Connect with us

News

‘UK suppressed wartime HC dispatches unfavorable to Western strategy at UNHRC’

Published

on

… 20-year UN ban on examination of accusations travesty of justice: ex-CJBy Shamindra Ferdinando

Former Chief Justice Sarath Nanda Silva (1999-2009), on Thursday (18), alleged that the British government had suppressed diplomatic cables sent by its wartime Defence Attaché Lt. Colonel Anthony Gash from the British High Commission, Colombo, because they ran counter to the claims made by the western bloc as regards Sri Lanka at the Geneva-based United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC).

Appearing on ‘Get Real’ on Derana 24×7, anchored by Johnney Mahieash, the 41st CJ explained the British, in spite of being a member of the UNHRC in addition to spearheading the Core Group, had no option but to suppress credible information as part of the overall strategy to sustain the campaign against Sri Lanka.

The UNHRC consists of 47 countries divided into five zones with the UK categorised along with Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands (Western Europe and other States). A vote on the Core Group’s resolution, backed by the US, is expected early next week at the end of the 46th session of the UNHRC on March 23. The session commenced on Feb 22.

Displaying a set of highly censored British diplomatic cables that dealt with the situation on the Vanni front in 2009 (January-May) made available by Lord Naseby, who obtained them following a protracted legal procedure, the former CJ expressed shock and dismay at the British choosing to suppress information provided by a person who enjoyed diplomatic status.

Silva said Lt. Colonel Gash had been stationed in Colombo during that period to provide information sought by the British pertaining to the conflict. Having perused the documents and examined the context in which they were written, the former CJ asserted that the Gash papers gave an accurate picture.

In an exclusive interview with The Island, in Sept 2019, Lord Naseby said that he struggled for nearly three years to secure the dispatches from the UK government after making the first formal request in Nov 2014.

Responding to another query posed by Mahieash, the former CJ questioned the rationale in the UK depriving a House of Lords member material relevant to an issue the UK government was deeply concerned about. The outspoken former CJ explained that for the British the dispatches from Colombo couldn’t have posed any security concerns though their disclosure was certainly detrimental to their Geneva agenda.

Referring to Gash dispatches again, former CJ Silva said that in spite of blackening sections of the reports from Colombo, the person assigned the task carelessly left some crucial words intact one could comprehend what had been censored.

Lord Naseby told The Island that he personally handed over sets of Gash reports to the then President Maithripala Sirisena’s administration as well as the Joint Opposition (now SLPP) in 2017. The Conservative Party politician regretted the disclosure of the vital material hadn’t been properly utilized by Sri Lanka. Lord Naseby revealed the existence of the Gash papers on Oct 12, 2017 in the House of Lords.

Comparing the LTTE with the Irish Republican Army, the former CJ pointed out the wartime British Defence Attaché’s comment on the LTTE employing foreign mercenaries to mount air attacks in Colombo and the Katunayake airbase, where Sri Lanka’s precious fighter squadrons were based at. The former CJ referred to specific reference to the LTTE targeting the Israeli supplied Kfir aircraft based at Katunayake at a crucial time of the war against the LTTE. Reference was also made to the LTTE having seven airstrips in the northern theatre of operations and its failure to use a fourth aircraft in its arsenal in the absence of a mercenary.

Sri Lanka brought the war to a successful conclusion in May 2009.

The former CJ said that another reason for the British to suppress Gash papers was that the British official officially assigned the task of keeping London informed of the developments here, presented a picture of the Sri Lankan military quite opposite to what they propagated. In the wake of Gash/Lord Naseby disclosure, the UN Panel of Experts (PoE) report based on unsubstantiated allegations was in tatters, the former CJ said.

The PoE issued its report on March 31, 2011.

The former CJ said that British diplomatic dispatches on the basis of UN reports explained how the LTTE deployed forcibly recruited ‘unwilling recruits’ in its desperate counter offensives as the fighting entered the final phase.

The former CJ stressed that the British should have disclosed all available information to ensure a free and fair inquiry. Sarath Nanda Silva was responding to the British declaration in February this year that they didn’t furnish Gash reports to the UNHRC nor did the Geneva body asked for them.

The former CJ alleged that the British were pursuing a politically motivated agenda. In the wake of his interview with Derana 24×7, The Island sought the former CJ’s opinion on measures that could be taken to ascertain the truth as regards the primary allegation namely the killing of 40,000 civilians (PoE, paragraph 137). The UK led Core Group which includes Germany and Canada could call for dispatches from Defence Advisors/Defence Attaches from other countries having diplomatic missions in Colombo. They could easily verify the Gash reports by comparing them with dispatches from other missions, the former CJ said, pointing out that the UN and ICRC, too, could furnish their reports.

The former CJ said that the British government actions had in fact embarrassed the ordinary people who believed in their supposed sense of justice and fair play.

The former CJ said that he was appalled by the PoE placed the number of dead at 40,000 in spite of UN report that dealt with the situation therein from August 2008 to May 13, 2009 having asserted only 7,721 perished on the Vanni front (both civilians and combatants/paragraph 134). He also pointed out the PoE declaration the unsubstantiated accusations that led to Geneva actions couldn’t be examined till 2031 (paragraph 23) revealed that due attention hadn’t been given to the high profile anti-Sri Lanka project. The PoE/UN prohibited the examination of accusations for a period of 20 years from 2011. Pointing out the discrepancy in varying figures quoted by interested parties, the former CJ said that wartime US Defence Advisor Lt. Col. Lawrence Smith’s revelation at the 2011 Colombo Defence Seminar could be utilized along with Gash reports to carefully re-examine the accusations.

The US official denied alleged war crimes, including battlefield executions, the former CJ said, pointing out that the US denial was made just a couple of months after the release of PoE report widely called the Darusman report. In fact, Geneva should have asked member states and other countries especially the US and India to provide their defence advisors’ dispatches to help its investigations. The Tamil Diaspora demanding justice never asked for those reports because all knew what would happen to politically motivated Geneva actions if the reports reached the public.

The former CJ also referred to a Wikileaks revelation that ICRC told the US in 2009 Sri Lanka military could have finished off the LTTE if the civilian factor was not taken into consideration. The bottom line is that the case against Sri Lanka had been exposed by the officials of the same countries, the former CJ said, urging the government to take a fresh look at all available information/evidence.

The former CJ told Derana 24/7 that cases shouldn’t be won by suppressing information/evidence. The former CJ further pointed out how a section of the media in early 2007 revealed the UN suppressing the LTTE detaining two UN Tamil employees for helping civilians to escape to the government controlled area. The UN acknowledged that New York was not briefed of the developments here, the former CJ said, urging those shedding crocodile tears to revisit Sri Lanka accountability issue.



Latest News

Steps are being taken to abolish the Executive Presidency and establish a Parliamentary System of Government – Prime Minister

Published

on

By

Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya stated that steps are being taken to abolish the Executive Presidency and establish a parliamentary system of government, including the appointment of a President without executive powers. The Prime Minister further stated that measures are currently underway to hold the Provincial Council elections, which have been stalled due to provisions in the Provincial Councils Elections (Amendment) Act No. 17 dated 2017.

The Prime Minister made these remarks on Friday the 19th of December at Parliament while responding to a question raised by the Leader of the Opposition, Sajith Premadasa, under Standing Order 27(2).

The Prime Minister further stated,

“As stated on page 194 of the policy statement “A Thriving Nation – A Beautiful Life”, the government intends to draft a new Constitution. This draft will be presented to the public, followed by dialogue and discussion, after which necessary amendments will be made. The Constitution is then expected to be approved through a referendum. At present, reports of committees previously appointed to draft a new Constitution, along with other constitutional reform proposals, are being considered. Thereafter, a basic concept paper will be submitted to the Cabinet of Ministers.

The necessary steps are taken to abolish the Executive Presidency, and establish a parliamentary system of government, and appoint a President without executive powers will be undertaken in the process of drafting the new Constitution. It is not possible to abolish the Executive Presidential system without introducing a new Constitution. A study is currently underway on the abolition of the Executive Presidency and the possible methods of the process. While giving due attention to resolving the country’s pressing issues, focus has also been placed on abolishing the Executive Presidency. Relevant timelines will be announced in due course.

Steps are currently being taken to hold the Provincial Council elections at the earliest possible time. Under Section 3(b) of the Provincial Councils Elections (Amendment) Act No. 17 dated 2017, a Delimitation Commission appointed by the President must submit a report determining the demarcation of electoral divisions and the number of electoral districts. Once this report receives parliamentary approval, it will be possible to hold the Provincial Council elections.

The inability to hold Provincial Council elections thus far is due to the fact that the delimitation process required under the provisions of the Provincial Councils Elections (Amendment) Act No. 17 dated 2017 has not yet been completed. Accordingly, a study is currently being conducted to determine whether the elections should be held after completing the delimitation process, or whether amendments should be introduced to the provisions of Act No. 17 dated 2017 in order to proceed with the elections. A decision on holding the Provincial Council elections will be taken following the completion of this study. Nevertheless, provisions have been allocated in the 2026 Budget to conduct the elections once these processes are concluded.

The Prime Minister further stated that studies are currently underway regarding the introduction of new legislation and necessary legal amendments required to establish a Government Prosecutor’s Office.

(Prime Minister’s Media Division)

Continue Reading

Latest News

The full speech delivered by President Anura Kumara Dissanayake in Parliament (2025-12-19)

Published

on

By

The full speech delivered by President Anura Kumara Dissanayake in Parliament (2025-12-19)

“Today, we have presented to Parliament the largest supplementary estimate submitted in recent history. On the 5th of this month, following a lengthy debate, this Parliament approved the Budget required for the year 2026. However, within a very short period, we have been compelled to present a supplementary estimate amounting to Rs. 500 billion.

This Parliament acknowledges that such a supplementary estimate is necessary both to restore normal life following the prevailing disaster situation and to revive our economy. However, I am aware that there is a discussion within Parliament and outside it suggesting that, as a result of this Rs. 500 billion, the economy will collapse by April.

I wish to provide some clarification regarding claims that the economy will face a serious threat as a result of presenting such a large sum through a supplementary estimate.

We are a government that has worked with strong fiscal discipline and clear targets. If we consider the year 2025, we have achieved success across a number of important economic indicators this year.

As you know, for a long period the Treasury account operated under a bank overdraft. At times, interest rates of 33% or 36% were paid on these overdrafts.

In 2018, the bank overdraft stood at Rs. 180 billion. In 2019, it increased to Rs. 274 billion; in 2020 to Rs. 575 billion; and in 2021 to Rs. 821 billion. In other words, the government’s bank account was overdrawn by Rs. 821 billion.

However, by November 2025, the balance of the government’s Treasury account had reached Rs. 1,202 billion. That represents an increase of Rs. 2 trillion compared to 2021. This is a very significant development for our country’s economy.

Had such a reserve not existed, we would not have been able to allocate this Rs. 500 billion today. In that case, we would have had to identify several alternative strategies to raise this amount. Secondly, in terms of revenue, Sri Lanka has recorded the highest level of government revenue since 2007 in the year 2025, at 15.9%. Thirdly, the lowest budget deficit since 1977 has been recorded, at 4.5%.

Moreover, this year has become the year in our history in which revenue targets were exceeded. This year, we expected revenue of Rs. 4,960 billion; by 15 December 2025, we had already generated Rs. 5,125 billion in revenue. At the same time, we were able to refrain from increasing the debt ceiling.

When presenting the 2026 Budget, we stated that we expected a debt ceiling of Rs. 3,800 billion. However, through our budget proposals, we reduced this by a further Rs. 60 billion and are maintaining a debt ceiling of Rs. 3,740 billion.

We are utilising this additional Rs. 500 billion without increasing our debt ceiling. This is extremely important. As a result, after a long period, we have been able to remain within the debt limits anticipated in the Budget.

Furthermore, since 1950, a surplus in our primary account has been recorded on only about six occasions. Over a period of 74 years, a positive primary balance has been recorded only six times, and on all six occasions it was below 1%. However, for the first time in history, the primary surplus this year is being reported at 3.8%.

This year, Sri Lanka is receiving the highest level of foreign remittances in its history. Tourism earnings amounted to approximately USD 3.8 billion in 2018, and we expect to surpass that figure. We expect our export earnings from goods and services to reach close to USD 18 billion.

These figures demonstrate that this success has been achieved as a result of strong financial management and disciplined, target-oriented governance.

However, we did not have an economy capable of withstanding major shocks. What we had was an economy in which even a small or misguided decision could result in severe destruction. Therefore, over the past 14 to 15 months, we have acted with extreme caution, avoiding mistakes and carefully examining even the most delicate aspects and have brought the economy to a position of stability.

No one can deny this. However, it is within such a context of economic stability that we have faced this shock. Had we not been in a position of economic stability and strength, we would not have been able to confront this situation.

It is the economic stability we have achieved so far that has created the courage and confidence necessary for us to face this challenge. However, we are also aware that the economy had not yet grown to a level capable of fully absorbing such a shock. This shock was inflicted on our economy at a time when we were rebuilding a collapsed country step by step.

Therefore, the economy must be managed through careful and finely calibrated interventions required to absorb and mitigate this shock. However, an economy is not about hoarding wealth like a miser and accumulating everything in one place. An economy means that if any benefit is derived from it, that benefit must in turn flow back to the people.

Otherwise, there is no benefit to the people merely in having trillions of rupees in surplus in the Treasury. Therefore, if we achieve even a small victory in the economy, that victory must be allowed to flow through to the people.

Accordingly, in this disaster situation, the reserves amounting to Rs. 1.2 trillion that we possess must be utilised to provide relief to the people. We will not refrain from doing so.

Our country has a history in which those in power shared benefits among themselves using large ladles. Was it just that compensation was paid to ministers after houses were set on fire?

There has always been a precedent in this country of those in power allocating themselves a large share, while distributing to the people with small ladles.

We did not form a National People’s Power government in order to distribute benefits to the government using large ladles. Our intention is to provide fair benefits to the people. Therefore, we have intervened to support the people fairly in overcoming this crisis.

Our policy approach is centred on how we intervene to enable people to restart their livelihoods and lead more stable lives once again. It is for this purpose that we are seeking Rs. 500 billion. Accordingly, we have allocated total provisions exceeding Rs. 700 billion for this purpose.

A report containing a preliminary assessment conducted by the World Bank on this matter is scheduled to be provided to us next Monday. The total extent of the damage can be ascertained from that report. However, there are several key matters to which we are paying close attention.

We are taking into account the potential inflationary impact of an additional Rs. 500 billion entering the market. Accordingly, efficiency in the production of goods and services must be enhanced.

A significant portion of the funds we allocate must therefore be spent on achieving growth in the production of goods and services. When approximately Rs. 500 billion is injected into the market, there is a likelihood of a corresponding increase in demand for US dollars. This is a reality we must clearly recognize.

Accordingly, it is essential to generate additional foreign exchange earnings in dollars, over and above the anticipated inflows. Failing to do so would exert pressure on the exchange rate. To mitigate this risk, we are seeking immediate financial assistance of USD 200 million from the International Monetary Fund. The IMF Executive Board is scheduled to meet, and we are confident that a fair and positive decision will be taken. In parallel, we are also expecting support from the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank. Therefore, beyond the dollar inflows projected under the 2026 plan, it is necessary to mobilize at least an additional USD 500 million.

Our focus is to carefully manage inflation and contain any adverse impact on the exchange rate. In this regard, a structured plan has been developed for the allocation of these funds. Accordingly, I will present the full framework of the proposed relief package in due course.

Once the emergency disaster situation has subsided, a payment of Rs. 25,000 is being provided to affected families to support the cleaning and restoration of their homes. This allowance is applicable to all eligible households. I am aware, however, that certain practical challenges arise in the implementation process. The determination of eligibility is carried out by public officials, including Grama Niladhari. Politicians neither distribute these funds nor make eligibility decisions. That said, if any individual has been treated unfairly, or if a deserving beneficiary has not received the payment, the political authority will intervene to review and address the issue.

This is the established and proper procedure. Claims suggesting that signatures from political committees are required are entirely false and misleading. A clear, structured mechanism has been established and is being implemented strictly through the state administrative system. Given the diversity of circumstances on the ground, some delays in the selection and verification process are inevitable and should be understood as natural. This is a reality we all recognize. The allowance is being distributed without discrimination. According to current reports, nearly 65% of eligible beneficiaries have already received the payment, while in some districts, distribution has reached 90% to 100% completion.

In addition, a further Rs. 50,000 allowance will be provided. This payment is intended to support families whose homes have been damaged or whose household furniture has been affected, enabling them to replace essential kitchen items. Every affected household will be eligible for this allowance. No previous government has implemented assistance of this nature in such a manner, this initiative is being carried out strictly based on a clear policy framework and guiding principles. According to the latest reported data, there are 6,228 fully damaged houses, 4,543 partially damaged houses deemed unsafe by the NBRO and 6,877 houses with no visible damage but not approved for occupancy by the NBRO. This brings the total number of affected houses to 17,648.

As a first step, all 17,648 households will receive a monthly allowance of Rs. 50,000 for a period of three months, commencing in January. We are also fully aware of the severe hardships faced by families living in displacement camps. Therefore, our objective is to relocate them from these facilities as quickly as possible and provide a housing rental allowance of Rs. 25,000, in accordance with the three categories previously outlined, to enable them to return to normal living arrangements. This allowance will be provided even if the affected families are temporarily residing with relatives.

In parallel, we have decided to expedite the resumption of agricultural activities. A large number of reservoirs under the Irrigation Department, Provincial Irrigation Departments and the Department of Agrarian Development have sustained damage. Steps are being taken to restore these facilities at the earliest possible time to ensure the availability of water for the upcoming Maha season. To this end, district-level discussions have been conducted across the country and the necessary assistance and concessions required for cultivation have already been extended to the farming community.

Accordingly, it has been decided to provide Rs. 150,000 per hectare to farmers who have cultivated paddy, maize, groundnuts and other cereal crops. Even where the extent of damage is relatively limited, it is essential to support farmers in rebuilding their livelihoods. We understand the deep personal and emotional loss experienced when cultivated land is destroyed. A farmer’s daily routine, walking to the field each morning, observing the crop and taking pride in its growth is closely tied to their sense of purpose. The psychological distress caused by the loss of such a harvest is fully recognised. Arrangements have been made for the Department of Agrarian Development to credit the relevant compensation amounts to the bank accounts of all farmers who received fertiliser subsidies by the course of next week.

In addition, farmers engaged in the cultivation of chillies, onions, papaya and banana will be classified under the vegetable crop category and will receive Rs. 200,000 per hectare as assistance. A number of proposals were received from the export agriculture sector. Accordingly, a decision has been taken to provide compensation for pepper, cardamom and coffee cultivations. All the necessary data required for this purpose have been provided. Based on those data, it has been decided to pay Rs. 250 per pepper plant. The Department of Export Agriculture has also agreed to provide new plants.

The livestock sector was the next major issue we were required to address. For paddy cultivation, the unit of measurement is a hectare. For vegetable cultivation, it is an acre. However, there is no such fixed unit of measurement for livestock farming. How many animals are there? There is a wide variety of animals. Even within the same species, animals vary in size. Therefore, the diversity is considerable.

So the question is how we ensure fairness in the face of this diversity. In addition, livestock farmers must be registered with the veterinary office. We need to consider unregistered livestock farming separately. As a first step, we have prepared plans for registered livestock farms. Accordingly, compensation of Rs. 200,000 will be provided for each hybrid cow lost, up to a maximum of ten cows, amounting to a maximum of Rs. 2 million.

For a non-hybrid indigenous cow, compensation of Rs. 50,000 will be provided per animal, up to a maximum of twenty cows, amounting to Rs. 1 million. The primary responsibility of every livestock farmer must be to register with the veterinary office. At the very least, farmers must report the number of animals they own every six months. If veterinary services are provided to an unregistered farm, a fee will have to be charged.

From this point onwards, services cannot be provided free of charge. Unregistered farmers will not be permitted to transport cattle from one province to another. Therefore, registration is essential. However, if a pig, goat or sheep has been lost, compensation of Rs. 20,000 per animal will be paid, up to a maximum of twenty animals. Accordingly, such plans have been prepared to revive the livestock sector.

Next, in the poultry sector, there are several different categories. For each layer chicken that has died, compensation of Rs. 500 will be provided, up to a maximum of 2,000 birds. Accordingly, if 2,000 birds have been lost, compensation of Rs. 1 million will be received.

For broiler chickens, compensation of Rs. 250 per bird will be paid, up to a maximum of 4,000 birds. There are many backyard poultry farms to which birds were provided to encourage farmers. We have decided to provide them as well with a grant of Rs. 10,000. Chicks can also be obtained free of charge again through the Provincial Council.

There are several issues within the fisheries sector. Those engaged in marine fishing cannot operate without insuring their boats. The Ministry of Fisheries issues fishing licences only if the boats are insured.

Everyone engaged in ocean fishing has insurance. However, although compensation is received through insurance, that amount is insufficient to purchase a new boat. We therefore decided that the insurance compensation should be paid to the Cey-Nor Foundation, which will then provide a new boat. A voucher worth Rs. 100,000 will be provided for fishing nets and gear. Once that voucher is submitted to the Cey-Nor Foundation, fishing nets and equipment can be obtained.

Our objective is to rejuvenate the fisheries industry. In addition, boats that have suffered minor damage will be repaired free of charge by the Cey-Nor Foundation and returned. Similarly, for a canoe used in inland fisheries, Rs. 100,000 will be provided, along with up to five nets through the fisheries society, at Rs. 15,000 per net, totalling Rs. 75,000.

In some tanks, approximately 35% of the fish fingerlings have been washed away. In some tanks, all of them have been washed away. The Ministry of Fisheries will provide fingerlings to damaged reservoirs on two occasions.

Schoolchildren affected by the disaster will receive Rs. 10,000 from the President’s Fund and Rs. 15,000 from the Treasury. We will make every effort to provide this assistance to schoolchildren before the new school term begins.”

Continue Reading

News

Lawyers slam NPP Mayor for claiming judicial powers

Published

on

BASL condemns Ranjan Jayalal for obstructing lawyer

The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) yesterday strongly condemned Kaduwela Mayor Ranjan Jayalal, alleging that he had obstructed an Attorney-at-Law representing an Animal Welfare Association during an inquiry conducted by the Mayor.

According to the BASL, the Mayor’s conduct amounted to a serious interference with the professional independence and duties of the lawyer.

The BASL in a media statement has referred to audio recordings in which the Mayor is allegedly heard claiming to be an “Unofficial Magistrate” and implying he was exercising judicial authority.

The BASL has stressed that such claims are entirely erroneous, noting that the Mayor was not acting under the authority of any Magistrate nor exercising judicial powers at the time.

The statement, dated December 19, 2025, has been signed by BASL President Rajeev Amarasuriya and Secretary Chathura Galhena, highlighting the association’s concern over what it described as a serious breach of professional conduct.

Continue Reading

Trending