News
22A throughwith required two thirdsmajority
Sarath Weerasekera’s only second reading ‘no’ vote, abstains on third reading
The Second Reading of the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution was passed in Parliament on Friday with the required two thirds majority with the Bill receiving 179 votes in favour and one vote – that of Colombo District MP Rear Admiral (Retd.) Sarath Weerasekera – against. The Third Reading was passed with 174 votes for and none against with Weerasekera abstaining. The vote was originally due to be taken at 5.30 pm on Friday but got delayed till 6.15 pm as the debate dragged on. The Bill was debated on Thursday and Friday and over 50 MPs spoke.
Justice, Prisons Affairs and Constitutional Reforms Minister Wijayadasa Rajapakshe presented the Bill entitled ‘Twenty Second Amendment to the Constitution’ to amend the Constitution” on Aug 10. The Supreme Court cleared the Bill on Sept. 6 ruling that it could be adopted with a two-thirds majority in Parliament with some clauses requiring a nationwide referendum. Announcing the court decision the same day, Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardene said the Bill could be adopted with a twothirds majority in Parliamentand a nationwide referendum on clauses two and three that are inconsistent with the Constitution.
The Supreme Court recommended changes to help Parliament pass the bill with only a special majority and no referendum. The bill aims to restore the independent commissions and also curbs some of the powers of the president.Interested parties were given time to petition the Supreme Court. There were 10 such petitions filed.
Speaking on Friday, Opposition leader Sajith Premadasa said that the youth and protesters who rose as the ‘Aragalaya’ deserve the credit and recognition for pushing through the 22nd Amendment. His party’s stance was not about the contents of the 20th or 22nd Amendments, but they believed their own 21st amendment was the most suitable.He said that the SJB would support the 22nd amendment, not because it offered a solution to the current crisis but because it was an improvement from the 20th amendment.
“Even though the 22A is not a solution at present, it is better than the 20A,” he said. He blamed the misuse of executive powers and the egoism derived from a two thirds parliamentary majority following a 6.9 million vote mandate at the Nov. 2019 presidential election for the downfall of the country.
News
Dr. Roshanie Dissanayake appointed Secretary to the Ministry of Science and Technology
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has appointed Dr. Roshanie Dissanayake as the Secretary to the Ministry of Science and Technology.
The letter of appointment was handed over to Dr. Dissanayake by Secretary to the President Dr. Nandika Sanath Kumanayake at the Presidential Secretariat on Friday (11) morning.
Dr. Roshanie Dissanayake has also served as an Additional Secretary (Sri Lanka Administrative Service – Special Grade) at the Ministry of Public Administration, Provincial Councils and Local Government.
President’s Media Division (PMD)
News
Gnanasara Thero absconding after SC ruling
Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thero was not at his temple in Rajagiriya when prison officials visited the premises yesterday to take steps following the Supreme Court ruling that nullified the presidential pardon granted to him, police sources said.
Prison officials who visited the temple on Nawala Road, Rajagiriya, were reportedly informed by those present that the Thero’s whereabouts were unknown. The development comes a day after the Supreme Court declared former President Maithripala Sirisena’s 2019 pardon of Gnanasara Thero null and void.
The three-member Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Janak De Silva, Dr. Sobhitha Rajakaruna and Sampath B. Abayakoon held that the pardon was arbitrary, violated the public trust and principles of natural justice, and was made beyond the proper exercise of the President’s constitutional discretion.
The case arose from Gnanasara Thero’s conduct at the Homagama Magistrate’s Court in January 2016 during proceedings relating to the disappearance of journalist and political cartoonist Prageeth Eknaligoda.
The Court of Appeal convicted him on four counts of contempt of court in 2018 and imposed concurrent prison terms amounting to six years. He had served about nine months when Sirisena granted him a presidential pardon on May 23, 2019.
The Supreme Court found that although Article 34 empowers the President to grant pardons, that power is held in trust for the people and is subject to constitutional limitations and judicial review. The Court concluded that Sirisena had effectively acted on the recommendation of the Additional Secretary (Legal) without demonstrating that he had independently considered the relevant material.
Justice De Silva held that the pardon was “arbitrary”, violated public trust and the rules of natural justice, and was ultra vires the President’s powers. The Court consequently found that the decision violated the fundamental right to equality guaranteed by Article 12(1) of the Constitution.
The ruling effectively restores the legal position under the original conviction, leaving Gnanasara Thero without the benefit of the 2019 pardon. The Supreme Court also clarified that a pardon does not erase a conviction or sentence, but merely relieves an offender from serving the sentence to the extent specified in the pardon.
Gnanasara Thero, the General Secretary of the Bodu Bala Sena, had been convicted over his conduct during proceedings concerning the disappearance of Eknaligoda, who went missing in January 2010 and has not been located.
Sandhya Eknaligoda, Prageeth Eknaligoda’s wife, was among those who challenged the presidential pardon before the Supreme Court, alongside the Centre for Policy Alternatives and its Executive Director Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu.
The detailed account of the judgment indicates that the Court’s ruling primarily nullified the pardon and restored the legal effect of the original sentence, with the implementation of the sentence falling to the relevant authorities.
Police sources said that the Supreme Court, however, did not permanently close the door on executive clemency. It held that a future President could grant Gnanasara Thero another pardon, provided the power is exercised lawfully and after proper consideration of all relevant material.
The Supreme Court has so far overturned three presidential pardons granted to two former Presidents. In January 2024, the Court declared former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s pardon of former MP Duminda Silva unlawful and invalid. In June 2024, it invalidated two pardons granted by former President Maithripala Sirisena to Royal Park murder convict Jude Shramantha Anthony Jayamaha — the first in May 2016, which commuted his death sentence to life imprisonment, and the second in October 2019, which released him from prison. Jayamaha, who was convicted of the murder of 19-year-old Yvonne Johnson, remains at large. Most recently, on September 10, 2026, the Supreme Court declared Sirisena’s 2019 pardon of Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thero null and void, ruling that it was arbitrary and inconsistent with the Constitution.
News
House to debate 22A, Judicature Bill next week
Parliament is scheduled to debate the Twenty-Second Amendment to the Constitution Bill and the Judicature (Amendment) Bill on September 24 and 25, subject to the Speaker’s announcement following the delivery of the Supreme Court determination on petitions filed against the Bills.
The programme for the Parliamentary Week from September 22 to 25 was decided at a meeting of the Committee on Parliamentary Business held on Thursday (10) under the chairmanship of Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne.
On each sitting day, Parliamentary Business under Standing Orders 22(1) to 22(6) will be taken up from 9.30 am to 10 am, followed by Questions for Oral Answers from 10 am to 11 am Questions under Standing Order 27(2) will be taken up from 11 am to 11.30 am.
On Tuesday (22), the Orders published in Extraordinary Gazette No. 2497/37 under the Petroleum Resources Act and the Promotion of Export Agriculture (Amendment) Bill will be debated from 11.30 am to 5 pm.
The Tredso Development Foundation (Incorporation) Bill, a Private Member’s Bill, will then be taken up for Second Reading before being referred to the Legislative Standing Committee.
An Opposition motion at the Adjournment Time will follow.
On Wednesday (23), the Chartered Institute of Media Professionals of Sri Lanka Bill will be debated from 11.30 am to 5 pm, followed by Questions at the Adjournment Time.
The Second Reading debate on the 22nd Amendment Bill and the Judicature (Amendment) Bill is scheduled for 11.30 am to 7 pm on Thursday (24) and Friday (25).
-
Sports3 days agoDDS set to lose Test captaincy
-
Features7 days agoAfter the parade: What a traffic OIC’s walk-out tells us
-
Editorial7 days agoArrests as theatre
-
News6 days agoThailand shuts door on undesirables from Sri Lanka
-
Latest News7 days agoHarshitha’s composed knock seals Sri Lanka’s semi-final berth
-
News3 days agoSri Lanka faces new grid challenge as rooftop solar surges: former CEB GM
-
Business6 days agoCEB successor company breaks into top three in competitive BESS tender
-
News7 days ago‘Choka Malli’ slips out of country before travel ban
