Connect with us

News

COPE promises to probe SJB accusations over fertiliser imports from China, India

Published

on

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) would soon initiate a thorough probe into the importation of organic fertiliser from China and Nano Nitrogen from India, its Chairman Prof. Ranjith Bandara told The Island yesterday (11).

The SLPP National List MP said so in response to the query regarding SJB and Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa, and Leader of the House Susil Premajayantha, taking up massive losses suffered by Sri Lanka due to fertiliser imports during President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s administration.

Prof. Bandara said that punitive active measures were needed to be taken against all those responsible, regardless of their standing in the society.Colombo District MP Premadasa said that the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government owed an explanation regarding the losses incurred due to fraudulent activities on the part of politicians and officials and action taken against those who have been accused of corruption.

Pointing out that he raised this issue in Parliament last Friday (09), parliamentarian Premadasa questioned the possibility of the government going the whole hog as those involved continued to wield power.

MP Premadasa questioned the basis under which Sri Lanka paid USD 6.9 mn to China for a consignment of rejected organic fertiliser. The former Deputy UNP leader alleged that the government had quite conveniently ignored the recommendations made by the Auditor General in this regard.

The People’s Bank, in early January 2022, paid USD 6.9 million to a Chinese company to settle a longstanding dispute triggered over its fertiliser shipment that was rejected after it was found to be contaminated.

The payment was made after the Colombo Commercial High Court dissolved an order preventing the payment to Qingdao Seawin Biotech for the imported fertiliser.The order was dissolved on the basis that the Chinese company and the Sri Lankan government had reached a settlement on the issue.

The SJB leader said that the Parliament should be informed of the status of the China deal. “I do not want to point finger at China and India as the responsibility of both deals lie with the Sri Lanka,” MP Premadasa said.

A staggering USD 6.9 mn payment was made in the wake of China blacklisting the People’s Bank for following a court directive.Lawmaker Premadasa pointed out that a comprehensive inquiry was needed to unravel the truth. The fertiliser scams couldn’t be investigated without taking into consideration President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s ill-fated decision to do away with chemical fertiliser, in May 2021.

MP Premadasa said that nano fertiliser, too, was imported under controversial circumstances. “We paid USD 12.45 for a 500 ml nano liquid fertiliser whereas it was available in India for USD 3.23,” MP Premadasa said. Therefore, Sri Lanka paid Rs 7,841 mn more than the actual price, he said.

MP Vijitha Herath told The Island that he raised this issue in Parliament at that time. Those who had been involved in these deals were named and in fact the CID initiated an inquiry following a complaint received from Dr. P. B. Jayasundera, the then Secretary to the President, lawmaker Herath said.

The CID recorded Dr. Jayasundera’s statement regarding the accusations directed by MP Hearth over nano fertiliser imports, whereas Gamini Senerath, the then Secretary to Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa, too, in a statement issued to the print media denied any wrongdoing on his part.

Editor of ‘Aruna’ Mahinda Illepperuma told The Island that he was questioned by the CID over the reportage of nano fertiliser imports after the disclosure of a State Bank being pressed to release funds. In spite of much publicised investigation, absolutely nothing happened, Illeperuma said.



News

CIABOC member’s appointment: Controversy over Speaker under probe heading selection process

Published

on

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The Opposition should intensity its focus on the forthcoming selection of a member of the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) and remain vigilant as Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne, MP, the head of the Constitutional Council (CC) tasked with making the relevant recommendation, is under investigation by the CIABOC, sources familiar with the ongoing inquiry told The Island.

Chethiya Goonasekara, PC, is expected to complete his three-year term on Dec 31, 2026. Sources pointed out that CIABOC Commissioners are appointed by the President on the recommendation made by the 10-member Constitutional Council.

The CIABOC initiated the investigation following a complaint lodged by suspended Chief of Staff and Deputy Secretary General of Parliament Chaminda Kularatne in early February this year. Sources said that as Goonasekera is scheduled to complete his term toward the end of 2026, the CC would have to call applications soon to choose the successor.

Goonasekara received his appointment from President Ranil Wickremesinghe in January 2024. A Justice W. M. N. P. Iddawala was appointed Chairman of the CIABOC. The other commissioner is K. Bernard Rajapakse.

Asked whether Iddawala and Rajapakse, too, would complete their terms soon, sources said that in terms of the Anti-Corruption Act No 09 of 2023, the Chairman of CIABOC would hold office for a period of five years, second commissioner (K. Bernard Rajapakse) for four years and the third commissioner (Chethiya Goonasekara) for a period of three years.

Sources said that the Opposition as well as civil society representatives in the CC should take up the issue of Speaker facing an investigation by the CIABOC taking part in the forthcoming selection process. Responding to queries, sources emphasized that the issue was whether in terms of Section 107 of the Anti-Corruption Act the participation of the Speaker in the selection process amounted to a violation of the Act itself.

The current members of the CC are Dr Jagath Wickramaratne, Speaker and Chairman of the Constitutional Council, Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, Prime Minister, Sajith Premadasa, Leader of the Opposition, Bimal Rathnayake, MP, Aboobucker Athambawa, MP, Ajith P. Perera, MP, Sivagnanam Shritharan, MP, Austin Fernando, Civil society representative, Prof. Wasantha Seneviratne, Civil society representative and Ranjith Ariyaratne, Civil society representative.

Sources pointed out that in spite of the sensitivity of the case, the CIABOC recorded Kularatne’s statement in the second week of August, six months after he lodged the complaint.

The CIABOC on 3, 8 and 10 Sept recorded the statements from the Transport Officer, Deputy Director, Administration and Assistant Director, Finance regarding the use of facilities by the Speaker, those assigned to his staff and other relevant matters.

The NPP named Dr. Wickramaratne as the Speaker after Asoka Ranwala resigned over controversy regarding his higher education qualifications.

SJB lawmaker Dayasiri Jayaskera has repeatedly raised the issues concerning the Speaker with the focus also on the Speaker using two government-managed residences, relevant staff in addition to expenditure on food, transport and fuel provided to the Speaker’s private secretary.

Political sources said that trouble erupted after the Parliamentary Staff Advisory Council in late January sacked Kularatne accusing him of providing false information to secure his appointment. Before being appointed as the Deputy Secretary-General of Parliament in 2023, Kularatne held several high-ranking positions, including Secretary to the Chief Government Whip, Additional Secretary to the President, Additional Secretary to the Prime Minister, and Additional Secretary to the Leader of the Opposition.

The SJB declared in Parliament that Ranwala should be brought back as the Speaker as they have no faith in Wickramaratne. MP Mujibur Rahuman jokingly told parliament that the Opposition wouldn’t raise Ranwala’s educational qualifications.

Continue Reading

News

GMOA: Countrywide cadre revision not done since 2015

Published

on

Dhammika

The Government Medical Officers’ Association (GMOA) has stressed the need to conduct a comprehensive countrywide cadre revision urgently.

GMOA spokesman Dr. Lasitha Dhammika told The Island that the failure on the part of successive governments to conduct cadre revision caused the deterioration of the public sector health services. Due to the absence of required statistics, they hadn’t been able to fully comprehend the situation on the ground and to ascertain the requirements of the public.

Dr. Dhammika pointed out the expansion of the services without supporting statistics and the need to initiate an immediate cadre revision. According to him, the GMOA had raised this issue with successive governments without success. The GMOA spokesman said that they also sought relevant information from the Health Ministry in terms of the Right to Information (RTI) Act two weeks ago but was yet to receive response.

(SF)

Continue Reading

News

Namal sends defiant message from remand custody

Published

on

Namal

Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) National Organiser and MP Namal Rajapaksa, currently held in remand custody, sent a defiant message from behind bars to supporters at the party’s “Jana Satana” rally in Anuradhapura on Saturday (12), vowing not to bow to what he described as political pressure from the government.

The message, issued from the Colombo Remand Prison, was addressed to those who gathered at the rally, which he described as a decisive new beginning for the SLPP.

Rajapaksa thanked supporters for their solidarity, saying he could feel the warmth of the brotherhood being shown to him, even from within the prison.

Quoting former South African President Nelson Mandela, he said “difficulties break some men but make others”, adding that the challenges his movement had faced had only made it stronger.

He credited his father with teaching him to grow stronger in the face of adversity.

Accusing the government of failing to honour its election promises, he pointed out that rising costs of living and tax burdens were placing considerable pressure on the public, including small and medium enterprises, farmers, fishermen and workers.

He alleged that state investigative institutions had been politicised under the government, claiming that allegations against individuals connected to the government were not being investigated fairly, though these claims were made by Rajapaksa and have not been independently verified.

Rajapaksa also criticised the government over its handling of constitutional reforms, the delay in holding Provincial Council elections and what he described as a lack of opportunities for young people entering the job market.

He concluded by declaring that he would not surrender to what he termed the Government’s political power and would not be intimidated, insisting that determination cannot be imprisoned.

He also urged supporters to remain peaceful, disciplined and respectful of the law throughout their campaign.

Continue Reading

Trending