Connect with us

Features

Sri Lankan scholar thrown under the bus in New Delhi

Published

on

Sasanka

by Saman Indrajith

On 31st July 2024, senior Sri Lankan scholar Prof. Sasanka Perera left the South Asian University, New Delhi, which he had helped establish and worked for nearly 13 years. This was as a mark of protest against the mistreatment of a PhD student he was supervising and an inquiry initiated against him (Prof. Perera) over his supervisory role.

Perera was one of the founding Professors of South Asian University, its only Sri Lankan academic, the founding Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences, the Founding Professor of Sociology and the university’s only non-Indian Vice President in addition to being its seniormost academic at the time he left the institution.

As reported by global media, the university issued a ‘charge sheet’ against his student for quoting in his research proposal the renowned American linguist Noam Chomsky’s criticism of the Indian Prime Minster Narendra Modi in an academic interview. Despite being a SAARC institution and co-funded by Sri Lanka, Perera was charged with violating Indian rules and the SAARC Charter for merely supervising his student and not asking him to remove the lines attributed to Prof. Chomsky.

Prof. Perera, speaking to The Island noted, “We quote people all the time, scholars, political leaders and ordinary people. This is a general practice, not just in social sciences but in other disciplines as well, to elaborate on issues in the interest of a well-rounded argument and providing perspective. But we give references to where these conversations have taken place, with whom and so on, as a means for corroboration. This quote was used with the same intent and in the same sense.” He added that if the university had had issues with any words or references in the unapproved research proposal, it should have been sent back to the student for editing as provided for by existing rules. Instead, the student was asked for explanation and Perera was subjected to an inquiry.

Perera also said that according to the legal provisions under which the university has been established, it enjoys diplomatic immunity as a SAARC institution, and therefore he cannot seek justice within the court system in India. Given this status, the SAU is an institution where anything is possible, beyond the reach of law and therefore it has carte-blanche. The incident has taken the social media space by storm and has been widely reported throughout India and abroad. It has also ignited a fierce debate on academic freedom in India.

According to Perera, against this backdrop, he requested support and intervention from the Sri Lanka High Commission in Delhi, which the latter had agreed to initially.

According to an Indian Express report on 4th August, Sri Lanka’s High Commissioner in India Kshenuka Senewiratne met the South Asian University President (VC), K.K. Aggarwal on 23rd April and expressed her “concerns” regarding “an intended inquiry” against Perera. As reported by the Indian Express, at the meeting, the High Commissioner hoped that the issue would be “resolved in a fair and amicable manner in the spirit of academic freedom safeguarding the reputation of the person and the University.” She had further observed, “the research project could be easily rejected at that juncture, as it remained a mere proposal.”

Writing to the University’s President, K. K. Aggarwal again on 12th May as the Indian Express reports, Senewiratne observed, “with Sri Lanka being a member state of the Governing Board of South Asian University, you would appreciate that as its Government representative, this situation is extremely disconcerting. I am constrained to observe that to date there has been no detailed response regarding the status of the inquiry, which is understood to have taken place. In fact, there was a paucity of information even when I originally broached the subject during the meeting [on 23 April]”

Subsequently, the High Commissioner retracted her interventions claiming in a letter to the Indian Express published on 9th August, that her communications to the SAU had been based on “the information provided by Prof. Perera to the High Commission in mid-April, which at no instance had any reference to the aforementioned interview of Mr. Chomsky.”

She further wrote to the Indian Express that “it is hereby emphasized that at the time of the representations being made by me to the University, the information of the said interview had not been divulged to the High Commission. It may be pertinent to note that the last letter from the SAU regretted the High Commission not knowing the full facts of the case, which seems in hindsight inter alia to be reference to this interview content.”

After this retraction, Prof. Perera speaking to the news website, The Wire, noted that it “makes it difficult for me to be silent, as now it is a matter of my trust in the integrity of the Sri Lankan state when it comes to protecting its citizens overseas, being dismantled”. He further told The Wire, “my interest is only about the role of the High Commissioner for throwing me under the bus, publicly disregarding my services to the nation for over twenty years and to the South Asian University for nearly thirteen years. As a representative of the Sri Lankan state, whose foremost responsibility it is to look after the welfare of the country’s citizens abroad, this is not only unfathomable but disgraceful.”

Prof. Perera told The Island, “I reiterate that the High Commissioner’s statement that I did not inform her of the Chomsky quote is an outright misrepresentation of facts. On 13th April, five days before my first meeting with her on this matter on 18th April, I had texted her on her official WhatsApp number and made the following observation about the inquiry against me: “… A formal inquiry has been instituted on the claim of violating professional code of conduct and violating laws of the host county. None of this makes any sense. In the first, it is for supervising a student whose work deals with Kashmir. There is quotation from a well-known US scholar on the Indian PM ….” She even responded to this message saying, “extremely sorry to hear of this issue. I will be out in Varnasi and back on Monday night. So earliest to meet is Tuesday ….” This correspondence has since been published in the Indian Express of 12th August.

Continuing, Perera noted that “her claim that I did not divulge the facts of the matter at hand, and therefore the contents of her letter to the Indian Express are undisputedly false.

Prof. Perera says he has kept the High Commissioner informed of all aspects of the inquiry process. He told The Island, “For instance, when I wrote to the President of SAU on what I considered to be serious lapses of the inquiry process on 21 June 2024, I forwarded that email to the High Commissioner too for information on the same day. I assumed she and the High Commission would look after my interests as a Sri Lankan citizen. Instead, surprisingly, the response was, “It is regretted that at paragraph 10 of the said communication you state that the representative of the Sri Lanka High Commission would ‘bear witness’ to the proceedings. However, you would note that the High Commission representative’s role was to ‘observe’.”

“Here was a situation where the career and the future of a Sri Lankan citizen in a foreign country was at stake without recourse to the local legal system, and instead of looking after those interests, the High Commissioner was splitting hairs over the meaning of the words ‘to bear witness’ which I had used, and ‘to observe’ with reference to the role of the High Commission representative to take note of the proceedings. In any case, the request to have a High Commission representative at the inquiry was rejected by the university and the High Commissioner did not proceed beyond that and remained silent. Again, I would have expected more from the High Commission given that I had no recourse to the law in this matter in a foreign country, as others do, in similar and routine circumstances.”

The question that remains unanswered is what the position of Sri Lanka’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs is when grave situations of this nature unfold in the global public domain concerning the welfare and interest of the country and its tax-paying citizens living overseas.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Arctic link discovered: Lankan scientists trace 8,000 km seabird migration route

Published

on

By Ifham Nizam

Sri Lankan scientists have uncovered a remarkable long-distance migration route used by seabirds, linking the island’s shores with the Arctic—an achievement that is expected to reshape global understanding of bird movement and highlight Sri Lanka’s importance in the natural world.

The discovery, led by Professor Sampath S. Seneviratne of the University of Colombo, shows that Heuglin’s Gulls travel nearly 8,000 kilometres from Sri Lanka to breeding grounds in northern Russia, following a carefully chosen path that combines coastal travel with long inland journeys.

Prof. Seneviratne told The Island that the finding challenges the long-standing belief that seabirds depend mainly on ocean routes.

“For a long time, we assumed seabirds would stay close to the sea throughout their migration. What we are seeing here is very different. These birds are moving across land as well, using a route that connects Sri Lanka directly with the Arctic,” he said.

Brown headed gull- migrating from Himalayas to Mannar

The birds begin their journey from the northwestern coast of Sri Lanka, especially around Mannar—an area known for its rich birdlife and coastal habitats. From there, they cross over to India and move along the western coastline before turning inland.

Their journey then takes them through Pakistan and Afghanistan, across parts of Central Asia, and onwards to the Arctic region, where they breed during the northern summer.

What has drawn particular attention from scientists is the route chosen by the birds.

Instead of attempting to cross the world’s highest mountain ranges, or taking a much longer path over the open ocean, the gulls appear to follow a middle course that allows them to avoid harsh conditions while still maintaining a steady journey.

Map 1 &2 birds moving through the continent to reach the Artctic

“They are not simply taking the shortest distance,” Prof. Seneviratne explained. “They are choosing a route that gives them the best chance of survival. Along this path, they are able to find food, rest, and avoid extreme environments.”

The birds travel long distances each day, covering hundreds of kilometres, but they do not do it all in one stretch. Their journey depends heavily on stopovers—places where they pause to rest and rebuild energy.

“These stopovers are critical,” Prof. Seneviratne said. “If the birds cannot find suitable places to feed and recover, they will not be able to complete the journey.”

Co-researcher Dr. Gayomini Panagoda said the discovery sheds light on a route that had remained largely hidden until now.

“We always knew these birds were leaving Sri Lanka during certain times of the year, but we did not fully understand where they were going or how they got there,” she said. “Now we have a much clearer picture of their journey.”

Awareness among schoolchildren

She added that the findings show how closely connected different parts of the world are through nature.

“A bird that spends part of its life in Sri Lanka ends up in the Arctic. That tells us how linked these ecosystems really are,” she said.

The findings also underline the importance of Sri Lanka’s coastal areas, which serve as vital feeding and resting grounds for migratory birds before they begin their long journey north.

Veteran ornithologist , Professor Emeritus Sarath Kotagama said these habitats are of international importance and must be protected.

“These coastal regions, especially places like Mannar, provide the food and shelter these birds need before migration. If those areas are damaged, it will affect bird populations far beyond Sri Lanka,” he said.

Professor Seneviratne with Dr. Gayomini Panagoda

Kotagama warned that increasing pressure on coastal ecosystems—from development, pollution, and climate change—could pose serious risks.

“We are already seeing changes in many of these birds. If we are not careful, we could lose habitats that are essential not just for local wildlife, but for species that travel across continents,” he said.

The discovery also draws attention to the wider network of migration routes that connect countries across Asia and beyond. Birds do not recognise national borders, and their survival depends on conditions in many different places along their journey.

Prof. Seneviratne stressed that protecting these birds will require cooperation between countries.

“These birds travel across several regions, and each of those regions plays a role in their survival. Conservation cannot be done by one country alone,” he said.

A GPS tagged Crab Plover

He added that more work is needed to understand how other species use similar routes and how changes in climate and land use may affect migration patterns in the future.

“There is still much we do not know. This is just one piece of a much larger picture,” he said.

Environmentalists say the findings should encourage stronger action to protect wetlands and coastal ecosystems in Sri Lanka, many of which are under increasing threat.

“These areas are not just important for birds,” Dr. Panagoda said. “They support fisheries, protect coastlines, and are part of our natural heritage. Protecting them benefits both people and wildlife.”

She noted that conserving these habitats will also help ensure that future generations can continue to witness the arrival and departure of migratory birds.

For Sri Lanka, the discovery is both a moment of pride and a reminder of responsibility.

It highlights the role the island plays in supporting wildlife that travels across vast distances and connects different parts of the world.

It also shows that even a small country can have a big impact when it comes to global biodiversity.

As Prof. Seneviratne put it, “What happens in Sri Lanka does not stay in Sri Lanka. These birds carry that connection across continents.”

The discovery is expected to encourage further research into bird migration in the region, as scientists continue to explore how different species move across landscapes and adapt to changing conditions.

It also reinforces the need to protect the natural environments that make such journeys possible.

In the end, the story of these birds is not just about distance. It is about survival, connection, and the delicate balance of nature.

From the shores of Sri Lanka to the frozen Arctic, their journey is a powerful reminder that the natural world is far more connected than we often realise—and that protecting one part of it helps protect the whole.

Continue Reading

Features

Why the promotion of drone warfare is unconscionable

Published

on

A drone strike on an oil facility in the Middle East in the current war.

For the morally-conscious, the tendency among some sections in Sri Lanka to promote the production of drones for national defence purposes could be deeply worrying. Besides, this proposition flies in the face of common sense and disregards the relentlessly increasing harsh economic realities coming in the wake of the current wars that could push many a southern country into beggary. In fact even the West is facing an economic recession.

To begin with the latter issues, it is a proved reality that the majority of Southern countries are descending further into poverty at present. The FAO has the ‘bleeding statistics’ . For instance, food insecurity in Asia is of such disquieting proportions that the region accounts for ‘ approximately half of the world’s 370.7 million undernourished people’.

It is against such a bleak economic backdrop that countries of the South are being called on to pump money into the production or importing of drones. Pointed reference needs to be made here to the South because drones are peddled as cutting-edge defence systems that are comparatively economical to acquire and relatively easy to operate. It is even voiced that with time drones could enable even smaller countries of the South to acquire ‘strategic parity’ with the major powers of the North and middle level powers.

Meanwhile, no thought is spared for the poor of the South who would sink steadily into poverty and powerlessness. Because more defence spending by southern countries only entrenches the ruling classes of those countries, and in some cases their military high commands, further in the systems of governance and repression.

This has essentially been the experience of the majority of post-colonial states. As aptly phrased by economic and political analyst Susan George in the seventies, it has always been a case of ‘The Other Half Dying’.

Accordingly, it cannot be perceived as to how more defence spending by the South on drones could help alleviate the latter’s principal problem of deepening poverty. As for the perceived escalating insecurities of the South, these problems are of such complexity that drones could never be seen as offering a quick fix for them. They need patient, multi-pronged managing, mainly at the negotiating table with the powers that matter. These are long- gestation projects that need to be compulsorily undertaken in view of the fact that the alternative could be indefinite conflict and war.

Since Sri Lanka too is mentioned as one of those countries that needs to look at the drone proposition with some seriousness, it is relevant to underscore that Sri Lanka is second in a list of countries that are described as facing acute material hardships at present in the wake of the economic instability bred by the Hormuz crisis. The source of such information is no less than the respected Kiel Institute for the World Economy. The first 10 such gravely affected countries are: Zambia, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Pakistan, Equatorial Guinea, Kenya, Bangladesh, Vietnam, the Philippines and Thailand.

It is thought-provoking that among the above countries are not only those that have been traditionally seen as experiencing severe underdevelopment but also up-and-coming middle income countries that have been hitherto described as being on a fast track to development. The interesting mix proves that no country at present could consider itself immune to current economic shocks originating mainly in the Middle East that could plunge it dramatically into acute poverty virtually overnight.

We are left to conclude that ‘Bread’ or the economic well being of people could in no way be sacrificed for ‘Drones’ in democratic countries whose governments are obliged to be accountable to the people. Considering the phenomenal hardships that could be waiting to happen worldwide, the world could very well do without more ‘Guns’ or ‘Drones’.

However, if southern governments in particular opt for ‘Drones’ or an accumulation of ‘Guns’, the chances are that there could be overwhelming tides of social discontent in their countries, bred by economic want, that could then ignite indefinite war and repression. That is, a ‘No-Win’ situation for all concerned.

Ukraine has been spiritedly and admirably taking the fight back to the invading Russian forces over the past few years but its skillful use of sophisticated drones of its own making has in no way decreased the human costs the war has been incurring for itself. Ukraine has no choice but to continue with all the weaponry at its command to beat back the Russian invader but sooner rather than later it would need to take into account the immense suffering the war has been inflicting on its people and focus on the fact that the Russians are not backing down but using equally lethal weaponry against it.

The above are some of the dilemmas of the present wars that call for urgent resolution. Warring countries are obliged to address on a priority basis the misery and destruction their actions incur for their publics and consider deploying diplomacy, preferably under the aegis of the UN, to work out peaceful solutions to their enmities and differences. Considering the futility of their war Russia and Ukraine are obliged to think on these lines.

No less a power than the US should be considering deeply right now the advisability of continuing with its military interventions in the South in particular to achieve its self interests. The rising loss of American lives and the economic costs of war in the Middle East will be weighing heavily with the Trump administration and it shouldn’t come as a surprise if negotiations are given a serious try, going ahead. Ground realities in the region moreover indicate that the US ‘has bitten off more than it could chew’ and that Iran is remaining hostile and unyielding despite being bloodied.

For both sides to the war what should be inescapable is the harsh reality of continuing human suffering on a chilling scale. Sophisticated and increasingly destructive weaponry such as drones and missiles are being used but they have not brought either side any closer to victory. Instead human misery is being perpetrated mindlessly with a steady deadening of consciences and a flagrant abandoning of reason.

Accordingly, what perceived legitimate aims could drone warfare, for instance, help achieve? It is quite some time since sections of the world community came to realize the futility of violence and war. There is no choice but for humans to recognize and revere the principle of the sacredness of life. A return to fundamentals is imperative.

Continue Reading

Features

Unforgettable experience …

Published

on

The committee members of the Ananda Balika Vidyalaya OGA – UK, who made Funky ’70s Bash Dinner Dance a total success (Photographs by: Praneeth Hettiarachchi)

Singer Rajiv Sebastian has the unique ability to woo an audience and he did just that on his recent trip to London, performing at the Funky ’70s Bash Dinner Dance.

This particular event of music, nostalgia, and celebration, was organised by the Ananda Balika Vidyalaya Old Girls’ Association – UK, and held at the DoubleTree by Hilton London Elstree, in Borehamwood, on 28th February.

They say the success of the evening was made possible through the dedication and hard work of President Devika Arrawwalage and the committed committee members of the Ananda Balika Vidyalaya OGA – UK.

Rajiv Sebastian was in top form, delivering an engaging performance that took the audience on a nostalgic musical journey through the iconic sounds of the’70s.

Doing the first set in full suit, with a fan joining in the action

He did three sets, appearing in three different outfits – suit, the normal shirt and trouser, and the sarong – and the crowd loved it.

Adding to the energy of the event, I’m told, was the music provided by the band Hasthi, made up of Sri Lankan musicians based in the UK.

At the end of a truly enjoyable and memorable event, the organisers had this to say about Rajiv Sebastian’s performance:

“On behalf of the entire team, I want to extend our heartfelt thanks to you for travelling all the way from Sri Lanka to perform at our first ever ABV dinner dance in the UK.

“Your performance was truly the highlight of the night. You have a superb talent for captivating an audience; from the moment you took the stage, your vibrant energy and incredible vocal range completely transformed the atmosphere.

“It was wonderful to see how effortlessly you engaged the crowd, keeping the dance floor packed and everyone in high spirits throughout the evening. You have graced the stage as a guest artiste on three separate occasions, delivering exceptional performances that set you apart from your peers.

“We feel incredibly privileged to have had an artiste of your calibre and charisma join us. You didn’t just provide music; you created an unforgettable experience that people are still talking about.

Surprises for his fans in Sri Lanka, as well

“Thank you for sharing your immense gift with us. Hope to see you back on a UK stage very soon!”

Yes, and it’s happening soon; Rajiv says he is off to London again, in mid-April, and will be performing at four different venues.

He also mentioned that he has some surprises for his fans in Sri Lanka, when he and his band, The Clan, present their 35th Anniversary concert … in June, this year.

Continue Reading

Trending