News
Online Safety Act: Opp. to move no-faith motion against Speaker for ignoring SC recommendations
GL alleges Mahinda Yapa an extension of executive
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Alleging that Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena functioned as an extension of the executive, Prof. G. L. Peiris, MP, yesterday (26), declared that the main Opposition Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB)would move a No-Confidence Motion (NCM) against the SLPPer over the enactment of Online Safety law (ONLINE SAFETY ACT, No. 9 OF 2024), contrary to the Constitution.
The SJB-led Opposition will push for debate and vote on the NCM in the run-up to the forthcoming presidential poll. In terms of the Constitution, the next presidential election will have to be conducted between Sept 17 and Oct 17 this year.
The dissident SLPP lawmaker, who recently aligned himself with the SJB, said that the party and Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa initiated the NCM. The former External Affairs Minister said so addressing the media at his Kirula Road residence after signing the NCM.
Prof. Peiris alleged that Speaker Abeywardena’s reckless actions undermined the Constitution as well as the parliamentary Standing Orders. There hadn’t been a previous instance of a Speaker disregarding the Supreme Court’s recommendations in respect of a particular Bill the way the incumbent did with the Online Safety Bill (OSB), Prof. Peiris maintained.
Of 225 MPs, 108 cast their votes in favour of the Bill and 62 voted against it.
“In spite of our efforts to convince the Speaker to adhere to the SC’s recommendations, he simply went ahead with the despicable political strategy pursued by the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa dispensation,” the former minister said, alleging that the Speaker also disregarded the Human Rights Commission’s advice in respect of the OSB.
Referring to a lengthy statement, titled ‘Clarification on ill-informed and baseless reports that the Online Safety Bill was passed in violation of the Supreme Court determination’ issued by the Speaker’s Office on February 06, 2024, Prof. Peiris pointed out that the HRC, in a four-page letter dated February 08, 2024 contradicted that stand of the Speaker.
The HRC pointed out that the SC’s recommendations in Section 13 (Clause 13 of the Bill), Section 16 (Clause 17 of the bill), Section 19 (Clause 21 of the Bill), Section 20 (Clause 22 of the Bill) and Section 27 (Clause 31 of the Bill) hadn’t been accommodated.
The HRC didn’t respond to The Island queries whether the Speaker’s Office responded to HRC Chairman retired Supreme Court Justice L.T.B. Dehideniya’s letter.
Prof. Peiris said that of 57 Sections of the Online Law the SC found fault with 34. In respect of the proposed Anti-Terrorism Bill, too, the SC recommended a spate of amendments and controversy surrounding the Broadcasting Authority Bill, the ex-minister said, alleging the government seemed bent on consolidating its position ahead of national elections.
Such laws were meant to protect the incumbent government by discouraging the Opposition, the civil society and the media, Prof. Peiris said, warning the European Union could be compelled to take countermeasures against the country over violation of fundamental rights. That would deliver a deadly blow at a time when the country was struggling to cope up with the developing economic-political-social crisis, the retired top law academic said, reminding the government that Sri Lanka was not out of the woods yet.
Tamil National Alliance (TNA) heavyweight M.A. Sumanthiran, as well as four office-bearers of the United Centenary Front (UCF), moved the SC against the Speaker’s action in purporting to certify the Bill while Parliament stood prorogued is ex facie unconstitutional, illegal, void ab initio and a nullity.
Prof. Peiris said that whatever the differences among various Opposition parties and groups they could take a common stand on the Speaker’s issue.
News
Iranian ships stranded, Lanka fears US sanctions
‘Companies may face US sanctions’: Lanka to put ‘national interest’ first as 19 Iranian vessels seek help
(ToI) Sri Lanka said on Friday it would “prioritise our national interests” before providing assistance to the crews of 19 Iranian ships anchored in international waters near the island nation.The crews are facing shortages of food, water and fuel. A foreign ministry spokesperson cited the risk of US sanctions against Sri Lankan companies supplying the vessels as a key concern.
The United States and Iran have been at war since February 28, when the US and Israel launched joint strikes against the Islamic Republic.
“Sri Lanka will put its national interest first before considering any help, and the companies that supply ships are aware of possible secondary sanctions from the United States,” spokesperson Thushara Rodrigo told reporters, ruling out any immediate assistance to the vessels.
Rodrigo clarified, however, that Sri Lanka had received no communication from the United States warning of repercussions if it decided to assist the vessels.According to Rodrigo, the ships are stationed 24 nautical miles off Sri Lanka’s coast.The Iranian Embassy said it had no information on the matter.
In March, a US torpedo attack sank the Iranian naval vessel IRIS Dena in Sri Lankan waters, killing 87 sailors.
The ship was returning to Iran after participating in a naval exercise at India’s invitation. A second Iranian vessel was brought to a Sri Lankan port after its crew reported technical problems.
Wounded sailors were treated at Sri Lankan hospitals, while those rescued from the second vessel were safely repatriated to Iran.
Sri Lanka is still recovering from an economic crisis, with both the United States and Iran serving as important trading partners. Washington played a key role in securing an International Monetary Fund bailout and supporting Sri Lanka’s agricultural sector to help avert a food crisis.
News
Sri Lanka CERT warns of overseas university admission scams
Sri Lanka CERT has warned the public of fraudulent social media advertisements offering admission to foreign universities after receiving complaints from parents and students who have lost hundreds of thousands of rupees to scammers.
The fraudsters reportedly pose as representatives of reputed foreign universities, promising admission, student visas, work permits and even eventual citizenship in return for registration fees and initial tuition payments.
They use convincing videos, photographs and documents circulated via email and WhatsApp to gain the confidence of unsuspecting victims before asking them to transfer money to foreign bank accounts. The scammers then disappear after receiving the payments, Sri Lanka CERT said.
The agency has urged prospective students and their parents to verify the authenticity of university representatives, documents and bank account details before making payments, and to seek overseas education opportunities only through legitimate and recognised channels.
News
Navi Pillay’s Lankan affairs in focus as she wins 2026 Nobel Peace Prize
Former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and International Court of Justice judge Navanethem “Navi” Pillay has won the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize for her contribution to international law and efforts to promote peace, the Norwegian Nobel Committee announced in Oslo on Friday.
Announcing the award, committee chairman Jørgen Watne Frydnes said Pillay had “significantly enlarged the scope and impact of international law” and helped advance “a more comprehensive global legal order” with exceptional courage. He also praised her long career, which began as a lawyer confronting deep-rooted discrimination in South Africa, and described her as a person with a “firm moral compass”.
Pillay, 85, served as the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights from 2008 to 2014. Her tenure brought her into sharp focus in Sri Lanka, particularly over her assessment of the country’s human rights situation in the aftermath of the decades-long civil war.
During an official fact-finding visit to Sri Lanka from August 25 to 31, 2013, Pillay travelled to areas including Jaffna, Kilinochchi and Trincomalee, where she met civil war survivors, families of the disappeared and local communities.
Following the visit, she warned that Sri Lanka was moving towards authoritarianism and highlighted what she described as a persistent climate of fear.
She also reported intimidation and harassment of people who had sought to meet her during the mission.
Pillay urged the UN Human Rights Council to establish an international inquiry mechanism to investigate alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by both government forces and the LTTE during the final stages of the 26-year civil war.
Her observations and recommendations became a significant part of international scrutiny of Sri Lanka’s post-war human rights record.
The Norwegian Nobel Committee received 287 nominations for this year’s Peace Prize, slightly more than a quarter of them being organisations. The committee traditionally considers efforts to promote peace, international fraternity and institutions that contribute to lasting stability.
Last year, Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado won the prize for her campaign for a democratic transition in Venezuela. She was praised as a woman who kept the flame of democracy burning amid growing darkness.
The 2026 award marks the 125th anniversary of the Nobel Peace Prize, first presented in 1901. Over its history, the prize has recognised prominent figures and organisations involved in advancing peace, human rights and international cooperation.
-
News6 days agoGeneva takes up Sallay’s case and govt. ignores opportunity to answer accusations
-
Features5 days agoPreventing grievances from becoming communal
-
Features3 days agoThe Sri Lankan who made Scottish history
-
Sports3 days agoNissanka absence opens door for Sri Lanka’s young guns
-
News4 days agoGnansara Thera to be assigned to prison printing section: Officials
-
Features6 days agoSri Lanka Cricket Bill: Governance reform is not yet a cricket strategy
-
News2 days agoNDB fraud Rs 60mn more than reported
-
Features3 days agoFuture of Sri Lanka’s state university system: Should it be shut down and reopened?
