News
13 A: Prez accused of abusing GR’s mandate
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Dissident SLPP National List MP Gevindu Cumaratunga has accused President Ranil Wickremesinghe of blatantly abusing ousted predecessor Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s mandate.The lawmaker questioned UNP leader Wickremesinghe’s recent declaration in Jaffna regarding the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, enacted in 1988, at the behest of India.
MP Cumaratunga yesterday (12) told The Island that he raised the issue in Parliament early this week, close on the heels of President Wickremesinghe’s high profile visit to Jaffna.
The MP, with an impeccable patriotic pedigree, said that those who voted for Gotabaya Rajapaksa at the Nov 2019 presidential election and gave the SLPP a nearly 2/3 majority at the parliamentary election, the following year, endorsed the country’s unitary status. The Parliament elected Wickremesinghe to complete the remainder of Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s five-year term, Cumaratunga said.
Addressing a gathering in Jaffna, President Wickremesinghe urged all provinces to utilize the powers within the 13th Amendment to achieve development. President Wickremesinghe declared that time was opportune to utilize the 13th Amendment.
Referring to a recent statement made by the Director General of the Office for National Unity and Reconciliation (ONUR) Deepthi Lamahewa, MP Cumaratunga said that the official who had been always supportive of devolution of power to the regions criticized the Provincial Councils for hindering post-war national reconciliation process.
MP Cumaratunga, in his address to Parliament, quoted Lamahewa as having said that Provincial Councils were an obstacle to reconciliation process.
At the onset, lawmaker Cumaratunga pointed out that seven lawmakers, representing the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) and All Ceylon Tamil Congress (ACTC), voted against the ONUR Bill on January 09 even though the new law was meant to appease the Tamil speaking community. Parliament passed the Bill with 48 MPs (SLPP 45+SLPP dissidents 2 +SJB dissident 1) whereas seven opposed and 169 skipped the vote.
Commending Justice Minister Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakse, PC, for the spearheading role he played in enacting new laws, ONUR and new Hydrography Bills, MP Cumaratunga said that they owed an explanation why the Tamil voted against the Bill at its Second Reading.
MP Cumaratunga said that if Tamil parties felt that particular Bill required amendments, they could have followed proper procedure to do so at the Committee Stage. Instead, they voted against the Bill.
TMVP leader Sivanesathurai Chandrakanthan aka Pilleyan (Batticaloa District), formerly of the LTTE, voted for the Bill. Lawmaker Cumaratunga was not present in Parliament at the time of voting.
Ahead of the Committee Stage, lawmaker Cumaratunga told Parliament that when the Sectoral Oversight Committee (SOC) on Reconciliation and National Unity examined the ONUR Bill on January 02, 2024, he proposed that the appointment of members to the ONUR office should be subjected to the approval of the Constitutional Council. MP Cumaratunga proposed that those who had been proposed by the Justice Minister and appointed by the President should be subjected to CC’s approval.
However, the Chairman of the SOC on Reconciliation and National Unity MP Dilan Perera hadn’t presented his colleague’s proposal at the Committee Stage, therefore, it was not accommodated. MP Cumaratunga said that when he inquired from the Secretary to the SOC about the status of his proposal he was told the Secretary to the Justice Ministry had been duly informed in this regard.
MP Cumaratunga appreciated President Wickremesinghe, during his recent visit to Jaffna, giving ear to Jaffna-based civil society activist Arun Siddharthan, who wants to unite the races to fight the country’s problems, Lawmaker Cumaratunga, who is also the leader of the Yuthukama civil society group, flayed the Northern and Eastern Provincial Councils for failing to re-open at least one of the Sinhala schools that had been closed down during the war. The MP said that their failure to do so, 15 years after the end of the conflict, couldn’t be justified under any circumstances.
News
Buddhist hierarchy demands prison perks for monk convicts
MONETABRIEF– Sri Lanka’s two most senior Buddhist chapters, Malwatte and Asgiriya, demanded special concessions for monks serving prison sentences, following the disrobing of convicted monk Ven. Galagodaatte Gnanasara in line with established procedures.
The chief prelate of the Asgiriya chapter, Most Venerable Warakagoda Sri Gnanarathana, told Prisons Commissioner Senaka Palletenna that Ven. Gnanasara, who is serving a six-year sentence for contempt of court, must be released immediately.
Prison authorities have no power to release or pardon convicts, but Palletenna told the monk in Kandy on Friday that he would convey his request to the relevant government authorities.
“There is no point in talking about this and that… The entire country has been shaken (??????? ) . He must be released,” the Asgiriya chief prelate said.
The Malwatte chief prelate, Most Venerable Thibbatuwawe Sri Siddhartha Sumangala, appeared to accept the court verdict against Ven. Gnanasara, but asked the prisons chief whether a separate section could be established for convicted monks.
Palletenna noted that a special ward for the clergy already existed at Welikada Prison.
At least 63 convicted Buddhist monks are currently incarcerated within Sri Lanka’s criminal justice system.
Meanwhile, a group of 34 Buddhist monks named in a Colombo Fort Magistrate’s Court order to vacate the vicinity of the Presidential Secretariat ended their protest and dispersed after lunch on Friday.The monks are demanding an unconditional pardon for Ven. Gnanasara, who has previously been imprisoned, making him a reconvicted prisoner.
News
Debate on NCM against Speaker postponed indefinitely
The debate on the no-confidence motion against Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne, submitted by the Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB), has been postponed indefinitely pending the Attorney General’s opinion on certain technical issues in the motion.
Government representatives raised the matter at a meeting of the Committee on Parliamentary Business, pointing out that several provisions of the motion required clarification and that the Attorney General’s advice should be obtained.
As obtaining the opinion would take time, the debate could not be scheduled for the next parliamentary week, parliamentary sources said.
Chief Opposition Whip Gayantha Karunatilaka said a date for the debate would be decided after the Attorney General’s advice was received.
Meanwhile, Parliament is scheduled to meet from October 20 to 23, Secretary General of Parliament Kushani Rohanadeera announced.
The parliamentary business for the week was finalised at a meeting of the Committee on Parliamentary Business held on Friday (16) under the chairmanship of Deputy Speaker Dr. Rizvie Salih.
On each sitting day, the period from 9.30 a.m. to 10 a.m. will be allocated for parliamentary business under Items 1 to 6 of Standing Order 22. Questions for Oral Answers will be taken up from 10 a.m. to 11 a.m., followed by questions under Standing Order 27(2) from 11 a.m. to 11.30 a.m.
On Tuesday, October 20, an Opposition-sponsored Adjournment Motion will be debated from 11.30 a.m. to 5.30 p.m.
On Wednesday, October 21, a resolution under the Public Debt Management Act and a Supplementary Estimate will be taken up for debate and approval from 11.30 a.m. to 5 p.m. The annual reports of five statutory institutions will subsequently be presented for approval without debate, while questions at the Adjournment Time will be taken up from 5 p.m. to 5.30 p.m.
On Thursday, October 22, the Second Reading debates on two Bills to amend the Poisons, Opium and Dangerous Drugs Ordinance (Bills Nos. 79 and 80) will be held from 11.30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
The annual reports of five statutory institutions will then be taken up for approval without debate, followed by an Opposition-sponsored Adjournment Motion from 5 p.m. to 5.30 p.m.
On Friday, October 23, the Second Reading debate on the Elimination of Rabies and Registration of Dogs Bill will be held from 11.30 a.m. to 5 p.m. A Government-sponsored Adjournment Motion will be debated during the final half-hour of the sitting.
News
Karannagoda pushed for £24,536 for Yoshitha’s UK training, Court told
Former Navy Commander Admiral Wasantha Karannagoda had, by letter dated May 19, 2014, requested the Secretary to the Ministry of Defence to approve the funds required for former Navy Lieutenant Yoshitha Rajapaksa, son of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, to attend the Royal Navy Young Officers Course at the Royal Navy Training College in the United Kingdom, the Colombo High Court was told on Thursday (15).
The court was informed that £24,536 in public funds had been spent on the training programme. The details emerged during testimony by a Navy representative appearing on behalf of former Navy Commander Admiral Travis Sinniah before Colombo High Court Judge Udesh Ranatunga, when the money laundering case against Rajapaksa was taken up for hearing.
Responding to questions during cross-examination, the witness explained that payments for Navy officers attending overseas training programmes were generally made in foreign currencies, including US dollars and British pounds.
Meanwhile, Navy Captain Nuwan Thushara Arangala, testifying for the prosecution, told court that Rajapaksa had received a total of Rs. 5,159,626.37 in salaries and allowances during his nine years of service in the Navy.
The court was informed that Rajapaksa had served as a Navy Lieutenant from December 14, 2006, to February 28, 2017, although his service had been suspended on February 28, 2016.
According to the testimony, his monthly gross salary was Rs. 16,390, in addition to allowances for food, uniforms, housing and special duties.
The witness clarified that these allowances did not include payments made for overseas training programmes or participation in sporting events while representing the Navy.
During the proceedings, the prosecution also submitted Rajapaksa’s annual declarations of assets and liabilities for the period from 2009 to 2015.
A National Savings Bank official also testified regarding savings accounts and fixed deposits maintained by Rajapaksa, stating that no withdrawals had been made from the accounts since they were opened.
Rajapaksa is facing charges under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act over his alleged failure to explain the source of nearly Rs. 735 million acquired between August 1, 2012, and August 29, 2013, in Rajagiriya and Bambalapitiya.
The prosecution alleges that funds suspected to have been derived from unlawful activities were deposited in bank accounts and fixed deposits.
The court also heard testimony concerning the appointment of a guardian for Daisy Forrest, the second defendant in the case, and matters relating to the clearance of an imported outside broadcasting (OB) truck associated with CSN television.
Further examination of witnesses was scheduled for October 30, with the court directing 11 prosecution witnesses to appear on that date.
-
Latest News5 days agoNissanka’s return headlines Sri Lanka’s Test squad against Pakistan
-
Latest News6 days agoFarhan and Sadaqat help Pakistan seal series in style
-
Features6 days agoIntake 16: 45 years of duty and honour
-
News6 days agoMalwathu Chapter issues statement on talks with President over Gnanasara Thera’s robes
-
News6 days agoCP alleges NPP has taken the blame for illegal US sanctions on Iranian vessels
-
News4 days agoSri Lanka, India caught in US-Iran ship crisis
-
Opinion6 days agoHow long can Sri Lanka remain silent on its demographic crisis?
-
Latest News4 days agoKusal Mendis’ unbeaten 87 hands Sri Lanka consolation win
