News
Nationalists wary of Indo-Lanka defence talks amidst secret MoUs
Top spokesman for the Patriotic National Movement (PNM) Dr. Wasantha Bandara yesterday (09) said that even two months after Sri Lanka entered into a Defence MoU with India, the Parliament, the country’s supreme legislative body, was yet to be informed about any of its contents.
Dr. Bandara found fault with the Opposition for not vigorously campaigning for the release of the seven MoUs, finalised during Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Colombo in early April. Those who represent the current Parliament seemed to be ready to go blindly with India, Dr. Bandara said, urging them to take a fresh look at the developing situation.
Responding to The Island queries, the civil society activist said that a top Indian defence delegation recently visited Colombo where the entire gamut of defence matters was discussed while the National People’s Power (NPP) government kept the Opposition in the dark.
The Indian delegation, led by Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh, last week separately met Deputy Minister of Defence Major General (retd.) Aruna Jayasekara and Defence Secretary Air Vice Marshal Sampath Thuyacontha (retd). Indian High Commissioner in Colombo Santosh Jha attended both meetings.
The Defence Ministry here quoted Singh as having reiterated India’s commitment to maintaining close and friendly relationship with Sri Lanka and further enhancement of defence and security cooperation, contributing to peace, stability, and prosperity in the region during his meeting with AVM Thuyakontha.
Dr. Bandara asked why the NPP couldn’t take the public into its confidence. “The government owed an explanation. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, in his capacity as the Defence Minister as well as the Commander-in-Chief of armed forces, cannot engage in a secret dialogue with India, under any circumstances,” Dr. Bandara said.
The Sectoral Oversight Committee (SOC) that dealt with defence was yet to discuss the Defence MoU, Dr. Bandara said, asserting that the whole parliamentary process seemed to be deeply flawed. Such a vital MoU should have been discussed at the relevant SOC before the government finalised it, Dr. Bandara said, pointing out that the current Indian posture in foreign policy matters may not be conducive to Sri Lanka, the former JVPer said.
Dr. Bandara pointed out that Prime Minister Modi announced the planned signing of the Defence MoU last December, several weeks before the NPP government mentioned it. The announcement made by Premier Modi, during President Dissanayake’s first official visit abroad since the presidential election, indicated that Sri Lanka didn’t have any other option than to proceed with New Delhi’s plans.
The PNM spokesman said that though some made an effort to portray the NPP-BJP government agreement on defence as a continuation of the dialogue between Modi and Ranil Wickremesinghe, the reality is different. A joint statement issued on July 21, 2023, soon after the conclusion of Wickremesinghe’s visit, hadn’t referred to an MoU on defence cooperation, Dr. Bandara said, asserting that specific MoU on defence was obviously a new addition.
Dr. Bandara said that nationalist groups got together in a bid to challenge the constitutionality of the Indo-Lanka MoUs.
The Patriotic National Movement, Global Sri Lanka Forum, Swadeshika Jathika Viyaparaya and Thunhela Jathika Viyaparaya filed a petition, requesting the Supreme Court to prevent the implementation of the MoUs, he said.
Challenging constitutionality of the seven MoUs finalised on April 07, 2025, in terms of Article 126 read with Article 17 of the Constitution, the petitioners, Dr. Gunadasa Amarasekera, Dr. Wasantha Bandara, Shyamendra Wickremarachchi, Chaminda Priyadarshana, Dr. Asoka Indrajith Kamaladasa and Ballanthudawa Achchige Nuwan Chamara Indunil asserted that the implementation of MoUs would violate the sovereignty of the people—including their economic sovereignty and right to governance—as well as the independence of Sri Lanka as a free state and nation.
“We are really concerned about the failure on the part of the parliamentary Opposition to take up this matter,” Dr. Bandara said, adding that the political parties here seemed to be dancing to India’s tune. The PNM spokesman questioned the rationale in India arranging groups of parliamentarians to visit New Delhi. “Have we ever gained from such foreign trips?” Dr. Bandara asked.
Among the 29 respondents were members of the Cabinet, including the Prime Minister, secretaries to the relevant ministries complicit in the issue at hand, Cabinet Secretary and the Attorney General.
The MoUs covered implementation of HVDC interconnection for import/export of power, cooperation in the field of sharing successful digital solutions implemented at population scale for digital transformation, development of Trincomalee as an energy hub, defence cooperation, multi-sectoral grant assistance for Eastern Province, cooperation in the field of Health and Medicine and cooperation between the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission and National Medicines Regulatory Authority.
Dr. Bandara alleged that India was taking advantage of the continuing economic crisis to pressure Sri Lanka. Unfortunately, those who represented Parliament, and the executive, lacked the strength to protect national interests.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
News
PUCSL and Treasury under IMF spotlight as CEB seeks 11.5% power tariff hike
The Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) and the Treasury are facing heightened scrutiny as the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) presses for an 11.5 percent electricity tariff increase, a move closely tied to IMF-driven state-owned enterprise (SOE) reforms aimed at curbing losses and easing fiscal pressure on the State.
The proposed hike comes as the Treasury intensifies efforts to reduce the budgetary burden of loss-making SOEs under Sri Lanka’s IMF programme, which places strong emphasis on cost-reflective pricing, improved governance and the elimination of quasi-fiscal deficits.
Power sector sources said the PUCSL has completed its technical evaluation of the CEB proposal and is expected to announce its determination shortly.
The decision is being closely watched not only as a test of regulatory independence, but also as an indicator of how Treasury-backed fiscal discipline is being enforced through independent regulators.Under the IMF agreement, Sri Lanka has committed to restructuring key SOEs, such as, the CEB to prevent recurring losses from spilling over into public finances.
Treasury officials have repeatedly warned that continued operational losses at the utility could ultimately require state intervention, undermining fiscal consolidation targets agreed with the IMF.
The CEB has justified the proposed 11.5 percent hike by citing high generation costs, foreign currency loan repayments and accumulated legacy losses, arguing that further tariff adjustments are necessary to stabilise finances and avoid a return to Treasury support.
However, critics argue that IMF-aligned reforms should not translate into routine tariff hikes without meaningful improvements in efficiency, cost controls and governance within the utility.
Trade unions and consumer groups have urged the PUCSL to resist pressure from both the CEB and fiscal authorities to simply pass costs on to consumers.
They also note that improved hydropower availability should reduce dependence on expensive thermal generation, easing cost pressures and giving the regulator room to moderate any tariff increase.
Energy analysts say the PUCSL’s ruling will reflect how effectively the Treasury’s fiscal objectives are being balanced against the regulator’s statutory duty to protect consumers, warning that over-reliance on tariff increases could erode public support for IMF-backed reforms.
Business chambers have cautioned that another electricity price hike could weaken industrial competitiveness and slow economic recovery, particularly in export-oriented and energy-intensive sectors already grappling with elevated costs.
Electricity tariffs remain one of the most politically sensitive aspects of IMF-linked restructuring, with previous hikes triggering widespread public discontent and raising concerns over social impact.
The PUCSL is expected to outline the basis of its decision, including whether the proposed 11.5 percent increase will be approved in full, scaled down, or restructured through slab-based mechanisms to cushion low-income households.
An energy expert stressed that Sri Lanka navigates IMF-mandated fiscal and SOE reforms, the forthcoming ruling is widely seen as a defining moment—testing not only the independence of the regulator, but also the Treasury’s ability to pursue reform without deepening the burden on consumers.
By Ifham Nizam ✍️
News
Bellana says Rs 900 mn fraud at NHSL cannot be suppressed by moving CID against him
Massive waste, corruption, irregularities and mismanagement at laboratories of the country’s premier hospital, revealed by the National Audit Office (NAO), couldn’t be suppressed by sacking or accusing him of issuing death threats to Health Secretary Dr. Anil Jasinghe, recently sacked Director of the National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL) Dr. Rukshan Bellana told The Island.
Dr. Bellana said so responding to Dr. Jasinghe’s request for police protection claiming that he (Bellana) was directly responsible for threatening him.
The NPP government owed an explanation without further delay as the queries raised by NAO pertained to Rs 900 mn fraud/loss caused as a result of procurement of chemical reagents for the 2022 to 2024 period remained unanswered, Dr. Bellana said, pointing out that NAO raised the issue in June last year.
Having accused all other political parties of corruption at all levels, the NPP couldn’t under any circumstances remain mum on NAO’s audit query, DR. Bellana said, claiming that he heard of attempts by certain interested parties to settle the matter outside legal procedures.
The former GMOA official said that the NPP’s reputation was at stake. Perhaps President Anura Kumara Dissanayake should look into this matter and ensure proper investigation. Dr. Bellana alleged that those who had been implicated in the NAO inquiry were making an attempt to depict procurement of shelf time expired chemical reagents as a minor matter.
By Shamindra Ferdinando ✍️
News
First harvest of rice offered to Dalada Maligawa
Continuing a centuries-old tradition, dating back to the era of ancient kings, the annual ‘Aluth Sahal Mangalya’—the offering of alms prepared from the maiden harvest of rice—was ceremonially observed at the Sri Dalada Maligawa on Duruthu Full Moon Poya Day, 03rd January.
The religious observances were conducted with the participation of Ven. Thibbatuwawe Sri Medhankara Thera, a member of the Thevava (officiating clergy) of the Sacred Tooth Relic, and Diyawadana Nilame Pradeep Nilanga Dela.
In keeping with long-established customs, paddy harvested from lands belonging to the Sri Dalada Maligawa was brought from the Atuwa (granary) in Pallekele. The newly harvested rice was subsequently prepared and offered as Buddha Pooja to the Sacred Tooth Relic.
Text and Pic by SK Samarnayake ✍️
-
News2 days agoHealth Minister sends letter of demand for one billion rupees in damages
-
News5 days agoLeading the Nation’s Connectivity Recovery Amid Unprecedented Challenges
-
Features6 days agoIt’s all over for Maxi Rozairo
-
Opinion4 days agoRemembering Douglas Devananda on New Year’s Day 2026
-
News6 days agoDr. Bellana: “I was removed as NHSL Deputy Director for exposing Rs. 900 mn fraud”
-
News5 days agoDons on warpath over alleged undue interference in university governance
-
Features6 days agoRebuilding Sri Lanka Through Inclusive Governance
-
Business5 days agoSri Lanka Tourism surpasses historic milestone with record tourist arrivals in 2025
