Features
POPE FRANCIS AS I KNEW HIM
It was about 8.30 am on April 21, 2025, the day after Easter when we were getting ready to continue the joy of the triumphant resurrection of Jesus Christ that the Italian TV stations began to give a shock to most of us with the announcement of the sudden death of Pope Francis at 7.35 am that day.
Although he was 88-years and was convalescing from the complexities of double bilateral multi-microbial pneumonia and multiple bronchioectasis attacks, it was a ‘shock’ because hardly 24 hours before, he had appeared on the balcony of St.Peter’s Basilica to deliver the customary Urbi et Orbi blessing. That day, he even summoned courage, in spite of his apparent frailty, to ride one last time in the popemobile among the thousands of faithful gathered at St.Peter’s Square which in retrospect appears to be his way of bidding farewell to the people he loved so much.
One news agency reported his passing away in these fitting words: “Pope Francis slipped quietly from this world—his departure marked not by spectacle, but by the same humility and human closeness that defined his pontificate”.
Simplicity of life
In 2013, he was elected Pope, thus, becoming the first Jesuit to become a Successor of St. Peter, the Apostle to whom Jesus entrusted his Church. He took the name Francis. It was the first time this name was adopted by a Pope of the Catholic Church, to honour the great Italian saint of the poor, St. Francis of Assisi who lived a simple and poor life, imitating the gospel value of detachment.
Till the end, Pope Francis tried his best to live up to his adopted papal name ‘Francis’ not only by living a simple, detached life, but also by reaching out to the poor and to those condemned to live in the margins of both the Church and the wider society in the world. This was nothing new for Bergoglio (as I regularly hear from my Argentinian students in Rome) because even as the Cardinal Archbishop of Buenos Aires, he was known for his simple lifestyle, such as travelling by public transport (bus, train and metro/sub-way) and for living in an ordinary flat cooking his own meals. This is something unheard of with regard to a vast majority of the Episcopal dignitaries in the contemporary Catholic Church.
It is the custom that immediately after the election of a new Pope within the closed doors of the Sistine Chapel adjacent to St.Peter’s Basilica, he is presented to the world from the front balcony of the Basilica, and then, to read a traditional prayer by him, and then, to impart his first papal blessing on those gathered in the massive piazza of St. Peter’s. However, I still remember when Cardinal Bergoglio was presented to the crowds as the new Pope, his first words were: “Buona Sera!” which means “Good Evening”!
Then, he bent before the thousands gathered in St.Peter’s Square that memorable evening, and said: “Please pray that God may grant his grace upon me to fulfill this immense responsibility as the Bishop of Rome”. There was pin-drop silence as the people sensed a moment of special grace. Those of us who were watching this unprecedented event were saying to ourselves: “Well, here is a Pope who will make a difference for the Church and the world”! And that’s precisely what Pope Francis did during the memorable 12 years of his papacy. He has initiated so many ecclesial processes, and the Church will no longer be the same!
Pope Francis will go down in history as the Pope who led a very simple life style. He had a certain allergy to all the glamorous ecclesiastical titles about which some of the Church leaders are so obsessed with even today. At a time when some of them insist on them being addressed as “My Lord”, “Your Grace”, “Your Eminence”,….etc., Pope Francis shunned all such archaic and feudalistic ecclesiastical titles, and signed all the official documents by the simple word “Francis”.
He also wanted himself to be called by the simple name “Francis”. This was an effort to live up to the words of Jesus Christ who insisted that the Apostles and their successors (the future Church leaders), be ‘servants’ of the flocks entrusted to them rather than being the ‘rulers’ or ‘masters’ over them.
Just a few days after his election as Pope, some of us were waiting to get a glimpse of him near the Basilica of St.John Lateran (which is also the Cathedral of Rome) as he came to take possession of his Cathedra (the throne) there as the Bishop of Rome. As the time for the ceremony approached, a line of posh cars carrying eminent Church personnel passed by, and we were wondering whether the new Pope, too, had already passed by without us noticing him. But then, a small Fiat car came at last with the new Pope seated in the front seat just next to the chauffer, waving at the cheering crowds!
Right from the beginning, he did not want to use the official car/s assigned to the Pope by the Vatican. Even later, when a rich philanthropist donated him a limousine for his use, Francis (with the donor’s permission) sold it and gave the money to the poor. Moreover, instead of living in the traditional Apostolic Palace, he opted to live in a simple flat at Casa de Santa Marta inside the Vatican.
The same simplicity was also manifested by his refusal to allow others to carry his brief case. Thus, it was quite a familiar sight to see how Francis was carrying his own brief case while boarding a plane. This practice continued till he got bound to a wheel chair later in life, due to health problems. At a time when it is a common sight to see an entourage of persons running behind most of the contemporary ecclesiastical dignitaries carrying the personal belongings and documents of their ‘masters’ and ‘lords’, this surely was a prophetic sign on the part of Francis.
The Pope of Mercy
If there is one defining characteristic of his papacy, it was his stress on God’s mercy in both word and action. As a matter of fact, the motto on his coat of arms read: “miserando atque eligendo“. It is a quotation taken from the homily of St.Bede (an eighth-century English writer who is also a Doctor of the Church) on the calling of the Apostle St.Mathew in the gospel according to Mathew which would amount to in English: “Having mercy (on Mathew), Jesus called Mathew.”
In fact, at the very first Wednesday Public Audience held by the new Pope in March 2013, he revealed how impressed he was by a book he had read (written by the German theologian Cardinal Walter Kasper) because it summed up the whole of what Jesus Christ proclaimed, namely, God’s mercy for all, especially for those who are forgotten and marginalized.
Two years later, he declared an Extraordinary Jubilee Year of Mercy from 2015 to 2016 in order to promote this great virtue around which – according to St. Thomas Aquinas – all the other virtues revolve.
Just as Jesus of Nazareth was, so also Francis desperately wanted a merciful Church. This is most evident in his Amoris Laetitia, wherein using the Bible, the Church Fathers, the leading theologians of the Church such as Sts. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas, and the teachings of his predecessors Francis highlighted the importance of reconciling with the Church community those who had been marginalized by the Church due to their falling short of what the Church teaches on marriage and family.
His efforts to reconcile the divorced and remarried Catholics (based mainly on his predecessor Pope John Paul II) was not accepted by quite a number of Church leaders – both bishops and priests – mostly out of ignorance of what the Pope really taught or out of ignorance of what the real Catholic moral tradition had been.
The Pope of the People
Francis often repeated his own phrase that the clergy as the Shepherds of the people (the sheep) need to have “the smell of the sheep”. He was open to all, both the righteous and the unrighteous, just as Jesus was. That’s why he often expressed aloud his desire to see a Church with open doors for all. He wanted a Church which soils her hands with the muck and the mud of the streets by being with the people, especially those marginalized by the Church.
Just as his predecessors had done, he too, was a Pope who worked against violence and war wherever they were because according to him, every war was a loss to humanity. One of the terms which has traditionally being used to refer to the Pope has been “Pontefice” (‘Pontiff’ in English) which means “the bridge builder” especially between two factions. Once, he even spontaneously went on his knees and kissed the feet of the rival leaders of the Sudanese conflict, imploring them earnestly to agree for a Peace Accord.
In the same vein, he was also a true Pontiff in promoting relations between the different Christian Churches (Ecumenism) and among the diverse religions (inter-religious dialogue). As a long-standing member of the ARCIC (Anglican Roman Catholic International Commission) and as a theological adviser to the FABC (Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences), I am a personal witness to Francis’ personal commitment to the above. Moreover, his monumental agreement on the Universal Human Fraternity with the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar, Ahmed al-Tayeb in the United Arab Emirates in 2019, as well as his Encyclical Letter Fratelli Tutti in 2020 are part of his legacy as Pope.
Personal Experience
Although I had the chance to see him many times, I also had the great blessing to meet him personally at least on 20 occasions. My first personal encounter with him was in October 2014 during the Synod of Bishops in Rome, as peritus (theological adviser) to the bishops of the FABC (Federation of Asian Bishops’ Conferences). Thereafter, I met him almost every year as a member of the Roman Catholic delegation to the ARCIC (Anglican Roman Catholic International Commission), a member of the Theological Commission for the synodal process and as a non-Episcopal voting member at the two Assemblies of the Synod on Synodality.
It was at these latter Assembly sessions which lasted one month each in October 2023 and October 2024 that I came to know him best. He came out to me first of all, as a fellow human being who spoke while looking at my eyes, taking me seriously. Many were the times when he nostalgically remembered his visit to Sri Lanka in January 2015 during which he canonized our beloved Apostle of Sri Lanka St.Joseph Vaz. On one such occasion when he said: “You know, crowds were cheering me under scorching sun on my way to Colombo from the airport”, I replied: “Well Holy Father, I was one among that massive crowd standing in front of my house enroute to Colombo”. Then he humorously said with a twinkle in his eye: “Oh! If I knew, I would have got down just to greet you!”
Then there were also moments when he advised me saying: “As a moral theologian, a son of the great St.Alphonsus, you have a big role to play in today’s complex realities!” Often, his face was full with a broad smile in spite of the many burdens he had to shoulder and the many criticisms he had to face. In fact, most of his official teaching documents had cheerful, uplifting titles, such as “Evangelii Gaudium” (the Joy of the Gospel), “Amoris Laetitia” (the Joy of Love), “Gaudete et Exsultate” (“Rejoice and be Glad”), …etc.
But there were also moments when I have seen him in a deep, pensive mood. That he was a man of firm faith in God was obvious at every meeting with him, whether official or personal, when he earnestly asked: “Please do not forget to pray for me!”. As Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re wound up his homily at the papal funeral mass said: “Pope Francis used to conclude his speeches and meetings by saying ‘Do not forget to pray for me.’
Dear Pope Francis, we now ask you to pray for us. May you bless the Church, bless Rome, and bless the whole world as you did last Sunday from the balcony of this Basilica in a final embrace with all the people of God, but also embrace humanity that seeks the truth with a sincere heart and holds high the torch of hope”.
Last but not least, though Pope Francis is not yet officially canonized by the Church, those who knew him are confident that he is already in the bosom of God. His death, just a day after Easter, has been seen by many as symbolically fitting. The resurrection he had preached only hours before has now become the hope to which he entrusted his soul. May you rest in Peace and rise in Glory, dear Pope Francis!
Rev. Fr. Vimal Tirimanna, CssR,
in Rome
Features
The State of the Union and the Spectacle of Trump
President Donald J. Trump, as the American President often calls himself, is a global spectacle. And so are his tariffs. On Friday, February 20, the US Supreme Court led by Chief Justice John Roberts and a 6-3 majority, struck down the most ballyhooed tariff scheme of all times. Upholding the earlier decisions of the lower federal courts, the Supreme Court held that Trump’s use of ‘emergency powers’ to impose the so called Liberation Day tariffs on 2 April 2025, is not legal. The Liberation Day tariffs, which were comically announced on a poster board at the White House Rose Garden, is a system of reciprocal tariffs applied to every country that exported goods and services to America. The court ruling has pulled off the legal fig leaf with which Trump had justified his universal tariff scheme.
Trump was livid after the ruling on Friday and invectively insulted the six judges who ruled against Trump’s tariffs. There was nothing personal about it, but for Trump, the ever petulant man-boy, there isn’t anything that is not personal. On Tuesday night in Washington, Trump delivered his first State of the Union address of his second presidency. The Chief Justice, who once called the State of the Union, “a political pep rally,” attended the pomp and exchanged a grim handshake with the President.
Tuesday’s State of the Union was the longest speech ever in what is a long standing American tradition that is also a constitutional requirement. The Trump showmanship was in full display for the millions of Americans who watched him and millions of others in the rest of world, especially mandarins of foreign governments, who were waiting to parse his words to detect any sign for his next move on tariffs or his next move in Iran. There was nothing much to parse, however, only theatre for Trump’s Republican followers and taunts for opposing Democrats. He was in his usual elements as the Divider in Chief. There was truly little on offer for overseas viewers.
On tariffs, he is bulldozing ahead, he boasted, notwithstanding the Supreme Court ruling last Friday. But the short lived days of unchecked executive tariff powers are over even though Trump wouldn’t let go of his obsessive illusions. On the Middle East, Trump praised himself for getting the release of Israeli hostages, dead or alive, out of Gaza, but had no word for the Palestinians who are still being battered on that wretched strip of land. On Ukraine, he bemoaned the continuing killings in their thousands every month but had no concept or plan for ending the war while insisting that it would not have started if he were president four years ago.
He gave no indication of what he might do in Iran. He prefers diplomacy, he said, but it would be the most costly diplomatic solution given the scale of deployment of America’s fighting assets in the region under his orders. In Trump’s mind, this could be one way of paying for a Nobel Prize for peace. More seriously, Trump is also caught in the horns of a dilemma of his own making. He wanted an external diversion from his growing domestic distractions. If he were thinking using Iran as a diversion, he also cannot not ignore the warnings from his own military professionals that going into Iran would not be a walk in the park like taking over Venezuela. His state of mind may explain his reticence on Iran in the State of the Union speech.
Even on the domestic front, there was hardly anything of substance or any new idea. One lone new idea Trump touted is about asking AI businesses to develop their own energy sources for their data centres without tapping into existing grids, raising demand and causing high prices and supply shortages. That was a political announcement to quell the rising consumer alarms, especially in states such as Michigan where energy guzzling data centres are becoming hot button issue for the midterm Congress and Senate elections in November. Trump can see the writing on the wall and used much of his speech to enthuse his base and use patriotism to persuade the others.

Political Pep Rally: Chief Justice John G. Roberts sits stoically with Justices Elena Kagan, Bret Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett, as Republicans are on their feet applauding.
Although a new idea, asking AI forces to produce their own energy comes against a background of a year-long assault on established programs for expanding renewable energy sources. Fortunately, the courts have nullified Trump’s executive orders stopping renewable energy programs. But there is no indication if the AI sector will be asked to use renewable energy sources or revert to the polluting sources of coal or oil. Nor is it clear if AI will be asked to generate surplus energy to add to the community supply or limit itself to feeding its own needs. As with all of Trump’s initiatives the devil is in the details and is left to be figured out later.
The Supreme Court Ruling
The backdrop to Tuesday’s State of the Union had been rendered by Friday’s Supreme Court ruling. Chief Justice Roberts who wrote the majority ruling was both unassuming and assertive in his conclusion: “We claim no special competence in matters of economics or foreign affairs. We claim only, as we must, the limited role assigned to us by Article III of the Constitution. Fulfilling that role, we hold that IEEPA (International Emergency Economic Powers Act) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs.”
IEEPA is a 1977 federal legislation that was enacted during the Carter presidency, to both clarify and restrict presidential powers to act during national emergency situations. The immediate context for the restrictive element was the experience of the Nixon presidency. One of the implied restrictions in IEEPA is in regard to tariffs which are not specifically mentioned in the legislation. On the other hand, Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution establishes taxes and tariffs as an exclusively legislative function whether they are imposed within the country or implemented to regulate trade and commerce with other countries. In his first term, Trump tried to impose tariffs on imports through the Congress but was rebuffed even by Republicans. In the second term, he took the IEEA route, bypassing Congress and expecting the conservative majority in the Supreme Court to bail him out of legal challenges. The Court said, No. Thus far, but no farther.
The main thrust of the ruling is that it marks a victory for the separation of powers against a president’s executive overreach. Three of the Court’s conservative judges (CJ Roberts, Neil Gorsuch, and Amy Coney Barrett) joined the three liberal judges (all women – Sonia Sotomayor, Elana Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson) to chart a majority ruling against the president’s tariffs. The three dissenters were Brett Kavanugh, who wrote the dissenting opinion, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett were appointed by Trump. Trump took out Gorsuch and Barrett for special treatment after their majority ruling, while heaping praise on Kavanaugh who ruled in favour of the tariffs. Barrett and Kavanaugh attended the State of the Union along with Roberts and Kagan, while the other five stayed away from the pep rally (see picture).
The Economics of the Ruling
In what was a splintered ruling, different judges split legal hairs between themselves while claiming no special competence in economics and ruling on a matter that was all about trade and economics. Yale university’s Stephen Roach has provided an insightful commentary on the economics of the court ruling, while “claiming no special competence in legal matters.” Roach takes out every one of Trump’s pseudo-arguments supporting tariffs and provides an economist’s take on the matter.
First, he debunks Trump’s claim that trade deficits are an American emergency. The real emergency, Roach notes, is the low level of American savings, falling to 0.2% of the national income in 2025, even as trade deficit in goods reached a new record $1.2 trillion. America’s need for foreign capital to compensate for its low savings, and its thirst for cheap imported goods keep the balance of payments and trade deficits at high levels.
Second, by imposing tariffs Trump is not helping but burdening US consumers. The Americans are the ones who are paying tariffs contrary to Trump’s own false beliefs and claims that foreign countries are paying them. 90% of the tariffs have been paid by American consumers, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Small businesses have paid the rest. Foreign countries pay nothing but they have been making deals with Trump to keep their exports flowing.
According to published statistics, the average U.S. applied tariff rate increased from 1.6% before Trump’s tariff’s to 17%, the highest level since World War II. The removal of reciprocal tariffs after the ruling would have lowered it to 9.1%, but it will rise to 13% after Trump’s 15% tariffs. The registered tariff revenue is about $175 billion, 0.6% of U.S. gross domestic product. The tariff monies collected are legally refundable. The Supreme Court did not get into the modalities for repayment and there would be multiple lawsuits before the lower courts if the Administration does not set up a refunding mechanism.
Lastly, in railing against globalization and the loss of American industries, Trump is cutting off America’s traditional allies and trading partners in Europe, Canada and Mexico who account for 54% of all US trade flows in manufactured goods. Cutting them off has only led these countries to look for other alternatives, especially China and India. All of this is not helping the US or its trade deficit. The American manufacturers (except for sectoral beneficiaries in steel, aluminum and auto industries), workers and consumers are paying the price for Trump’s economic idiosyncrasies. As Roach notes, the Court stayed away from the economic considerations, but by declaring Trump’s IEEPA tariffs unconstitutional, the Court has sent an important message to the American people and the rest of the world that “US policies may not be personalized by the whims of a vindictive and uninformed wannabe autocrat.”
by Rajan Philips
Features
The Victor Melder odyssey: from engine driver CGR to Melbourne library founder
He celebrated his 90th birthday recently, never returned to his homeland because he’s a bad traveler
(Continued from last week)
THE GARRAT LOCOS, were monstrous machines that were able to haul trains on the incline, that normally two locos did. Whilst a normal loco hauled five carriages on its own, a Garrat loco could haul nine. When passenger traffic warranted it and trains had over nine carriages or had a large number of freight wagons, then a Garret loco hauled the train assisted by a loco from behind.
When a train was worked by two normal locos (one pulling, the other pushing) and they reached the summit level at Pattipola (in either direction), the loco pushing (piloting) would travel around to the front the train and be coupled in front of the loco already in front and the two locos took the train down the incline. With a Garraat loco this could not be done as the bridges could not take the combined weight. The pilot loco therefore ran down single, following THE TRAIN.
My father was stationed at Nawalapitiya as a senior driver at the time, and it wasn’t a picnic working with him. He believed in the practical side of things and always had the apprentices carrying out some extra duties or the other to acquaint themselves with the loco. I had more than my fair share.
After the four months upcountry, we were back at Dematagoda on the K. V. steam locos. From the sublime to the ridiculous, I would say after the Garret locos upcountry. Here the work was much easier and at a slower pace, as the trains did not run at speed like their mainline counterparts. The last two months of the third year saw us on the two types of diesel locos on the K.V. line, the Hunslett and Krupp diesels, which worked the passenger trains. For once this was a ‘cushy, sit-down’ job, doing nothing exciting, but keeping a sharp lookout and exchanging tablets on the run. The third year had come to an end and ‘the light at the end of tunnel was getting closer’.
The fourth year saw us all at the Diesel loco shed at Maradana, which was cheek by jowl with the Maradana railway station. The first three months we worked with the diesel mechanical fitters and the following three months with the electrical fitters. Heavy emphasis was placed on a working knowledge of the electrical circuits of the different diesel locos in service, to ensure the drivers were able to attend to electrical faults en-route and bring the train home. This was again a period of lectures and demonstrations
We also spent three months at the Ratmalana workshops, where the diesels were stripped down to the core and refitted after major repairs, to ensure we had a look at what went on inside the many closed and sealed working parts. This was again a 7.00am to 4.00pm day job. Back again at the Diesel shed, Maradana, saw us riding as assistants for the next three months on all the diesel locos in service – The Brush Bragnal (M1), General Electrical (M2), Hunslett locos (G2) and Diesel Rail Cars.
After the final written test on Diesel locos, we began our fifth and final year, which was that of shunting engine driver. The first six months were spent at Maligawatte Yard on steam shunting locos and the next three months shunting drivers on the diesel shunting locos at Colombo goods yard. The final three months were spent as assistants on the M1 and M2 locos working all the fast passenger and mail trains.
I was finally appointed Engine Driver Class III on July 6, 1962, as mentioned earlier I lost eight months of my apprenticeship due to being ill and had to make up the time. This appointment was on three years’ probation, on the initial salary of the scale Rs 1,680 – 72 – Rs 2,184, per annum.
Little did the general traveling public realize that they had well trained and qualified engine drivers working their trains to time Victor was stationed in Galle until December 1967, when he resigned from the railway to migrate to Melbourne, Australia to join the rest of his family. He was the last of 11 siblings to leave Ceylon. Their two elder children were born in Galle. Victor and Esther had three more children in Australia. The children, three boys and two girls) were brought up with love and devotion. They have seven grandchildren and two great grandchildren. They meet often as a family.
He worked for the Victorian State Public Service and retired in 1993 after 25 years’ service. At the time of retirement, he worked for the Ministry for Conservation & Environment. He held the position of Project Officer in charge of the Ministry’s Procedural Documents.
He worked part-time for the Victorian Electoral Office and the Australian Electoral Office, covering State and Federal Elections, from 1972 to 2010. From 1972 to 1982 and was a Clerical Officer and then in 1983 was appointed Officer-in-Charge, Lychfield Avenue Polling Booth, Jacana which is my (the writer’s) electorate.
As part of serving the community Victor participated in a number of ways, quite often unremunerated. He worked part-time for the Department of Census & Statistics, and worked as a Census Collector for the Census of 1972, 1976, 1980 and then Group Leader of 16 Collectors in his area for the 1984, 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008 and 2012.
In 1970, Victor began this library, now known as the ‘Victor Melder Sri Lanka Library’, for the purpose of making Sri Lanka better known in Australia. On looking back he has this to say: “Forty-five years later, I can say that it is serving its purpose. In 1993 President Ranasinghe Premadasa of Sri Lanka bestowed on me a national honor – ‘Sri Lanka Ranjana’ for my then 25 years’ service to Sri Lanka in Australia. I feel very privileged to be honored by my motherland, which I feel is the highest accolade one can ever get.”
There were many more accolades over the years:
15.10. 2004, Serendib News, 2004 Business and Community Award.
4.2.2008, Award for Services to the SL Community by The Consulate of Sri Lanka in Victoria (by R. Arambewela)
2024 – SL Consul General’s Award
In 2025 , Victor was one of the ten outstanding Sri Lankans in Australia at the Lankan Fest.
An annual Victor Melder Appreciation award was established to honour an outstanding member by the SriLankan Consulate.
The following appreciation by the late Gamini Dissanayake is very appropriate.
Comment by the late Minister Gamini Dissanayake, in the comment book of the VMSL library.
A man is attached to many things. Attachments though leading to sorrow in the end
are the living reality of life. Amongst these many attachments, the most noble are the attachments to one’s family and to one’s country. You have left Sri Lanka long ago but “she” is within you yet and every nerve and sinew of your body, mind and soul seem to belong there. In your love for the country of your birth you seem to have no racial or religious connotations – you simply love “HER” – the pure, clear, simple, abstract and glowing Sri Lanka of our imagination and vision. You are an example of what all Sri Lankan’s should be. May you live long with your vision and may Sri Lanka evolve to deserve sons like you.
With my best Wishes.
Gamini Dissanayake, Minister from Sri Lanka.
15 February 1987.
The Victor Melder Lecture
The Monash council established the Victor Melder Lecture which is presented every February. It is now an annual event looked forward to by Melbournians. A guest lecturer is carefully chosen each year for this special event.
Victor and his library has featured on many publications such as the Sunday Times in 2008 and LMD International in 2026.
“Although having been a railway man, I am a poor traveler and get travel sickness, hence I have not travelled much. I have never been back to Sri Lanka, never travelled in Australia, not even to Geelong. I am happiest doing what I like best, either at Church or in this library. My younger daughter has finally given up after months of trying to coax, cajole and coerce me into a trip to Sri Lanka to celebrate this (90th) birthday.
I am most fortunate that over the years I have made good friends, some from my school days. It is also a great privilege to grow old in the company of friends — like-minded individuals who have spent their childhood and youth in the same environment as oneself and shared similar life experiences.”
Victor’s love of books started from childhood. Since his young years he has been interested in reading. At St Mary’s College, Nawalapitiya, the library had over 300 books on Greek and Roman history and mythology and he read every one of them.
He read the newspapers daily, which his parents subscribed to, including the ‘Readers Digest’.His mother was an avid fan of Crossword Puzzles and encouraged all the children to follow her, a trait which he continues to this day.
At his workplace in Melbourne, Victor encountered many who asked questions about Ceylon. Often, he could not find an answer to these queries. This was long before the internet existed. He then started getting books on Ceylon/SriLanka and reading them. Very soon his collection expanded and he thought of the Vicor Melder SriLanka Library as source of reference. It is now a vast collection of over 7,000 books, magazines and periodicals.
Another driver of his service to fellow men is his deep Catholic faith in which he follows the footsteps of the Master.
Victor was baptized at St Anthony’s Cathedral, Kandy by Fr Galassi, OSB. Since the age of 10 he have been involved with Church activities both in Sri Lanka and Australia. He remains a devout Catholic and this underlies his spirit of service to fellowmen.
He began as an Altar Server at St Mary’s Church, Nawalapitiya, and continued even in his adult life. In Australia, Esther and Victor have been Parishioners at St Dominic’s Church, Broadmeadows, since 1970.He started as an Adult Server and have been an Altar Server Trainer, Reader and Special Minister He was a member of the ‘Counting Team’ for monies collected at Sunday Masses, for 35 years.
He has actively retired from this work since 2010, but is still ‘on call’, to help when required. To add in his own words
“My Catholic faith has always been important to me, and I can never imagine my having spent a day away from God. Faith is all that matters to Esther too. We attend daily Mass and busy ourselves with many activities in our Parish Church.
For nearly 25 years, we have also been members of a religious order ‘The Community of the Sons & Daughters of God’, it is contemplative and monastic in nature, we are veritable monks in the world. We do no good works, other than show Christ to the world, by our actions. Both Esther and I, after much prayer and discernment have become more deeply involved, taking vows of poverty, obedience and chastity, within the Community. Our spirituality gives us much peace, solace and comfort.”
“This is not my CV for beatification and canonization. My faith is in fact an antidote for overcoming evil, I too struggle like everyone else. I have to exorcise the demons within me by myself. I am a perfect candidate for “being a street angel and home devil” by my constant impatience, lack of tolerance and wanting instant perfection from everyone. “
The above exemplifies the humility of the man who admits to his foibles.
More than 25 years ago The Ceylon Society of Australia was formed in Sydney by a group of Ceylon lovers led by Hugh Karunanayake. Very soon the Melbourne chapter of the organization was formed, and Victor was a crucial part of this. At every Talk, Victor displayed books relevant to the topic. For many years he continued to do so carrying a big box of books and driving a fair distance to the meeting place. Eventually when he could no longer drive his car, he made certain that the books reached the venue through his close friend, Hemal Gurusinghe.
He also was the guest speaker at one of the meetings and he regaled the audience with railway stories.
Victor has dedicated his life on this mission, and we can be proud of his achievements. His vision is to find a permanent home for his library where future generations can use it and continue the service that he commenced. The plea is to get like-minded individuals in the quest to find a suitable and permanent home for the Victor Melder Srilankan Library.
by Dr. Srilal Fernando
Features
Sri Lanka to Host First-Ever World Congress on Snakes in Landmark Scientific Milestone
Sri Lanka is set to make scientific history by hosting the world’s first global conference dedicated entirely to snake research, conservation and public health, with the World Congress on Snakes (WCS) 2026 scheduled to take place from October 1–4 at The Grand Kandyan Hotel in Kandy World Congress on Snakes.
The congress marks a major milestone not only for Sri Lanka’s biodiversity research community but also for global collaboration in herpetology, conservation science and snakebite management.
Congress Chairperson Dr. Anslem de Silva described the event as “a long-overdue global scientific platform that recognises the ecological, medical and cultural importance of snakes.”
“This will be the first international congress fully devoted to snakes — from their evolution and taxonomy to venom research and snakebite epidemiology,” Dr. de Silva said. “Sri Lanka, with its exceptional biodiversity and deep ecological relationship with snakes, is a fitting host for such a historic gathering.”
Global Scientific Collaboration
The congress has been established through an international scientific partnership, bringing together leading experts from Sri Lanka, India and Australia. It is expected to attract herpetologists, wildlife conservationists, toxinologists, veterinarians, genomic researchers, policymakers and environmental organisations from around the world.
The International Scientific Committee includes globally respected experts such as Prof. Aaron Bauer, Prof. Rick Shine, Prof. Indraneil Das and several other authorities in reptile research and conservation biology.
Dr. de Silva emphasised that the congress is designed to bridge biodiversity science, medicine and society.
“Our aim is not merely to present academic findings. We want to translate science into practical conservation action, improved public health strategies and informed policy decisions,” he explained.
Addressing a Neglected Public Health Crisis
A key pillar of the congress will be snakebite envenoming — widely recognised as a neglected tropical health problem affecting rural communities across Asia, Africa and Latin America.
“Snakebite is not just a medical issue; it is a socio-economic issue that disproportionately impacts farming communities,” Dr. de Silva noted. “By bringing clinicians, toxinologists and conservation scientists together, we can strengthen prevention strategies, improve treatment protocols and promote community education.”
Scientific sessions will explore venom biochemistry, clinical toxinology, antivenom sustainability and advances in genomic research, alongside broader themes such as ecological behaviour, species classification, conservation biology and environmental governance.
Dr. de Silva stressed that fear-driven persecution of snakes, habitat destruction and illegal wildlife trade continue to threaten snake populations globally.
“Snakes play an essential ecological role, particularly in controlling rodent populations and maintaining agricultural balance,” he said. “Conservation and public safety are not opposing goals — they are interconnected. Scientific understanding is the foundation for coexistence.”
The congress will also examine cultural perceptions of snakes, veterinary care, captive management, digital monitoring technologies and integrated conservation approaches linking biodiversity protection with human wellbeing.
Strategic Importance for Sri Lanka
Hosting the global event in the historic city of Kandy — a UNESCO World Heritage site — is expected to significantly enhance Sri Lanka’s standing as a hub for scientific and environmental collaboration.
Dr. de Silva pointed out that the benefits extend beyond the four-day meeting.
“This congress will open doors for Sri Lankan researchers and students to access world-class expertise, training and international partnerships,” he said. “It will strengthen our national research capacity in biodiversity and environmental health.”
He added that the event would also generate economic activity and position Sri Lanka as a destination for high-level scientific conferences, expanding the country’s international image beyond traditional tourism promotion.
The congress has received support from major international conservation bodies including the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Save the Snakes, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo and the Amphibian and Reptile Research Organization of Sri Lanka (ARROS).
As preparations gather momentum, Dr. de Silva expressed optimism that the World Congress on Snakes 2026 would leave a lasting legacy.
“This is more than a conference,” he said. “It is the beginning of a global movement to promote science-based conservation, improve snakebite management and inspire the next generation of researchers. Sri Lanka is proud to lead that conversation.”
By Ifham Nizam
-
Features6 days agoLOVEABLE BUT LETHAL: When four-legged stars remind us of a silent killer
-
Business6 days agoBathiya & Santhush make a strategic bet on Colombo
-
Business6 days agoSeeing is believing – the silent scale behind SriLankan’s ground operation
-
Features6 days agoProtection of Occupants Bill: Good, Bad and Ugly
-
News6 days agoPrime Minister Attends the 40th Anniversary of the Sri Lanka Nippon Educational and Cultural Centre
-
News6 days agoCoal ash surge at N’cholai power plant raises fresh environmental concerns
-
Business6 days agoHuawei unveils Top 10 Smart PV & ESS Trends for 2026
-
Opinion2 days agoJamming and re-setting the world: What is the role of Donald Trump?



