Features
Declarations vs. Realities
The Camp David Paradox
by Nilantha Ilangamuwa
Another Camp David convention has concluded, echoing Prophet Marx’s timeless insight that history perpetually replays itself, transitioning from tragedy to farce. Amidst this era of instability, the Camp David summit’s tone may shift, but its foundational agenda remains unaltered. To sow discord in the West Asia, it’s imperative to unite Japan and South Korea, two historic foes in the Asia-Pacific region, much as Egypt and Israel were bound by a historic “peace agreement.”
At the time of writing, Japan’s contentious release of 7,800 tons of highly radioactive Fukushima Daiichi wastewater into the Pacific Ocean, led by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), has stirred a global outcry. Locals and neighboring nations vehemently oppose this move, highlighting both geopolitical and humanitarian concerns. This contentious decision marks the Kishida administration’s first significant move following the Camp David summit, where the three parties ostensibly committed themselves to upholding the values of international cooperation, the rule of law, and independently guaranteed transparency and accountability.
History serves as an invaluable teacher, offering lessons to avert impending catastrophes. Sadly, humanity consistently shuns these teachings. Camp David, the US presidential sanctuary, boasts a storied legacy within American leadership, bearing witness to pivotal events and negotiations. Originally christened Shangri-La by Franklin D. Roosevelt, it became the stage for critical dialogues and political gatherings. Presidents from Eisenhower to Kennedy and Johnson, blending official duties with leisure, contributed to its legacy. Notably, Nixon and Ford enhanced its facilities, while Jimmy Carter immortalized the Camp David Accords, a landmark moment in Middle East diplomacy.
Ronald Reagan, during his tenure, revitalized the retreat’s natural allure. Subsequent presidents, from George H. W. Bush to Donald Trump, leveraged this venue for important meetings and global summits. In this backdrop, Joe Biden convened the most recent Camp David summit alongside Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, professing their intent to ‘preserve peace’ in the Asia-Pacific region. At its conclusion, they purportedly reached a principled agreement on the trilateral relationship among the United States, Japan, and South Korea.
Throughout its rich history, Camp David has proven an adaptable and indispensable asset for U.S. presidents, facilitating diplomatic negotiations, political deliberations, and moments of personal reprieve. Paradoxically, each instance of U.S. leaders convening there to discuss world peace coincides with the outbreak of various wars elsewhere, seemingly sponsored by the U.S. administration.
Reflecting on the inaugural and most riveting Camp David summit, it’s evident that the peace achieved between Egypt and Israel under the auspices of the Carter administration, despite its fragility, averted further wars between them. However, the region’s conflicts undoubtedly transformed. Jimmy Carter, known variously as Dasher, Deacon, or Lock Master, often hailed as a principled advocate of peaceful solutions, bears a more nuanced legacy when scrutinized through the lens of history’s balance sheets.
Former President Jimmy Carter’s reputation as a champion of human rights and kindness comes under scrutiny when we examine his actions during and after his presidency. While he engaged in commendable activities such as constructing homes for the impoverished and advocating human rights, his foreign policy decisions cast doubt on his commitment to these principles.
Carter covertly supported the genocidal Pol Pot regime in Cambodia, a regime eventually overthrown by Vietnam in 1979, as retribution for Vietnam’s opposition to the United States during the Vietnam War. His unwavering support for the Shah of Iran, despite the Shah’s brutal torture facilitated by the CIA, raises questions about his stance on human rights. Furthermore, Carter’s invasion of East Timor continued to arm Indonesia’s oppressive dictatorship, contributing to one of the most tragic genocides in history. His administration’s backing of Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza and subsequent efforts to intervene on Somoza’s behalf also cast a shadow over his commitment to human rights.
While Carter’s post-presidential activities reflect positive humanitarian efforts, these actions during his presidency underscore a complex legacy where his professed principles occasionally contradicted his foreign policy decisions.
The stark truth about the Camp David summits is that they have consistently fallen short in the pursuit of lasting peace. Instead, they have often served as calculated maneuvers by strategic actors, driven by ambitions to expand their influence. The outcomes of this year’s summit offer little hope for change, serving as an ominous warning of an impending conflict in the Asia-Pacific region, with the aim of countering a ‘designated enemy.’ This is not a time for complacency, but a moment demanding vigilant attention and decisive action.
In their official statement on the Camp David Principles, the leaders emphasize technological cooperation to bolster the Indo-Pacific region’s vibrancy and dynamism, based on mutual trust, adherence to international law, and respect for standards. They aspire to establish common practices and norms among their nations and international organizations to guide the development, use, and transfer of critical and emerging technologies.
Historically, U.S. declarations of intent in the region have often rung hollow, generating justified skepticism. Painful chapters such as the Korean War, the Vietnam conflict, and the bombings in Laos and Cambodia serve as stark reminders of the severe consequences when words and deeds fail to align. The Camp David Principles underscore a commitment to shared values and adherence to international law, a promising stance. However, the world has witnessed instances of U.S. foreign policy selectively applying these principles. History underscores that unwavering consistency in upholding these values is paramount to building trust.
The promise to promote peace and stability echoes familiar rhetoric, yet the historical record reveals U.S. involvement that has at times exacerbated regional instability. Ongoing conflicts not only in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria but also in Ukraine serve as contemporary examples that warrant reflection. While expressing support for ASEAN centrality and unity is commendable, it must transcend mere lip service. Resolving the South China Sea dispute is of utmost importance, as failure to do so jeopardizes regional stability and raises doubts about the sincerity of this commitment.
Although the commitment to denuclearization and dialogue with North Korea deserves praise, history has shown that diplomatic efforts often falter due to shifting priorities or insufficient follow-through. We must demand a sustained and unwavering dedication to this endeavor. Open and equitable economic practices are indispensable, extending beyond select trade partners. The charge of economic protectionism has been leveled against the United States, necessitating concrete actions to demonstrate genuine cooperation and a commitment to fair trade practices.
Cooperation on technology and climate change must transcend mere rhetoric. The world eagerly anticipates concrete actions and authentic collaboration. Additionally, commitments to non-proliferation should translate into tangible disarmament efforts. Noble as they are, commitments to inclusion and human rights must be unwaveringly upheld, both domestically and on the international stage. The United States must not shy away from addressing its own human rights challenges.
Skepticism shrouds the ‘Camp David Principles’ with good reason. The United States must learn from history and translate its professed principles into concrete actions, replacing hypocrisy with stability in the Indo-Pacific. It’s time for deeds, not just words, to shape the region’s future. As the world watches, the U.S. must break the cycle of empty declarations. As they boldly reassert their unyielding commitment to upholding Japan and the Republic of Korea’s ironclad deterrence, bolstered by a formidable array of military might, and wholeheartedly commit to conducting routine trilateral exercises, what possible rationale remains to question the imperative of securing enduring peace and seamless coexistence? While the Camp David statements may hint at confrontation, the present calls for an urgent need for genuine social cooperation, responsibility, mutual respect based on mutual sensitivities, and lasting friendships that transcend blame and the specter of war.
Features
The challenge of being positive about SAARC
It was a few years back that a former President of Sri Lanka took it on himself to pronounce SAARC ‘dead’. Since then there have been other sections of Sri Lankan opinion that have joined the critics of SAARC and taken the solemn stance that SAARC has indeed died what may be called a natural death.
Their fatalism is understandable. SAARC has failed to meet at heads of government or state level for the past several years to take the SAARC process notably forward. Regional cooperation has more or less been only an appealing idea. No substantive concrete projects have taken off to make the idea a hard reality. ‘Inner paralysis’ seems to be SAARC’s lot. Hence the fatalism in these circles.
However, being one of the worst cash-strapped regions of the world and a teemingly populated one with people virtually left to their devices, what choices do the ‘SAARC Eight’ have other than to try their best to band together and continue with their cooperation efforts, however small they may be?
There is no escaping the mounting debt trap for many of these countries and bankrupt Sri Lanka is a glaring example, but ‘throwing in the towel’ and abandoning themselves entirely to the diktats of the strongest economies and their agencies will prove a ‘living death’ for many countries in the SAARC fold.
The gains may be meagre but giving-up on SAARC cooperation in full would prove self-defeating for the organization and South Asia. Right now, the collective intention ought to be to salvage what the region could from the tenuous cooperative efforts. Moreover, such initiatives could go some distance to generate a degree of goodwill among the Eight and help in sustaining a dialogue process.
Given this backdrop it proved ‘a stich in time’ for the Regional Centre for Strategic Studies (RCSS), Colombo, to recently host the SAARC Secretary General Ambassador Md. Golam Sarwar to a round table discussion on the unifying potential of SAARC and its future possibilities, besides other related issue areas.
Held on June 24th and moderated by RCSS Executive Director and former ambassador Ravinatha Aryasinha, the forum brought together a vibrant, wide ranging audience comprising academicians, diplomats, senior public servants, civil society activists and many others. Following the presentation by Ambassador Golam Sarwar titled, ‘Reigniting SAARC: Achievements, Challenges and the Way Ahead’, a lively Q&A followed.
The above forum could be described as an act of lighting the proverbial ‘candle’ rather than ‘cursing the darkness.’ It surely is a ‘darkness’ that could be seen as daunting considering that the region’s pivotal powers, India and Pakistan, are failing to act in a spirit of accord but are engaged in bitter finger-pointing on a number of questions of vital importance to SAARC.
On the other hand, what is the rest of the region doing to bring the above sides together? It is disappointing that to date the rest of SAARC has failed to launch a major diplomatic drive to bring peace between the feuding regional heavyweights. It needs to act without delay and establish its earnestness and this effort would need to prove SAARC’s staying power in the unfolding months and even years.
In assessing SAARC’s seeming failure local opinion in particular has failed to factor in what could be described as weak leadership. Since Sheikh Mujibur Rahman of Bangladesh, the founding father of SAARC, the region has failed to produce a visionary leader who could advance the SAARC cause with charisma and drive.
Among other reasons, weak leadership accounts considerably for the faltering and stuttering status, as it were, of SAARC. Badly needed are leaders who could go the extra mile, think less of narrow national interests and work diligently towards the collective well being of the region but SAARC’s millions of ordinary people have been made to wait in vain for leaders of such stature. Instead, they have been burdened with politicians who seem to be relishing the apparently moribund state of SAARC.
Looking back, it could be said that it was the dynamic leadership factor that led to the launching of the Non-Aligned Movement and for its sustenance for a few decades. True, it could be seen in some quarters that NAM is no more, but as in the case of SAARC, the former too has been unfortunate to be burdened over the years with politicians who lack the vision and drive to unflaggingly advance the fortunes of the South. NAM and SAARC lack the dynamism and vision of leaders of the stature of Jawaharlal Nehru, for example, to give them the required guidance and intellectual depth.
The reasons are complex for there not being among us currently political leaders with the vision and the steadfast commitment to advance the legitimate interests of the South. However, it could be stated with conviction that the majority of Southern leaders have too easily caved in to the demands of the global North and its financial agencies.
These leaders have failed to see, for instance, that the largely market economy oriented Northern governments would not view with favour a centrist economic model that attaches priority to the interests of the dis-empowered publics of the South. This realization ought to have dawned on the current government in Sri Lanka, for instance, some while ago but it has no choice but to abide by IMF dictates since economic survival at present is unthinkable without the latter’s succour.
Accordingly for SAARC this should be the time for some soul-searching. Priority needs to be attached to ending the feuding between India and Pakistan since at present the material fortunes of the region hinge largely on these regional giants giving peaceful relations among them a try. This is no easy challenge to meet but some daring, visionary diplomacy needs to take hold among the rest of SAARC.
There is some sense in SAARC bringing the peoples of the region together through programs that address their best collective interests. A meeting of minds among SAARC nations could enable SAARC and its agencies to build a region-wide people’s movement for progressive political and economic change that could in turn lead to the region’s political leaders sensitizing themselves more to the neglected needs of their publics.
However, the time is ‘now’ for the initiation of these progressive changes and the voice of SAARC well wishers would need to drown out those of their critics.
Features
OPA seminar examines Sri Lanka’s economic recovery, resilience and growth pathways
A seminar, “Sri Lanka’s Economic Crossroads: Navigating Recovery, Resilience and Growth” was recently held by the Organisation of Professional Associations of Sri Lanka (OPA) at the OPA Auditorium, bringing together economists, OPA members, and professionals from diverse fields for an insightful discussion on Sri Lanka’s economic recovery and future growth prospects.
The event was held under the patronage of Jayantha Gallehewa, President of the OPA, and was jointly organised by the National Issues Committee (NIC) and the Seminars, Workshops and Programmes Committee of the OPA. The event reaffirmed the organisation’s commitment to advancing professional excellence, fostering insightful intellectual engagement, facilitating interdisciplinary knowledge exchange and creating a constructive platform for informed dialogue on issues of national importance.
The panel of speakers comprised Dr. Harsha Aturupane, Lead Economist and Programme Leader for Human Development at the World Bank for Sri Lanka and the Maldives; Dr. Achinthya Koswatta, Senior Lecturer in Economics at the Open University of Sri Lanka, and Anushan Kapilan, Lead Economist at Verité Research.
In his welcome address, the President of the OPA emphasised that Sri Lanka was at a critical juncture in its economic recovery journey where sustained reforms, effective implementation, and collective national commitment are essential to achieving long-term stability, resilience and inclusive growth. He noted that the country had experienced one of the most severe economic crises in its history with the economy contracting by 7.8 percent in 2022 and a further 11.5 percent in 2023, resulting in significant economic and social challenges.
Delivering his introductory remarks Bhanu Wijeyaratne, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the National Issues Committee, underscored the need to move beyond short-term economic stabilisation towards a comprehensive agenda of structural transformation. He observed that the economic crisis had revealed deep-rooted weaknesses within the economy, including persistent fiscal pressures, rising public debt, foreign exchange limitations, and insufficient diversification of the export base. He stressed that addressing these challenges through strategic reforms, institutional strengthening and long-term economic planning would be essential to establishing a more resilient and competitive economy.
While acknowledging recent positive developments, including improved inflation management, tourism recovery and signs of economic stabilisation, Wijeyaratne stressed the need to advance reforms aimed at strengthening fiscal discipline, enhancing productivity, improving competitiveness, developing human capital and reinforcing governance and institutional effectiveness.
He further highlighted the important role of professionals, businesses, academia and other stakeholders in contributing to evidence-based dialogue and supporting Sri Lanka’s journey towards a resilient, inclusive and sustainable economic future.
Delivering the keynote presentation, Dr. Harsha Aturupane provided a comprehensive assessment of Sri Lanka’s economic prospects within the broader context of global economic transformation. He argued that Sri Lanka functioned as a small open economy whose performance is significantly influenced by developments in the global marketplace. External factors could not be controlled, and the country must strengthen its domestic capacity and resilience to respond effectively to international economic shifts, he noted.
Tracing the evolution of global economic systems, Dr. Aturupane highlighted the transition from ideological divisions between state-controlled and market-oriented economies towards increasingly pragmatic approaches focused on growth, competitiveness and development. He noted that Sri Lanka’s own economic journey reflects a similar evolution, with contemporary policy debates now centred on practical solutions for sustainable economic progress.
The presentation also examined the transformative impact of globalisation. Dr. Aturupane observed that global economic integration had enabled several East Asian economies, including South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong, to achieve remarkable economic advancement through export-led growth strategies. Sri Lanka similarly benefited from this process through the expansion of its apparel industry and increased integration into global value chains.
Turning to Sri Lanka’s recovery programme, Dr. Aturupane emphasised that the ongoing stabilisation process should be viewed as a national programme supported by the International Monetary Fund rather than solely as an IMF initiative. He observed that strong worker remittances, improved tourism earnings, enhanced government revenue mobilisation and prudent import management have contributed significantly to economic stabilisation.
Despite this progress, he cautioned that rebuilding foreign exchange reserves and meeting future debt obligations remain major challenges. He underscored the need to strengthen export performance, attract investment and generate sustainable foreign exchange earnings to ensure long-term economic resilience.
The discussion also focused on monetary stability, inflation management and exchange-rate policy. Dr. Aturupane stressed that maintaining price stability was fundamental to sustainable growth and household welfare, while sound monetary policy remains essential for preserving economic confidence.
Looking beyond stabilisation, he argued that Sri Lanka must transition towards a broader economic transformation agenda. Sustainable growth, he noted, will depend on expanding productive capacity through investment, technological advancement, innovation, skills development and structural reforms.
Among the key constraints identified was the high cost of energy, which continues to affect competitiveness and investment attractiveness. Dr. Aturupane emphasised the importance of improving efficiency and affordability within the energy sector to enhance Sri Lanka’s business environment.
He further highlighted the social dimensions of the crisis, noting the rise in poverty and economic vulnerability among households. Strengthening social protection systems and ensuring inclusive growth, he argued, must remain central components of the national development agenda.
Another critical challenge identified was Sri Lanka’s demographic transition. With an ageing population, outward migration and evolving labour market dynamics, the country is increasingly confronting labour shortages in several sectors. Dr. Aturupane suggested that greater automation, increased labour-force participation and strategic workforce planning would be necessary to address these emerging realities.
Concluding his presentation, he emphasised the need to improve governance, strengthen institutions, enhance competitiveness and create an enabling environment for private sector investment. Sri Lanka’s future success, he noted, will depend on its ability to move decisively beyond crisis management towards a development model founded on resilience, innovation, productivity and inclusive growth.
Dr. Achinthya Koswatta reiterated the importance of policy consistency and predictability in fostering investment and industrial development. She observed that frequent policy changes create uncertainty and discourage long-term investment decisions, whereas stable and coherent policy frameworks build confidence and support sustainable economic transformation.
Meanwhile, Anushan Kapilan highlighted the substantial progress achieved in restoring macroeconomic stability following the recent crisis. He noted significant improvements in fiscal performance, including increased government revenue, reduced reliance on debt financing and a historically low fiscal deficit.
He further observed that public debt levels are declining faster than anticipated, economic growth has exceeded expectations and inflation has been brought under control more rapidly than forecast. Nevertheless, he cautioned that the recovery remains uneven, particularly within the industrial sector and that many households have yet to experience a meaningful improvement in living standards.
The seminar was expertly coordinated by Eng. Chamil Edirimuni, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the Seminars, Workshops and Programmes Committee, while the technical moderation and interactive discussion session were facilitated by Bhanu Wijeyaratne, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the National Issues Committee.
The event was attended by Tisara De Silva, President-Elect of the OPA, Eng. Ravi Rupasinghe, General Secretary, Past Presidents, members of the Executive Council, representatives of the General Forum and professionals representing a wide range of disciplines.
The seminar concluded with a vibrant exchange of ideas and perspectives, reaffirming the importance of evidence-based policy dialogue, institutional collaboration and collective national commitment in advancing Sri Lanka’s economic recovery, resilience and sustainable growth.
Features
Her roots run deep in Sri Lanka
Yes, for UK-based presenter and artiste Samantha Kay, home is where the heart – and the roots – are. And her roots run deep in Sri Lanka.
In an exclusive interview with The Island, Samantha says “I’m proud to be Sri Lankan. My mum is from Kandy and my dad is from Colombo, so Sri Lanka has always held a very special place in my heart.
“Whenever I visit Sri Lanka, I love spending time on the beautiful south coast, especially Hikkaduwa and Mirissa. It’s somewhere I always feel connected to my roots and completely at peace.”
Now living in Bournemouth, on the south coast of England, where, she says, she is lucky to be close to some of the UK’s most beautiful beaches, including the iconic Sandbanks, Samantha has built a career that refuses to fit into one box.
She is a radio presenter, podcast host, singer-songwriter, personal trainer and life coach.
“I genuinely love the variety because every role allows me to connect with people and, hopefully, make a positive difference in someone’s day.”
Of course, music has taken her far.
One of her proudest achievements, she says, was releasing a song with 90s music icon Angie Brown, which reached No. 9 in the UK Club Charts.
She also reached the final stages of The X Factor and performed at Wembley Stadium in front of thousands.
Beyond music, Samantha competed in bikini bodybuilding across the UK, winning several titles. “It taught me discipline, resilience and self-belief,” she recalls.
Today, her focus is on radio, podcasting and coaching women. Her podcast encourages people to live life on their own terms rather than feeling pressured to follow society’s expectations.
Says Samantha: “Whether someone is single, changing careers, travelling solo or simply trying to find their purpose, I want them to know that it’s never too late to create a life that feels authentic. If you’ve ever felt like you don’t fit into the box, maybe you were never meant to.”
Samantha Kay also spent a year in Dubai, performing at five-star hotels, including FIVE, and coaching at the iconic outdoor gym on Palm Jumeirah.
“I taught strength and conditioning classes, and hosted wellness retreats, combining my passion for music, health and inspiring others.”
However, with family matters calling her back to the UK, she made the choice to return. “Family comes first,” she says.
Looking ahead, Samantha plans to grow her radio and podcast work, release more music, and expand her wellness retreats.
“My biggest passion is helping people, especially women, build confidence and believe in themselves,” she says.
“Wherever my career takes me, I hope to continue inspiring others to live with courage, kindness and authenticity, while never forgetting my Sri Lankan roots.”
-
News7 days agoHerath warns prospective migrant workers not to get fleeced by racketeers
-
Features5 days agoPrison riots and politics: NPP’s biggest challenge and Sri Lanka’s biggest opportunity
-
Editorial6 days agoWhat’s the world coming to?
-
Foreign News6 days agoTensions erupt in Indian state after 11-year-old raped and murdered
-
Features7 days agoDevanesan Annan – in Memoriam
-
Editorial7 days agoPunishment in hellholes
-
Features2 days agoDirty Money
-
News7 days agoRepresentatives of the Organization of Professional Associations (OPA) of Sri Lanka meet the Prime Minister
