Editorial
Thus spake the Prez
Thursday 20th November, 2025
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has strongly defended two political appointees occupying the top positions in the Ministry of Public Security and the Criminal Investigation Department (CID). The modus operandi adopted by him to support his brief for them is a textbook example of ‘straw man’, a logical fallacy, which involves recasting opponents’ arguments into weaker versions that are easier to refute instead of addressing stronger, substantive issues.
President Dissanayake has advanced several arguments, imputing improper motives to his political opponents for their opposition to the appointment of NPP member, retired SSP Shani Abeysekera, as the CID Director. Abeysekera is an investigator nonpareil, whose investigations have led to the conviction of almost all the accused in cases filed by the CID, the President has said, insisting that there is documentary proof to support his claim, but he has not cared to make it public.
The main argument against Abeysekera’s post-retirement appointment as the CID Director is not based on his skills but a glaring conflict of interest on his part, arising mainly from two factors. He is a prominent member of the NPP’s Retired Police Collective, and therefore cannot be expected to act impartially when investigating matters that could jeopardise the interests of his party, upon which he is dependent to hold his current position, as a political appointee. No other government catapulted a party member in retirement to the post of the CID Director. The President has also evaded one of the main reasons why Abeysekera’s controversial appointment has come under criticism—the CID’s failure, under his watch, to prevent the National Thowheed Jamath (NTJ) from carrying out the Easter Sunday terror attacks in 2019. If the President’s claim is true that Abeysekera is a maven in the police, why did the CID, under his supervision, fail to prevent the Easter Sunday attacks, despite the availability of actionable intelligence? The CID kept on barking up the wrong tree following the execution-style killings of two policemen at Vavunathivu in 2018. Some former LTTE cadres were arrested on suspicion although the NTJ was responsible for those crimes. The CID later claimed that it had been misled by military intelligence. It is unthinkable that the CID, under a person the NPP likens to Sherlock Holmes, was thrown off the trail of a terrorist outfit!
There is no way Abeysekera or current Secretary to the Ministry of Public Security and Head of the NPP’s Retired Police Collective SDIG (Rtd.) Ravi Seneviratne, who was the SDIG in charge of the CID, in 2019, can absolve themselves of the responsibility for the CID’s lapses that led to the Easter Sunday attacks. There is a serious conflict of interest on the part of the duo, and they cannot be expected to act impartially regarding the ongoing investigations into the Easter Sunday carnage. It has been revealed that the family of Mohamed Ibrahim, a JVP National List nominee for the 2015 general election, funded the Easter Sunday terror project. Ibrahim’s two sons took part in the suicide bomb attacks in 2019. This dimension of the terror strikes must be probed thoroughly, but how can two NPP members be expected to maintain neutrality and an open mind, as the Secretary to the Public Security Ministry and the CID Director?
President Dissanayake’s arguments rely more on pathos, which appeals to an audience’s emotions, than on logos, which appeals to their logic and reason. The President has said Abeysekera was unjustly kept behind bars by the Rajapaksa government. He went on to say that Abeysekera underwent heart surgery while in remand prison. Abeysekera’s sister wept while describing his condition, the President has said. The Rajapaksas abused power to launch witch-hunts against their rivals, and among their victims are former war-time Army Commander Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka and former Chief Justice Dr. Shirani Bandaranaike. But it is self-defeating for the President to highlight the injustices the Rajapaksas inflicted on Abeysekera, who is now in charge of investigations against them. One could argue that the government has handpicked Abeysekera as the CID Director because he is driven by a desire to take revenge from the Rajapaksas, whom the NPP is all out to destroy politically. There is provision for remedy even when a judge is considered prejudiced—recusal—but no such safeguard is available when the CID Director happens to be prejudiced!
President Dissanayake has chosen to ignore a leaked audio clip of a telephone conversation between Abeysekera and the then Deputy Minister Ranjan Ramanayake, during the Yahapalana government. Abeysekera, who was the CID Director at that time, is heard discussing an investigation with Ramanayake and offering to wash pots and pans in the latter’s house.
President Dissanayake has turned a blind eye to the issue of conflict of interest on the part of Seneviratne, who was the SDIG in charge of the CID at the time of the Easter Sunday attacks. He has also ignored the Opposition’s claim that Seneviratne misused his authority, as the Secretary to the Ministry of Public Security to have a drunk driving charge dropped in a case against him for causing a road accident in late 2023.
The government has rejected out of hand the Alwis Committee report, which has held Abeysekera and Seneviratne accountable for the CID’s failure to prevent the Easter Sunday terror attacks. It has said the Chairperson of the Committee, former High Court Judge A. N. J de Alwis, was prejudiced against Abeysekera and Seneviratne. Similarly, one could argue that the integrity of the investigations being conducted by the CID into the Easter Sunday bombings, with Abeysekera and Seneviratne in their current positions, is also compromised. No amount of glib talk can justify the appointment of two prominent NPP members as the Head of the Public Security Ministry and the CID Director.
Editorial
Crime and cops
Saturday 17th January, 2026
The police headquarters has released an AI-generated image of a suspect wanted in connection with a fatal shooting incident in Dehiwala on 09 Jan., 2026, and sought public assistance to arrest him. AI has made the task of creating facial composites much easier. The public no doubt must cooperate with the police and help combat crime, but much more needs to be done to neutralise the dangerous underworld gangs.
Two notorious criminals and a female suspect arrested in Dubai were brought back yesterday. Dubai has become a haven for Sri Lankan criminals, and everything possible must be done to arrest all of them there and repatriate them here to stand trial for their crimes.
There have been several shooting incidents so far this year, and a couple of lives, including that of a teenager, have been lost. Last year saw more than 100 incidents of gun violence, which claimed scores of lives. One can only hope that the police will be able to bring the situation under control this year. Hope is said to spring eternal.
Underworld gangs have amply demonstrated their ability to strike at will anywhere although some of their leaders have been arrested. The police swing into action after shooting incidents and go hell for leather to arrest the shooters; in some cases, they succeed in their endeavour. Crime prevention is apparently not their forte.
Last year, a much-advertised campaign was launched to crush crime syndicates involved in drug dealing, killings and gun running. It yielded some discernible results, but very little is heard of it these days. Has it gone the same way as the past anti-crime operations?
Identikits, manually created or A-generated, could be deceptive in some cases however useful they may be in tracking down criminals on the run. This is a fact investigators should bear in mind lest they should arrest the wrong persons and torture them in the name of interrogating them.
It was alleged last week that the police had put a man to the question simply because he resembled a suspect in an identikit released to the media. The victim has claimed that he went to a police station in Colombo of his own volition after realising that there was a striking similarity between him and the suspect composite in question, only to be beaten mercilessly and asked to make a confession to a crime that he had not committed. The police have denied his claim. A thorough investigation must be conducted into the alleged incident.
Cases of mistaken identity are not rare in Sri Lanka, where the police make arrests hastily and consider suspects guilty until they are proven innocent. They have earned notoriety for acting according to their whims and fancies or at the behest of their political masters in arresting suspects. This is one of the reasons why the conviction rate remains extremely low in this country. It is between 4% and 6%. Some studies have even placed it at 2%.
Meanwhile, the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) must not be made to conduct politically motivated investigations, which prevent it from carrying out its duties and functions efficiently. Its raison d’etre is probing crimes, but successive governments have reduced it to a mere appendage of the party in power. Today, the situation has taken a turn for the worse, with government politicians rushing to the CID at the drop of a hat, demanding investigations. This practice must be brought to and end.
Editorial
The Chakka Clash
Friday 16th January, 2026
Never a dull day in Sri Lanka, where controversies abound. As if the ongoing political war on the government’s hurriedly introduced education reforms were not enough, there is a dispute over a religious symbol, of all things, The Opposition has taken exception to an image in a newly crafted learning module. SJB and Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa insists that the symbol described as the Dhamma Chakka in the textbook is in fact the Ashoka Chakra. He took up the issue in Parliament last week, demanding an explanation from the government. Several other Opposition politicians have expressed similar views.
Responding to Premadasa’s argument, Prime Minister and Minister of Education and Higher Education Dr. Harini Amarasuriya told the House that the Buddhist symbol in the school textbook, introduced under the new education reform programme, looked similar to the Ashoka Chakra, but it was the Dhamma Chakka approved by the Ministry of Buddhist Affairs, the Advisory Council on Buddhist Affairs and the Maha Nayake Theras of the Asgiriya and Malwathu Chapters. However, the debate over the symbol in question is far from over; the Opposition politicians and their propagandists continue to castigate the government. The Chakka issue has left the public confused.
There have emerged two schools of thought over the Buddhist symbol in the school textbook. Differences between the Dhamma Chakka and the Ashoka Chakra are not limited to their distinct shapes alone, according to the critics of the symbol at issue. They have pointed out that the Dhamma Chakka symbolises the Noble Eightfold Path and moral law or Dhamma while the Ashoka Chakra represents law and justice (or dhamma in a civic sentence), movement, progress, good governance and discipline, and therefore in today’s context it is secular and not religious, as such. The Dhamma Chakka is found in Buddhist temples, stupas, manuscripts and religious art while the Ashoka Chakra is mostly in the Indian national flag, government emblems and currency and official seals. The rival school of thought insists that the symbol in the textbook is the real Dhamma Chakka and what the Opposition has taken up is a non-issue.
The ongoing debate is of immense interest in that the traditional Dhamma Chakka is known as a sacred Buddhist symbol of spiritual law and the path to liberation. The Ashoka Chakra has become a modern national symbol of India; it has been inspired by the Dhamma Chakka but used mostly in a secular context. The question is what prompted the government to use a symbol other than the traditional Dhamma Chakka in a school textbook, and thereby spark a controversy unncessarily.
Ironically, the NPP government drawing criticism for using a symbol that is confused with the Ashoka Chakra, a national symbol of India, is led by the JVP, which once launched a violent anti-Indian campaign and even gunned down traders who sold Indian onions or local varieties that resembled them. The government finds itself in a dilemma. Its critics maintain that the Dhamma Chakka in Sri Lanka’s state emblem is different from what the government calls the real Dhamma Chakka approved by the Ministry of Buddhist Affairs, the Advisory Committee on Buddhist Affairs and some Maha Nayake Theras. How can this glaring discrepancy be rectified? There cannot be two different Dhamma Chakkas—one in the state emblem and the other in school textbooks or elsewhere, according to those who want the government to stick to the traditional Dhamma Chakka.
It is imperative that the government, the Ministry of Buddha Sasana, the Opposition, the Maha Sangha, Buddhist scholars and other stakeholders address the Chakka issue urgently and clear up public confusion.
Editorial
Reforms, frogs and tortoises
Thursday 15th January, 2026
The government finally swallowed its pride and postponed the implementation of education reforms meant for Grade 06. It has said its reform initiative is on track, but it is very likely to avoid a headlong rush. It may not concede defeat, but it is obviously wary of performing another high-wire act without a safety net amidst protests.
The government has done itself a favour by shelving the education reforms for Grade 06. Protests tend to snowball, and the Satyagraha campaigns, rallies and marches against the education reforms have the potential to develop into another ‘go-home’ movement.
The opponents of the current education reforms are now demanding that the government deep-six its reform package wholesale and ensure that the architects thereof bear the cost of error-ridden modules, amounting to about Rs. 70 million. Their message is loud and clear; those who wasted state funds for printing those modules will face legal action when the NPP loses power.
The Opposition and the trade unions critical of the proposed education reforms are still out for Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya’s scalp, blaming her for the reform mess in the education sector. They are also making many unsubstantiated allegations against her. Trouble is far from over for her and the government.
Now that all stakeholders have agreed that the education system needs reform, the government should begin formulating education reforms anew while adopting an inclusive approach. The best way to set about the task of introducing reforms in any sector is to consult all key stakeholders and secure their concurrence.
The NPP government led by the JVP, which is a great admirer of the Chinese Communist Party, should have adopted the gradual trial-and-error approach recommended by Deng Xiaoping, and crossed the river by feeling the stones. Instead of taking one experimental step at a time and adapting to circumstances, the NPP government made the mistake of plunging headfirst into reforming the education system.
It has been proposed that the government set up a Presidential Task Force consisting of experts, political representatives, trade unionists and other stakeholders to reform the education system. This proposal deserves serious consideration. A broadly representative task force will help ensure the smooth implementation of education reforms. Well begun is said to be half done.
Meanwhile, Tuesday’s meeting between President Anura Kumara Dissanayake and some trade unions representing teachers and principals has been viewed in some quarters as part of a divide-and-rule strategy, for it has caused a rift between the trade unionists invited by the President and others, who claim that the event was scripted. However, those who met the President on Tuesday have thrown their weight behind the campaign to recover the cost of poorly crafted learning modules that have been shelved.
President of the All Ceylon United Teachers’ Association Ven. Yalwala Pannasekera Thera, one of the trade unionists who met the President on Tuesday, has given a karmic twist to the education reform issue. Tearing into the NPP politicians and state officials responsible for printing the badly drafted modules, he said yesterday those who misused funds meant for children would be reborn as frogs in Beira Lake and tortoises in the Kandy Lake.
Politicians who misuse state funds and abuse power may find themselves in the company of frogs and tortoises even before they go the way of all flesh. One may recall that in 2022, some politicians of the previous dispensation and their supporters swam with frogs in Beira Lake, where angry mobs plunged them. The same fate is likely to befall all politicians who let power get the better of them, resort to highhanded action, flaunting mandates and supermajorities, and thereby test the public’s patience.
-
Business2 days agoKoaloo.Fi and Stredge forge strategic partnership to offer businesses sustainable supply chain solutions
-
Business6 days agoDialog and UnionPay International Join Forces to Elevate Sri Lanka’s Digital Payment Landscape
-
News6 days agoSajith: Ashoka Chakra replaces Dharmachakra in Buddhism textbook
-
Editorial1 day agoThe Chakka Clash
-
Features6 days agoThe Paradox of Trump Power: Contested Authoritarian at Home, Uncontested Bully Abroad
-
Features6 days agoSubject:Whatever happened to (my) three million dollars?
-
Business2 days agoSLT MOBITEL and Fintelex empower farmers with the launch of Yaya Agro App
-
Features1 day agoOnline work compatibility of education tablets
