Connect with us

News

Electricity regulator contradicts Minister; tariff reduction certain

Published

on

Dayasiri and Jayakody

…10% to 20% decrease on the cards

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The Energy Ministry couldn’t intervene in the electricity tariff revision as the exclusive authority to do so was vested with the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) in terms of the relevant Acts, authoritative sources told The Island.

Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody’s recent declaration in Parliament that tariff revision wouldn’t be implemented for a period of three years had no legal validity, sources said. Minister Jayakody said so in response to a query raised by SJB MP Dayasiri Jayasekera.

The PUCSL would make its position on the tariff revision known to the public on Friday (17), sources said, adding that available data indicated that tariffs could be reduced by 10% to 20%.

Earlier, the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) proposed to the PUCSL that tariff revision should be put on hold for six months, beginning January 2025. The PUCSL, appointed by President Anura Kumara Disanayake consists of Prof. K.P. Lalith Chandralal (Chairperson), Piyal Henanayake and Dr. Chathuri Samanmali Fernando.

In terms of the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka Act No. 35 of 2002 and the Sri Lanka Electricity Act No. 20 of 2009, the PUCSL is the regulator, hence its authority couldn’t be challenged by the Minister.

Sources said that the PUCSL considered available data, assessment and information before deciding on tariff revision. The Energy Minister, or the Secretary to that Ministry, could have made representations to the PUC during recent public consultations, sources said, adding that several lawmakers appeared before the Commission recently.

The PUCSL couldn’t be deprived of its authority unless the NPP government amended both Acts, sources said.

Alleging that Minister Jayakody deceived the Parliament with regard to the tariff revision issue, Opposition MP Dayasiri Jayasekera told The Island that he would raise a privilege issue in the House. The issue here is whether the Minister is conversant with the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka Act No. 35 of 2002 and the Sri Lanka Electricity Act No. 20 of 2009.

The Minister seemed to have ignored the fact that the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government, in 2023, began introducing four tariff revisions annually. Before that, tariff revisions were effected twice a year.

The last revision was in July 2024 when the PUC reduced power tariffs by 22.5% against the backdrop of the CEB claiming that the maximum affordable was just 3%.

The CEB has requested that the PUCSL revert to the old system as four revisions a year seemed an unnecessary exercise.

We quoted SJB trade unionist Ananda Palitha in yesterday’s issue (13 January) of The Island that electricity tariffs could be reduced by as much as 35% as ,contrary to CEB’s claims, the state enterprise earned significant revenue gains, running into billions of Rupees.

Lawmaker Jayasekera pointed out that Minister Jayakody declared in Parliament that the NPP never promised an immediate electricity tariff revision. That declaration was contrary to President Anura Kumara Disanayake’s assurance, in the run up to the presidential election, that one third of the electricity bill would be reduced, along with the fuel price.

However, the electricity tariff revision was to be announced in October 2024, in line with the previous government’s decision to implement four revisions annually, the former Minister said.

Referring to revisions, both increases and reduction in electricity tariffs, sources pointed out that on every occasion, since 2022, the PUCSL had no option but to disagree with the CEB’s false assessments for obvious reasons. The CEB always proposed higher increases and low reductions in line with their overall strategy, sources said, emphasizing the responsibility on the part of the Ministry to engage the PUCSL.

The government must realise that the PUCSL is the economic, technical and safety regulator of the electricity industry, and the designated regulator for petroleum and water services industries as well. The PUCSL also has been assigned as the shadow regulator for the lubricant market in Sri Lanka.



News

LAWASIA warns against ad hoc initiative to increase judges’ retirement ages

Published

on

T.L Yap

The Law Association for Asia and the Pacific (LAWASIA) has backed the campaign by the Bar Association of Sri Lanka against the government’s effort’s to extend the retirement ages of judges of the Superior Courts.

T.L Yap, President of LAWASIA, in a statement dated 26 June, has expressed concern over the NPP government’s move in the wake of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s recent statement in Parliament on the delay in making the appointments.

The text of the statement: “LAWASIA shares the concern expressed by the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) on 25th May 2026 in a letter to His Excellency the President of Sri Lanka regarding the prospect of the Government of Sri Lanka introducing an amendment to the Constitution which would increase the retirement age of the Judges of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.

LAWASIA supports the sentiments expressed by BASL in its letter of 25 May, namely: “Extending the retirement age of the sitting Judges of these Courts at this point of time is likely to be viewed by the public as a blatant attempt to interfere with the judiciary… The independence of the Judiciary and the public confidence reposed in it, are indispensable pillars of the rule of law and the democratic framework of (Sri Lanka).

In that regard it is of paramount importance that the Judiciary must not only remain independent in fact but also must be seen by the public to be wholly independent, impartial, and free from even the slightest perception of influence, favour, accommodation, or impropriety”

The Constitution of Sri Lanka recognizes the independence of the judiciary and its importance in preserving and maintaining the rule of law. The retirement age of senior judges is presently fixed by Article 107(5) of the Constitution. Constitutional amendment in any jurisdiction is a serious matter which must not be undertaken lightly. LAWASIA’s principal concern is that the proposed constitutional amendment has the appearance of an ad hoc initiative without adequate public consultation. This in turn has the potential to undermine public confidence in the judiciary.

An independent, competent and respected judiciary is the cornerstone of any democracy. LAWASIA has long advocated the fundamental importance of this principle.

The essence of LAWASIA’s formal position in relation to the independence of the judiciary lies in the Beijing Statement of Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary in the LAWASIA Region, adopted at the Conference of Chief Justices held in Beijing in 1997 and subsequently signed by 32 Chief Justices from across the Asia-Pacific.

The Beijing Statement in essence emphasizes the fundamental importance of the independence of the judiciary, and comments on a range of related issues including the objectives of the judiciary, the appointment of judges, the tenure of judges, judicial conditions and the relationship between the judiciary and the executive.

Endorsing the concerns raised by another international organization, the Commonwealth Lawyers Association, LAWASIA accordingly calls upon the authorities in Sri Lanka to:

• refrain from proceeding with the proposed constitutional amendments seeking to increase the

retirement age of members of the Judiciary;

• resist piecemeal and ad hoc amendments to the Constitution of Sri Lanka.

• adhere to due process of consultation and stakeholder engagement in constitutional reform;

• desist from taking any steps which would undermine confidence in the Judiciary and

irreparably diminish the independence of the judiciary; and

• ensure adherence to the rule of law and respect for the independence of the judiciary.

Continue Reading

News

Countrywide drug bust:7, 300 youths arrested

Published

on

A total of 7,300 young people, below the age of 21, had been arrested on suspicion since the launch of the nationwide ‘Ratama Ekata’ anti-drug operation, DIG in charge of the Police Narcotics Bureau, Ashoka Dharmasena, told The Island yesterday.

DIG Dharmasena said the suspects included about 150 females under the age of 21. He added that more than 214,000 suspects had been taken into custody since the commencement of the national anti-narcotics operation.

The operation was launched with the primary objectives of disrupting the supply of narcotics across the country, reducing the demand for illegal drugs and rehabilitating those addicted to narcotic substances, he said.

DIG Dharmasena said law enforcement authorities had so far seized more than 15,000 kilogrammes of narcotics, including cannabis, during the ongoing operation.

He also noted that police had achieved considerable success in intercepting narcotics smuggled into the country by sea, contributing significantly to efforts to curb the illicit drug trade.

The Police Narcotics Bureau said the nationwide operation would continue as part of the government’s broader strategy to dismantle drug trafficking networks and minimise the social impact of narcotics.

by Norman Palihawadane ✍️

Continue Reading

News

ANP leader further remanded

Published

on

Leader of the Abhinava Nivahal Peramuna, Amit Weerasinghe, was yesterday ordered to be remanded until July 3 by Teldeniya Magistrate Kamal Sanjaya Jayatilake over allegations that he defrauded state officials and businessmen of approximately Rs. 120 million by promising to construct cabana holiday resorts in Ella and Digana.

The suspect was produced before court by the Teldeniya Police Headquarters following his re-arrest on fresh complaints. The Magistrate also ordered an investigation into the suspect’s assets and properties, imposed a travel ban, and directed authorities to freeze his bank accounts.

The Teldeniya Police informed the Magistrate that 26 complaints had been received against the suspect so far and that investigations had revealed a large-scale financial fraud.The Magistrate further directed the police to hand over investigations into the alleged fraud to the CID in Colombo by the next court date.

Weerasinghe had previously been granted bail by court but was arrested again following the receipt of additional complaints.

Investigations are being conducted by Teldeniya Police Headquarters OIC CI D. M. Chandrapala and Teldeniya Division SSP Harsha Amarasinghe under the supervision of Central Province Senior DIG Lalith Pathinayake and DIG Sudath Masinghe.

by SK Samaranayake ✍️

Continue Reading

Trending