Connect with us

Sports

A case of home comforts abroad for India

Published

on

by Rex Clementine

There’s been a hue and cry over the privileges India have enjoyed during this Champions Trophy. From start to finish, Rohit Sharma’s men have set up camp in the same Dubai hotel, played at the same ground, and barely had to adjust to anything other than the opposition’s bowling. Meanwhile, the rest of the teams have been living out of suitcases, hopping from city to city, battling jet lag and varying conditions.

Spare a thought for New Zealand. The Kiwis started in Karachi, then jetted off to Rawalpindi, flew back to Dubai for their last group game against India and were then whisked off to Lahore before returning to Dubai for the final. They’ve spent more time in the air these past two weeks than A.C.S. Hameed did in a fortnight during his long career as Foreign Minister under three Presidents!

One set of rules for India, another for the rest – it’s simply not cricket. No wonder most Sri Lankans will be backing the Kiwis in the grand finale on Sunday evening.

India’s pampered scheduling is nothing new. The argument that India bankrolls world cricket and therefore deserves preferential treatment is as immature as Rainl saying ‘umpire hora’ after faring poorly in a debate. Broadcasters claim Indian fans want to watch their team play on weekends, so the schedule is tailor-made for primetime, with generous breaks between games. Meanwhile, the rest of the teams are running between the wickets just to keep up.

It’s a bitter pill to swallow, but the reality is that cricket’s power structure is lopsided and there’s little anyone can do about it. The unspoken rule in world cricket today seems to be: don’t upset India. Some call it cowardice, but others see it as self-preservation. Take Sri Lanka, for example. A two-week Indian tour generates more revenue for Sri Lanka Cricket than any other bilateral series. Not just Sri Lanka, but for many cricket boards, playing nice with India is a financial necessity.

But what about the bigger boards – Australia and England? Surely, they don’t need to kowtow to India? Well, the answer is simple – greed. Within a span of seven months, India played five Tests in Australia and will play five more in England – a financial windfall for the founder members of the ICC. Their own franchise leagues – the Big Bash and The Hundred – were once touted as rivals to the IPL, but even they don’t generate the kind of money that an India series brings.

That’s why it’s ironic that England and Australia are grumbling about India’s cozy Champions Trophy schedule. Let’s get real – neither of them has had it as bad as New Zealand. In ICC events, the Big Three – India, England, and Australia – always get the red carpet treatment, while the rest of the cricketing world is left to make do with the scraps.

Take the last T20 World Cup in the Caribbean and USA. India played all but one of their first-round games in New York. Australia and England? They never even set foot in the USA! They were enjoying a Caribbean cruise, with England playing in Barbados and Antigua, while Australia hopped between Barbados, Antigua, and St. Lucia. It was less a cricket tournament, more a winter holiday.

Sri Lanka, on the other hand, were sent on a whirlwind tour – from New York to Dallas to Miami before finally landing in St. Lucia. By the time the tournament ended, the players were running on fumes.

And let’s not forget the 2016 T20 World Cup in India. England played two games in Bombay, three in Delhi, then strolled into Calcutta for the final – and that was that. Meanwhile, Sri Lanka and other smaller nations were dragged across the length and breadth of India.

It’s high time ICC ensured a level playing field in their tournaments. Right now, the scales are tipping too heavily in India’s favor. Cricket is a gentleman’s game, but when the playing conditions are this skewed, it starts to feel less like sport and more like a scripted drama with a predictable ending. That is not what the fans want. That is not what the game wants.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Trophy row unlikely to repeat in Japan

Published

on

By

The Indian women’s team, like the men’s side a year ago, refused to accept the trophy from Mohsin Naqvi in Dubai [Cricbuzz]
Will the Asia Cup trophy fiasco play out in the Asian Games? That is the obvious question on everyone’s mind as the Indian women’s team, favourites for the gold medal, prepare to take on Sri Lanka. The Indian women’s team, like the men’s side a year ago, refused to accept the trophy from Mohsin Naqvi in Dubai last week.
There is always a chance that Naqvi, by virtue of being the president of the Asian Cricket Council (ACC), could be an invitee at the Games. Will he be accorded the privilege of presenting the medals in Nagoya? Chances are that he may, well, not be.
With India having strong diplomatic relations with Japan, Dubai is unlikely to be repeated in Nagoya. The two countries recently announced special measures to commemorate 75 years of friendship. As part of this, India, the World’s No. 1 side, agreed to play Japan.
For the reigning world champions to take on an associate nation, ranked 41st, is no ordinary gesture. It involved the governments of the two countries, besides, of course, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the Japan Cricket Association (JCA) to work out the fixture. The September 22 game, thus, is far from being a routine bilateral match.

Neighbours Nepal, who have been a rising team in world cricket, have not had the opportunity of playing India in a bilateral international so far. Japan has been given such a significant opportunity, and unlikely the country will allow any embarrassment for the Indian side. The Naqvi-led ACC will have little say.
“That is my reading,” said a member of the ACC. “I think Japan will not allow it. India’s gesture of playing Japan will not go unacknowledged.”
The decision on the chief guest for the medal event will, of course, be the prerogative of the Olympic Council of Asia (OCA), but the Japanese Olympic Committee (JOC) and the Aichi-Nagoya Asian Games and Asian Para Games Organizing Committee (AINAGOC) will have a major say in the matter. Both bodies are expected to be mindful of India’s concerns.
The BCCI has stayed clear of the issue. After Friday’s AGM, Devajit Saikia said he would refrain from commenting on a hypothetical situation of India being on the podium and Naqvi presenting the medals. “The teams have to first reach the podium. We will take a call then, taking into account all prevailing factors at that moment. We will cross the bridge only when we reach it,” the BCCI secretary told ToI.
A delegation of the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) is in Nagoya, but sources within the IOA declined to discuss the matter. It is unlikely that the IOA has made a representation to the OCA, JOC or AINAGOC on the issue.
There is also no immediate information on whether Naqvi will travel to Japan at all. A spokesman for the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) told Cricbuzz that his visit to Japan is doubtful. “I don’t think so,” he replied to a query from this website. It may well be that the PCB spokesman may not have the travel plans of the country’s Interior Minister. In any case, Naqvi is known to make decisions at the last minute. He landed in Dubai just about 30 minutes before the Women’s Asia Cup final was due to end last Sunday.
The BCCI officials, however, will be there in Nagoya. Saikia himself confirmed that he would travel to Japan on October 1 and stay on for the men’s final, which will be held on October 3. The Indian men’s cricket team is scheduled to travel to Japan late on Saturday night. The two finals are on September 22 (women’s) and October 3.
As previously reported by Cricbuzz on August 12, India and Pakistan teams – both in men and women – are drawn to meet only in a medal contest – either for the gold or for bronze. There is also a possibility that there may be no India-Pakistan matches in Japan at all.
Continue Reading

Latest News

Ellis and Inglis break Zimbabwe hearts to secure one-wicket thriller

Published

on

By

Australia concluded their first Zimbabwe tour after 12 years with a clean sweep of the hosts, who were unable to deliver a consolation win to a festive Harare crowd, as Nathan Ellis held his nerve alongside No. 11 Spencer Johnson in a match-winning tenth-wicket stand of 27. Zimbabwe do not have any internationals at home for the rest of the 2026 and, after posting their second-highest total batting first against Australia, saw the match slip from their grasp in the dramatic closing stages.

Pressure changed sides throughout the last quarter of the contest. Australia were cruising on 162 for 3 in the 26th over, when Brad Evans removed Alex Carey for the third of his four wickets and set the cat among the pigeons as wickets fell regularly. Josh Inglis was holding the chase together with his second ODI hundred but when he fell 45 were still needed. Then Ellis, who had earlier taken 3 for 50, put together a superbly-measured 36 not out to secure a thrilling win.

Their chase was built largely on the efforts of Inglis, who was the third Australian to reach a hundred in the series, after Matt Renshaw in the opening match and Travis Head in game two. In contrast, Zimbabwe did not have a century-marker, though Sikandar Raza and Craig Ervine  scored two fifties each, including in this match and were the leading run scorers across the three matches.

Zimbabwe also had two of the three top bowlers and will know that it was in moments, not personnel terms, that they lost to Australia. In this match, there were four major ones. The first came when Innocent Kaia, batting well on 55, had to retire hurt with what looked like a hamstring injury to interrupt an 80-run fourth wicket stand with Ervine and stall Zimbabwe. The second was when Ervine, on 59, tried to accelerate with 10 overs left to go and holed out to long-on to spark a collapse of 4 for 22 which left Zimbabwe short of the 300 that was in their sights.

 

Then, in the field, Inglis, on 48, cut Ernest Masuku in the air to backward point and Wessly Madhevere leapt to his right but could not hold on. The drop proved costly even though Madhevere took a stunner to dismiss Carey. Madhevere’s biggest mistake was still to come. In the penultimate over when Ellis launched Masuku to deep midwicket, Madhevere got under the ball and spilled the chance.

With nine runs needed off the last six balls, Raza then gave Madhevere the ball, even though Graeme Cremer had an over in hand having caused problems in his first ODI in 2018. The first ball went for six and left Madhevere inconsolable at the end.

Inglis was in early after Evans struck twice in his first two overs. He had Head caught at deep backward square when he flicked off his pads and then found Mitchell Marsh’s inside edge to leave Australia were 25 for 2 in the fourth over. Inglis announced himself with a swivel pull that went for four and was brutal through the point area. He greeted Cremer’s return by sending his first ball – a full toss – through mid-on for four. But Cremer came back well and bowled Cooper Connolly with a classic leg break to announce his return in some style.

Inglis and Carey put on 85 for the fourth-wicket to keep Australia in control and Inglis’ big challenge came when Australia started to wobble. They were on 203 for 5 after 35 overs, 69 runs away from victory, and in the space of two overs Raza had Ollie Peake out lbw and Cremer got Xavier Bartlett with a googly. Then, Blessing Muzarabani was brought back to keep Australia under pressure and bounced Ellis, who fended him skywards but the chance fell out of Brendan Taylor’s reach. Muzarabani finished the series wicketless.

Inglis reached his century with a strong sweep against Cremer off his 94th ball and victory was still 55 runs away. When Raza bowled Inglis in the 42nd over, Zimbabwe were ahead in the contest but the management of their attack towards the end will raise questions. Muzarabani was bowled out after 44 overs and Evans with two overs to go. Cremer, despite his experience, was overlooked for his final over.

That won’t be the only area Zimbabwe will leave with questions. Their batting line-up underwhelmed in parts, especially after they chose to put runs on the board in the final match. They started off reasonably well and were on 34 without loss after six overs before their opening pair gave way.

Ben Curran’s poor returns in white-ball cricket continued when he gloved Johnson down leg and was caught behind for 7. His partner Brian Bennett didn’t fare much better. After showing promise with classy flicks off the pads and crunching pulls off short balls, Bennett skied a Ellis delivery to Head at midwicket to depart for 30. Bennett has not crossed 40 in his last eight ODI innings, despite getting several starts. Zimbabwe were 57 for 2 at the end of the powerplay.

Taylor took his time to get to a 16-ball nine before he was bowled by an Adam Zampa flipper and his form will also be a concern. Kaia, whose first runs had come off a thick inside edge, offered a chance on 27 when he was out of his crease early as Renshaw fired in a delivery down leg. Inglis fumbled and recovered but could not stump Kaia, who put the early jitters aside to play some classy strokes. He drove Renshaw through mid-on and pulled Johnson flat and hard to bisect the fielders in the deep. His fifty came just after the innings’ halfway mark, off 59 balls, and marked the first time he had crossed the milestone in 12 innings, since January 2023.

Kaia and Ervine got Zimbabwe into a good position and when Kaia retired on 148 for 3, it was up to Raza and Ervine to accelerate. They brought up the Zimbabwean 200 with 10 overs to go but the final flourish never came. Ervine was eager to up the ante but could not clear Renshaw at long-on and Madhevere sent an Ellis slower ball to cover to give Australia two wickets in two overs.

Evans showed glimpses of his finishing skills with back to back fours off Johnson but then top-edged a short ball to give Johnson a second wicket and Cremer was out lbw to a pinpoint Ellis yorker. Raza reached fifty soon after that and farmed strike for the final five overs to end unbeaten on 81 which gave Zimbabwe a competitive total, but agonisingly not quite enough.

Scores:
Australia 272 for 9 in 49.5 overs  (Josh Inglis 103; Brad Evans 4-47, Graeme Cremer 2-53, Sikandar Raza 2-42) beat Zimbabwe 271 for 8 in 50 overs (Innocent Kaia 55 retired hurt,Craig Ervine 59, Sikandar Raza 81*; Spencer Johnson 2-50, Nathan Ellis 3-50, Adam Zampa 2-53) by one wicket

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Latest News

Kenya’s Ngetich breaks women-only half-marathon world record by a second

Published

on

By

(File pic) Agnes Ngetich won her latest major title of the year at the World Athletics Road Running Championships in Denmark after winning the team half-marathon and the World Cross Country Championships in the United States in January (Aljazeera)

Kenya’s Agnes Ngetich took a second off the women-only half-marathon world record on Sunday when she won the World Athletics Road Running Championships in Copenhagen, stopping the clock at one hour, five minutes, and 15 seconds.

Ngetich, who also broke the women-only 10km (6.2-mile) world record last year, pushed to the front from the outset on a sunny morning in the Danish capital and led until the end, finishing 50 seconds ahead of compatriot Veronica Loleo, who came in second.

The previous record was set by Peres Jepchirchir, another Kenyan, when she won the World Half Marathon title in Poland in 2020.

The overall women’s half-marathon world record is held by Ethiopia’s Letesenbet Gidey, who clocked 1:02:52 in 2021 at the mixed-gender Valencia Half Marathon in Spain.

Sunday’s win was the latest major title this year for the 25-year-old Ngetich, who also won the team half marathon in Copenhagen and the World Cross Country Championships in Florida in the US in January.

(Aljazeera)

Continue Reading

Trending