Connect with us

News

NARA hits back at Justice Minister, alleges Navy making bid to take over its functions

Published

on

Jt. Secretary of Scientists Association, NARA, Nilupa Samarakoon addressing the media

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The National Aquatic Resources Research and Development Agency (NARA) yesterday (07) denied accusations that the premier marine research institute continued to cause massive loss of revenue to the government due to its failure to achieve key responsibility in preparing Electronic Navigation Charts (ENC)/hydrographic maps to be sold to foreign vessels passing through Sri Lankan waters.

NARA maintains that there is absolutely no basis for the allegations made by Justice Minister Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe, PC, recently.

Addressing the media on behalf of NARA at its head office at Crow Island, Mattakkuliya, President of the Scientists Association, NARA, Upul Liyanage, its Jt. Secretary Nilupa Samarakoon and D.V.S. P. Bandara of the Technology Transfer Division alleged attempts were being made by interested parties to establish another setup similar to NARA at the expense of an institution that served the country for well over two decades.

They appreciated the initial assistance provided by Germany, beginning in 1986, to facilitate NARA ‘operations.’

The NARA is the apex national institute vested with the responsibility of carrying out research, development and management of aquatic resources. The agency comes under the purview of Fisheries Minister Douglas Devananda.

Among the allegations directed at NARA pertained to the utilization of funds received for services provided to foreign parties and lack of commitment to meet the challenging tasks.

The Justice Minister said the National Hydrographic Bill had been submitted to the Parliament to enable the country to receive full benefits of ensuring safe passage of foreign vessels passing through local waters.

However, NARA alleged that the proposed Bill was meant to weaken NARA to pave the way for the Navy to take over the operation. Repeatedly asked why NARA opposed the Bill, the state enterprise insisted that it couldn’t give reasons as the Supreme Court had been moved by the Scientists Association.

Responding to queries, NARA emphasized that Minister Rajapakshe’s claims that Sri Lanka could earn as much as USD 200 mn annually (or Rs 65 bn) if the Navy took over the job didn’t hold water.

Commenting on accusations pertaining to misappropriation of public funds, NARA said that the agency used to receive Rs 20 m annually though that was now down to Rs 1.5 mn. Declaring that NARA hadn’t been found fault by State Audit under any circumstances, they urged the government to provide the required support and help overcome whatever shortcomings.

Reference was also made to the joint Indo-Sri Lanka hydrographic survey undertaken sometime back. NARA declined to answer questions on various projections made by the Navy while repeatedly pointing out that financial gains couldn’t often match massive investments made by the government.

NARA said that contrary to accusations the agency always managed to meet the country’s requirements over the years. There hadn’t been a single instance of the country having to bring in outside expertise as NARA met the requirements. Unfortunately now attempts were being made to tarnish NARA’s image to such an extent both local and foreign parties would lose their confidence in the agency.

NARA acknowledged that they worked with the Navy and since 2019 the only research vessel it owned was manned by the Navy.

NARA said that the agency had been severely perturbed by the move to enact a new Bill amidst heavy onslaught by interested parties.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

PSTA worse than PTA: FSP

Published

on

The Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) yesterday accused the government of seeking to use the proposed Protection of the State from Terrorism Act (PSTA) to suppress popular political activity, claiming that some of its provisions were more repressive than those of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA).

FSP Education Secretary Pubudu Jayagoda told a media briefing, in Nugegoda, that the definition of terrorism in the Bill was so broad that it could be used to label almost any form of popular political activity as terrorism.

He said the Bill’s approach to defining terrorism was based largely on attempts to compel a government, or an international organisation, to do, or refrain from doing something, rather than on internationally recognised criteria, such as killings, causing serious bodily harm, kidnapping or acts intended to spread terror among the public.

Jayagoda also alleged that the Bill transferred substantial powers from the judiciary to the executive, while extending powers of arrest, investigation and detention to the armed forces, in addition to the police.

He claimed that the government had sought to portray the Bill as a replacement for the PTA while retaining or introducing provisions that could facilitate political victimisation and repression.

The FSP also questioned the government’s decision to proceed with the Bill, despite having previously sought public views on an earlier draft.

Jayagoda said a draft had been published earlier this year, with the period for public submissions ending on February 28, but the Bill subsequently gazetted was essentially the same draft with some provisions rearranged.

Jayagoda also referred to a letter reportedly sent by Attorney-at-Law Saliya Peiris, a member of a Committee, chaired by President’s Counsel Rienzie Arsecularatne, that had been appointed to draft the legislation. He said Peiris had stated, in the October 06 letter, that changes had been made to the draft prepared by the Committee.

“This means that even the Committee, appointed to prepare the Bill, was a deception,” Jayagoda alleged.

He said that the PSTA was fundamentally similar to the Anti-Terrorism Bill introduced by the previous government, in 2023, which the National People’s Power (NPP) opposed and challenged in court.

“If the NPP opposed that Bill then and is now bringing the same legislation before Parliament, the government must explain its position,” he said.

Jayagoda called on NPP MPs to oppose the PSTA in Parliament and urged trade unions and other groups to build a broad public movement against the legislation.

He challenged the government to an open debate on the Bill.

Continue Reading

News

Shiranthi R remanded until 13 Oct.

Published

on

Former First Lady Shiranthi Rajapaksa was yesterday remanded until 13 October after being produced before the Colombo Magistrate’s Court following her arrest by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).

Shiranthi, wife of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, was arrested at her residence on Poorwarama Road, Kirulapone, after CIABOC officers recorded a statement from her for nearly two hours.

According to the CIABOC, the arrest was made over allegations that Rs. 10 million obtained from the National Savings Bank through the Siriliya Saviya organisation was misappropriated.

The money was allegedly obtained to provide a Computed Tomography (CT) scanner to the children’s hospital. Investigators allege that the scanner was not provided and that the funds were instead unlawfully used.

CIABOC is investigating alleged offences under the Public Property Act and corruption-related provisions in connection with the transaction and other financial activities involving Siriliya Saviya, which was headed by Rajapaksa.

Rajapaksa returned to Sri Lanka on Monday night on a flight from Malaysia after travelling overseas for medical treatment. She left for Singapore on 16 September after being admitted to a private hospital in Colombo on 15 September following an illness.

She had been due to appear before the Financial Crimes Investigation Division (FCID) on 13 October in connection with its investigation into the financial affairs of Siriliya Saviya.

Meanwhile, her lawyers filed an anticipatory bail application before the Maligakanda Magistrate’s Court on Monday, seeking an order preventing her arrest in connection with the FCID investigation.

Continue Reading

News

Former NSB Chairman Kariyawasam granted bail

Published

on

Former National Savings Bank (NSB) Chairman Pradeep Kariyawasam was yesterday granted bail by the Colombo Magistrate’s Court following his arrest by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).

Kariyawasam, husband of former Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake, was arrested in connection with the Bribery Commission’s investigation into the ‘Siriliya Saviya’ account linked to former First Lady Shiranthi Rajapaksa.

The investigation concerns financial activities involving the Siriliya Saviya initiative, which was headed by Rajapaksa, wife of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa.

CIABOC is continuing investigations into the alleged financial irregularities relating to the account.

Continue Reading

Trending