.

Why the Debate Matters

For ordinary citizens, struggling with high inflation and daily survival, such debates often sound like elites protecting each other. “Why should my tax money pay for a politician’s family trip?” is a fair and emotional question.

But the counterpoint is equally important: If we expect our leaders to serve, travel, and represent the country, we must accept that public funds will sometimes cover situations that look private. The problem is not overlap—it is excess.

A President accompanying his wife abroad, while carrying state duties, may be acceptable.

A President using public aircraft to fly in supporters for political rallies is not.

A Minister who attends a personal event but also holds bilateral meetings could argue that his role justifies the expense. A Minister who disguises a holiday as “official business” crosses the line.

This is where the “point of no return” metaphor bites: once politicians repeatedly blur private and public without accountability, trust in government collapses. Citizens then view all spending as theft, regardless of context.

When Enemies Become Best Friends Behind Bars

And then came the parade of visitors—Wickremesinghe’s old political enemies, suddenly transformed into bedside sympathisers. Men and women who once thundered about his failures now with practiced solemnity, as if paying homage to a fallen monarch. Some scholars saw it not as compassion but as a class solidarity, elite and non-elite. In Sri Lanka, the political elite may clash fiercely in public, like cats, but when scrutiny arrives, old enemies close ranks. Leaders once condemned as tyrants are swiftly rebranded as “respected statesmen,” while citizens are expected to applaud. It is hardly surprising, then, that public faith in politics continues to erode.

Conclusion: The True Test of Integrity

The Ranil Wickremesinghe controversy is less about one former President’s trip and more about Sri Lanka’s culture of accountability. We are at risk of reaching a “point of no return” in public trust, where citizens no longer distinguish between minor overlaps and major abuses.

So, the next time you hear cries of “misuse,” don’t just ask who paid the bill. Ask instead:

Was it in good faith linked naturally to the duties of office?

Was it excessive or abusive, designed for personal gain?

Did it cross the line from overlap to outright exploitation?

That, more than headlines or political mudslinging, may be the true test of integrity in public life.

(The writer, a senior Chartered Accountant and professional banker, is Professor at SLIIT, Malabe. The views and opinions expressed in this article are personal.)



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Acid test emerges for US-EU ties

Published

on

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen addressing the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on Tuesday put forward the EU’s viewpoint on current questions in international politics with a clarity, coherence and eloquence that was noteworthy. Essentially, she aimed to leave no one in doubt that a ‘new form of European independence’ had emerged and that European solidarity was at a peak.

These comments emerge against the backdrop of speculation in some international quarters that the Post-World War Two global political and economic order is unraveling. For example, if there was a general tacit presumption that US- Western European ties in particular were more or less rock-solid, that proposition apparently could no longer be taken for granted.

For instance, while US President Donald Trump is on record that he would bring Greenland under US administrative control even by using force against any opposition, if necessary, the EU Commission President was forthright that the EU stood for Greenland’s continued sovereignty and independence.

In fact at the time of writing, small military contingents from France, Germany, Sweden, Norway and the Netherlands are reportedly already in Greenland’s capital of Nook for what are described as limited reconnaissance operations. Such moves acquire added importance in view of a further comment by von der Leyen to the effect that the EU would be acting ‘in full solidarity with Greenland and Denmark’; the latter being the current governing entity of Greenland.

It is also of note that the EU Commission President went on to say that the ‘EU has an unwavering commitment to UK’s independence.’ The immediate backdrop to this observation was a UK decision to hand over administrative control over the strategically important Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia to Mauritius in the face of opposition by the Trump administration. That is, European unity in the face of present controversial moves by the US with regard to Greenland and other matters of contention is an unshakable ‘given’.

It is probably the fact that some prominent EU members, who also hold membership of NATO, are firmly behind the EU in its current stand-offs with the US that is prompting the view that the Post-World War Two order is beginning to unravel. This is, however, a matter for the future. It will be in the interests of the contending quarters concerned and probably the world to ensure that the present tensions do not degenerate into an armed confrontation which would have implications for world peace.

However, it is quite some time since the Post-World War Two order began to face challenges. Observers need to take their minds back to the Balkan crisis and the subsequent US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq in the immediate Post-Cold War years, for example, to trace the basic historic contours of how the challenges emerged. In the above developments the seeds of global ‘disorder’ were sown.

Such ‘disorder’ was further aggravated by the Russian invasion of Ukraine four years ago. Now it may seem that the world is reaping the proverbial whirlwind. It is relevant to also note that the EU Commission President was on record as pledging to extend material and financial support to Ukraine in its travails.

Currently, the international law and order situation is such that sections of the world cannot be faulted for seeing the Post World War Two international order as relentlessly unraveling, as it were. It will be in the interests of all concerned for negotiated solutions to be found to these global tangles. In fact von der Leyen has committed the EU to finding diplomatic solutions to the issues at hand, including the US-inspired tariff-related squabbles.

Given the apparent helplessness of the UN system, a pre-World War Two situation seems to be unfolding, with those states wielding the most armed might trying to mould international power relations in their favour. In the lead-up to the Second World War, the Hitlerian regime in Germany invaded unopposed one Eastern European country after another as the League of Nations stood idly by. World War Two was the result of the Allied Powers finally jerking themselves out of their complacency and taking on Germany and its allies in a full-blown world war.

However, unlike in the late thirties of the last century, the seeming number one aggressor, which is the US this time around, is not going unchallenged. The EU which has within its fold the foremost of Western democracies has done well to indicate to the US that its power games in Europe are not going unmonitored and unchecked. If the US’ designs to take control of Greenland and Denmark, for instance, are not defeated the world could very well be having on its hands, sooner rather than later, a pre-World War Two type situation.

Ironically, it is the ‘World’s Mightiest Democracy’ which is today allowing itself to be seen as the prime aggressor in the present round of global tensions. In the current confrontations, democratic opinion the world over is obliged to back the EU, since it has emerged as the principal opponent of the US, which is allowing itself to be seen as a fascist power.

Hopefully sane counsel would prevail among the chief antagonists in the present standoff growing, once again, out of uncontainable territorial ambitions. The EU is obliged to lead from the front in resolving the current crisis by diplomatic means since a region-wide armed conflict, for instance, could lead to unbearable ill-consequences for the world.

It does not follow that the UN has no role to play currently. Given the existing power realities within the UN Security Council, the UN cannot be faulted for coming to be seen as helpless in the face of the present tensions. However, it will need to continue with and build on its worldwide development activities since the global South in particular needs them very badly.

The UN needs to strive in the latter directions more than ever before since multi-billionaires are now in the seats of power in the principle state of the global North, the US. As the charity Oxfam has pointed out, such financially all-powerful persons and allied institutions are multiplying virtually incalculably. It follows from these realities that the poor of the world would suffer continuous neglect. The UN would need to redouble its efforts to help these needy sections before widespread poverty leads to hemispheric discontent.

Continue Reading

Features

Brighten up your skin …

Published

on

Hi! This week I’ve come up with tips to brighten up your skin.

* Turmeric and Yoghurt Face Pack:

You will need 01 teaspoon of turmeric powder and 02 tablespoons of fresh yoghurt.

Mix the turmeric and yoghurt into a smooth paste and apply evenly on clean skin. Leave it for 15–20 minutes and then rinse with lukewarm water

Benefits:

Reduces pigmentation, brightens dull skin and fights acne-causing bacteria.

* Lemon and Honey Glow Pack:

Mix 01teaspoon lemon juice and 01 tablespoon honey and apply it gently to the face. Leave for 10–15 minutes and then wash off with cool water.

Benefits:

Lightens dark spots, improves skin tone and deeply moisturises. By the way, use only 01–02 times a week and avoid sun exposure after use.

* Aloe Vera Gel Treatment:

All you need is fresh aloe vera gel which you can extract from an aloe leaf. Apply a thin layer, before bedtime, leave it overnight, and then wash face in the morning.

Benefits:

Repairs damaged skin, lightens pigmentation and adds natural glow.

* Rice Flour and Milk Scrub:

You will need 01 tablespoon rice flour and 02 tablespoons fresh milk.

Mix the rice flour and milk into a thick paste and then massage gently in circular motions. Leave for 10 minutes and then rinse with water.

Benefits:

Removes dead skin cells, improves complexion, and smoothens skin.

* Tomato Pulp Mask:

Apply the tomato pulp directly, leave for 15 minutes, and then rinse with cool water

Benefits:

Controls excess oil, reduces tan, and brightens skin naturally.

Continue Reading

Features

Shooting for the stars …

Published

on

That’s precisely what 25-year-old Hansana Balasuriya has in mind – shooting for the stars – when she was selected to represent Sri Lanka on the international stage at Miss Intercontinental 2025, in Sahl Hasheesh, Egypt.

The grand finale is next Thursday, 29th January, and Hansana is all geared up to make her presence felt in a big way.

Her journey is a testament to her fearless spirit and multifaceted talents … yes, her life is a whirlwind of passion, purpose, and pageantry.

Raised in a family of water babies (Director of The Deep End and Glory Swim Shop), Hansana’s love affair with swimming began in childhood and then she branched out to master the “art of 8 limbs” as a Muay Thai fighter, nailed Karate and Kickboxing (3-time black belt holder), and even threw herself into athletics (literally!), especially throwing events, and netball, as well.

A proud Bishop’s College alumna, Hansana’s leadership skills also shone bright as Senior Choir Leader.

She earned a BA (Hons) in Business Administration from Esoft Metropolitan University, and then the world became her playground.

Before long, modelling and pageantry also came into her scene.

She says she took to part-time modelling, as a hobby, and that led to pageants, grabbing 2nd Runner-up titles at Miss Nature Queen and Miss World Sri Lanka 2025.

When she’s not ruling the stage, or pool, Hansana’s belting tunes with Soul Sounds, Sri Lanka’s largest female ensemble.

What’s more, her artistry extends to drawing, and she loves hitting the open road for long drives, she says.

This water warrior is also on a mission – as Founder of Wave of Safety,

Hansana happens to be the youngest Executive Committee Member of the Sri Lanka Aquatic Sports Union (SLASU) and, as founder of Wave of Safety, she’s spreading water safety awareness and saving lives.

Today is Hansana’s ninth day in Egypt and the itinerary for today, says National Director for Sri Lanka, Brian Kerkoven, is ‘Jeep Safari and Sunset at the Desert.’

And … the all-important day at Miss Intercontinental 2025 is next Thursday, 29th January.

Well, good luck to Hansana.

Continue Reading

Trending