Features
Vilnius Summit Fallout: Unforeseen Consequences of NATO
by Nilantha Ilangamuwa
From a technical standpoint, the final communiqués released by the G7 at the Hiroshima Summit in May and the recently concluded NATO Vilnius Summit exhibit negligible differentiation. They blatantly disregarded the pressing global issues that demand immediate attention. Consider, for instance, the dire state of poverty, gripping 1.2 billion people across 111 developing nations, subjecting them to acute multidimensional deprivation. Hunger, an alarming crisis affecting 44 countries with distressing severity, has left over 350 million children languishing in extreme poverty, battling hunger on a daily basis.
Inequality continues to soar, with the world’s wealthiest individuals amassing an astounding $852 billion in the first half of 2023, while a staggering 47 percent of the global population struggles to survive on a meager $6.25 per day. Furthermore, their agenda appears devoid of any meaningful consideration for climate change and the catastrophic ramifications of the military-industrial complex. It is evident that their primary focus lies in perpetuating proxy wars, relegating genuine global concerns to a secondary position.
The communiqués emanating from the world’s wealthiest nations, who bear a solemn duty of responsibility and accountability to the global community, singularly identify two rival nations as their primary targets: the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China. The Communiqué of the Vilnius Summit explicitly declares the Russian Federation to be the paramount and immediate menace to the security of the Allies and to peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic region. Simultaneously, it asserts that “The People’s Republic of China’s declared ambitions and coercive policies pose challenges to [their] interests, security, and values.” Interestingly, the communiqué refrains from directly diminishing China’s influential power, opting instead to state, “we remain receptive to engaging constructively with the PRC, including fostering reciprocal transparency, in order to safeguard the security interests of the Alliance.”
While these two nations profoundly strive for societal improvement and the betterment of livelihoods for ordinary citizens, the actions undertaken by NATO have frequently entailed devastating bombings that serve to enrich the military-industrial complex. Noteworthy instances include Bosnia in 1994, Yugoslavia during the Kosovo War in 1999, the bombing campaign in Afghanistan in 2007, and the intervention that led to an inevitable civil war in Libya. Unfortunately, these overt operations represent only a fraction of the countless covert proxy wars that NATO has armed and financed, consistently evading accountability.
Ironically, the NATO communiqué accuses, “while we have called on Russia to engage constructively in credible negotiations with Ukraine, Russia has not shown any genuine openness to a just and lasting peace.” However, in a recent meeting in Moscow, Russian President Vladimir Putin presented a draft of a 2022 peace treaty signed by Russia and Ukraine, accusing Ukraine of discarding it into the ‘garbage of history.’ Unfortunately, this significant development has been overlooked by mainstream media and international organizations dedicated to promoting global peace and stability. This context sets the stage for the NATO summit held this year. The importance of this summit extends beyond the mere exchange of thoughts among heads of member states; it resides in the underlying implications of the summit’s venue, which holds captivating narratives within European civilization.
The political history of Vilnius stands as an enduring testament to societies grappling with extreme tensions, where powerful nations have thrust society into unprecedented crises. This history traces back to the era of Duke Gediminas, whose visionary dream depicted an iron wolf standing atop a hill, basking in triumph after a successful hunt of a zubr in the sacred forest near the Sventaragis Valley, where the Vilnia River merges with the Neris River. Inspired by this dream, the city of Vilnius took shape. As the legacy of these rulers reverberates across the globe, the so-called wealthiest nations persistently widen the gaping divide between the affluent and the impoverished, all while hypocritically espousing concern for self-proclaimed adversaries. They adamantly demand recognition of their own problems as universal concerns.
During the summit convened in Vilnius, initially touted as a NATO aspiration for Ukraine, the narrative took an unexpected turn. The focus abruptly shifted when the Ukrainian President, who once derided the idea of a non-specific timeline for NATO membership as absurd, boldly proclaimed at the conference’s conclusion that the Ukrainian delegation had secured a momentous security victory for the nation and its people. With unwavering conviction, he declared that NATO membership is a matter of time.
UK Defense Secretary Ben Wallace emphatically emphasized that the Ukrainian President’s words should not be taken lightly, as the inevitable membership would indisputably come to fruition. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen boasted about the astounding progress Ukraine has made towards NATO membership. However, amidst the ongoing conflict, Ukraine increasingly resembles a war-ravaged land, reminiscent of an Afghanistan within Europe’s borders. Those who lay claim to championing human rights, democracy, and the rule of law exhibit the most grotesque and hypocritical behavior by not even daring to dream of advocating for a ceasefire.
Since the NATO summit in Bucharest in 2008, where Ukraine’s aspirations for membership were officially acknowledged, the country has been eagerly awaiting admission into the alliance. However, Ukraine finds itself teetering on the brink of anarchy. President Zelensky’s grip on power remains stable due to martial law, which conveniently postpones the scheduled elections for 2023 and 2024. Astonishingly, the West, often preaching about the importance of public opinion, turns a blind eye to this troubling situation. They are preoccupied with their ongoing struggle against a state they have long failed to defeat. The war persists.
Among the crucial questions arising from the recently concluded NATO summit in Vilnius, one figure looms large: President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan of Turkey. His unexpected decision to support Sweden’s NATO bid was a strategic maneuver to bolster his administration in economically strained Turkey and respond to Russian actions in Syria that targeted Turkey’s paramilitary forces. It also served as a symbolic rebuke to Fethullah Gülen, a US-based Turkish preacher whose group, the Fethullahist Terrorist Organization (FETO), is recognized as a terrorist organization and pursued by the Ankara government. FETO allegedly orchestrated the failed coup d’état, resulting in the tragic loss of 251 innocent lives and injuring thousands. Yesterday, July 15, we commemorated the fifth anniversary of this heartbreaking tragedy.
On the one hand, President Zelensky undoubtedly experienced disappointment at this summit of costly warmongers. In his address, he expressed his frustration with the major powers’ relentless desire to escalate tensions for years to come. They are now plotting small-scale and lone-wolf attacks within Russia while pushing pro-Russian regions in Ukraine towards a full-blown civil war, reminiscent of the Afghan situation in the 1980s. Nonetheless, as prominent pro-Kremlin political theorists argue, Russia is prepared to endure the consequences of a prolonged war for another year or two. Ukraine will never be the same again; its society has become deeply divided.
Meanwhile, the luckiest individual at this summit was Jens Stoltenberg, the former Norwegian Prime Minister and current NATO Secretary General. He secured another year’s extension to perpetuate the façade of “world peace.” During his meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, Stoltenberg declared, “No other partner is closer to NATO than Japan,” indicating NATO’s focus on a “security” agenda in the Asia Pacific region.
As noted by an anti-Chinese publication, Stoltenberg and Kishida share similar geopolitical perspectives. The Japanese leader believes that “Ukraine today may be East Asia tomorrow,” while the NATO chief emphasizes that security is not merely regional but global. Their voices hint at an impending conflict with China, with Japan positioning itself as the “victim” in the equation. Future provocations against China, such as manipulations involving Taiwan’s territorial issues, might shift towards Japan, igniting yet another war against a “designated enemy.”
Emmanuel Macron’s uncertain political future in France did not hinder him from single-handedly foiling the plan to establish a NATO liaison office in Tokyo. Among the heads of state, Macron’s government stood alone in grasping the gravity and far-reaching consequences of initiating another war, openly opposing the initiative and successfully eradicating any mention of the office from the summit communiqué. Macron emerges as the undisputed pragmatic and practical figure at the summit.
His relentless endeavors to ease tensions between nations echo the actions of the late President Charles de Gaulle, who boldly withdrew France from NATO in 1966 and demanded the removal of all military headquarters and installations not under French command from French territory by 1967. However, the recent extension of Stoltenberg’s term and the persistence of Kishida raise concerns as anti-Chinese newspapers warned shortly after the Vilnius Summit. This indicates an imminent danger akin to a turbulent sea, with unforeseen consequences lurking ahead in Asia.
[Writer can be reached at ilangamuwa@gmail.com
Features
Acid test emerges for US-EU ties
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen addressing the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on Tuesday put forward the EU’s viewpoint on current questions in international politics with a clarity, coherence and eloquence that was noteworthy. Essentially, she aimed to leave no one in doubt that a ‘new form of European independence’ had emerged and that European solidarity was at a peak.
These comments emerge against the backdrop of speculation in some international quarters that the Post-World War Two global political and economic order is unraveling. For example, if there was a general tacit presumption that US- Western European ties in particular were more or less rock-solid, that proposition apparently could no longer be taken for granted.
For instance, while US President Donald Trump is on record that he would bring Greenland under US administrative control even by using force against any opposition, if necessary, the EU Commission President was forthright that the EU stood for Greenland’s continued sovereignty and independence.
In fact at the time of writing, small military contingents from France, Germany, Sweden, Norway and the Netherlands are reportedly already in Greenland’s capital of Nook for what are described as limited reconnaissance operations. Such moves acquire added importance in view of a further comment by von der Leyen to the effect that the EU would be acting ‘in full solidarity with Greenland and Denmark’; the latter being the current governing entity of Greenland.
It is also of note that the EU Commission President went on to say that the ‘EU has an unwavering commitment to UK’s independence.’ The immediate backdrop to this observation was a UK decision to hand over administrative control over the strategically important Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia to Mauritius in the face of opposition by the Trump administration. That is, European unity in the face of present controversial moves by the US with regard to Greenland and other matters of contention is an unshakable ‘given’.
It is probably the fact that some prominent EU members, who also hold membership of NATO, are firmly behind the EU in its current stand-offs with the US that is prompting the view that the Post-World War Two order is beginning to unravel. This is, however, a matter for the future. It will be in the interests of the contending quarters concerned and probably the world to ensure that the present tensions do not degenerate into an armed confrontation which would have implications for world peace.
However, it is quite some time since the Post-World War Two order began to face challenges. Observers need to take their minds back to the Balkan crisis and the subsequent US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq in the immediate Post-Cold War years, for example, to trace the basic historic contours of how the challenges emerged. In the above developments the seeds of global ‘disorder’ were sown.
Such ‘disorder’ was further aggravated by the Russian invasion of Ukraine four years ago. Now it may seem that the world is reaping the proverbial whirlwind. It is relevant to also note that the EU Commission President was on record as pledging to extend material and financial support to Ukraine in its travails.
Currently, the international law and order situation is such that sections of the world cannot be faulted for seeing the Post World War Two international order as relentlessly unraveling, as it were. It will be in the interests of all concerned for negotiated solutions to be found to these global tangles. In fact von der Leyen has committed the EU to finding diplomatic solutions to the issues at hand, including the US-inspired tariff-related squabbles.
Given the apparent helplessness of the UN system, a pre-World War Two situation seems to be unfolding, with those states wielding the most armed might trying to mould international power relations in their favour. In the lead-up to the Second World War, the Hitlerian regime in Germany invaded unopposed one Eastern European country after another as the League of Nations stood idly by. World War Two was the result of the Allied Powers finally jerking themselves out of their complacency and taking on Germany and its allies in a full-blown world war.
However, unlike in the late thirties of the last century, the seeming number one aggressor, which is the US this time around, is not going unchallenged. The EU which has within its fold the foremost of Western democracies has done well to indicate to the US that its power games in Europe are not going unmonitored and unchecked. If the US’ designs to take control of Greenland and Denmark, for instance, are not defeated the world could very well be having on its hands, sooner rather than later, a pre-World War Two type situation.
Ironically, it is the ‘World’s Mightiest Democracy’ which is today allowing itself to be seen as the prime aggressor in the present round of global tensions. In the current confrontations, democratic opinion the world over is obliged to back the EU, since it has emerged as the principal opponent of the US, which is allowing itself to be seen as a fascist power.
Hopefully sane counsel would prevail among the chief antagonists in the present standoff growing, once again, out of uncontainable territorial ambitions. The EU is obliged to lead from the front in resolving the current crisis by diplomatic means since a region-wide armed conflict, for instance, could lead to unbearable ill-consequences for the world.
It does not follow that the UN has no role to play currently. Given the existing power realities within the UN Security Council, the UN cannot be faulted for coming to be seen as helpless in the face of the present tensions. However, it will need to continue with and build on its worldwide development activities since the global South in particular needs them very badly.
The UN needs to strive in the latter directions more than ever before since multi-billionaires are now in the seats of power in the principle state of the global North, the US. As the charity Oxfam has pointed out, such financially all-powerful persons and allied institutions are multiplying virtually incalculably. It follows from these realities that the poor of the world would suffer continuous neglect. The UN would need to redouble its efforts to help these needy sections before widespread poverty leads to hemispheric discontent.
Features
Brighten up your skin …
Hi! This week I’ve come up with tips to brighten up your skin.
* Turmeric and Yoghurt Face Pack:
You will need 01 teaspoon of turmeric powder and 02 tablespoons of fresh yoghurt.
Mix the turmeric and yoghurt into a smooth paste and apply evenly on clean skin. Leave it for 15–20 minutes and then rinse with lukewarm water
Benefits:
Reduces pigmentation, brightens dull skin and fights acne-causing bacteria.
* Lemon and Honey Glow Pack:
Mix 01teaspoon lemon juice and 01 tablespoon honey and apply it gently to the face. Leave for 10–15 minutes and then wash off with cool water.
Benefits:
Lightens dark spots, improves skin tone and deeply moisturises. By the way, use only 01–02 times a week and avoid sun exposure after use.
* Aloe Vera Gel Treatment:
All you need is fresh aloe vera gel which you can extract from an aloe leaf. Apply a thin layer, before bedtime, leave it overnight, and then wash face in the morning.
Benefits:
Repairs damaged skin, lightens pigmentation and adds natural glow.
* Rice Flour and Milk Scrub:
You will need 01 tablespoon rice flour and 02 tablespoons fresh milk.
Mix the rice flour and milk into a thick paste and then massage gently in circular motions. Leave for 10 minutes and then rinse with water.
Benefits:
Removes dead skin cells, improves complexion, and smoothens skin.
* Tomato Pulp Mask:
Apply the tomato pulp directly, leave for 15 minutes, and then rinse with cool water
Benefits:
Controls excess oil, reduces tan, and brightens skin naturally.
Features
Shooting for the stars …
That’s precisely what 25-year-old Hansana Balasuriya has in mind – shooting for the stars – when she was selected to represent Sri Lanka on the international stage at Miss Intercontinental 2025, in Sahl Hasheesh, Egypt.
The grand finale is next Thursday, 29th January, and Hansana is all geared up to make her presence felt in a big way.
Her journey is a testament to her fearless spirit and multifaceted talents … yes, her life is a whirlwind of passion, purpose, and pageantry.
Raised in a family of water babies (Director of The Deep End and Glory Swim Shop), Hansana’s love affair with swimming began in childhood and then she branched out to master the “art of 8 limbs” as a Muay Thai fighter, nailed Karate and Kickboxing (3-time black belt holder), and even threw herself into athletics (literally!), especially throwing events, and netball, as well.
A proud Bishop’s College alumna, Hansana’s leadership skills also shone bright as Senior Choir Leader.
She earned a BA (Hons) in Business Administration from Esoft Metropolitan University, and then the world became her playground.
Before long, modelling and pageantry also came into her scene.
She says she took to part-time modelling, as a hobby, and that led to pageants, grabbing 2nd Runner-up titles at Miss Nature Queen and Miss World Sri Lanka 2025.
When she’s not ruling the stage, or pool, Hansana’s belting tunes with Soul Sounds, Sri Lanka’s largest female ensemble.
What’s more, her artistry extends to drawing, and she loves hitting the open road for long drives, she says.
This water warrior is also on a mission – as Founder of Wave of Safety,
Hansana happens to be the youngest Executive Committee Member of the Sri Lanka Aquatic Sports Union (SLASU) and, as founder of Wave of Safety, she’s spreading water safety awareness and saving lives.
Today is Hansana’s ninth day in Egypt and the itinerary for today, says National Director for Sri Lanka, Brian Kerkoven, is ‘Jeep Safari and Sunset at the Desert.’
And … the all-important day at Miss Intercontinental 2025 is next Thursday, 29th January.
Well, good luck to Hansana.
-
Editorial5 days agoIllusory rule of law
-
News6 days agoUNDP’s assessment confirms widespread economic fallout from Cyclone Ditwah
-
Editorial6 days agoCrime and cops
-
Features5 days agoDaydreams on a winter’s day
-
Editorial7 days agoThe Chakka Clash
-
Features5 days agoSurprise move of both the Minister and myself from Agriculture to Education
-
Features4 days agoExtended mind thesis:A Buddhist perspective
-
Features5 days agoThe Story of Furniture in Sri Lanka
