Editorial
Were the right questions asked?
The Institute of Chartered Accountants deserves the highest praise for persuading three of Sri Lanka’s former Presidents, Chandrika Kumaratunga, Maithripala Sirisena and Ranil Wickremesinghe, to appear on a single platform at its 45th annual conference last week. Mahinda Rajapaksa, who was also billed to appear was a no show, whether on second thoughts or on account of his increasing frailty that is often visible on television home screens. Whether Gotabaya Rajapaksa was invited and what his response was, we do not know. His public appearances since he quit the presidency have been few and far between. Nevertheless, three out of five living ex-presidents on a common platform was not at all a bad show for which the organizers deserve the warmest congratulations.
Naturally corruption was a focus at this meeting. Like the broad masses of the country, those who led Sri Lanka are all too aware of endemic corruption which certainly influenced the recent election of Anura Kumara Dissanayake as the President of the Republic. Corruption, no doubt, has been present not only during the post-independence period but in pre-independent Ceylon as well. To cite one example, it has been alleged that what became then the Kelani Valley Railway Line was built for a mine in South Africa. When it was not purchased as arranged by the intended buyer, a British Governor is alleged to have purchased it for the Ceylon Government Railway.
Although it is cliche today, and widely parroted that all of Ceylon/Sri Lanka’s leaders have, in one way or another been corrupt or at least guilty of cronyism, few in good conscience can accuse the Senanayakes, Bandaranaikes or Sir. John Kotelawela of that. Mr. Bandaranaike paid with his life for resisting the demands of Mapitigama Buddharakkita who played no minor role in ensuring the 1956 electoral landslide that swept SWRD to power. There is a tendency to frame corruption as a post-independence phenomenon that followed the brown sahibs taking over as rulers of the country. But that is not strictly correct although, admittedly, corruption as we know today has grown exponentially in recent decades. It is widely perceived that the opening of the economy in 1978 – not 1977 when J.R. Jayewardene won his five sixths landslide as is often wrongly said – gave an impetus to this development. But that is not also correct at least in the lower levels of the public service where pita vaasi or fringe benefits have long been a fact of life.
The police constable, the village headman, court clerks etc. have enjoyed such perquisites and we would wager that no importer or exporter can claim they have not oiled palms at customs. Auditors have no difficulty passing such payments as acceptable “pre-shipment expenditure.” Editorial writers over the years have expounded about sprats who are netted while the sharks get away. The recent long remanding of former Health Minister Keheliya Rambukwella – incidentally a school bearing his name got a new name the other day – was a rare occurrence. But Prasanna Ranatunga, convicted of extortion, served a full term as a cabinet minister in the last government pending an appeal still not concluded. Voters at the recent presidential election had a problem marking a cross against names of candidates who have consorted and co-existed with corrupt elements in their governments. Media giving publicity to those such as the unlamented Mervyn Silva is also culpable.
President Wickremesinghe, at least within public knowledge, had no obligations to the Rajapaksas when he was prime minister of the Yahapalana government of 2015. This, of course, was not the case when he assumed the prime ministry post-Aragalaya and was elected to serve the balance Gotabaya term by the SLPP majority in parliament. At last week’s forum former President Chandrika Kumaratunga accused Yahapalana PM RW of doing nothing about hoarded loot of USD one billion of the young son of an unnamed political leader banked in Dubai. “I saw the bank statement with my own eyes,” CBK said. “But we could not charge him in court as we needed the original documents.”
RW responded saying his then government sent teams to Dubai but could not find any evidence. “I was told that the member’s relative had kept money abroad. The bank was named as the National Bank of Dubai. We sent in teams which had officials from the police, AG’s department and the Bribery Commission. We were not able to get anything at all. It was not there. Minister Tilak Marapona spoke to the foreign minister of the UAE. There was no trace of the money. The bank said they cannot disclose anything unless we have a court order.” Interesting. But we remember a minister at that time shooting his mouth off about a bank account number is possession of that government giving an early warning.
In any case, Dubai banks like Swiss banks do not easily part with information on account holders. That would undermine their secret accounts business that has grow in mind boggling proportions. The question now in Sri Lanka is whether there was/is a will to pursue these matters to their conclusion even if there was a way. RW’s claim that we lack the skills for this kind of investigation is credible. But we have a record of locking up at least one capable investigator. Shani Abeysekera is now back in the police. Hopefully some moribund cases will at least now get moving.
Sadly, we have no ‘Hard Talk’ kind of investigators to fire the right questions at ex-presidents on the podium at public events. Even if we did, whether moderators would have permitted such questions is doubtful. CBK has a Waters Edge conviction where both she and her friend Ronnie Pieris were fined. Sirisena has paid a Rs. 100 million penalty on the Easter bombing after first pleading he had no money and depended on a mango plantation – over and above ex-presidential perks and pension – for his livelihood. A lot of searching questions could have been asked.
Editorial
Thriving corruption and delayed probes
Past several months have seen some former ministers and ex-state officials being remanded and denied bail ‘to prevent interference with evidence-gathering processes and the intimidation of witnesses. Some of the offences they are charged with were allegedly committed years ago during previous governments. It is while in power that transgressors can cover their tracks by suppressing or eliminating evidence and influencing or intimidating witnesses. Those who are facing legal action for corruption must have resorted to such tactics while their parties were in power. The venal state officials accused of having aided and abetted such alleged transgressions for personal gain, too, must have done likewise. It is therefore doubtful whether holding them on remand for extended periods at present serves the intended purpose.
Politicians and officials should be arrested and remanded immediately after their transgressions come to light if interference with evidence and the intimidation of witnesses are to be prevented. If investigations had been launched into numerous corrupt deals exposed during the Mahinda Rajapaksa government, it would have been possible to bring those responsible for them to justice. Most members of that administration have got away with their corrupt deals.
Various international organisations campaigning against corruption, money laundering, etc., particularly Transparency International, the National Anti-Corruption Commission of Australia, and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, have stressed the importance of swift probes. They have pointed out that investigating corruption immediately after instances thereof come to light is essential for multiple reasons. Early investigations help preserve evidence and deter concealment, which is very common in Sri Lanka. Corrupt politicians are known to hide documents, destroy records or influence witnesses, especially when they are in power. Evidence can be made to disappear making it harder for investigators to get at the truth if investigations are delayed. Equally, prompt investigations are a prerequisite for maintaining public trust in institutions, such as the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption, and the rule of law. Protracted delays in conducting investigations invariably create the impression that the system is corrupt, ineffective and biased. Early action increases the chances of successful prosecution and deterrence.
It is against this backdrop that several damning allegations of corruption against the incumbent government should be viewed. The JVP/NPP came to power, promising what it described as ‘a system change’ to eliminate bribery and corruption and other such social evils. But it is apparently emulating its predecessors in handling allegations against its senior members. It vilifies whistle-blowers, denies allegations and delays investigations. Worse, the CID is headed by a prominent member of the Retired Police Collective of the NPP, and its integrity is therefore compromised.
A huge stock of coal imported for power generation has been found to be substandard. The low calorific value of the coal has resulted in low power output per tonne, and engineers have warned that the use of low-quality coal could damage the machinery of the Norochchoalai power plant. Staggering losses the Ceylon Electricity Board has suffered by importing substandard coal are expected to be passed on to the public in the form of tariff hikes. The government is accused of having interfered with the tender process to facilitate the registration of the company which supplied the low-quality coal. What needs to be done immediately is to probe the allegation that the bidding process was delayed to enable the supplier concerned to be registered. A delay in launching an investigation into the alleged coal procurement racket will help the culprits cover their tracks.
A Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) probe has been launched into the green-channelling of as many as 323 red-flagged freight containers through the Colombo Port in January 2025. The uninspected cargo may have included narcotics and lethal weapons, the Opposition has claimed. It has been alleged that the high-risk containers were released at the behest of a powerful minister. So, one can argue that the government helped cover his tracks before launching a parliamentary probe. Only the naïve will expect a PSC, dominated by the NPP MPs and headed by a minister, to reveal anything that is detrimental to the interests of the NPP government.
Keheliya Rambukwella was arrested over a procurement racket in the Health Ministry while he was a minister in the previous government. True, that beleaguered administration had to throw him to the wolves for want of a better alternative. But the fact remains that his arrest and remand helped protect the evidence-gathering process, among other things. Why no arrests have been made over the release of 323 high-risk containers without Customs inspection, and the procurement of substandard coal, under the ‘clean’ NPP government, is the question.
Editorial
Govt. provoking TUs
Saturday 31st Junuary, 2026
The government has ignored the ultimatum given by the Government Medical Officers Association (GMOA). Its intransigence will only drive the protesting doctors to intensify their trade union action, causing more suffering to patients.
The government has launched a propaganda campaign to turn public opinion against the GMOA by claiming that the doctors are demanding pay hikes with no heed for the economic difficulties caused by Cyclone Ditwah. It has stretched the truth to bolster its claims, suppressing the fact that the protesting doctors have softened their stand and expressed their willingness to give up their trade union action if the government addresses the issues the resolution of which does not cost the state coffers anything. According to media reports, their demands include the establishment of a special service minute for doctors, enhancing the disturbance, availability, and transport allowance, converting the extra duty allowance into a fixed one, and the implementation of a written agreement with the Health Minister on resolving issues regarding a research allowance and transport.
What the government should do to prevent disruptions to the health sector is to bring the GMOA to the negotiating table forthwith and work out a compromise formula. But it has succumbed to the arrogance of power, which drives strong governments to bulldoze their way through. Health Minister Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa has told the doctors that it’s his way or the highway.
The government is apparently cherishing the delusion that since it has a steamroller majority in Parliament, it can do as it pleases, and others have to obey its dictates. Let it be warned that it is inviting trouble. Mandates come with short lifespans, and hubris and downfall are neighbours. Its efforts to neutralise the GMOA have galvanised other health sector trade unions into joining forces; they know that if the government succeeds in flooring the GMOA, so to speak, they will have no chance whatsoever of winning their demands. It is popularly said in this country that “one who lays one’s hands on the gourd does not spare the pumpkin”. In fact, that seems to be the government’s strategy. It is dealing with protesting trade unions in such a way as to deter others from launching labour struggles. It has chosen to ignore a hunger strike by the Development Officers (DOs), attached to the state-run schools; they demanding that they be absorbed into the teacher service. The protesters campaigned hard for the JVP/NPP in the 2024 elections, expecting their fair demand to be met. These graduates have worked as teachers for about seven years, and there is no reason why the government cannot appoint them as teachers; they can be further trained, if need be, after being appointed as teachers. The DOs have received the typical karapincha (curry leaves) treatment from the government they helped elect—they have been used and discarded. The government has shown a callous disregard for not only their career prospects but also their dear lives. The DOs were informed yesterday evening that they could meet President Anura Kumara Dissanayake on Tuesday (03 Feb). But NPP MP Chandna Sooriyaarachchi revealed to the media yesterday that all arrangements had been made for a competitive examination to be held soon!
The GMOA used to give short shrift to other health sector trade unions, and go to the extent of being critical of their labour struggles. It was labouring under the misconception that the state health institutions could operate without other categories of workers. They even sought to establish what may be described as a health sector trade union hierarchy modelled on the four-varna caste system, and place themselves at the top. Now, they have realised the need to cooperate with other trade unions instead of confronting them.
If the health sector trade unions close ranks, they will stand a better chance of winning their demands, and labour unions in other sectors will follow suit to boost their bargaining power. The government continues to provide its political opponents and trade unions with rallying points. Governments intoxicated with power think no end of themselves and behave like aggressive drunkards in shebeens only to receive sobering knocks in elections.
Editorial
Listen to workers
Friday 30th January, 2026
Time was when governments inveighed against the JVP for instigating strikes in vital sectors to further its political interests. Today, a JVP-led government is accusing its political rivals of manipulating trade unions to advance their political agendas on the pretext of championing workers’ rights. Following the 2024 regime change, it was widely thought that the country would at last be free from strikes as the JVP, the main instigator of strikes, had gained state power. During the initial phase of the JVP-NPP rule, all was quiet on the trade union front, but labour disputes began to manifest themselves thereafter.
Development Officers (DOs), attached to the state-run schools, have been protesting near the Presidential Secretariat, Colombo, for four days, demanding that they be absorbed into the teacher service without being made to sit a competitive examination. Some of them were on a hunger strike at the time of writing, claiming that the government had denied them an opportunity to be heard.
The NPP administration is thought to be in a straitjacket where state sector recruitment is concerned. It has to curtail government expenditure in keeping with the IMF bailout conditions. But pressure is mounting on it to fulfil its pledges to the unemployed graduates and the DOs, who campaigned hard for the JVP/NPP in the 2024 presidential and parliamentary elections. In 2024, a few weeks after forming a government, the NPP had a DOs’ protest near the Education Ministry in Battaramulla dispersed by the police!
The state service, bursting at the seams, has become a main source of employment for ruling party supporters over the past several decades. Sri Lanka currently has about 1.5 million public sector employees, with the workforce having doubled over the past one and a half decades. Although there is one public official for every 14 citizens, the efficiency of the state service remains extremely low. Only the UNP-led UNF government (2001-2004) sought to address this issue and curtailed state sector recruitments. But the then President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga sacked that government, and the SLFP-led UPFA, which came to power by winning the 2004 general election, upended the UNF’s recruitment policy and resumed making political appointments in the state sector.
By some quirk of fate, the JVP, which pressured all previous governments to employ graduates in the state sector, is now under fire for not recruiting some graduates as teachers.
Opinion may be divided on the protesting DOs’ demand at issue. But it defies comprehension why the government wants them to sit a competitive examination, for they have worked as teachers for years. They have had hands-on experience in schools, and the question is why they are not appointed as teachers straightaway.
The government, which claims to espouse Marxism, ought to talk to protesters and strikers instead of trying to intimidate them into submission. Let it be repeated that in the past, the JVP was behind almost all strikes, demanding solutions to workers’ problems. Unfortunately, it is now riding roughshod over trade unions and workers. It is playing a game of chicken with the Government Medical Officers’ Association (GMOA), and the protesting doctors have given Minister of Health Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa 48 hours to address their problems or face the consequences. It is hoped that he will invite the doctors on the warpath to the negotiating table and try to avert a health sector strike.
There is no way hospitals can function during a doctors’ strike, and it will be a mistake for the government to wait, expecting the GMOA to blink first. It must get protesters, including doctors and the DOs around the table, and have a serious discussion on the unresolved issues that have driven them to resort to trade union action.
-
Business7 days agoComBank, UnionPay launch SplendorPlus Card for travelers to China
-
Business4 days agoClimate risks, poverty, and recovery financing in focus at CEPA policy panel
-
Opinion3 days agoSri Lanka, the Stars,and statesmen
-
Business2 days agoHayleys Mobility ushering in a new era of premium sustainable mobility
-
Opinion7 days agoLuck knocks at your door every day
-
Business2 days agoAdvice Lab unveils new 13,000+ sqft office, marking major expansion in financial services BPO to Australia
-
Business2 days agoArpico NextGen Mattress gains recognition for innovation
-
Editorial2 days agoGovt. provoking TUs
