Features
Teaching in Northern Sri Lanka: Battling standardisation and Taylorism in education on the margins
By Erandika de Silva
It is a fact that there are disparities in access to education between the major population centres in Sri Lanka and those outside. Many of us are aware of the factors that create such disparities and these topics are often discussed in the media, academic circles and in the development sector, as well. Yet, with all this awareness, do we not still have our own misconceptions about students, teachers and other workers who study and work in peripheries? We talk of disparities in academic standards in the centre and the peripheries but how often do we stop to think of what access to education is like outside of the centre? Is standardisation through curriculum revisions going to magically improve standards and students’ access to education in the peripheries? This short piece aims to shed light on certain experiences from the north of Sri Lanka in relation to standardisation in the peripheries.

Setting the bar
Setting standards is the biggest challenge. The question is where to set the bar knowing that not every student starts both school and university education on a level playing field. For instance, every city has its own centres and peripheries. My experience, as a member of the panel of judges for a zonal level English Day competition was a rude awakening to the inequalities between the centres and peripheries in Jaffna. A well-resourced/privileged Christian school, in Jaffna, rendered an outstanding performance which was a flashy display of their resources, and the intellectual support they receive from the adults around them. The script, too, stood out from the rest of the schools due to its subject matter: It was an English play on how the land acquisition and redistribution in the 1950s affected the landowning gentry in Sri Lanka. Even in its subject matter, the play sympathised with a middle-class family that faced catastrophic effects due to the Land Acquisition Act of 1950. The other plays were English plays with scripts possibly written by schoolchildren on everyday matters, and performed with minimal theatre resources. My dilemma, as a judge, was how to judge these performances when the inequalities were right in my face. Where do we set the bar then? Is not the centre the standard by default? Is the standard equitable then?
At the university, too, setting the bar is a challenge as certain academic departments must canvass for students to offer special degrees if they do not fulfil the required quota of students. Such canvassing, more often than not, is done as affirmative action and it results from a moral/ethical dilemma on the part of the university teachers who understand the need for producing graduates to eventually become school teachers who could, in turn, contribute to education in the north and east. It is often done on the basis that something is better than nothing. One may, then, raise the question whether affirmative action affects standards. This is exactly the kind of dilemmas faced by educators from the margins.
There is also a question of quality and standards when it comes to external degree programmes that mostly attract school teachers where English as a subject is concerned. These programmes are haphazardly and arbitrarily delivered with just four lectures per course each semester which makes us question whether the University’s drive towards standardisation applies to internal degree programmes only, and if so, why?
Navigating and negotiating Taylorism in the classroom
Education in the margins faces a number of pedagogical issues against the backdrop of World Bank or similar donor-funded curriculum-revisions adopted by the University Grants Commission. These donor-funded education policy revisions and curriculum transformations cater to a “scientific” and managerial approach to education through their monitoring, evaluation, and quality assurance mechanisms. What goes unnoticed is that such approaches are no more than an extension of Frederick W. Taylor’s “scientific management” of industry into the domain of education. In twentieth-century United States, Taylor’s “scientific management” of the workplace maximised efficiency and productivity through standardisation, mechanisation and itemisation of labour. Taylor’s system was swiftly taken up by business and industry, and it gradually permeated to education, and beyond. With monitoring, standardised testing, institutional authority and control permeating the public university system, and hiring of “efficiency experts” to evaluate educational operations, higher educational is reduced to production lines that are meant to cater to the demands of the capitalist economy.
What do we make of the quantitative metrics that are introduced to measure the productivity of educational programmes and the extension of the principles of “scientific management” and efficiency into higher education? The danger is that these metrics are taken as gospel truth in determining the “employability” of graduates. Previous Kuppi columns explored the damaging effects of metrics on Arts and Humanities. Certain disciplines run the risk of extinction in the face of narrow rhetoric and metrics that boil down education to “employability”. These metrics are also detrimental as “employability” has become the measure of determining whether tax payers’ money is put to good use or not. There have been national reports that discourage Arts education on baseless grounds that arts graduates are unemployable.
A question worth addressing is what these quantitative metrics do to students. In the Arts and Humanities faculties, curricula are injected with an artificially formed set of standards that are and hence seem to be unachievable to the students. There is a lot of groundwork to be done before one can even engage with such bureaucratically (mal?)formed outcome-based educational methodologies. It would make more sense to set down prerequisites for a course and allocate some time for students to fulfil those where necessary.
Bending and mending the rules on fair and equitable grounds
While university teachers are the gatekeepers in academia, there are also instances where they bend and mend the rules where necessary on fair and equitable grounds. For instance, my (limited) teaching experience at Jaffna University has produced before me numerous reasons as to why my students deserve some leniency when it comes to attendance, deadlines, and marking. When students submitted their first set of assignments to me in my first term of work, I was surprised to see that their assignments did not show adherence to any standard referencing format. I was teaching an undergraduate class in the second year where the students barely had any knowledge of standard referencing and acts of academic misconduct. There are, of course, moments when we do question these standard practices but as an educator, the dilemma would be to decide whether to penalize the students for not following academic guidelines or to investigate the reasons as to why the students have failed to follow academic guidelines. The question is, whether, in a highly bureaucratic and autocratic system, addressing such issues flexibly is possible. Are all teachers happy or willing to go the extra mile of work to bridge any gaps or disparities among first/second year students who come from various backgrounds? Even if they are willing, can university teachers afford such exercises while managing teaching, evaluation, research and administrative work?
Higher education administrators are (mis?)guided by a supposed scientific system of pedagogical management that lures higher education into an orchestrated effort of measuring results against fixed standards, task- and outcome-based results. It is thought that synchronization of outcomes will produce a graduate who is capable of achieving an objective goal. It presumes to iron out differences. But these “templatized” assessments and outcome-based methodologies overlook the creative capacities, differences and potentials of students. Students in the peripheries need a lot preparatory work if they are to achieve these standards. Standardization does not make sense without efforts to address these systemic issues.
Most educational reforms, and curricular revisions/transformations are introduced with the intention of tightening up bureaucratic slack in higher educational institutions, and thereby standardizing education across institutions and disciplines. But can such measures address inequalities entrenched in the socio-economic spheres of Sri Lanka? Is standardizing education desirable if inequalities that affect students’ access to quality education is not addressed simultaneously? How is it possible to standardize education if inequalities in access to both secondary and tertiary education persist? Without equal access to primary and secondary education and opportunities, standardized higher education is nothing more than what DuBois termed “a mountain path to Canaan” where the peripheries will be in a constant battle to learn the “cabalistic letters of the white man”.
“It was weary work. The cold statistician wrote down the inches of progress here and there, noted also where here and there a foot had slipped or someone had fallen. To the tired climbers, the horizon was ever dark, the mists were often cold, the Canaan was always dim and far away.”
-W.E.B. DuBois
(The author is attached to the Department of Linguistics and English, University of Jaffna)
Kuppi is a politics and pedagogy happening on the margins of the lecture hall that parodies, subverts, and simultaneously reaffirms social hierarchies.
Features
Arctic link discovered: Lankan scientists trace 8,000 km seabird migration route
By Ifham Nizam
Sri Lankan scientists have uncovered a remarkable long-distance migration route used by seabirds, linking the island’s shores with the Arctic—an achievement that is expected to reshape global understanding of bird movement and highlight Sri Lanka’s importance in the natural world.
The discovery, led by Professor Sampath S. Seneviratne of the University of Colombo, shows that Heuglin’s Gulls travel nearly 8,000 kilometres from Sri Lanka to breeding grounds in northern Russia, following a carefully chosen path that combines coastal travel with long inland journeys.
Prof. Seneviratne told The Island that the finding challenges the long-standing belief that seabirds depend mainly on ocean routes.
“For a long time, we assumed seabirds would stay close to the sea throughout their migration. What we are seeing here is very different. These birds are moving across land as well, using a route that connects Sri Lanka directly with the Arctic,” he said.

Brown headed gull- migrating from Himalayas to Mannar
The birds begin their journey from the northwestern coast of Sri Lanka, especially around Mannar—an area known for its rich birdlife and coastal habitats. From there, they cross over to India and move along the western coastline before turning inland.
Their journey then takes them through Pakistan and Afghanistan, across parts of Central Asia, and onwards to the Arctic region, where they breed during the northern summer.
What has drawn particular attention from scientists is the route chosen by the birds.
Instead of attempting to cross the world’s highest mountain ranges, or taking a much longer path over the open ocean, the gulls appear to follow a middle course that allows them to avoid harsh conditions while still maintaining a steady journey.
Map 1 &2 birds moving through the continent to reach the Artctic
“They are not simply taking the shortest distance,” Prof. Seneviratne explained. “They are choosing a route that gives them the best chance of survival. Along this path, they are able to find food, rest, and avoid extreme environments.”
The birds travel long distances each day, covering hundreds of kilometres, but they do not do it all in one stretch. Their journey depends heavily on stopovers—places where they pause to rest and rebuild energy.
“These stopovers are critical,” Prof. Seneviratne said. “If the birds cannot find suitable places to feed and recover, they will not be able to complete the journey.”
Co-researcher Dr. Gayomini Panagoda said the discovery sheds light on a route that had remained largely hidden until now.
“We always knew these birds were leaving Sri Lanka during certain times of the year, but we did not fully understand where they were going or how they got there,” she said. “Now we have a much clearer picture of their journey.”

Awareness among schoolchildren
She added that the findings show how closely connected different parts of the world are through nature.
“A bird that spends part of its life in Sri Lanka ends up in the Arctic. That tells us how linked these ecosystems really are,” she said.
The findings also underline the importance of Sri Lanka’s coastal areas, which serve as vital feeding and resting grounds for migratory birds before they begin their long journey north.
Veteran ornithologist , Professor Emeritus Sarath Kotagama said these habitats are of international importance and must be protected.
“These coastal regions, especially places like Mannar, provide the food and shelter these birds need before migration. If those areas are damaged, it will affect bird populations far beyond Sri Lanka,” he said.

Professor Seneviratne with Dr. Gayomini Panagoda
Kotagama warned that increasing pressure on coastal ecosystems—from development, pollution, and climate change—could pose serious risks.
“We are already seeing changes in many of these birds. If we are not careful, we could lose habitats that are essential not just for local wildlife, but for species that travel across continents,” he said.
The discovery also draws attention to the wider network of migration routes that connect countries across Asia and beyond. Birds do not recognise national borders, and their survival depends on conditions in many different places along their journey.
Prof. Seneviratne stressed that protecting these birds will require cooperation between countries.
“These birds travel across several regions, and each of those regions plays a role in their survival. Conservation cannot be done by one country alone,” he said.

A GPS tagged Crab Plover
He added that more work is needed to understand how other species use similar routes and how changes in climate and land use may affect migration patterns in the future.
“There is still much we do not know. This is just one piece of a much larger picture,” he said.
Environmentalists say the findings should encourage stronger action to protect wetlands and coastal ecosystems in Sri Lanka, many of which are under increasing threat.
“These areas are not just important for birds,” Dr. Panagoda said. “They support fisheries, protect coastlines, and are part of our natural heritage. Protecting them benefits both people and wildlife.”
She noted that conserving these habitats will also help ensure that future generations can continue to witness the arrival and departure of migratory birds.
For Sri Lanka, the discovery is both a moment of pride and a reminder of responsibility.
It highlights the role the island plays in supporting wildlife that travels across vast distances and connects different parts of the world.
It also shows that even a small country can have a big impact when it comes to global biodiversity.
As Prof. Seneviratne put it, “What happens in Sri Lanka does not stay in Sri Lanka. These birds carry that connection across continents.”
The discovery is expected to encourage further research into bird migration in the region, as scientists continue to explore how different species move across landscapes and adapt to changing conditions.
It also reinforces the need to protect the natural environments that make such journeys possible.
In the end, the story of these birds is not just about distance. It is about survival, connection, and the delicate balance of nature.
From the shores of Sri Lanka to the frozen Arctic, their journey is a powerful reminder that the natural world is far more connected than we often realise—and that protecting one part of it helps protect the whole.
Features
Why the promotion of drone warfare is unconscionable
For the morally-conscious, the tendency among some sections in Sri Lanka to promote the production of drones for national defence purposes could be deeply worrying. Besides, this proposition flies in the face of common sense and disregards the relentlessly increasing harsh economic realities coming in the wake of the current wars that could push many a southern country into beggary. In fact even the West is facing an economic recession.
To begin with the latter issues, it is a proved reality that the majority of Southern countries are descending further into poverty at present. The FAO has the ‘bleeding statistics’ . For instance, food insecurity in Asia is of such disquieting proportions that the region accounts for ‘ approximately half of the world’s 370.7 million undernourished people’.
It is against such a bleak economic backdrop that countries of the South are being called on to pump money into the production or importing of drones. Pointed reference needs to be made here to the South because drones are peddled as cutting-edge defence systems that are comparatively economical to acquire and relatively easy to operate. It is even voiced that with time drones could enable even smaller countries of the South to acquire ‘strategic parity’ with the major powers of the North and middle level powers.
Meanwhile, no thought is spared for the poor of the South who would sink steadily into poverty and powerlessness. Because more defence spending by southern countries only entrenches the ruling classes of those countries, and in some cases their military high commands, further in the systems of governance and repression.
This has essentially been the experience of the majority of post-colonial states. As aptly phrased by economic and political analyst Susan George in the seventies, it has always been a case of ‘The Other Half Dying’.
Accordingly, it cannot be perceived as to how more defence spending by the South on drones could help alleviate the latter’s principal problem of deepening poverty. As for the perceived escalating insecurities of the South, these problems are of such complexity that drones could never be seen as offering a quick fix for them. They need patient, multi-pronged managing, mainly at the negotiating table with the powers that matter. These are long- gestation projects that need to be compulsorily undertaken in view of the fact that the alternative could be indefinite conflict and war.
Since Sri Lanka too is mentioned as one of those countries that needs to look at the drone proposition with some seriousness, it is relevant to underscore that Sri Lanka is second in a list of countries that are described as facing acute material hardships at present in the wake of the economic instability bred by the Hormuz crisis. The source of such information is no less than the respected Kiel Institute for the World Economy. The first 10 such gravely affected countries are: Zambia, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Pakistan, Equatorial Guinea, Kenya, Bangladesh, Vietnam, the Philippines and Thailand.
It is thought-provoking that among the above countries are not only those that have been traditionally seen as experiencing severe underdevelopment but also up-and-coming middle income countries that have been hitherto described as being on a fast track to development. The interesting mix proves that no country at present could consider itself immune to current economic shocks originating mainly in the Middle East that could plunge it dramatically into acute poverty virtually overnight.
We are left to conclude that ‘Bread’ or the economic well being of people could in no way be sacrificed for ‘Drones’ in democratic countries whose governments are obliged to be accountable to the people. Considering the phenomenal hardships that could be waiting to happen worldwide, the world could very well do without more ‘Guns’ or ‘Drones’.
However, if southern governments in particular opt for ‘Drones’ or an accumulation of ‘Guns’, the chances are that there could be overwhelming tides of social discontent in their countries, bred by economic want, that could then ignite indefinite war and repression. That is, a ‘No-Win’ situation for all concerned.
Ukraine has been spiritedly and admirably taking the fight back to the invading Russian forces over the past few years but its skillful use of sophisticated drones of its own making has in no way decreased the human costs the war has been incurring for itself. Ukraine has no choice but to continue with all the weaponry at its command to beat back the Russian invader but sooner rather than later it would need to take into account the immense suffering the war has been inflicting on its people and focus on the fact that the Russians are not backing down but using equally lethal weaponry against it.
The above are some of the dilemmas of the present wars that call for urgent resolution. Warring countries are obliged to address on a priority basis the misery and destruction their actions incur for their publics and consider deploying diplomacy, preferably under the aegis of the UN, to work out peaceful solutions to their enmities and differences. Considering the futility of their war Russia and Ukraine are obliged to think on these lines.
No less a power than the US should be considering deeply right now the advisability of continuing with its military interventions in the South in particular to achieve its self interests. The rising loss of American lives and the economic costs of war in the Middle East will be weighing heavily with the Trump administration and it shouldn’t come as a surprise if negotiations are given a serious try, going ahead. Ground realities in the region moreover indicate that the US ‘has bitten off more than it could chew’ and that Iran is remaining hostile and unyielding despite being bloodied.
For both sides to the war what should be inescapable is the harsh reality of continuing human suffering on a chilling scale. Sophisticated and increasingly destructive weaponry such as drones and missiles are being used but they have not brought either side any closer to victory. Instead human misery is being perpetrated mindlessly with a steady deadening of consciences and a flagrant abandoning of reason.
Accordingly, what perceived legitimate aims could drone warfare, for instance, help achieve? It is quite some time since sections of the world community came to realize the futility of violence and war. There is no choice but for humans to recognize and revere the principle of the sacredness of life. A return to fundamentals is imperative.
Features
Unforgettable experience …
Singer Rajiv Sebastian has the unique ability to woo an audience and he did just that on his recent trip to London, performing at the Funky ’70s Bash Dinner Dance.
This particular event of music, nostalgia, and celebration, was organised by the Ananda Balika Vidyalaya Old Girls’ Association – UK, and held at the DoubleTree by Hilton London Elstree, in Borehamwood, on 28th February.
They say the success of the evening was made possible through the dedication and hard work of President Devika Arrawwalage and the committed committee members of the Ananda Balika Vidyalaya OGA – UK.
Rajiv Sebastian was in top form, delivering an engaging performance that took the audience on a nostalgic musical journey through the iconic sounds of the’70s.

Doing the first set in full suit, with a fan joining in the action
He did three sets, appearing in three different outfits – suit, the normal shirt and trouser, and the sarong – and the crowd loved it.
Adding to the energy of the event, I’m told, was the music provided by the band Hasthi, made up of Sri Lankan musicians based in the UK.
At the end of a truly enjoyable and memorable event, the organisers had this to say about Rajiv Sebastian’s performance:
“On behalf of the entire team, I want to extend our heartfelt thanks to you for travelling all the way from Sri Lanka to perform at our first ever ABV dinner dance in the UK.
- Superb talent for captivating an audience
- Rajiv Sebastian
“Your performance was truly the highlight of the night. You have a superb talent for captivating an audience; from the moment you took the stage, your vibrant energy and incredible vocal range completely transformed the atmosphere.
“It was wonderful to see how effortlessly you engaged the crowd, keeping the dance floor packed and everyone in high spirits throughout the evening. You have graced the stage as a guest artiste on three separate occasions, delivering exceptional performances that set you apart from your peers.
“We feel incredibly privileged to have had an artiste of your calibre and charisma join us. You didn’t just provide music; you created an unforgettable experience that people are still talking about.

Surprises for his fans in Sri Lanka, as well
“Thank you for sharing your immense gift with us. Hope to see you back on a UK stage very soon!”
Yes, and it’s happening soon; Rajiv says he is off to London again, in mid-April, and will be performing at four different venues.
He also mentioned that he has some surprises for his fans in Sri Lanka, when he and his band, The Clan, present their 35th Anniversary concert … in June, this year.
-
Features5 days agoA World Order in Crisis: War, Power, and Resistance
-
News6 days agoEnergy Minister indicted on corruption charges ahead of no-faith motion against him
-
Sports7 days agoSLC to hold EGM in April
-
Opinion6 days agoWhen elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers
-
Features6 days agoLest we forget
-
News2 days agoTariff shock from 01 April as power costs climb across the board
-
Business7 days agoPan Asia Bank empowers export sector as Strategic Partner of NCE Export Awards
-
News5 days agoMinister Jayakody indicted in Colombo High Court over alleged corruption




