Opinion
The day I first met Prime Minister Sirimavo Bandaranaike
by Prof. Gamini Keerawella
(From the publication The BCIS At Fifty –A Journey of Learning and Dialogue)
I can still vividly recall the striking image of the Bandaranaike Memorial International Conference Hall (BMICH), deeply engraved in my memory from the very first day I laid eyes on it. It was in 1976, a few months after the historic Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) Summit had been held there. As I was walking along Bauddhaloka Mawatha from the Kanatte Junction towards Thummulla, it suddenly appeared on my left. Though I had glimpsed its image in newspapers covering the NAM Summit, nothing could have prepared me for the breathtaking reality. There it stood—a pristine white colossus, gleaming in the sun—an architectural marvel that commanded both reverence and awe.
In that moment, a surge of emotion swept over me; reminiscent of how I felt when I first set foot on the University of Peradeniya as a novice undergraduate in 1968. The memory remains just as vivid—the way I stood, mesmerised by the grandeur of the university’s sprawling complexes, each a testament to human ingenuity and vision, seamlessly intertwined with the natural splendour of the Hantane mountain range and the winding beauty of the Mahaweli River valley. Both moments—Peradeniya and the BMICH—have left an indelible imprint on my life. When I was recruited to the academic staff of the University of Peradeniya in 1975, the environment of the university became an inseparable part of my life, shaping my experiences and outlook. I found myself deeply immersed in the beauty of the campus—where nature and architecture engage in a timeless, harmonious dialogue. In a similar vein, the octagonal BMICH stands as a true architectural marvel, unique in its form and scale within the country. The design is a masterpiece of modern Chinese architecture, its imposing pillars embracing the octagonal structure in a style reminiscent of a Roman Acropolis—where the ancient and the modern converge in breathtaking fusion.
In 1976, as I stood before the BCIS, it never crossed my mind that one day I would become the Executive Director of the Bandaranaike Centre for International Studies (BCIS), the educational arm of the Bandaranaike National Memorial Foundation (BMNF). Nor could I have imagined becoming a member of its Council of Management and Academic Affairs Board of BMICH.
In 1980, I took study leave and left Peradeniya for Canada to pursue my postgraduate studies. After earning my MA at the University of Windsor in 1982, I moved to the University of British Columbia (UBC) to pursue my doctorate. Having completed all the required coursework and on the verge of submitting my doctoral dissertation, I was called back to Peradeniya in May 1985 as my study leave had come to an end. Since I deeply loved my work at Peradeniya, I returned with the firm confidence that I would soon be able to return to UBC during one of the long vacations to defend my Ph.D. dissertation.

Sirimavo Bandaranaike
In 1986, while I was putting the final touches on my doctoral dissertation, I received an unexpected invitation to a regional conference at the BMICH, organised by BCIS. By then, several of my senior colleagues from the University of Peradeniya, such as Profs. S.U. Kodikara, Birty Gajameragedara, Vishwa Warnapala, K.H. Jayasinghe, P.V.J. Jayasekera, and Mahinda Werake, were already involved in BCIS’s academic programmes. I was both surprised and deeply honoured by the invitation. As a junior academic, it was an extraordinary privilege for me to engage with distinguished scholars from South Asia, including K. Subrahmanyam, K.P. Misra, K.R. Singh, and S.D. Muni from India, as well as Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema and Rasul Rais from Pakistan. I also noticed the presence of prominent journalists like Mervyn Silva and Gamini Weerakoon among the panelists, further underscoring the significance of the event. Participating in this seminar with such renowned scholars was a defining moment in my academic journey, and I believed that my senior colleagues played a role in arranging an invitation to me.
By that time, a new wing had been annexed to the main BMICH hall, and the conference was held in the adjoining building. To my surprise, Madam Sirimavo Bandaranaike, Chairperson of the BMNF and a keen supporter of BCIS, was present and actively engaged in the proceedings, adding even more significance to the event. It was the first time I found myself in close proximity to the remarkable figure of Madam Sirimavo Bandaranaike, the world’s first female Prime Minister. I was instantly struck by her commanding presence—an undeniable aura of magnanimity and charisma that left a lasting impression. Her dignified posture and quiet strength embodied the true essence of leadership and grace.
During the tea break after the inaugural session, refreshments were served in the adjoining vestibule. In one corner, a settee had been arranged, where Madam Sirimavo Bandaranaike sat, choosing to remain with the conference participants rather than retreat to a private space. Senior academics and foreign delegates naturally gravitated toward her, drawn by her presence. It was then that Mr. Ray Forbes, then the Director of BCIS, approached me, his usual stern tone breaking through the crowd as he informed me that Madam Bandaranaike wished to speak with me. When Mr. Forbes introduced me, she indicated that she wished to speak with me privately. As I stood before her, I experienced both awe and anxiety. She gestured for me to sit across from her, and in her deep, resonant voice, inquired about my studies. There was motherly warmth in her tone, yet it was coupled with an unmistakable air of authority that commanded respect. As we conversed, my fears slowly subsided. To my surprise, she knew much about my background, and it was clear this was the reason she had sought me out.
In April 1971, while still in my third year of university, I was arrested by the security forces for my involvement in the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) and the 1971 uprising. After nearly three years of incarceration, I was released at the end of 1973 and returned to university at the beginning of 1974. Despite the interruption to my studies, I excelled in my final examinations in 1975, which led to my recruitment to the academic staff of the Department of History—initially on a temporary basis, and later as a probationary lecturer. On the verge of completing my doctorate at one of the world’s leading universities, I shared this journey with Madam Sirimavo Bandaranaike during our conversation. She was genuinely pleased to hear about my academic progress and showed great interest in my doctoral dissertation, titled Superpower Naval Rivalry in the Indian Ocean Since 1945 and Sri Lanka’s Response. She encouraged me to actively engage in the academic programmes at BCIS. Her words of both support and expectation inspired me to contribute to the institution’s intellectual landscape.
In our brief conversation, she spoke with clarity and purpose, exhibiting the vision and decisiveness of a true leader and accomplished stateswoman. She sought to engage individuals like us in BCIS initiatives, determined to break the exclusivity surrounding the study of international affairs, which had long been confined to a small, elitist segment of society. As a public educational institution, the BCIS aspired to democratise the systematic study of International Relations, making it accessible to a broader audience. Sri Lanka, she noted, was in dire need of scholarly contributions to inform its policy-making process, particularly given the chaotic state of the country’s foreign policy at the time, with decisions being made in a haphazard manner. Recognizing the scarcity of academic research in International Relations, the BCIS aimed to become a hub for policy research, especially in areas relevant to Sri Lanka’s foreign policy. She concluded by emphasiaing the critical role the BCIS could play in fostering dialogue among scholars from across South Asia, addressing regional issues through collaboration and mutual understanding. I was deeply impressed by her vision for the BCIS, which was rooted in a spirit of social democracy, seeking to bridge divides and serve the public good.
My meeting with Madam Sirimavo Bandaranaike that day remains one of the most memorable experiences of my life. The clarity with which she articulated the vision and mission of BCIS left a lasting impression on me. She spoke with conviction about the Centre’s purpose—not just as an academic institution but also as a beacon of public education, aimed at shaping informed citizens and influencing policy. Her emphasis on the core values of the BCIS struck a chord with me. She envisioned the BCIS as a platform where scholars, policymakers, and the public could engage in meaningful discourse on international relations and diplomacy, with a focus on Sri Lanka’s unique position in the global arena. These values were not abstract ideals but guiding principles that shaped the institution’s commitment to inclusivity, accessibility, and public service.
Madam Bandaranaike’s words still resonate in my mind, reminding me of the responsibility we have to promote these social democratic principles. Her vision for the BCIS was clear: it was to be a place where the study of international relations would be democratised, where knowledge would not be the privilege of the few but a resource for the many. She understood the power of education as a tool for both social and political transformation, and her leadership reflected a deep commitment to creating a more equitable and just society. Inspired by this vision, I was determined to support and uphold the values on which the BCIS was founded.
Opinion
Appreciation: D. L. O. Mendis Visionary Engineer, Philosopher, and Mentor
Today, we honour the life and legacy of D.L.O. Mendis, a visionary engineer and philosopher whose contributions defined the standards of our profession. D.L.O. possessed a rare combination of analytical rigor and creative foresight. His numerous technical papers presented here and abroad related to water resources development stand as enduring monuments to his brilliance.
Beyond creating blueprints and technical specifications, D.L.O. presented bold ideas that challenged and strengthened our professional communities. He was a dedicated mentor to junior engineers, and a leader who firmly believed that engineering was, above all, a service to humanity. While we mourn this great loss, we take solace in knowing that his radical influence shaped our careers and the ethical code that governs our profession.
A Career of Integrity and Excellence
Throughout his career spanning more than 70 years, D.L.O. embodied the highest standards of integrity and technical excellence. He was particularly instrumental in advancing our
understanding of ancient irrigation systems, bridging the gap between historical wisdom and modern development.
Academic and Professional Journey
D.L.O.’s educational journey began at Ladies’ College(which accepted boys in lower grades at the time) before he moved to Royal College. He later entered the University of Ceylon as a member of the pioneering first batch of engineering students in 1950, graduating in 1954 in a class of nearly 25 students.
His professional path was distinguished and diverse:
Irrigation Department:
Served for nearly 10 years.
River Valleys Development Board (RVDB):
Contributed during the construction of the Uda Walawe reservoir.
Ministry of Plan Implementation:
Served as Deputy Director under Director M. S. M. De Silva, where his main contribution was the promotion of appropriate technology, particularly the advancement of historical Kotmale ironwork which has existed since the era of Parakrama Bahu the Great, and the South Eastern Dry Zone Project. (SEDZ).
Consultancy:
Served as a freelance consultant.
Leadership:
A prolific contributor of a large number of technical papers to the Institution of Engineers, Sri Lanka (IESL), eventually serving as its President.
Personal Reflections and Anecdotes
My association with D.L.O. spanned more than 50 years. I first saw him riding a bicycle past Akbar Hall while I was an engineering student. I later learned his family was residing at Prof. Paul’s residence nearby while he was serving at Uda Walawe Reservoir Project as a senior engineer for the RVDB.
Through D.L.O., I had the privilege of meeting legendary professionals outside the Irrigation Department, includingthe exceptionally bright M.S.M. de Silva and the international economist, Dr. Lal Jayawardena (Mr. N.U.Jayawardena’s son).
A Tribute to a Legacy
We extend our deepest gratitude for Mr. D.L.O. Mendis’slifelong service and offer our sincerest condolences to his family and colleagues. His monumental work and numerous publications remain a lasting gift to future generations of engineers.
May he attain the supreme bliss of Nibbana!
G.T. Dharmasena,
Former Director General of Irrigation
Opinion
Nature’s revenge for human greed and the plight of the Third World
Now there is no doubt about the phenomenon of global warming, its far reaching effects and its causes. Yet Donald Trump says global warming is con and Europe, too, is dithering about what measures should be urgently taken to save Earth. Deliberations at the COP30 meeting in Brazil did not bring the desired results regarding emission of greenhouse gases. The biggest polluters like the US, who have not met the minimum goals regarding emissions, decided at the 2015 Paris Agreement, failed to provide guarantees that they will correct themselves in the coming years. Cyclones that hit Sri Lanka and other Asian countries last month are the direct result of unrestricted burning of fossil fuel and other activities that cause emission of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Extreme climate events hit poor countries like the proverbial lightning that strikes the begging bowl.
The last decade has seen some of the worst natural disasters in the history of mankind. The devastating impacts of the climate crisis reached new heights in 2024, with scores of unprecedented heatwaves, floods and storms across the globe, according to the UN’s World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Yet human greed which is the ultimate cause of global warming continues unabated and CO2 emissions reach new records. The WMO’s report on 2024, the hottest year on record, sets out a trail of destruction from extreme weather that took lives, demolished buildings and ravaged vital crops. More than 800,000 people were displaced and made homeless, the highest yearly number since records began in 2008.
The report lists 151 unprecedented extreme weather events in 2024, meaning they were worse than any ever recorded in the region. Heatwaves in Japan left hundreds of thousands of people struck down by heatstroke. Soaring temperatures during heatwaves peaked at 49.9C at Carnarvon in Western Australia, 49.7C in the city of Tabas in Iran, and 48.5C in a nationwide heatwave in Mali.
Record rains in Italy led to floods, landslides and electricity blackouts; torrents destroyed thousands of homes in Senegal; and flash floods in Pakistan and Brazil caused major crop losses.
Storms were also supercharged by global heating in 2024, with an unprecedented six typhoons in under a month hitting the Philippines. Hurricane Helene was the strongest ever recorded to strike the Big Bend region of Florida in the US, while Vietnam was hit by Super Typhoon Yagi, affecting 3.6 million people. Many more unprecedented events will have passed unrecorded.
The world is already deep into the climate crisis, with the WMO report saying that for the first time, the 10 hottest years on record all occurred in the last decade. However, global carbon emissions have continued to rise, which will bring even worse impacts. Experts were particularly critical of the purge of climate scientists and programmes by the US president, Donald Trump, saying that ignoring reality left ordinary people paying the price.
“Leaders must step up – seizing the benefits of cheap, clean renewables for their people and economies – with new national climate plans due this year,” said the UN secretary general, António Guterres.
Extreme climate events like heat waves, intense rainfall, droughts, and severe storms have significantly increased in frequency and intensity over the past decades, driven by global warming, with studies showing a fivefold increase in climate disasters compared to the 1970s, and human influence now clearly linked to many specific events, according to reports from organisations like the UN, WMO, and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The number of recorded climate-related disasters (storms, floods, droughts, wildfires) surged from 711 in the 1970s to over 3,000 in the 2000s and 2010s.
The intensity of these events is also alarmingly rising. Heatwaves, heavy precipitation events, and sea-level impacts from cyclones are becoming more severe, with phenomena like extreme heat in North America now considered “virtually impossible” without human-caused climate change. Scientists can now more confidently attribute specific extreme events (like heatwaves in Europe or floods in Asia) to climate change, moving beyond general predictions to clear causation. The warming atmosphere holds more moisture, fueling more intense precipitation, while human activities (like burning fossil fuels) continue to warm the planet, loading the dice for extreme weather.
These disasters could have been considerably lessened if the signatories to the Paris Agreement on climate change signed in 2016 had fulfilled their commitment to the agreement. The goal of the UN agreement was to reduce the average global temperature rise well below 2 degrees C above pre-industrial levels. To achieve this, it was necessary to cut down CO2 emission by 20%, increase the renewable energy market by 20% and improve energy efficiency by 20%, the so called 20/20/20 targets. However, the agreement was non-binding for the individual countries.
Despite all this effort, green-house gas emissions reached an all-time record of 37 billion tons in 2018 and 41 billion tonnes in 2024. This has caused havoc all over the world, long dry periods affecting crops, desertification, forest fires alternating with torrential rain, huge floods and storms. Countries like China, the US, EU and India who in that order are the largest emitters of greenhouse gases have a great responsibility in saving the world from total destruction. Though China, EU and India appear to be on course to achieve Intended Nationally Determined Contributions towards emission reduction, they must do more in double quick time if global temperature rise is to be kept at 1.5C. In contrast President Trump in his usual bumbling and foolish attitude is planning to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. .
It has been calculated that if meat consumption is reduced by 20% carbon emission would be reduced by 5%. Cutting down on meat consumption would be good for health also and would lesson cruelty to animals. There are several similar measures that people and governments could do to mitigate this problem. But human greed seems to be uncontrollable. Obviously rich countries have the capacity to deal with extreme weather events and don’t care much about their devastating impact on poor countries.
In a country like Sri Lanka, for instance, when the waters rage, people have nowhere to go. Poor people with limited land resources cannot choose where to live. This is why hawkers whose wayside shops on the Kadugannawa climb were destroyed by recent earth slides are seen reconstructing the shops in the same places. There may not be sufficient land available to relocate all those who live in unsafe places like the foot of unstable hills, in river basins, sea beaches, etc. in a small country like ours. A significant portion of Sri Lanka’s population lives in disaster-prone areas, with nearly 19 million people residing in vulnerable spots like low-lying or landslide-prone regions, including hill slopes, making them highly susceptible to climate impacts. The National Building and Research Organisation (NBRO) has identified over 14,000 specific landslide-prone locations, affecting thousands of rural and estate homes, with thousands more at high or medium risk, especially in districts like Badulla, Kandy, and Kegalle.
To make life safe from extreme weather for at least the most vulnerable and the poorest may be beyond the means of our poor country with all its economic ills. Experts say we have to be prepared to live with climate change. Rather we may have to die with it unless the preventable is prevented ! According to climate scientists, global warming is preventable. The Director of the Penn Center for Science, Sustainability & the Media, Michael Mann is among many scientists who point to the “game-changing new scientific understanding” that global warming would stabilize relatively quickly (within a decade) if emissions were to reach net zero, meaning that the worst outcomes are avoidable if we act swiftly. The authors of the comprehensive IPCC reports emphasize that every fraction of a degree of warming that is prevented will save countless lives and protect vital ecosystems. These reports serve as the authoritative voice on climate science and policy recommendations.
The battle against global warming, it appears, has to be fought by the Global South as the North is not doing enough. It is the poor countries of the Global South that do not have the capacity to absorb the blows that nature delivers, and it is they who have to bear the brunt of the relentless onslaught. As I have mentioned in my earlier letters the Global South has to get together to fight the greed driven neo-liberalism which is the cause of so many ills including global warming. In this regard China, India, South Africa and perhaps Iran with the backing of Russia may have to take the leadership and construct an alternative to the present global economic system which would have to take strong cognition of the need to safeguard the environment and cut down on emissions drastically and quickly. This is not impossible if consumerism, which is the driver of neo-liberalism, could be controlled. To achieve this human greed will have to be restrained, perhaps by means of good morals. Unless the Global South realizes the impending peril and takes necessary measures we are doomed.
by N. A. de S. Amaratunga ✍️
Opinion
Remembering Douglas Devananda on New Year’s Day 2026
I have no intention of even implicitly commenting on the legality of the ongoing incarceration of Douglas Devananda.
I’ve no legal background, and that’s because having been selected for the Law faculty at the University of Colombo on the basis of my A level results, I opted to study Political Science instead. I did so because I had an acute sense of the asymmetry between the law and justice and had developed a growing compulsion on issues of ethics—issues of right and wrong, good and evil.
However, as someone who has had a book published in the UK on political ethics, I have no compunction is saying that as a country, as a society, there has to be a better way than this.
It is morally and ethically wrong, indeed a travesty, that Douglas, a wounded hero of the anti-LTTE war, should spend New Year 2026 in the dreaded Mahara prison.
Douglas should be honoured as a rare example of a young man, who having quite understandably taken up arms to fight against Sinhala racism and for the Tamil people, decided while still a young man to opt to fight on the side of the democratic Sri Lankan state and to campaign for devolution for the North and East within the framework of a united Sri Lanka and its Constitution.
Douglas was an admired young leader of the PLA, the military wing of the Marxist EPRLF when he began to be known.
Nothing is more ironic than the historical fact that in July 1983 he survived the horrifying Welikada prison massacres, during which Sinhala prisoners, instigated and incentivized from outside (Gonawela Sunil is a name that transpired), slaughtered Tamil prisoners and gauged out their eyes.
Having escaped from jail in Batticaloa, Douglas came back to Sri Lanka in 1989, having had a change of heart after hundreds of youngsters belonging to the EPRLF, PLOT, and TELO had been massacred from 1986 onwards by the hardcore separatist, totalitarian Tigers. He was welcomed by President Premadasa and Minister Ranjan Wijeratne who took him and his ‘boys’ under their wing. There are photos of Douglas in shorts and carrying an automatic weapon, accompanying Ranjan Wijeratne and the Sri Lankan armed forces after the liberation of the islands off Jaffna from the Tiger grip.
It is Douglas who kept those vital islands safe, together with the Navy, throughout the war.
Douglas stayed with the democratic Sri Lankan state, remaining loyal to the elected president of the day, without ever turning on his or her predecessor. He probably still wears, as he did for decades, the fountain pen that President Premadasa gifted him.
During the LTTE’s offensive on Jaffna after the fall of Elephant Pass, the mass base built up by Douglas which gave the EPDP many municipal seats, helped keep Jaffna itself safe, with more Tamil civilians fleeing into Jaffna than out of it. I recall President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga giving him a satellite phone. Army Chief Lionel Balagalle gave him a pair of mini-Uzis for his safety.
Douglas was no paramilitary leader, pure and simple. His public speech on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the founding of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party, delivered without a teleprompter, is an excellent roadmap for the graduated implementation of the 13th amendment and the attainment of maximum devolution within a unitary state.
Like Chandrika, Douglas has had his sight severely impaired by the LTTE. As a Minister he had visited Tamil detainees imprisoned in wartime, and been set upon by a group of LTTE prisoners who had planned for his visit, concealing sharpened handles of steel buckets in the ceiling, and slammed the pointed metal through his skull. Douglas still needs repeated daily medication for his eyes which were miraculously saved by the Sri Lankan surgeons who repaired his skull, but at a subsequent stage, he was also treated by surgeons overseas.
No Sri Lankan, Sinhala or Tamil, civilian politician or military brass, has survived as many attempted assassinations by the Tigers as has Douglas. I believe the count is eleven. There’s a video somewhere of a suicide bomber blasting herself in his office, yards away from him.
Under no previous Sri Lankan administration since the early 1980s has Douglas found himself behind bars. He has served and/or supported seven democratic Presidents: Premadasa, Wijetunga, Chandrika, Mahinda, Sirisena, Gotabaya and Wickremesinghe. He has been a Minister over decades and a parliamentarian for longer.
He was a firm frontline ally of the Sri Lankan state and its armed forces during the worst challenge the country faced from the worst enemy it had since Independence.
During my tenure as Sri Lanka’s ambassador/Permanent representative to the UN Geneva, Douglas Devananda came from Colombo to defend Sri Lanka in discussions with high level UN officials including UN Human Rights High Commissioner Navanethem Pillay. This was in April 23, mere weeks before the decisive battle of the UN HRC Special session on Sri Lanka which we won handsomely. The media release on his visit reads as follows:
A high-level delegation led by the Hon. Minister Douglas Devananda, Minister of Social Services and Social Welfare, which also included the Hon. Rishad Bathiudeen, Minister of Resettlement and Disaster Relief Services, H.E. Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka, Ambassador/ Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the United Nations Office in Geneva, Prof. Rajiva Wijesinha, Secretary to the Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights, and Mr. Yasantha Kodagoda, Deputy Solicitor General, Attorney General’s Department, represented Sri Lanka at the Durban Review Conference.
“Organized by the United Nations, the Durban Review Conference provides an opportunity to assess and accelerate progress on implementation of measures adopted at the 2001 World Conference against Racism, including assessment of contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. On the opening day of this conference, Hon. Douglas Devananda made a statement behalf of the Government of Sri Lanka.
“On the sidelines of the Durban Review Conference which is being held from 20th to 24th of April 2009, the Sri Lankan delegation met with senior UN officials, and a number of dignitaries from diverse countries and updated them on the current situation in Sri Lanka against the backdrop of Sri Lanka’s fight against separatism and terrorism.
Hon. Devananda and Hon. Bathiudeen, along with the rest of the delegation, held meetings with Ms. Navanethem Pillai, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mr. Antonio Guterres, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (and a former Prime Minister of Portugal) and Mr. Anders Johnsson, Secretary-General of the Inter-Parliamentary Union.’
(https://live.lankamission.org/index.php/human-rights/676-minister-devananda-meets-un-high-commissioners-for-human-rights-and-refugees-2.html)
In contemporary world history, a leader from a minority community who defends the unity of his country against a separatist terrorist force deriving from that minority is hailed as a hero. A leader who takes the side of the democratic state, arms in hand, against a totalitarian fascistic foe, is hailed as a hero. Evidently, not so in current-day Sri Lanka.
[Dayan Jayatilleka, Sri Lanka’s former Ambassador to the UN Geneva; France, Spain, Portugal and UNESCO; and the Russian Federation, was a Vice-President of the UN Human Rights Council and Chairman, ILO.]
by Dr Dayan Jayatilleka ✍️
-
Sports5 days agoGurusinha’s Boxing Day hundred celebrated in Melbourne
-
News3 days agoLeading the Nation’s Connectivity Recovery Amid Unprecedented Challenges
-
Sports6 days agoTime to close the Dickwella chapter
-
Features4 days agoIt’s all over for Maxi Rozairo
-
News6 days agoEnvironmentalists warn Sri Lanka’s ecological safeguards are failing
-
News4 days agoDr. Bellana: “I was removed as NHSL Deputy Director for exposing Rs. 900 mn fraud”
-
News3 days agoDons on warpath over alleged undue interference in university governance
-
Features6 days agoDigambaram draws a broad brush canvas of SL’s existing political situation
