Features
The Great Train Robbery by corrupt SLPP politicians
“Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest. – Mark Twain”
by Prof. Asoka S. Seneviratne
The recent disclosure by the Cabinet Spokesman and Minister Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa to the Parliament of 43 former Government Ministers and MPs who received Rs. 1.224 billion as compensation for the property damage incurred during the 2022 Aragalaya (Struggle) protest astonished the public for many reasons. First, until the disclosure mentioned above, there was not even a slight indication of compensation payments by the previous government or from those ministers and MPs who made massive cries about the damages caused to their properties. Second, it is the vast amounts they have claimed in compensation against the provision of the Disaster Management Act in 2005. Third is the massive exploitation by the 43 politicians in many ways, particularly in the bankrupt economy. Finally, selfish politicians entirely disregarded people’s sufferings in a bankrupt economy. This paper aims to explain the above because there is a mounting protest by the public about the Rs. 1.224 billion compensation payment.
Aragalaya or People’s Struggle and Property Damage.
First of all, I must say that none would support and approve any property damage or vandalism. The civilized world vehemently condemns such vicious acts.
Aragalaya was the outcome of the people’s mounting or unprecedented sufferings, which the UNP and SLFP politicians have caused from time to time since 1948. At independence, Ceylon was next to Japan in economic development, but it declared bankruptcy in 2022. It is not intended to provide details on the above, as I have published about the causes and reasons for Aragalaya. However, what is important is the background that caused property destruction. The Rajapaksa Regime, headed by Mahinda Rajapaksa (MR), directly advised their supporters to go and attack the peaceful or innocent demonstrators at the Galle face Green. In short, it was a state-organised terror attack. People in many parts of the country retaliated to the above, causing property damage. This is the truth. Given the above, compensation payment is only one aspect. At the same time, there are two other aspects. First, people, including Mahinda Rajapaksa, who is responsible for attacking the peaceful demonstrators in the Galle face Green, must be prosecuted.
Second, people who caused the property damages must be charged, and such people are liable for damages.
Excessive Damage Claims by the SLPP Culprits
Forty three former SLPP Ministers and MPs had claimed a total of Rs. 1.224 billion in compensation. I am listing the names and amounts for analytical purposes. The following have been paid less than Rs 2.5 million. Kapila Nuwan Athukorala Rs. 504,000, Wimalaweera Dissanayake Rs 550,000, Geetha Kumarasinghe Rs 972,000, Janaka Tissakuttiarachchi Rs 1.1 million, Gunapala Ratnasekera Rs 1.4 million, Premnath Dolawatte Rs 2.3 million, Priyankara Jayaratne Rs 2.3 million and S. Athukorala Rs 2.5 million. The total number of MPs is 8. The following MPs have been paid between Rs 2.8 million and Rs. 10.55 million. Jayantha Ketagoda Rs 2.8 million, Wimal Weerawansa Rs 2.9 million, Channa Jayasumana Rs 3.3 million, Akila Ellawala Rs 3.5 million, Chamal Rajapaksa Rs 6.5 million, Asoka Priyantha Rs 7.2 million, Chandima Weerakkody Rs 6.9 million, Samanpriya Herath Rs 10.5 million, and Janaka Bandara Thenekoon Rs. 10.55 million. The total number of MPs is 9. The following MPs have been paid between Rs 11 Million and Rs. 30 Million. Rohitha Abeygunawardena Rs 11.6 million, Seetha Arambepola Rs 13.7 million, Sahan Pradeep 17.1 million, Shehan Semasinghe Rs 18.5 million, Indika Anuruddha Rs 19.5 million, Milan Jayatilaka Rs 22.3 million, Ramesh Pathirana Rs 28.1 million, Duminda Dissanayake Rs 28.8 million, and Kanska Herath Rs 29.2 million.
The total number of MPs. 9.
The following MPs have been paid between Rs 32 million and Rs. 43 million. D. B. Herath Rs 32.1 million, Prasanna Ranaweera Rs 32.7 million, W. Weerasinghe Rs 37.2 million, Santha Bandara Rs 39.1 million,Sanath Nishantha Rs 42.7 million and .S. M. Chandrasena Rs 43.8 million. The total number of MPs is 6.
The following MPs have been paid between Rs 50 million and 95.9 million. Siripala Gamlath Rs 50.9 million, Arundika Fernando Rs 55.2 million, Sumith Udukumubura Rs 55.9 million, Prasanna Ranatunga Rs 56. 1 million, Kokila Gunawardene Rs 58. 7 million, Mohan P. De Silva Rs 60.1 million, Nimal Lanza Rs 69.2 million, Ali Sabry Rahim Rs. 70.9 million, Gamini Lokuge Rs 74.9 million, Johnston Fernando Rs 93.4 million and Keheliya Rambukwella Rs 95.9 million. The total number of MPs is 11.
Keheliya Rambukwella has won the cup for the highest claim. As reported in the media, some former cabinet ministers and a deputy minister were massively compensated to the tune of over Rs. 60 million each. One of them was convicted of extortion and held the cabinet office pending appeal, and another spent several months in remand on corruption charges and resigned upon being arrested.
Compensation payments must be made according to the country’s laws because they are government funds or taxpayers’ money. The “2005 Damage Management Act” in Sri Lanka is officially called the “Sri Lanka Disaster Management Act, No. 13 of 2005.” This Act establishes a legal framework for managing disasters in the country, including setting up the National Council for Disaster Management and the Disaster Management Centre. According to the provision of the Act, the maximum amount paid for property destruction due to natural disasters or man-made causes is. Rs 2.5 million. However, one critical point is that 26 MPs have been paid well over Rs2.5 million or exponentially higher amounts. Another crucial point is Rs. 107.5 million is the total amount based on Rs—2.5 million per MP. Given the above, there is an overpayment of Rs. 1217 million. Clearly, those in power took advantage of or misused the system, while ordinary people struggled to receive even the most basic relief, such as crop damage relief.
Rs. 2.5 million compensation is impossible for many people unless they have political or other influence, which is the reality in the country. While between Rs. 11 million and Rs 44 million have been paid for 15 MPs, between Rs. 50 million and Rs. 95.9 million have been paid for 11 MPs. Famous culprits like Prasanna Ranatunga, Nimal Lanza, Ali Sabry, Rahim Gamini Lokuge , Johnston Fernando, and Keheliya Rambukwella are in the latter group. Compared to the above mentioned Rs 2.5 million maximum limit, Johnston Fernando and Keheliaya Rambukwella have raked nearly fifty times as damages. This is taxpayers ‘money. It seems that Aragalaya was a welcome gesture or disguised fortune for the SLPP MPs in any way. It must be mentioned that excess payment of Rs. 1.217 billion can be used for projects for the welfare and well-being of the poorest of the country, where about 60% do not have clean water for consumption.
Questions/Concerns Regarding Exploitation by the SLPP Culprits
As I stated, the civilised world does not tolerate property damage or vandalism. At the same time, a fair amount of compensation is accepted. However, there is mounting suspicion about the staggering amounts paid based on fake assessment or valuation. It is said that the government has done the damage assessments by a Ministry of Public Administration and Home Affairs committee. This committee worked based on the reports submitted by the Divisional Secretaries (DS). There is no doubt that Ministers and MPs forced DS for inflated damage amounts, which is the reality in the country. Generally, except for a few, all those SLPP Ministers and MPs were corrupt in many ways, so the people defeated them in the last general election.
It was a political Tsunami for them. When people struggled to meet basic needs, the SLPP Ministers and MPs leisurely and freely claimed unacceptable amounts for property damages with the support and consent of then-President Ranil Wickremesinghe (RW). He was looking for political gain or political support at the cost of taxpayers’ money. It was political bribery of RW. RW stated that he received an economy with bankruptcy. However, he used the bankrupt economy for corrupt practices, which was shameful. It shows his low-quality leadership. Those SLPP MPs caught by the political tsunami claimed unethical amounts in compensation and are now at home, shedding crocodile tears about the minor and temporary problems regarding rice and coconuts. Those Ministers and MPs who claimed shocking amounts must have submitted their Assets and Liabilities.
So, the bribery commission should check against the staggering claims or such asset accumulation. Also, 43 SLPP have tax files that must be checked against the claims. Some ministers and MPs must also have claims from the house and content insurance or fire insurance. If so, such double claims must be investigated by the authorities. Apart from those Ministers and MPs, other politicians of SLPP must have claimed damages. This is another concern that must be examined. Based on the Right to Information Act, the public can assess all the above-mentioned facts and figures. Indeed, the plate of the AKD/NPP government is full of economic and social issues left by the previous regimes since 1948. However, all the above concerns must be dealt with as soon as possible according to the law in the country to expose the nakedness of the SLPP culprit politicians. It is worth mentioning that 36 former MPs, most from SLPP, robbed or misused the President’s Fund. I wrote above with CT under “President’s Fund is a Tragedy”. SLPP means a den of thieves, and its leadership must take responsibility for the above.
People suffered massively before and after the Aragalaya. However, politicians did not care for them; that was the truth. Politicians had all comfort, luxury, and security. Politicians such as MR, is not ready to give up the above. They are still looking for the same comforts, luxuries and security until their die at the taxpayers’ expense which costs staggering amounts of money. Ministers and MPs of the AKD/NPP government live down-to-earth life, while the SLPP politicians want to secure the lost paradise in the quickest posible time. Mahinda, Gotabaya, and Basil Rajapaksa (The TRIO) named by Supreme Court (SC) as the men who by their continued inaction and callous disregard to take remedial action breached the public trust reposed in by the people.
This landmark SC decision was delivered in 2023, and the aftermath of the Aragalaya in 2022. In other words, people made enormous sacrifices during and after Covid and the economic crisis leading to Aragalaya. Given the above landmark decision by the SC, I argue that the Rajapaksa TRIO must compensate for the people’s suffering caused by the Rajapaksas similar to the compensation claims by the SLPP politicians for their sufferings or damages. In other words, Aragalaya was caused by the Rajapaksa TRIO, and the SLPP politicians reaped the maximum benefits aided by RW for property damage. Given the above, it reminds me of the infamous Great Train Robbery in the UK in 1963, which involved a massive US$74 million. It was a well-planned and executed heist. Damage caused by Aragalaya was not planned at all. However, there is no doubt that the staggering claims by 43 SLPP politicians had been well planned and executed. This is why it was unknown until Minister Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa exposed it a few days ago. Forty three SLPP politicians and others must be investigated for illegal and corrupt practices and mete out justice to the culprits as soon as possible. The down-to-earth life of the NPP politicians is an excellent example of the SLPP culprit politicians doing the right thing rather than talking like parrots for 24 hours. The same applies to the other politicians in the opposition. Amidst the above, the AKD/NPP government is batting well according to the people’s mandate.
Conclusion
The civilised world does not accept or tolerate property damage. At the same time, it is ethical that property damage must be compensated according to the law in the country. Given the bankrupt economy, the compensation claims by 43 SLPP culprit politicians amounting to Rs. 1.224 billion aided by RW are disgusting in many ways. The public protest is mounting, so all concerns must be investigated, and the culprits must be prosecuted accordingly, while excess amounts paid must be recovered. SLLP culprit politicians can learn from the down-to-earth life of the NPP politicians. The Rajapaksas caused the country’s bankruptcy which forced people to suffer massively in many ways. Like the SLPP culprits compensated by the government for property damage, the Rajapaksas must pay for the sufferings of the people. Amidst the Great Train Robbery by the SLPP culprits or the den of corrupt politicians of SLPP, the AKD/NPP government is batting well based on the people’s mandate.
*The writer worked as the Special Advisor to the Office of the President of Namibia for five years and was Senior Consultant with UNDP for 20 years. He worked as a senior economist with the Central Bank of Sri Lanka (1972-1993) before he migrated to New Zealand d. The author can be contacted: asoka.seneviratne@gmail.com
Features
Digital transformation in the Global South
Understanding Sri Lanka through the India AI Impact Summit 2026
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has rapidly moved from being a specialised technological field into a major social force that shapes economies, cultures, governance, and everyday human life. The India AI Impact Summit 2026, held in New Delhi, symbolised a significant moment for the Global South, especially South Asia, because it demonstrated that artificial intelligence is no longer limited to advanced Western economies but can also become a development tool for emerging societies. The summit gathered governments, researchers, technology companies, and international organisations to discuss how AI can support social welfare, public services, and economic growth. Its central message was that artificial intelligence should be human centred and socially useful. Instead of focusing only on powerful computing systems, the summit emphasised affordable technologies, open collaboration, and ethical responsibility so that ordinary citizens can benefit from digital transformation. For South Asia, where large populations live in rural areas and resources are unevenly distributed, this idea is particularly important.
People friendly AI
One of the most important concepts promoted at the summit was the idea of “people friendly AI.” This means that artificial intelligence should be accessible, understandable, and helpful in daily activities. In South Asia, language diversity and economic inequality often prevent people from using advanced technology. Therefore, systems designed for local languages, and smartphones, play a crucial role. When a farmer can speak to a digital assistant in Sinhala, Tamil, or Hindi and receive advice about weather patterns or crop diseases, technology becomes practical rather than distant. Similarly, voice based interfaces allow elderly people and individuals with limited literacy to use digital services. Affordable mobile based AI tools reduce the digital divide between urban and rural populations. As a result, artificial intelligence stops being an elite instrument and becomes a social assistant that supports ordinary life.
Transformation in education sector
The influence of this transformation is visible in education. AI based learning platforms can analyse student performance and provide personalised lessons. Instead of all students following the same pace, weaker learners receive additional practice while advanced learners explore deeper material. Teachers are able to focus on mentoring and explanation rather than repetitive instruction. In many South Asian societies, including Sri Lanka, education has long depended on memorisation and private tuition classes. AI tutoring systems could reduce educational inequality by giving rural students access to learning resources, similar to those available in cities. A student who struggles with mathematics, for example, can practice step by step exercises automatically generated according to individual mistakes. This reduces pressure, improves confidence, and gradually changes the educational culture from rote learning toward understanding and problem solving.
Healthcare is another area where AI is becoming people friendly. Many rural communities face shortages of doctors and medical facilities. AI-assisted diagnostic tools can analyse symptoms, or medical images, and provide early warnings about diseases. Patients can receive preliminary advice through mobile applications, which helps them decide whether hospital visits are necessary. This reduces overcrowding in hospitals and saves travel costs. Public health authorities can also analyse large datasets to monitor disease outbreaks and allocate resources efficiently. In this way, artificial intelligence supports not only individual patients but also the entire health system.
Agriculture, which remains a primary livelihood for millions in South Asia, is also undergoing transformation. Farmers traditionally rely on seasonal experience, but climate change has made weather patterns unpredictable. AI systems that analyse rainfall data, soil conditions, and satellite images can predict crop performance and recommend irrigation schedules. Early detection of plant diseases prevents large-scale crop losses. For a small farmer, accurate information can mean the difference between profit and debt. Thus, AI directly influences economic stability at the household level.
Employment and communication reshaped
Artificial intelligence is also reshaping employment and communication. Routine clerical and repetitive tasks are increasingly automated, while demand grows for digital skills, such as data management, programming, and online services. Many young people in South Asia are beginning to participate in remote work, freelancing, and digital entrepreneurship. AI translation tools allow communication across languages, enabling businesses to reach international customers. Knowledge becomes more accessible because information can be summarised, translated, and explained instantly. This leads to a broader sociological shift: authority moves from tradition and hierarchy toward information and analytical reasoning. Individuals rely more on data when making decisions about education, finance, and career planning.
Impact on Sri Lanka
The impact on Sri Lanka is especially significant because the country shares many social and economic conditions with India and often adopts regional technological innovations. Sri Lanka has already begun integrating artificial intelligence into education, agriculture, and public administration. In schools and universities, AI learning tools may reduce the heavy dependence on private tuition and help students in rural districts receive equal academic support. In agriculture, predictive analytics can help farmers manage climate variability, improving productivity and food security. In public administration, digital systems can speed up document processing, licensing, and public service delivery. Smart transportation systems may reduce congestion in urban areas, saving time and fuel.
Economic opportunities are also expanding. Sri Lanka’s service based economy and IT outsourcing sector can benefit from increased global demand for digital skills. AI-assisted software development, data annotation, and online service platforms can create new employment pathways, especially for educated youth. Small and medium entrepreneurs can use AI tools to design products, manage finances, and market services internationally at low cost. In tourism, personalised digital assistants and recommendation systems can improve visitor experiences and help small businesses connect with travellers directly.
Digital inequality
However, the integration of artificial intelligence also raises serious concerns. Digital inequality may widen if only educated urban populations gain access to technological skills. Some routine jobs may disappear, requiring workers to retrain. There are also risks of misinformation, surveillance, and misuse of personal data. Ethical regulation and transparency are, therefore, essential. Governments must develop policies that protect privacy, ensure accountability, and encourage responsible innovation. Public awareness and digital literacy programmes are necessary so that citizens understand both the benefits and limitations of AI systems.
Beyond economics and services, AI is gradually influencing social relationships and cultural patterns. South Asian societies have traditionally relied on hierarchy and personal authority, but data-driven decision making changes this structure. Agricultural planning may depend on predictive models rather than ancestral practice, and educational evaluation may rely on learning analytics instead of examination rankings alone. This does not eliminate human judgment, but it alters its basis. Societies increasingly value analytical thinking, creativity, and adaptability. Educational systems must, therefore, move beyond memorisation toward critical thinking and interdisciplinary learning.
AI contribution to national development
In Sri Lanka, these changes may contribute to national development if implemented carefully. AI-supported financial monitoring can improve transparency and reduce corruption. Smart infrastructure systems can help manage transportation and urban planning. Communication technologies can support interaction among Sinhala, Tamil, and English speakers, promoting social inclusion in a multilingual society. Assistive technologies can improve accessibility for persons with disabilities, enabling broader participation in education and employment. These developments show that artificial intelligence is not merely a technological innovation but a social instrument capable of strengthening equality when guided by ethical policy.
Symbolic shift
Ultimately, the India AI Impact Summit 2026 represents a symbolic shift in the global technological landscape. It indicates that developing nations are beginning to shape the future of artificial intelligence according to their own social needs rather than passively importing technology. For South Asia and Sri Lanka, the challenge is not whether AI will arrive but how it will be used. If education systems prepare citizens, if governments establish responsible regulations, and if access remains inclusive, AI can become a partner in development rather than a source of inequality. The future will likely involve close collaboration between humans and intelligent systems, where machines assist decision making while human values guide outcomes. In this sense, artificial intelligence does not replace human society, but transforms it, offering Sri Lanka an opportunity to build a more knowledge based, efficient, and equitable social order in the decades ahead.
by Milinda Mayadunna
Features
Governance cannot be a postscript to economics
The visit by IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva to Sri Lanka was widely described as a success for the government. She was fulsome in her praise of the country and its developmental potential. The grounds for this success and collaborative spirit go back to the inception of the agreement signed in March 2023 in the aftermath of Sri Lanka’s declaration of international bankruptcy. The IMF came in to fulfil its role as lender of last resort. The government of the day bit the bullet. It imposed unpopular policies on the people, most notably significant tax increases. At a moment when the country had run out of foreign exchange, defaulted on its debt, and faced shortages of fuel, medicine and food, the IMF programme restored a measure of confidence both within the country and internationally.
Since 1965 Sri Lanka has entered into agreements with the IMF on 16 occasions none of which were taken to their full term. The present agreement is the 17th agreement . IMF agreements have traditionally been focused on economic restructuring. Invariably the terms of agreement have been harsh on the people, with priority being given to ensure the debtor country pays its loans back to the IMF. Fiscal consolidation, tax increases, subsidy reductions and structural reforms have been the recurring features. The social and political costs have often been high. Governments have lost popularity and sometimes fallen before programmes were completed. The IMF has learned from experience across the world that macroeconomic reform without social protection can generate backlash, instability and policy reversals.
The experience of countries such as Greece, Ireland and Portugal in dealing with the IMF during the eurozone crisis demonstrated the political and social costs of austerity, even though those economies later stabilised and returned to growth. The evolution of IMF policies has ensured that there are two special features in the present agreement. The first is that the IMF has included a safety net of social welfare spending to mitigate the impact of the austerity measures on the poorest sections of the population. No country can hope to grow at 7 or 8 percent per annum when a third of its people are struggling to survive. Poverty alleviation measures in the Aswesuma programme, developed with the agreement of the IMF, are key to mitigating the worst impacts of the rising cost of living and limited opportunities for employment.
Governance Included
The second important feature of the IMF agreement is the inclusion of governance criteria to be implemented alongside the economic reforms. It goes to the heart of why Sri Lanka has had to return to the IMF repeatedly. Economic mismanagement did not take place in a vacuum. It was enabled by weak institutions, politicised decision making, non-transparent procurement, and the erosion of checks and balances. In its economic reform process, the IMF has included an assessment of governance related issues to accompany the economic restructuring process. At the top of this list is tackling the problem of corruption by means of publicising contracts, ensuring open solicitation of tenders, and strengthening financial accountability mechanisms.
The IMF also encouraged a civil society diagnostic study and engaged with civil society organisations regularly. The civil society analysis of governance issues which was promoted by Verite Research and facilitated by Transparency International was wider in scope than those identified in the IMF’s own diagnostic. It pointed to systemic weaknesses that go beyond narrow fiscal concerns. The civil society diagnostic study included issues of social justice such as the inequitable impact of targeting EPF and ETF funds of workers for restructuring and the need to repeal abuse prone laws such as the Prevention of Terrorism Act and the Online Safety Act. When workers see their retirement savings restructured without adequate consultation, confidence in policy making erodes. When laws are perceived to be instruments of arbitrary power, social cohesion weakens.
During a meeting between the IMF Managing Director Georgeiva and civil society members last week, there was discussion on the implementation of those governance measures in which she spoke in a manner that was not alien to the civil society representatives. Significantly, the civil society diagnostic report also referred to the ethnic conflict and the breakdown of interethnic relations that led to three decades of deadly war, causing severe economic losses to the country. This was also discussed at the meeting. Governance is not only about accounting standards and procurement rules. It is about social justice, equality before the law, and political representation. On this issue the government has more to do. Ethnic and religious minorities find themselves inadequately represented in high level government committees. The provincial council system that ensured ethnic and minority representation at the provincial level continues to be in abeyance.
Beyond IMF
The significance of addressing governance issues is not only relevant to the IMF agreement. It is also important in accessing tariff concessions from the European Union. The GSP Plus tariff concession given by the EU enables Sri Lankan exports to be sold at lower prices and win markets in Europe. For an export dependent economy, this is critical. Loss of such concessions would directly affect employment in key sectors such as apparel. The government needs to address longstanding EU concerns about the protection of human rights and labour rights in the country. The EU has, for several years, linked the continuation of GSP Plus to compliance with international conventions. This includes the condition that the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) be brought into line with international standards. The government’s alternative in the form of the draft Protection of the State from Terrorism Act (PTSA) is less abusive on paper but is wider in scope and retains the core features of the PTA.
Governance and social justice factors cannot be ignored or downplayed in the pursuit of economic development. If Sri Lanka is to break out of its cycle of crisis and bailout, it must internalise the fact that good governance which promotes social justice and more fairly distributes the costs and fruits of development is the foundation on which durable economic growth is built. Without it, stabilisation will remain fragile, poverty will remain high, and the promise of 7 to 8 percent growth will remain elusive. The implementation of governance reforms will also have a positive effect through the creative mechanism of governance linked bonds, an innovation of the present IMF agreement.
The Sri Lankan think tank Verité Research played an important role in the development of governance linked bonds. They reduce the rate of interest payable by the government on outstanding debt on the basis that better governance leads to a reduction in risk for those who have lent their money to Sri Lanka. This is a direct financial reward for governance reform. The present IMF programme offers an opportunity not only to stabilise the economy but to strengthen the institutions that underpin it. That opportunity needs to be taken. Without it, the country cannot attract investment, expand exports and move towards shared prosperity and to a 7-8 percent growth rate that can lift the country out of its debt trap.
by Jehan Perera
Features
MISTER Band … in the spotlight
It’s a good sign, indeed, for the local scene, to see artistes, who have not been very much in the limelight, now making their presence felt, in a big way, and I’m glad to give them the publicity they deserve.
On 10th February we had Yellow Beatz in the spotlight and this week it’s MISTER Band.
This outfit is certainly not new to our scene; they have been around since 2012, under the leadership of Sithum Waidyarathne.
The seven energetic members who make up MISTER Band are:
Sithum Waidyarathne (leader/founder/saxophonist/guitarist and vocalist), Rangana Seram (bass guitarist), Vihanga Liyanage (vocalist), Ridmi Dissanayake (female vocalist), Nuwan Cristo (keyboardist/vocalist), Kasun Thennakoon (lead guitarist), and Nuwan Madushanka (drummer).
According to Sithum, their vision is to provide high quality entertainmen to those who engage their services.
“Thanks to our engaging performances and growing popularity, MISTER Band continues to be in high demand … at weddings, corporate events and dinner dances,” said Sithum.
They predominantly cover English and Sinhala music, as well as the most popular genres.
And the reviews that come their way, after a performance, are excellent, they say, and this is one of the bouquets they received:
It was a pleasure to have you at our wedding. Being avid music fans we wanted the best music, not just a big named band, and you guys acceded that expectations. Big thanks to Sithum for being very supportive, attentive and generous.
- Sithum Waidyarathne: Band leader and founder
- Ridmi Dissanayake: MISTER Band’s female vocalist
The best thing is the post feedback from all the guests. Normally we get mixed reviews but the whole crowd was impressed by you.
MISTER Band was one of our best choices for our wedding.
What is interesting is that for the past four consecutive years, this outfit has performed overseas, during New Year’s Eve, thereby taking their music to the international stage, as well.
The band has also produced a collection of original songs, with around six original tracks composed by the band leader, Sithum Waidyarathne, including ‘Suraganak Dutuwa,’ ‘Landuni,’ ‘Dili Dili Payana,’ ‘Hada Wedana,’ and ‘Nil Kandu Athare.’
Two more songs are set to be released this month: ‘Hitha Norida’ and ‘Premaye Hanguman.’
In addition to their original music, they have also created a strong online presence by performing and uploading over 50 cover songs and medleys to YouTube.
“We’re now planning to connect with an even wider audience by releasing more cover content very soon,” said Sithum, adding that they are also very active on social media, under the name Mister Band Official – on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok.
-
Features2 days agoWhy does the state threaten Its people with yet another anti-terror law?
-
Features2 days agoVictor Melder turns 90: Railwayman and bibliophile extraordinary
-
Features2 days agoReconciliation, Mood of the Nation and the NPP Government
-
Features1 day agoLOVEABLE BUT LETHAL: When four-legged stars remind us of a silent killer
-
Features2 days agoVictor, the Friend of the Foreign Press
-
Latest News4 days agoNew Zealand meet familiar opponents Pakistan at spin-friendly Premadasa
-
Latest News4 days agoTariffs ruling is major blow to Trump’s second-term agenda
-
Latest News4 days agoECB push back at Pakistan ‘shadow-ban’ reports ahead of Hundred auction


