Connect with us

Features

Diamonds, tears and tiaras

Published

on

Marilyn Monroe’s genius and tragedy of her life

By Dahami P. Samarathunga

I remember watching “Blonde”, with a few of friends back in 2022 and finding its portrayal of Marilyn Monroe most unfair. Even though the film was dubbed a ‘fictional biopic’, it seemed as though it had failed to be even that presenting her story as an unending tragedy, with too much focus on the negatives. The director described the film as a representation of Marilyn captured through the lens of a camera, with her highlighted beauty, sensuality, and sex appeal saying it was an emphasis on “the idea of Marilyn Monroe” rather than the actual person herself ignoring the fact that she had fought hard to be taken seriously, instead of as some ‘sexual object’, through the major part of her career.

It is no secret that Marilyn was a symbol of Hollywood glitter and arguably the most recognizable movie star of her time. But her success and rise to stardom didn’t come easy as she had to overcome not only the politics behind the scenes in show business but also her own personal demons. In the midst of the multitude of tragedies she endured in her short time on earth, she was one of the hardest working women in show business, who was well aware of the ugly side of Hollywood and as actress Shelly Winters once revealed, “If she was dumber, she would’ve been happier.”

Marilyn was born “Norma Jeane Mortenson on June 1, 1926 and didn’t have a normal upbringing as her mother was diagnosed with schizophrenia and she had never seen her father. Due to her illness, her mother was admitted to a mental institution, making Grace Goddard, a family friend, her guardian. But, due to her husband’s reluctance to keep the child, Norma was later sent back to an orphanage where she was abused and shunted through over a dozen foster homes within a few years greatly affecting her mental state. The orphanage staff believed Norma could thrive in a family setting resulting in Grace Goddard moving her back to her home. But Norma’s happiness was short lived as Grace’s husband, attempted to sexually molest her causing Norma to develop a stutter which she later tried to conceal by adopting to more breathy and softer speaking tone during her studio days.

Through out her school and teenage years, Norma was constantly moved to friends and relatives’ homes. Her foster parents often encouraged her to go out for movies as they didn’t like having her in the house all the time. This led to her becoming infatuated with the idea of being a movie star. To remove Norma out of their home state, Grace Goddard who remained her legal guardian and her husband decided to marry her off to their neighbour James Dougherty, five years her senior. Though she went along with their decision, she felt she was pressured into it and believed her destiny was elsewhere. She was only 16-years old at the time.

After Dougherty was shipped off to the Pacific during World War ll, Norma worked at a “Radioplane” factory where she was discovered by David Conover, a photographer working for the US military. Impressed by her good looks, he invited her to model for an Air Force calendar. This led her to quit her factory job in 1945 and sign up with a modelling agency where she was an instant success, being featured in magazines and advertising commercials. The agency considered her to be one of their most hardworking models.

Around this time Norma bleached her hair blonde, drawing inspiration from her childhood idol Jean Harlow. She signed a contract with a Fox Studio in 1946 and went on to take her iconic screen name Marilyn Monroe adding the ‘Monroe’ which was her mother’s maiden name. She divorced Dougherty in 1947 as he opposed her film career. Marilyn was dropped by Fox after her initial contract and was later signed on by Columbia Pictures. Both studios were hesitant to give her prominent roles as they deemed, ‘she was too timid and shy to be in front of camera’. However, due to her later appearances in a few Fox hits, she was offered a seven-year deal with 20th Century Fox in 1950 but was heartbroken after hearing her rumoured lover, talent agent Johnny Hyde, had died of a heart attack a few days later.

After going back to Fox, Marilyn began to work extensively with her acting coach Natasha Lytess and was determined to make a name for herself as an actress in show business. In 1953, she starred in three consecutive box office hits consolidating her status as one of the most sought-after stars in cinema. “Niagara” was a breakthrough for Marilyn as many believed her years of hard work had finally paid off. Her iconic walking scene in Niagara was considered the longest such scene in the history of cinema and was filmed in a one single take.

It was said that Marilyn had to walk about 35 meters in the shot, with the director, Henry Hathaway initially not planning to shoot a long scene. But, once the cameras started rolling, Marilyn’s graceful walk enthralled the entire film crew and hundreds of onlookers on the street with nobody daring to stop her. She next starred in “Gentlemen Prefer Blondes” alongside Jane Rusell who was an industry veteran. Jane described Marilyn as a ‘sweet individual’ and a ‘workaholic’, revealing how overly critical she was of her own work, “She did look to her coach a lot,” Rusell said. “She worked with her after a full day’s shooting, when I couldn’t think of anything but going home, eating and crashing into bed. “But she’d go on working. She was really determined.”

At the time of the movie’s release, it was revealed that Russell was paid over ten times more than Marilyn due to the contract she held. But despite their pay difference, the pair remained close. Marilyn later spoke of a time when the movie was being shot, she was upset over not having her own dressing room. “The public would be quite disillusioned with the way the industry treats its stars”, Marilyn said. “She (Russel) got $ 200,000 for the film, and I got my 500 a week. But to me it was considerable. The only thing was I couldn’t get my own dressing room. I said look, ‘after all I’m the blonde, and gentlemen prefer blondes!’ “.

Though the studios tried to downplay her acting talent, refusing to look past her beauty, critics believed Marilyn had outshone a cast of seasoned veterans with Russell revealing she didn’t mind playing second fiddle Marilyn as they had formed a bond and didn’t compete with each other. With the success of her movies, Marilyn was offered the same stereotypical “dumb blonde” characters which, she strictly refused. After rejecting series of such movies, she was sent on leave in January 1954 as the studio accused her breaching her contract.

However, Marilyn had the last laugh as she married the baseball star, Joe DiMaggio, at a hugely publicized event a few weeks later. They jetted off to Japan for their honeymoon with Marilyn later detouring to perform before thousands of US soldiers in Korea, creating a media frenzy that became one of the biggest news stories of the year. After this highly publicized tour, she was offered a new contract with Fox in March of 1954.

However, Marilyn’s marriage to DiMaggio ended in less than a year with speculation that their separation was triggered by an iconic scene during the shooting of “The Seven Year Itch.” Here, Marilyn’s skirt gets blown by the gust from a subway grate orchestrated by Fox for publicity reasons. DiMaggio was furious over seeing that photo and the excitement it created that he reportedly struck her later that night at St. Regis Hotel, where they stayed. Many believed Marilyn’s fame overwhelmed DiMaggio who eventually grew jealous.

Tired of being cast as a ‘sex symbol’ upset she couldn’t choose her own roles and conflicts with the studio, Marilyn was suspended from work. She countered by opening her own production company, “MMP” with her photographer Milton Green, in late 1954.

Green’s wife, Amy, a close friend of Marilyn, once said she loved strolling around the streets of New York with the actress hiding behind her glasses or a scarf. Nobody bothered her. Once when they were on such a walk, Marilyn asked, “Do you want to see me become her?” “I just said ‘Yes’, Amy revealed. “And then I saw it. I don’t know how to explain what she did because it was so very subtle. Suddenly cars were slowing and people were turning their heads and stopping to stare. They were recognizing Marilyn Monroe as if she pulled off a mask or something.”

Marilyn in every sense was a fine actress. She often made her movements and mannerisms appropriate for the camera and honed her speaking skills with the help of the books such as, ‘The Thinking Body’ by Mabel Elsworth Todd. This showed how hard she was willing to work to perfect every aspect her career and persona. By the late 1955 Fox was eager to work with her again and offered her a contract with provisions allowing her to pick movies, directors, and projects of her own.

She declared another victory against Fox in 1956 by legally changing her name to “Marilyn Monroe” which was seen as a clever entrepreneurial decision by the same media that once ridiculed her for leaving Fox and going independent. It also was considered a rare feat, as her superstars of her stature typically avoided legal conflicts with major studios fearing potential damage to their careers. She later married playwright Arthur Miller in 1956, seen as controversial by many.

One well documented aspect of Marilyn’s life was how understood and loved she was by fellow female stars. Joan Collins revealed how Marilyn was the first to warn her about the vultures in Hollywood saying, “Beware of the wolves in Hollywood honey. If the studio bosses don’t get what they want from you, they’ll drop your contract”.

Marilyn also had an endearing relationship with Jazz icon Ella Fitzgerald. ‘She’s my very favourite person and I love her as a person as well as a singer; I think she’s the greatest,” she once said of Fitzgerald. Ella later recalled how Marilyn came to her rescue when many venue owners did not let her perform at important theatres and nightclubs because she was black. “I owe Marilyn Monroe a real debt,” She revealed. “She personally called the owner of the Mocambo and told him she wanted me booked immediately. The owner agreed and Marilyn was at the front table, every night. The press went overboard. After that, I never had to play at a small jazz club again.”

Marilyn was diagnosed with endometriosis and suffered a few miscarriages in late 1950’s which made her self medicate to cope with depression. She was later admitted to a hospital after an overdose. With her personal heartaches and career frustrations, she started using alcohol, narcotics, and stimulants to cope with chronic insomnia and stress. But she eventually made a comeback in 1958 with the box office hit “Some like it hot”, which won her the Golden Globe for Best Actress in 1960.

In 1961 Marilyn starred in the movie “The Misfits”, written by Arthur Miller, who had promised her to write a script where she could fully showcase her talent as a dramatic actor. Marilyn later discovered an entry in his notebook, where he allegedly called their marriage “disappointing”, insinuating she was a threat to his creative image. This eventually strained their relationship. She was distraught after seeing his remarks and noticed he had rewritten and changed the movie script persistently making it difficult for her to memorise the dialogues. ‘He was supposed to be writing this for me”, she told a friend, “He could have written me anything, but he comes up with this”.

Following a difficult shooting due to Marilyn’s health and severe prescription drug abuse, Miller and she decided to part in 1961, signifying the culmination of Marilyn’s final released movie.

On August 5, 1962, Marilyn was found unresponsive in her bedroom and her death was ruled as an overdose and “a probable suicide”. It was revealed that she had ingested a lethal dose of Nembutal, which is often associated with treating anxiety. Some believed there was a government involvement in her demise due to rumoured ties between her and the Kennedy brothers in her final days. However, when investigators reopened the case decades later, they failed to find any evidence strong enough to suggest any foul play. Yet, some in the industry still refused to believe that Marilyn had taken her own life, with the likes of Jane Russell opining that there were certainly some “dirty tricks” involved in her death.

Joe DiMaggio was devastated upon hearing of Marilyn’s untimely death and felt guilty as he believed he partly contributed to her demise. They had reconciled shortly before her death. He organized her funeral and barred anyone from Hollywood attending as he believed they all played a part in her tragic end. Arthur Miller didn’t attend the funeral, but criticized the public mourners writing, “glad that it is not you going into the earth, glad that it is this lovely girl who at last you killed”.

In a way “Marilyn”, was Norma Jeane Mortensen’s greatest creation; but that identity slowly became a burden as Marilyn often felt trapped in the image of a sex goddess. Unfortunately, for her there was no turning back as her stardom had hit heights beyond her control. She wasn’t naive, but understood the nature of fame, “‘Fame is also a burden,”, Marilyn once said. She had masterfully built the image of “Marilyn” and played it so effortlessly that the studios wanted her to believe in that image.

“Well, I hope you got something here” she said to Richard Meryman as he was wrapping up the recording of her final interview. “But please don’t make me look like a joke”. It’s no secret that Marilyn despised how superficial the studios painted her to be and hated the media’s guts for pushing that narrative and running along with it. But she also sensed what she deemed as a fantasy was slowly becoming her reality and this left her fragmented and losing control.

(The writer is a Canadian of Sri Lankan descent living in Toronto. She may be contacted at dahamisamarathunga44@gmail.com)



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Beyond traditional jobs: Why Sri Lanka needs to facilitate the gig economy

Published

on

Image courtesy Oxford University

by Kapila Chinthaka Premarathne
Head of the Department of Agricultural Systems and a Senior Lecturer in Agricultural Economics at the Faculty of Agriculture,
Rajarata University of Sri Lanka

Beyond the Graduate Unemployment Number

Sri Lanka’s economic recovery has improved macroeconomic stability, but youth unemployment remains a significant labour-market concern. Around 43% of Sri Lankan youth aged 15–24 with postsecondary education are unemployed, the highest among the Asian economies compared in the IMF analysis, compared with about 36% in Bangladesh and 13.2% in Thailand. This reflects a problem of skills mismatches and the difficulty of connecting higher education with changing labour-market demand. The concern goes beyond unemployment itself. Sri Lanka has invested heavily in educating its younger population, yet the conventional labour market is not creating enough opportunities to convert these qualifications into income. Many young people possess degrees, technical knowledge and growing digital familiarity, but remain outside formal employment because suitable jobs may not exist in the right place, at the right time or under conditions compatible with their circumstances. This makes it necessary to think beyond traditional employment models and explore new ways of connecting Sri Lanka’s educated youth with economic opportunities.

This is where Sri Lanka needs to reconsider how it understands employment

Employment has traditionally been viewed through the employer–employee relationship, with qualifications leading to a formal job and regular salary. While this model remains important, digital platforms are creating new ways to generate income, allowing individuals to work for multiple clients across geographical boundaries without permanent employment. Sri Lanka therefore needs to look beyond simply creating conventional jobs and consider whether it is building the conditions for its educated population to participate in the growing global market for digital services.

The Opportunity of the Gig Economy

The gig economy extends far beyond ride-hailing and delivery services. Digital platforms increasingly connect skilled individuals with opportunities in software development, design, accounting, data analysis, digital marketing, translation, online education, research and consultancy. This is particularly relevant to Sri Lanka, where a highly educated population faces a relatively limited domestic market for specialised skills. Digital platforms can overcome geographical constraints by connecting Sri Lankan workers directly with international clients.

As highlighted in my previous LSE South Asia article on women and the gig economy, such work should not replace formal employment but can create additional income opportunities when supported by appropriate skills, digital infrastructure, training and institutional support. A skilled person in Anuradhapura, Jaffna, Batticaloa or Monaragala could potentially serve clients in London, Melbourne or Dubai without first relocating to Colombo. This makes the gig economy relevant not only to employment but also to Sri Lanka’s emerging digital services-export strategy.

A Digitally Familiar Generation

Sri Lanka’s younger generation is growing up with smartphones, social media, online learning, digital applications and digital financial services, giving them a level of digital familiarity that previous generations did not have. However, digital familiarity does not automatically translate into digital employability. The challenge is to transform everyday digital use into productive skills such as data analysis, artificial intelligence, software development, digital marketing, financial analysis and online professional services.

Sri Lanka therefore needs to move young people from being consumers of digital services to producers of digital value. Universities, vocational institutions and training providers can play an important role in converting existing digital familiarity into marketable skills that connect young people with both domestic and international opportunities. This is increasingly important as technological change and AI reshape labour markets and intensify the need for skills that match emerging forms of work.

The Gender Dimension

The gig economy may be particularly relevant to women, who often face barriers to conventional employment arising from childcare, eldercare, mobility, social expectations and rigid working arrangements. For mothers and women living outside major urban centres, fixed working hours and daily commuting can make formal employment difficult even when suitable jobs exist.

Digital gig work can provide greater flexibility, allowing women to undertake professional assignments from home or their communities and potentially serve international clients without relocating. As discussed in my earlier LSE South Asia article, this opportunity is most meaningful when supported by digital infrastructure, skills training, virtual work hubs, mentorship and appropriate institutional support. However, flexibility should expand women’s economic choices rather than simply add paid work to existing unpaid household responsibilities.

Pressure on Labour-Market Opportunity

The value of a job cannot be judged by salary alone, as commuting, working hours and household responsibilities can significantly affect its real economic value. Flexible digital work can potentially reduce some of these costs by allowing people to work from home or nearby digital hubs and participate in employment on a part-time or project basis. While gig work cannot solve all household pressures, a more flexible organisation of work can create additional employment opportunities while helping households manage their limited time and resources more effectively.

A Possible Third Option Between Unemployment and Migration

Sri Lanka’s migration and brain-drain concerns highlight the need to explore employment opportunities beyond the domestic labour market. While overseas migration will remain an important individual and economic choice, digital work can provide another pathway by allowing skilled Sri Lankans to serve international clients without physically leaving the country. Software developers, designers, analysts, researchers, translators and consultants can potentially earn from global markets while remaining in Sri Lanka. Digital gig work cannot eliminate migration or reverse brain drain, but it can create an additional option between domestic unemployment and physical migration—working for the world while remaining in Sri Lanka.

Recognising and Making Digital Work Reputable

A major institutional gap is that conventional systems are designed around salaried employment, while a freelancer may earn from multiple clients without a single employer or salary certificate. This can make legitimate digital workers difficult to recognise when they seek loans, leasing, insurance or business finance. Sri Lanka could address this through a voluntary digital-worker or independent-professional registration mechanism, providing a recognised economic identity based on qualifications, verified skills, platform activity and documented income, without creating unnecessary bureaucracy.

Such recognition should also make digital income bankable. Banks could assess verified platform earnings, bank transactions, contracts, invoices, tax records, savings and repayment history alongside conventional employment documents. A standardised digital income statement could further help workers demonstrate their financial capacity. The key shift is from asking “Who is your employer?” to asking “Can your income be verified and is it sufficiently stable?”. This would allow successful digital workers to build financial credibility and use their earnings to access credit, acquire assets and develop their own businesses.

Digital Payments Are Part of the Labour Market

Access to reliable international payment systems is essential if Sri Lankans are to participate effectively in the global digital economy. Recent developments in PayPal’s local banking arrangements, including its partnerships with Sampath Bank and Commercial Bank, indicate progress in this direction. However, the broader priority should be a regulated and efficient digital-payment ecosystem that allows workers to receive international earnings, transfer them to Sri Lankan bank accounts, document their income and meet relevant financial and tax requirements with minimal friction. International payment infrastructure is therefore not simply a technology issue; it is an essential component of Sri Lanka’s emerging services-export economy.

Building Infrastructure Outside Colombo

Digital familiarity alone is insufficient without reliable internet, electricity, computers, software and suitable working environments, particularly in rural and underserved areas. To ensure that the gig economy supports regional development rather than becoming another Colombo-centred opportunity, Sri Lanka could establish regional digital-work hubs through universities, vocational institutions, libraries and public-private partnerships. These hubs could provide connectivity, equipment, training, mentoring and assistance with platform registration and international payments. If graduates must migrate to Colombo simply to access such infrastructure, the geographical advantage of digital work is significantly reduced.

From Freelancer to Entrepreneur

Gig work should not be viewed as an end in itself. A person may begin with small online assignments, develop regular clients and professional credibility, and eventually establish a small digital enterprise. This creates a potential pathway from graduate to freelancer, professional service provider and entrepreneur, allowing individuals to create markets around their own skills rather than waiting for conventional vacancies. Universities can support this transition by teaching students not only subject knowledge but also portfolio development, market identification, client communication, digital platforms and contract management. A degree demonstrates educational attainment, while a professional portfolio demonstrates what a graduate can offer to the market.

Facilitation Must Be Matched by Protection

Promoting the gig economy without appropriate safeguards could simply transfer employment risks from institutions to individuals. Digital workers may face uncertain incomes, weak bargaining power and limited social protection. Sri Lanka should therefore facilitate digital work while also ensuring opportunities for independent workers to build savings, access insurance and participate in portable social-protection mechanisms. Flexibility should create greater economic choice without compromising long-term financial security, particularly for women.

A regional Example from India: Think Globally and act Locally

India provides a useful regional example of how the gig economy can be approached as a policy issue rather than simply as informal or temporary work. NITI Aayog has estimated the size and future employment potential of India’s gig and platform economy and has developed recommendations covering employment generation, skills, financial inclusion and social protection. More importantly, India has begun creating institutional mechanisms around these workers. Its e-Shram portal provides a national database of unorganised workers, including gig and platform workers, creating a recognised identity through which workers can potentially access employment, skills development and social-security services. India has also explored platform-led skills development through skill certificates, skill passports and on-the-job training, while NITI Aayog has proposed cash-flow-based lending models that could allow platform workers to demonstrate creditworthiness through their earnings rather than conventional employment or collateral.

Social protection has also entered the policy framework. India’s Code on Social Security, 2020 formally recognises gig and platform workers and provides a basis for schemes covering areas such as accident insurance, health, maternity, disability and old-age protection. India is still developing and refining these arrangements, and Sri Lanka need not replicate the Indian model.

However, the experience demonstrates an important policy lesson: the gig economy can be supported through a system that identifies workers, develops their skills, makes their income more visible to financial institutions and extends appropriate social protection. Sri Lanka could develop its own simpler framework suited to its smaller economy, beginning with recognising digital workers and building the institutional conditions that allow their skills and earnings to become part of the formal economy.

Rethinking Employment and the Next Opportunity

The 43 percent figure for educated young Sri Lankans should encourage a wider discussion about the changing nature of work. Sri Lanka will continue to need conventional employment through firms, industries, farms, professional organisations and public institutions, but the changing labour market also requires new opportunities to connect educated Sri Lankans with global digital markets. The gig economy can provide an additional pathway to increase female labour-force participation, reduce the pressure for migration and brain drain, and connect Sri Lankan skills with markets beyond geographical boundaries.

This does not require a complicated bureaucracy. It requires recognising legitimate digital workers, facilitating access to international platforms and payment systems, allowing verified digital income to support credit assessment, developing portable social protection, and strengthening digital infrastructure and skills beyond major urban centres. Better data on digital workers would also help policymakers develop evidence-based interventions.

The future of work is therefore not only about creating more jobs, but about creating more ways for Sri Lankans to work, earn and build livelihoods while continuing to live and contribute in Sri Lanka. The gig economy should be recognised as part of an emerging digital labour market and services-export economy, where workers can build professional identities, earn internationally, access finance and eventually develop their own enterprises.

Continue Reading

Features

Are religions getting redundant in the modern world?

Published

on

by Dr Upul Wijayawardhana

We are living in an era of astonishingly rapid scientific advancement. From the time Apple launched the ‘iPhone’ in January 2007, the first targeting the mass market, smartphones have taken over the world, making them indispensable. According to the latest statistics, there are around 8.1 billion mobile phones with 7.4 billion active smartphones, for the world population of 8.25 billion. Except for a tiny minority of the very poor, most people have at least one smartphone.

We are now entering the era of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and smart robots. Recently, a ‘Chinese’ robot ran 100 metres faster than Usain Bolt! Though Alan Turing proposed the idea of ‘Thinking Machines’ way back in 1950, the real AI boom commenced with the release of the generative AI chatbot, ChatGPT, by OpenAI in November 2020. Number of technology firms in the US as well as in China have joined the race, China catching up very fast, quite unexpectedly. There is a frenzy at the moment, raising expectations, as the imminent floating of these companies is likely to value the two leaders, OpenAI and Anthropic, trillion dollars each!

However, trouble is brewing in the AI field. On top of the concerns raised by environmentalists regarding the huge power drain by AI centres, there are recent reports of some AI models hacking independently into other systems, without human input. Worse still, a senior researcher at Anthropic, who has previously worked for OpenAI as well, resigned in early September on ethical grounds stating that the way the two companies are fast-tracking AI poses an existential threat to humanity. Surprisingly, instead of a rebuttal the head of Anthropic supported his view, soon joined by three more heads of leading AI developers. Whilst they agreed on slowing progress, President Trump has claimed that slowing is totally unnecessary as long as a super intelligent President like himself is at the helm! There does not seem to be an end to Trump’s grandiosity! He was joined by Tony Blair. In contrast, King Charles held a summit with representatives of all AI developers to find a way AI could be developed without a threat to humanity. That is how wise leaders act!

Less sophisticated AI tools are already in widespread use and installed in computers, laptops and smartphones. Some of us are using these automatically. However, the more advanced AI tools like ChatGPT can change even reality. For instance, AI can generate videos hardly distinguishable from real ones. What you enjoy watching on YouTube may be just the creations of AI! Some people use AI to write articles; only a few of them admit that they do so. Very soon we may be reading stories AI creates and listening to music, courtesy of AI. Technology seems to be fast becoming the new religion? Or, will the existential threat move us more towards religion?

Religion, perhaps, is as old as humanity itself; various belief systems evolving and disappearing coupled with the fortunes of the associated civilizations. Just like AI, religion is also a creation of the human mind which our ancestors did to explain many phenomena which appeared, at that time, to be supernatural. Starting with Animism, perceiving the divine in the natural world around, humans went on to Polytheism, believing in many gods like in Hinduism, culminating in the concept of Monotheism.

World’s oldest religion, Hinduism, still in wide practice, is devoid of a founder or a single text. The earliest scriptures, Rigveda, is considered to be around 3,500 years old but archaeologists have discovered symbols of importance to Hinduism as far back as 7,000 BCE. Though it is considered to be Polytheistic, it can be argued that it was the precursor of Monotheism, the concept of a creator God, as Brahma was the creator in the triad, Trimurti, Vishnu being the preserver and Shiva being the destroyer. It seems to be a sensible balancing act; create, destroy and repair with improvements.

It is pretty obvious that as science expands, the importance of religion contracts but it is hardly likely religions would be totally redundant. We have no choice as to which family we are born to and that invariably determines what your religion would be, if any. Religion is the first brainwashing a child encounters and most remain in the same faith, often trying to defend even the indefensible, but some change through conviction or conversion due to one of many reasons. Further, religious rituals have social values and religious practices often come to one’s solace at times of distress. Therefore, many will continue with the religion they were born to but with declining enthusiasm, at times. However, some religions seem to be facing problems like falling attendances in places of worship. With education and tech savviness expanding, one would expect the youth to be less enthusiastic about religion but the converse is true in some religions, some youth becoming very militant unfortunately.

While most religions make you subservient to a supernatural power, the Buddha was wise and bold enough to remove those shackles. He proclaimed that one’s destiny is in one’s own hands. However, many Buddhists appear to attach greater significance to rituals than to practising the Dhamma.

Buddhism as a religion may become less relevant as the frontiers of science expands but the Buddha Dhamma, especially Abhidhamma and Vipassana, would receive increasing recognition, the Buddha remaining an authority on consciousness and the mind.

Scientific progress should be for the betterment of society but AI developers are taking huge risks, taking massive loans threatening the world economy, for one aim: profit! Some do not seem to care even if their actions pose an existential threat to humanity.

Perhaps, if the Four Sublime Attitudes (Sathara Brahma Vihara) expounded by the Buddha; loving kindness (Metta), compassion (Karuna), empathetic joy (Muditha) and equanimity (Upekkha) are adopted as universal values, the world would become a safer place to live in, with or without AI.

Continue Reading

Features

‘The Bullet that Missed’

Published

on

Tales of Mystery and Suspense 21

by Prof. Rajiva Wijesinha

Another book that is part of a series, today—one that is fun without the brooding concentration on criminality in different forms that marks the Rebus novels. This one about the Thursday Murder Club, is a romp as its two predecessors were interspersed with deaths and what might be deaths.

The Bullet that Missed

begins with a meeting with the presenter of ‘South East Tonight’, a programme about the area, in which Coopers Chase is situated. The meeting is held because the club has decided to look into the murder of the producer’s assistant, Bethany Waites, whose car was found at the bottom of a cliff ten years ago. There was blood in it, but the body was never found.

Or, rather, the book begins with an account of Bethany Waites deciding, on the night she vanished, to meet someone in connection with a case of massive fraud that she had been investigating, after sending the producer, Mike Waghorn, a message that she had found new evidence though he had no idea what it was. The night she died, she sent him another message: “I don’t say this often enough, but thank you.”

CCTV cameras showed her leaving her place, but then the vehicle vanished, before being sighted near the cliff, with two people in it. Investigation of the fraud had led to the imprisonment of a woman, Heather Garbutt, though it proved impossible to pin anything on Jack Mason, the mastermind for whom she had worked.

The Club conducts investigations on several fronts, including through Connie Johnson, the drug dealer they had helped imprison in the earlier book. The psychiatrist Ibrahim, the most respectable member of the Club, interviews her in an attempt to get her to find out more from Heather, who is in the same prison as she. They also investigate the CCTV record of the night Bethany vanished, and deduce that she went to an apartment block and exited from its other side, and that is why she was not seen leaving the town. But some time had elapsed between her being seen in the town and then on the cliff.

Meanwhile, Elizabeth has been kidnapped, along with her husband, and taken to a house in Staffordshire, where she is told by a man called the Viking that she must kill a former KGB agent now in London, who has a profitable career in money laundering. The Viking tells her he will inform Viktor that she was responsible for stealing the diamonds, the story of which is told in the previous Murder Club Mystery, and Viktor will then kill her.

Elizabeth, who has an affair with Viktor, knows he will not kill her, but when the Viking says he will also send Viktor a picture of Joyce, she decides she must act, and goes to see Viktor, and fires when she gets him in the bathroom. But, of course, she fired into the ceiling, and Viktor is then taken to Coopers Chase, to stay with Joyce until they have dealt with the Viking. And Viktor then enjoys the camaraderie of the retirement home so much that he wonders whether he too should settle there.

Elizabeth does trace the Viking, or rather her husband does, for he has noticed rare books on the shelves in his library, and an antiquarian book dealer friend managed to find out who bought them. But before they could confront him, he comes to Coopers Chase, for he has seen the bullet hole in the bathroom of Viktor’s flat and realized he was fooled.

But he cannot bring himself to kill Joyce straight away, and she knocks him out with a drug in a cup of tea. When he meets Viktor, they both decide to fall in with the plans of the Club.

Before this, Heather has been found dead in her cell, with a note saying that ‘they’ were going to kill her, and only Connie could help. Before that she had admitted that she was frightened to name the man behind the fraud. Jack Mason said the same, after Ron had won his confidence. The Club had deduced by then that the body was buried in the garden of Heather’s house which Jack had bought, after she had been jailed, and digging reveals a gun and money, but no body. Jack tells them that the mastermind had said that Bethany was buried with a bullet with his DNA on it.

The Club is now working with the Chief Constable of Kent, Andrew Everton, who writes thrillers himself, but in the form of e-books. He is in search of a publisher, and delighted when Mike Waghorn puts him on his programme, as is Donna, who is substituted at the last minute for Chris.

The Club finds out whom Bethany visited in the apartment block—Mike’s assistant Pauline, who tells them later what she and Bethany had been doing. But this is after the man behind the fraud has been unmasked up in the house in Staffordshire, where he was trying to hire the Viking and Viktor to find the money that he had stashed away, using accounts that he could no longer trace. He has also confessed to murdering Bethany, hoping this will persuade the two money launderers to help him, but it turns out that he did not do this. Nor did he kill Heather, the incriminating note having been placed in her room by Connie, who decided that Heather’s suicide should be treated as murder so that the person who had been blackmailing her should be found out.

It was Jack Mason’s murder that was brought home to the crook. It turns out that Bethany, her appearance altered by Pauline, has vanished, to a new life in Dubai, where she has taken control of the missing millions. She has gone there because the threat, she received through the bullet she was looking at in the preamble, was to Mike and she wanted him out of danger.

Yet another whimsical conclusion to a whimsical book with enough loose ends left hanging for another sequel.

Continue Reading

Trending