Features
The role of parliamentarians, the Speaker and restoring the dignity of Parliament
Parliament is the highest law-making body in the country consisting of the elected representatives of the people. It is the place where laws that impact the lives of very citizen of the country are made and hence the proper functioning of parliament is in the interest of all Sri Lankans. In recent years public confidence in parliament and their elected representatives has deteriorated due to some ugly incidents that have taken place within its precincts as well as due to the poor conduct of some MPs who have acted contrary to Standing Orders and brought the entire House to disrepute.
Since my retirement from Parliament in 1994, a question I get asked frequently is why parliamentary standards have dropped and why we don’t produce parliamentarians in the caliber of the ones we have seen in the past. This is a matter of great concern to me personally and to all Sri Lankans but I can only answer this based on my experience in the House, however not based on sociology or human behaviour, as I am not trained in these fields.
I leave that to some of by more able colleagues such as good friends like Professor Gananath Obeyesekera, Emeritus Professor of Princeton University, U.S.A., H.L. Seneviratne, my batchmate in Peradeniya, now a Professor of Sociology in the US or even so much better Hon. Sarath Amunugama, who has had the privilege of observing the House from within and outside, to answer this question fully.
However, ill-equipped as I am, I felt I should try, even inadequately to answer this. When I joined Parliament in the sixties, as a young man in my middle twenties, I was deeply impressed by the caliber of the Members and if I may be permitted, I would like to mention the names of some of them. I begin with Mrs. Sirimavo Bandaranaike, the first woman Prime Minister of the world, Dudley Senanayake, Dr. N.M. Perera, Dr. Colvin R. de Silva, Pieter Keuneman, Dr. S.A. Wickramasinghe, Phillip Gunawardena, Felix Dias Bandaranaike, Leslie Goonawardene, Bernard Soysa, T.B. Subasinghe, S.J.V. Chelvanayakam, and M. Sivasithamparam and I could go on and on.
It so happened that almost all had the benefit of either a university education or earning professional qualifications and most from the UK, USA, Russia, and Europe. Whether it was their enlightened education abroad, family backgrounds or refined ethical standards they adopted during their studies abroad, their speeches in Parliament were erudite and polished.
To me, a callow youth then, it was indeed an inspiration to follow their speeches and conduct within the Chamber and outside. Their contributions were studied ones. always relevant to the subject and it was a pleasure and privilege to listen to. In those days, many of my friends asked me for a ticket to the galleries to listen to their speeches. By and large, their conduct was exemplary and their speeches were well prepared and dignified in delivery. Even if they interrupted a fellow Member, it was done in style and in a decorous and dignified manner.
No doubt they lost their tempers, but yet there was restraint. I vividly recall senior Members like Phillip Gunawardena. Once he entered the Chamber and took his seat, he only got up at interval time or at adjournment time. He brought all his ministerial files to his desk and perused them studiously without ever leaving the Chamber. I recall him losing his temper when another Member called him, “a Boralugoda mee haraka.” Angered by this intemperate remark, he, and his brother Robert, promptly rushed out of their seats into the Well of the House to confront the Member; but soon returned to their seats containing their anger.
It was indeed a great pleasure to listen to Dr. N.M. Perera and Pieter Keuneman. Both these Members had prepared their speeches so well that they almost read out from the slips of papers they had carefully prepared. I used to collect these to hand them over to the Hansard Department so that they correctly record their speeches.
Some anecdotes come to my mind that illustrates the standards the Members of the past maintained. One related to Minister, U.B. Wanninayake, then Minister of Finance and his son. His son had applied for a vacancy in a state bank. At the interview he was asked his name and then his father’s name. The interview board was overawed interviewing the finance minister’s son. The Chairman of the Bank, a few days later, had phoned the father and told him that his son appeared for an interview. Minister Wanninayake had expressed surprise as he did not know of it at all. The Chairman then asked him, “Sir, what shall we do?” His prompt response was, “If he is suitable, take him. If he is not, send him away.”
There was also an incident relating to I.M.R.A. Iriyagolla, Minister of Education, who had been asked by the Hon. Dudley Senanayake, then Prime Minister, about his daughter accepting from the Indian Embassy a scholarship routed through the Ministry of Education. Hon. Iriyagolla questioned his daughter and was told how she applied on her own and was chosen to receive an undergrad scholarship. Hon. Iriyagolla reported back to the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister’s reply was, “Ask your daughter not to accept the scholarship. You are the Minister of Education and these scholarships though given by the Indian Embassy are routed through your Ministry.” That was the rectitude displayed by the Prime Minister of the day.
These anecdotes are to remind people that there were times when politicians conducted themselves in the most impeccable manner and put public interest above personal interests. This is not to say there are no politicians that continue to maintain high standards but they are fewer in number and unfortunately it is those who break the rules and behave in unruly manner who are often highlighted, rather than those who conduct themselves with dignity and decorum.
I like to add a note regarding the responsibilities and duties of the Speaker. I believe the Speaker is at least 70 per cent responsible for ensuring that the House is conducted in keeping with Standing Orders and that the rule the Speaker has the final word should be upheld firmly. If MPs disregard the Order from the Chair, they must be asked to refrain from such conduct and if not obeyed, asked to leave the Chamber and such behaviour brought to the notice of the relevant Whip. It is of utmost importance that the Speaker performs his duties independently and impartially. In doing so, he will easily earn the full confidence of all Members.
He cannot afford to fail even once. Having won the confidence of the House, he has every opportunity to be strict and vigilant regarding the conduct and behavior of the members. He should come down very heavily on all errant members. He is fully empowered to do this under the provisions of the Standing Orders. He is empowered to ask an errant member to leave the chamber for the rest of the day’s sitting. Newspapers will no doubt give sufficient publicity to this and the errant members will find it difficult to face their constituents. Hopefully, this will prevent the MPs from acting in an errant manner in future. Once the Speaker does so members will begin to respect him and he will win the confidence of the House.
A great deal of responsibility of the behavior of MPs within the House rests with the party leaders as well as the Leader of the House, Chief Government Whip, and the Chief Opposition Whip. I remember when Dudley Senanayake was the Prime Minister, if there were any unwarranted interruptions from members of his side, he would turn around and signal with his hand for them to sit down and they would do so. Today it seems there is little control over the behaviour of their MPs, by the Leader of the House and the Leader of the Opposition.
When new MPs are elected, they are given a one or two-day training conducted by the Secretary General about their role as parliamentarians. Copies of the Constitution, Standing Orders, and the Parliament (Powers and Privileges) Act are given to each new MP but now it seems that many MPs are unaware of the rules for speaking and conduct in the House. Speakers are often interrupted without adherence to rules regarding rising to a Point of Order and Members get up to speak without reference to the relevant Standing Order.
I also feel that party leaders too have an enormous responsibility cast on them when choosing candidates to give them nominations at election time. They should strictly consider the choice of nominee by giving integrity, impeccable honesty, and a sound educational background pride of place. All too often unsuitable people are chosen just because they are popular in the area or have substantial financial resources but have a very questionable backgrounds in terms of honesty and integrity.
Popularity in the district alone may not be sufficient if he has a dubious past. I may add that a reasonable standard of education would be essential if one hopes to become a MP. Hopefully, a sound education will help an MP to develop a sense of honesty and integrity and guide him to follow a code of proper conduct and make contributions to debate worthy of the high office he holds.
The role to be played by leaders of all political parties should not be underestimated. It is up to them to ensure continuous strict and vigilant control over their members and to take them to task when they fail. Party leaders could choose two or three members who show interest and possess a deep knowledge of subject to speak on which comes up for debate and make a real contribution rather than allow any member not quite conversant with the subject matter at hand, to speak, and waste the time of the House.
Since time available for Members may be limited, if such a choice is made it will certainly enhance the content of their speeches and quality of debate. This may seem to restrict the freedom of the members speaking, but if properly explained to them by their leaders, hopefully the desired objective can be achieved and a high standard of debate expected.
I believe there is a need for more training of MPs which should be a continuous process rather than one that only takes place when they are new to the Legislature. Refreshers courses will help them to understand their responsibilities as lawmakers and ensure that the law-making process is handled with due seriousness. There is no need to go to five-star resorts for these programs as the parliament complex is more than well equipped with facilities to conduct such sessions on non-sitting days.
Members should be encouraged to visit the library and request the research officers there to prepare a five-page report on the most recent developments of the subject matter they had chosen. Yet another observation I like to make is that under the present electoral system the area covered is too large an extent instead of the small constituencies we had in the past. Members today have to spend large sums of money in their District and as a result, Members may even go to the extent of getting into serious debt or become obliged to people who finance their campaigns thus giving away their independence leading to a lack of integrity.
Hopefully, we will soon see a fresh electoral system going back to smaller wards and constituencies, making them less dependent on borrowed finances and making Members more accessible to their constituents. My personal belief is that the constituency system is more desirable, though the first-past-the -post has inbuilt deficiencies. The close tie between the Member and his small constituency is essential. For example, the Colombo District returns 29 members and the area ranges from Peliyagoda in the North, Kalutara in the South and Avissawella in the East and voters cannot find the MP who represents their particular area.
(Excerpted from Memories of 33 year in Parliament by Nihal Seneviratne)
Features
Digital transformation in the Global South
Understanding Sri Lanka through the India AI Impact Summit 2026
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has rapidly moved from being a specialised technological field into a major social force that shapes economies, cultures, governance, and everyday human life. The India AI Impact Summit 2026, held in New Delhi, symbolised a significant moment for the Global South, especially South Asia, because it demonstrated that artificial intelligence is no longer limited to advanced Western economies but can also become a development tool for emerging societies. The summit gathered governments, researchers, technology companies, and international organisations to discuss how AI can support social welfare, public services, and economic growth. Its central message was that artificial intelligence should be human centred and socially useful. Instead of focusing only on powerful computing systems, the summit emphasised affordable technologies, open collaboration, and ethical responsibility so that ordinary citizens can benefit from digital transformation. For South Asia, where large populations live in rural areas and resources are unevenly distributed, this idea is particularly important.
People friendly AI
One of the most important concepts promoted at the summit was the idea of “people friendly AI.” This means that artificial intelligence should be accessible, understandable, and helpful in daily activities. In South Asia, language diversity and economic inequality often prevent people from using advanced technology. Therefore, systems designed for local languages, and smartphones, play a crucial role. When a farmer can speak to a digital assistant in Sinhala, Tamil, or Hindi and receive advice about weather patterns or crop diseases, technology becomes practical rather than distant. Similarly, voice based interfaces allow elderly people and individuals with limited literacy to use digital services. Affordable mobile based AI tools reduce the digital divide between urban and rural populations. As a result, artificial intelligence stops being an elite instrument and becomes a social assistant that supports ordinary life.
Transformation in education sector
The influence of this transformation is visible in education. AI based learning platforms can analyse student performance and provide personalised lessons. Instead of all students following the same pace, weaker learners receive additional practice while advanced learners explore deeper material. Teachers are able to focus on mentoring and explanation rather than repetitive instruction. In many South Asian societies, including Sri Lanka, education has long depended on memorisation and private tuition classes. AI tutoring systems could reduce educational inequality by giving rural students access to learning resources, similar to those available in cities. A student who struggles with mathematics, for example, can practice step by step exercises automatically generated according to individual mistakes. This reduces pressure, improves confidence, and gradually changes the educational culture from rote learning toward understanding and problem solving.
Healthcare is another area where AI is becoming people friendly. Many rural communities face shortages of doctors and medical facilities. AI-assisted diagnostic tools can analyse symptoms, or medical images, and provide early warnings about diseases. Patients can receive preliminary advice through mobile applications, which helps them decide whether hospital visits are necessary. This reduces overcrowding in hospitals and saves travel costs. Public health authorities can also analyse large datasets to monitor disease outbreaks and allocate resources efficiently. In this way, artificial intelligence supports not only individual patients but also the entire health system.
Agriculture, which remains a primary livelihood for millions in South Asia, is also undergoing transformation. Farmers traditionally rely on seasonal experience, but climate change has made weather patterns unpredictable. AI systems that analyse rainfall data, soil conditions, and satellite images can predict crop performance and recommend irrigation schedules. Early detection of plant diseases prevents large-scale crop losses. For a small farmer, accurate information can mean the difference between profit and debt. Thus, AI directly influences economic stability at the household level.
Employment and communication reshaped
Artificial intelligence is also reshaping employment and communication. Routine clerical and repetitive tasks are increasingly automated, while demand grows for digital skills, such as data management, programming, and online services. Many young people in South Asia are beginning to participate in remote work, freelancing, and digital entrepreneurship. AI translation tools allow communication across languages, enabling businesses to reach international customers. Knowledge becomes more accessible because information can be summarised, translated, and explained instantly. This leads to a broader sociological shift: authority moves from tradition and hierarchy toward information and analytical reasoning. Individuals rely more on data when making decisions about education, finance, and career planning.
Impact on Sri Lanka
The impact on Sri Lanka is especially significant because the country shares many social and economic conditions with India and often adopts regional technological innovations. Sri Lanka has already begun integrating artificial intelligence into education, agriculture, and public administration. In schools and universities, AI learning tools may reduce the heavy dependence on private tuition and help students in rural districts receive equal academic support. In agriculture, predictive analytics can help farmers manage climate variability, improving productivity and food security. In public administration, digital systems can speed up document processing, licensing, and public service delivery. Smart transportation systems may reduce congestion in urban areas, saving time and fuel.
Economic opportunities are also expanding. Sri Lanka’s service based economy and IT outsourcing sector can benefit from increased global demand for digital skills. AI-assisted software development, data annotation, and online service platforms can create new employment pathways, especially for educated youth. Small and medium entrepreneurs can use AI tools to design products, manage finances, and market services internationally at low cost. In tourism, personalised digital assistants and recommendation systems can improve visitor experiences and help small businesses connect with travellers directly.
Digital inequality
However, the integration of artificial intelligence also raises serious concerns. Digital inequality may widen if only educated urban populations gain access to technological skills. Some routine jobs may disappear, requiring workers to retrain. There are also risks of misinformation, surveillance, and misuse of personal data. Ethical regulation and transparency are, therefore, essential. Governments must develop policies that protect privacy, ensure accountability, and encourage responsible innovation. Public awareness and digital literacy programmes are necessary so that citizens understand both the benefits and limitations of AI systems.
Beyond economics and services, AI is gradually influencing social relationships and cultural patterns. South Asian societies have traditionally relied on hierarchy and personal authority, but data-driven decision making changes this structure. Agricultural planning may depend on predictive models rather than ancestral practice, and educational evaluation may rely on learning analytics instead of examination rankings alone. This does not eliminate human judgment, but it alters its basis. Societies increasingly value analytical thinking, creativity, and adaptability. Educational systems must, therefore, move beyond memorisation toward critical thinking and interdisciplinary learning.
AI contribution to national development
In Sri Lanka, these changes may contribute to national development if implemented carefully. AI-supported financial monitoring can improve transparency and reduce corruption. Smart infrastructure systems can help manage transportation and urban planning. Communication technologies can support interaction among Sinhala, Tamil, and English speakers, promoting social inclusion in a multilingual society. Assistive technologies can improve accessibility for persons with disabilities, enabling broader participation in education and employment. These developments show that artificial intelligence is not merely a technological innovation but a social instrument capable of strengthening equality when guided by ethical policy.
Symbolic shift
Ultimately, the India AI Impact Summit 2026 represents a symbolic shift in the global technological landscape. It indicates that developing nations are beginning to shape the future of artificial intelligence according to their own social needs rather than passively importing technology. For South Asia and Sri Lanka, the challenge is not whether AI will arrive but how it will be used. If education systems prepare citizens, if governments establish responsible regulations, and if access remains inclusive, AI can become a partner in development rather than a source of inequality. The future will likely involve close collaboration between humans and intelligent systems, where machines assist decision making while human values guide outcomes. In this sense, artificial intelligence does not replace human society, but transforms it, offering Sri Lanka an opportunity to build a more knowledge based, efficient, and equitable social order in the decades ahead.
by Milinda Mayadunna
Features
Governance cannot be a postscript to economics
The visit by IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva to Sri Lanka was widely described as a success for the government. She was fulsome in her praise of the country and its developmental potential. The grounds for this success and collaborative spirit go back to the inception of the agreement signed in March 2023 in the aftermath of Sri Lanka’s declaration of international bankruptcy. The IMF came in to fulfil its role as lender of last resort. The government of the day bit the bullet. It imposed unpopular policies on the people, most notably significant tax increases. At a moment when the country had run out of foreign exchange, defaulted on its debt, and faced shortages of fuel, medicine and food, the IMF programme restored a measure of confidence both within the country and internationally.
Since 1965 Sri Lanka has entered into agreements with the IMF on 16 occasions none of which were taken to their full term. The present agreement is the 17th agreement . IMF agreements have traditionally been focused on economic restructuring. Invariably the terms of agreement have been harsh on the people, with priority being given to ensure the debtor country pays its loans back to the IMF. Fiscal consolidation, tax increases, subsidy reductions and structural reforms have been the recurring features. The social and political costs have often been high. Governments have lost popularity and sometimes fallen before programmes were completed. The IMF has learned from experience across the world that macroeconomic reform without social protection can generate backlash, instability and policy reversals.
The experience of countries such as Greece, Ireland and Portugal in dealing with the IMF during the eurozone crisis demonstrated the political and social costs of austerity, even though those economies later stabilised and returned to growth. The evolution of IMF policies has ensured that there are two special features in the present agreement. The first is that the IMF has included a safety net of social welfare spending to mitigate the impact of the austerity measures on the poorest sections of the population. No country can hope to grow at 7 or 8 percent per annum when a third of its people are struggling to survive. Poverty alleviation measures in the Aswesuma programme, developed with the agreement of the IMF, are key to mitigating the worst impacts of the rising cost of living and limited opportunities for employment.
Governance Included
The second important feature of the IMF agreement is the inclusion of governance criteria to be implemented alongside the economic reforms. It goes to the heart of why Sri Lanka has had to return to the IMF repeatedly. Economic mismanagement did not take place in a vacuum. It was enabled by weak institutions, politicised decision making, non-transparent procurement, and the erosion of checks and balances. In its economic reform process, the IMF has included an assessment of governance related issues to accompany the economic restructuring process. At the top of this list is tackling the problem of corruption by means of publicising contracts, ensuring open solicitation of tenders, and strengthening financial accountability mechanisms.
The IMF also encouraged a civil society diagnostic study and engaged with civil society organisations regularly. The civil society analysis of governance issues which was promoted by Verite Research and facilitated by Transparency International was wider in scope than those identified in the IMF’s own diagnostic. It pointed to systemic weaknesses that go beyond narrow fiscal concerns. The civil society diagnostic study included issues of social justice such as the inequitable impact of targeting EPF and ETF funds of workers for restructuring and the need to repeal abuse prone laws such as the Prevention of Terrorism Act and the Online Safety Act. When workers see their retirement savings restructured without adequate consultation, confidence in policy making erodes. When laws are perceived to be instruments of arbitrary power, social cohesion weakens.
During a meeting between the IMF Managing Director Georgeiva and civil society members last week, there was discussion on the implementation of those governance measures in which she spoke in a manner that was not alien to the civil society representatives. Significantly, the civil society diagnostic report also referred to the ethnic conflict and the breakdown of interethnic relations that led to three decades of deadly war, causing severe economic losses to the country. This was also discussed at the meeting. Governance is not only about accounting standards and procurement rules. It is about social justice, equality before the law, and political representation. On this issue the government has more to do. Ethnic and religious minorities find themselves inadequately represented in high level government committees. The provincial council system that ensured ethnic and minority representation at the provincial level continues to be in abeyance.
Beyond IMF
The significance of addressing governance issues is not only relevant to the IMF agreement. It is also important in accessing tariff concessions from the European Union. The GSP Plus tariff concession given by the EU enables Sri Lankan exports to be sold at lower prices and win markets in Europe. For an export dependent economy, this is critical. Loss of such concessions would directly affect employment in key sectors such as apparel. The government needs to address longstanding EU concerns about the protection of human rights and labour rights in the country. The EU has, for several years, linked the continuation of GSP Plus to compliance with international conventions. This includes the condition that the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) be brought into line with international standards. The government’s alternative in the form of the draft Protection of the State from Terrorism Act (PTSA) is less abusive on paper but is wider in scope and retains the core features of the PTA.
Governance and social justice factors cannot be ignored or downplayed in the pursuit of economic development. If Sri Lanka is to break out of its cycle of crisis and bailout, it must internalise the fact that good governance which promotes social justice and more fairly distributes the costs and fruits of development is the foundation on which durable economic growth is built. Without it, stabilisation will remain fragile, poverty will remain high, and the promise of 7 to 8 percent growth will remain elusive. The implementation of governance reforms will also have a positive effect through the creative mechanism of governance linked bonds, an innovation of the present IMF agreement.
The Sri Lankan think tank Verité Research played an important role in the development of governance linked bonds. They reduce the rate of interest payable by the government on outstanding debt on the basis that better governance leads to a reduction in risk for those who have lent their money to Sri Lanka. This is a direct financial reward for governance reform. The present IMF programme offers an opportunity not only to stabilise the economy but to strengthen the institutions that underpin it. That opportunity needs to be taken. Without it, the country cannot attract investment, expand exports and move towards shared prosperity and to a 7-8 percent growth rate that can lift the country out of its debt trap.
by Jehan Perera
Features
MISTER Band … in the spotlight
It’s a good sign, indeed, for the local scene, to see artistes, who have not been very much in the limelight, now making their presence felt, in a big way, and I’m glad to give them the publicity they deserve.
On 10th February we had Yellow Beatz in the spotlight and this week it’s MISTER Band.
This outfit is certainly not new to our scene; they have been around since 2012, under the leadership of Sithum Waidyarathne.
The seven energetic members who make up MISTER Band are:
Sithum Waidyarathne (leader/founder/saxophonist/guitarist and vocalist), Rangana Seram (bass guitarist), Vihanga Liyanage (vocalist), Ridmi Dissanayake (female vocalist), Nuwan Cristo (keyboardist/vocalist), Kasun Thennakoon (lead guitarist), and Nuwan Madushanka (drummer).
According to Sithum, their vision is to provide high quality entertainmen to those who engage their services.
“Thanks to our engaging performances and growing popularity, MISTER Band continues to be in high demand … at weddings, corporate events and dinner dances,” said Sithum.
They predominantly cover English and Sinhala music, as well as the most popular genres.
And the reviews that come their way, after a performance, are excellent, they say, and this is one of the bouquets they received:
It was a pleasure to have you at our wedding. Being avid music fans we wanted the best music, not just a big named band, and you guys acceded that expectations. Big thanks to Sithum for being very supportive, attentive and generous.
- Sithum Waidyarathne: Band leader and founder
- Ridmi Dissanayake: MISTER Band’s female vocalist
The best thing is the post feedback from all the guests. Normally we get mixed reviews but the whole crowd was impressed by you.
MISTER Band was one of our best choices for our wedding.
What is interesting is that for the past four consecutive years, this outfit has performed overseas, during New Year’s Eve, thereby taking their music to the international stage, as well.
The band has also produced a collection of original songs, with around six original tracks composed by the band leader, Sithum Waidyarathne, including ‘Suraganak Dutuwa,’ ‘Landuni,’ ‘Dili Dili Payana,’ ‘Hada Wedana,’ and ‘Nil Kandu Athare.’
Two more songs are set to be released this month: ‘Hitha Norida’ and ‘Premaye Hanguman.’
In addition to their original music, they have also created a strong online presence by performing and uploading over 50 cover songs and medleys to YouTube.
“We’re now planning to connect with an even wider audience by releasing more cover content very soon,” said Sithum, adding that they are also very active on social media, under the name Mister Band Official – on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok.
-
Features3 days agoWhy does the state threaten Its people with yet another anti-terror law?
-
Features3 days agoReconciliation, Mood of the Nation and the NPP Government
-
Features3 days agoVictor Melder turns 90: Railwayman and bibliophile extraordinary
-
Features2 days agoLOVEABLE BUT LETHAL: When four-legged stars remind us of a silent killer
-
Features3 days agoVictor, the Friend of the Foreign Press
-
Latest News4 days agoNew Zealand meet familiar opponents Pakistan at spin-friendly Premadasa
-
Latest News4 days agoTariffs ruling is major blow to Trump’s second-term agenda
-
Latest News4 days agoECB push back at Pakistan ‘shadow-ban’ reports ahead of Hundred auction


