Connect with us

Midweek Review

Speaker’s disclosure and Lal Kantha’s statement

Published

on

Directing Aragalaya  from Galle Face to Parliament

The JVP-led push towards overrunning Parliament by sheer mob force on July 09, 2022, failed for want of muscle and the Army finally standing its ground. A split among various factions in the wake of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa fleeing the President’s House led to the quick collapse of externally backed violent public protest campaigns as the Army was given clear cut orders to thwart the Aragalaya march on Parliament.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake, MP, in a face saving exercise said that party seniors have to be cautious of what they say in public. Dissanayake, who is contesting the presidential election on the Jathika Jana Balawegaya (JJB) ticket said so responding to a media query whether virtual public confession by Lal Kantha last week harmed their presidential polls campaign.

One-time Minister in the People’s Alliance (PA) parivasa government during Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga’s second term, Lal Kantha dropped a bombshell inadvertently by declaring Aragalaya failed to overrun Parliament due to failure on the part of some sections of the protest movement.

Lal Kantha found fault with those he called Galle Face protest leaders for their failure to bring the project to a successful conclusion. Though the former lawmaker later tried to dilute what he said, in his original declaration close on the heels of Bangladeshi Premier Sheikh Hasina’s illegal ouster by obviously similarly orchestrated violence, the JJB executive committee member alleged that so called Galle Face protest leaders thwarted the planned takeover of Parliament.

Washington-led West is working in not so mysterious ways in far too many places to oust legally constituted governments to suit their agendas, little realizing that the dice may have been already cast due to their own economic meltdown, thanks primarily to their resorting to hoodoo economics of having endless quantitative easings.

The often controversial Lal Kantha didn’t mince his words when he declared they had an opportunity to take control of the House. Had that happened, Aragalaya would have definitely taken a totally different shape. The US projects here, as well as the 100% successful one in Bangladesh, should be discussed taking into consideration its post-Soviet strategies, particularly with the focus on perceived threats from China and the Russian Federation.

The JVP and JJB leader never contradicted Lal Kantha. In his swift response to the media, Dissanayake emphasized that they wanted to create an environment for the dissolution of Parliament, thereby giving a fresh opportunity to the electorate. That was their strategy, based on the presumption that the Parliament didn’t reflect the Will of the people. The most important question is does the JVP represent the Will of the people?

At the last parliamentary polls, conducted in August 2020, the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), or Pohottuwa party, won 145 seats, whereas the main Opposition party SJB obtained 54 seats, Illankai Thamil Arasu Kadchi (ITAK) received 10 seats and the JVP (they became JJB only recently) was placed fourth with three seats.

In spite of having just three seats in Parliament, the JJB now posed quite a serious challenge to President Ranil Wickremesinghe (independent candidate) and SJB candidate Premadasa. Regardless of what various interested parties propagated, the main candidates at the Sept. 21 contest are Wickremesinghe, Premadasa and Dissanayake. Both the Wickremesinghe camp as well as the SJB feared the JJB’s unprecedented challenge. For the first time the two major political camps are being threatened by a third. Examination of the results of previous presidential polls, beginning with the first conducted on Oct 20, 1982 to Nov 16, 2019, proves that there had never been a genuine third force. But is destructive elements being helped by unseen forces from the West in not so mysterious ways to wreak havoc in the country once again as happened from March to July 2022?

The first post-Aragalaya national election can be quite a challenge to Wickremesinghe and Premadasa. It would be pertinent to mention the results of the first and the last presidential polls contested by the JVP, Rohana Wijeweera, in 1982, under their own symbol, and Dissanayake as JJB candidate in 2019.

UNP’s J. R. Jayewardene secured 3,450,811 votes (52.91%), SLFP candidate Hector Kobbekaduwa polled 2,548,438 (39.07%) and Rohana Wijeweera obtained 273,428 (4.19%) at the 1982 election.

Thirty-seven years later, SLPP’s Gotabaya Rajapaksa polled a staggering 6,924,255 votes (52.25%) whereas Sajith Premadasa, who contested on the New Democratic Front (NDF) ticket, got 5,564,239 (41.99%) and Anura Kumara Dissanayake of the JVP polled 418,553 (3.16%). The question is whether as a result of Aragalaya, the electorate may help to cause a political upheaval at the forthcoming election with the required evil input from the West.

Speaker’s shocking disclosure ignored

If not for the serious challenge posed by the JJB, the other political parties wouldn’t have bothered to attack Lal Kantha over his recent statement. Actually, the JVP heavyweight didn’t say anything new. Lal Kantha didn’t reveal anything at all, as it was common knowledge. That is the truth.

But, those who are concerned about the JJB’s challenge took it up vigorously. A group of lawyers promoting the interests of the SJB presidential polls candidate lodged a complaint with the Criminal Investigation Department (CID). The group declared that the offence perpetrated by Lal Kantha is punishable by death.

In Parliament Pivithuru Hela Urumaya (PHU) leader and Attorney-at-Law Udaya Gammanpila wanted Lal Kantha arrested. The PHU leader explained the responsibility on the part of the Wickremesimnghe-led government to take the JVPer into custody over planned unconstitutional take-over of Parliament on July 09, 2022, through sheer violence.

Even over two years after the unconstitutional removal of Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who won a handsome mandate regardless of an internationally backed high profile campaign against him, the murky circumstances leading to his ouster remains uninvestigated.

The powers that be ensured Aragalaya remained uninvestigated. Various interested parties sought to exploit Lal Kantha’s statement only because they felt it could be beneficial for their candidates. The JVP’s role in the Aragalaya is certainly not a secret. Therefore, no one should react to Lal Kantha’s declaration with shock and dismay.

Both, Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena in Parliament and President Ranil Wickremesinghe on several occasions, both here and abroad (UK), made far more serious disclosures regarding Aragalaya. In addition, ousted President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, in his memoirs ‘The Conspiracy to oust me from Presidency,’ revealed external interventions made through Aragalaya. But, those credible assertions never led to a comprehensive investigation into the controversial happenings in 2022 (March 31 to July 20). The powers that be conveniently ignored them!

The lawyers’ group affiliated to the SJB that called for a CID probe on Lal Kantha should explain its stand on the disclosures made by the Speaker and the incumbent President.

Speaker Abeywardena told Parliament that he had been asked by some foreign powers to take over the executive presidency while the country was in crisis. The declaration was made on the afternoon of March 21, 2024, soon after the defeat of a no-faith motion against him.

“The objective of those who made that request was to create another Libya or Afghanistan here. They did not want to resolve the crisis or restore law and order to protect this country.”

The Matara District MP said that during Aragalaya many parties had pressured him to accept the post of Executive President. There had been both local and foreign forces. “I was asked to name a Prime Minister and Cabinet of Ministers and rule the country. However, I was determined to uphold democracy,” the Speaker said, declaring that he was surprised to see some of those who asked him to become the President of the country had signed the no-faith motion against him.

“When I rejected that call, they resorted to intimidation. There were threats, too. Among those who exerted pressure on me were leading Bhikkhus and leaders of other religions.”

President Wickremesinghe referred to intense pressure that was brought on him to resign in the wake of Gotabaya Rajapaksa fleeing the country during the second week of July 2022. President Wickremesinghe refrained from at least indicating who the culprits were. It would be essential to keep in mind Wickremesinghe, in his capacity as the UNP leader, played a significant role in promoting and strengthening Aragalaya though he may not have been the original choice of Aragalaya strategists as the President.

Speaker Abeywardena wouldn’t have said so if he was not incensed by the Opposition no-faith motion against him. However, the irate President inadvertently confirmed what National Freedom Front (NFF) leader Wimal Weerawansa and award winning nationalistic writer Sena Thoradeniya exposed the same a year before. Weerawansa’s ‘Nine: The Hidden Story’ and Thoradeniya’s ‘Galle Face Protest: System Change or Anarchy?’ explained the circumstances leading to Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s ouster.

They squarely placed the blame on the US. They didn’t hesitate at all to name outgoing US Ambassador Julie Chung as the main culprit. Some interested parties contemptuously dismissed their accusations. They ridiculed MP Weerawansa’s assertion that the US-led project envisaged Speaker Abeywardena as the interim leader pending general election with a brainwashed Sri Lanka ready to elect Pol Pots as their leaders. MP Weerawansa described accommodating Wickremesinghe as plan ‘B’ whereas plan ‘A’ envisaged Speaker Abeywardena as the interim leader and considered weak and more amenable.

Both Weerawansa and Thoradeniya alleged that Ambassador Chung personally met Speaker Abeywardena to offer the post of President. Chung immediately dismissed Weerawansa’s work as a figment of his imagination. However, Speaker Abeywardena never contradicted the MP’s claim or made any reference to ‘Nine: The Hidden Story’ and Thoradeniya’s ‘Galle Face Protest: System Change or Anarchy?’ in his capacity as the Speaker.

Why did the Speaker refrain from commenting on allegations? Did the Speaker and the President reach some sort of consensus in this regard?

Whatever the reasons, Speaker Abeywardena should earn the respect of all right thinking people for refusing the sinister US offer. Those who sneered and dismissed foreign hand assertion in Aragalaya owed the country an explanation. The heinous operation that ousted Premier Hasina, whatever her shortcomings and wrong decisions were, has already exposed the US hand.

Sri Lanka never wanted to probe Aragalaya as all political parties, in Parliament, sought benefits out of Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s ouster. The actions of the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and others as well as the Sri Lankan Opposition can be compared and studied if the government is genuinely interested in establishing the truth.

A contentious issue

Regional power India and the US cannot under any circumstances be on the same page regarding the developing situation in Bangladesh. Having perused a spate of reports and watched so many videos that dealt with the issue, there cannot be absolutely any doubt that the murderous regime change project in the Maldives stunned India. The bottom line is that India doesn’t want a destabilized Bangladesh and an administration overtly pro-US as the Modi administration resents an environment that may encourage large scale public protest campaigns in New Delhi. India, too, is vulnerable to such clandestine projects. The US manipulation of events in Pakistan that cost much loved leader Imran Khan his premiership plunged the country into crisis must be examined against the latest developments in the sub-continent.

The way protesters forced Bangladesh’s Chief Justice Obaidul Hasan to resign over the last weekend underscored the severity of the developing crisis.

President Wickremesinghe recently declared before print and electronic media at the Cinnamon Grand that if not for him, Sri Lanka, too, would have ended up like Bangladesh. Wickremesinghe commented on the appointment of Nobel Peace Prize-winning economist Muhammad Yunus as head of an interim government. President Wickremesinghe pointed out that the appointment was made though in terms of the Bangladesh Constitution, a member of the Parliament should have been given that opportunity.

The appointment of Yunus, a darling of the West took place in the wake of the parliament’s dissolution. Lal Kantha’s declaration that the Galle Face protest should have been diverted to Parliament immediately after President Gotabaya Rajapaksa succumbed to their pressure and gave up Office. Lal Kantha made that declaration commenting on the latest developments in the wake of Premier Hasina’s ouster.

A thorough examination of ouster of Gotabaya Rajapaksa and Hasina should be undertaken at least after the conclusion of the presidential election next month. This should be done keeping in mind that in Sri Lanka the government is headed by the executive president whereas an elected Premier governed Bangladesh.

Oshala’s revelation

Presidential election candidate of the New Independent Front Oshala Herath said that he complained to Human Rights Commission (HRC) regarding the failure on the part of the police and the Speaker to inquire into the circumstances President Gotabaya Rajapaksa issued his letter of resignation after fleeing the country.

The often controversial civil society activist revealed that he raised this issue with C.D. Wickremaratne, who served as the IGP at the time of Aragalaya, and Speaker Abeywardena and subsequently with Wickremaratne’s successor but felt the need for HRC’s attention as his request was not heeded. The matter had been brought to HRC’s attention on August 12, 2022.

Herath has questioned the validity of Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s letter of resignation rationally explaining his concerns over the external hand in an elected President’s ouster, whatever his shortcomings and wrong decisions were. The public activist, who successfully moved the Supreme Court against State Minister Diana Gamage over citizenship issue, emphasized in his letter to HRC that removal of democratically elected President, through an insurrection instigated by foreign hands, violated constitutional rights of the people.

Herath made available to The Island entire set of letters he wrote to relevant authorities, as well as correspondence received, regarding the unresolved issue. The correspondence included a letter signed by Justice Rohini Marasinghe on August 22, 2022, in her capacity as the then Chairperson of the HRC. There was another signatory. Human Rights Commissioner Dr. Nimal Karunasiri is his name. The HRC, basically emphasized to President Wickremesinghe responsibility on the part of his government to look into the matters raised by the independent commission, including sufficient security to the ousted President and his family.

Wikileaks revealed the clandestine US intervention at the 2010 presidential poll. The US went to the extent of forcing Illankai Thamil Arasu Kadchi to throw its weight behind General Sarath Fonseka’s candidature. The war-winning General failed, pathetically as he was trounced by Mahinda Rajapaksa. But, the US-backed UNP-led coalition that campaigned for Fonseka fielded two other presidential candidates under the ‘Swan’ symbol of the New Democratic Front (NDF). Maithripala Sirisena (2015) and Sajith Premadasa (2019) were the candidates. However, NDF that hasn’t represented Local Government, Provincial Councils or Parliament is not in the fray this time.

Having earlier referred to Justice Rohini Marasinghe, the writer is of the view that HRC cannot, under any circumstances, play down the importance of Speaker Abeywardena’s disclosure regarding external interventions.

HRC’s Chairman, Justice L.T.B. Dehideniya, in April this year, questioned whether the Speaker’s claim of external intervention is an issue of national importance. Perhaps, against the backdrop of overthrowing the legitimately elected government of Bangladesh, HRC should take a fresh look into Aragalaya. HRC cannot be unaware that those who moved court demanding punitive action against the police and the military for not protecting their properties quietly withdrew the case on the basis of a promise made by the government that there would be fresh comprehensive inquiry.

Most of those who originally moved court have ended up in President Wickremesinghe camp backing him at the presidential election. The government should reveal the status of the promised fresh investigation.

Instead of seeking a thorough investigation, Wickremesinghe’s camp sought political mileage out of him accepting premiership in May 2022. The President’s camp declared that Sri Lanka would have ended up like Bangladesh if not for Wickremesinghe risking his political life to save the country.

SLPP foolishly declared that it named Nama Rajapaksa as its candidate as Aragalaya asked for youth to be placed in charge of the country.

In a few weeks, the electorate will reveal how Aragalaya impacted on them. In the absence of a proper investigation to ascertain Aragalaya, the results of the Sept 21 national election will reveal the ground situation.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Midweek Review

Raid on ‘Millennium City’ DMI safe-house:

Published

on

Having served as the Commander of the Army, 2000 to 2004, during his 39-year career, Lionel Balagalle passed away in Oct. 2023. He is the founding father of military intelligence

A forgotten story (part 1)

Colombo High Court Judge Adithya Patabendi, on March 27, 2025, acquitted former ASP Kulasiri Udugampola, who had been indicted over the Kandy police raid on a safe house run by the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) at the Millennium City housing complex, Athurugiriya. The raid, conducted in the first week of January 2002, sent shock waves through the defence establishment. Delivering the judgment, 23 years after the raid, Patabendi declared that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt.

The Dec. 5, 2001 parliamentary election was conducted at the height of the war in the North. Having gained the upper hand in the battlefield, the LTTE was working on a Ceasefire Agreement with Norway. The country was in turmoil with President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga, who survived an LTTE suicide blast at the final rally of her Dec. 1999 presidential election campaign, struggling to overcome a sustained UNP offensive.

In the run-up to the Dec. 5, 2001 parliamentary polls, UNP leader, Ranil Wickremesinghe accused the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) of planning to assassinate him. The UNPer claimed that the DMI was training Tamil terrorists at the Panaluwa Army Testing Range to mount an attack on his campaign bus, as well as his political rallies.

The unprecedented accusation placed the war-weary Army in an extremely embarrassing position when it was actually turning tables on the enemy using its own tactics in areas considered by then as being off limits for security forces. The UNP, with no shame, brazenly exploited the made-up threat as the main Opposition party and its allies, including a treacherous section of the media, stepped-up pressure on the Army to no end.

On the instructions of Wickremesinghe, UNP Chairman Charitha Ratwatte and Deputy Chairman Daya Palpola wrote a hard-hitting letter to Army Commander, Lt. Gen. Lionel Balagalle warning that he would be held responsible ‘in the event of an unfortunate incident’. The UNP duo accused the Army chief of training personnel to engage in a destabilisation campaign against the UNP.

An irate Army Commander, Lt. Gen. Balagalle in reply addressed a letter to Ratwatte and Palpola dismissing their accusations. The Island, in a front-page exclusive headlined ‘Army chief says no truth in UNP claims,’ in its Nov, 11, 2001 edition that revealed the exchange between Army headquarters and Sirikotha.

The report was based on what Lt. Gen. Balagalle had told this writer the previous evening. The Army chief, himself a one-time head of the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI), said that there was absolutely no basis for the UNP allegation that a hit squad was undergoing training in the use of high explosives and thermobaric weapons to attack Wickremesinghe.

The UNP ignored the Army chief’s letter. The allegation was repeated throughout the campaign. The raid on the DMI safe-house should be examined against the backdrop of the exchange between the Army commander and Sirikotha.

It was somewhat reminiscent of the JVP tactic to tarnish all others who had ruled the country since independence as being A Grade crooks to come to power with a record majority they couldn’t have even dreamt of knowing their sordid past. The trick was to repeat a lie long enough with the help of Western funded international and local NGO quislings and the gullible masses believed it.

Amidst a furore over the UNP allegation that the Army conspired to assassinate Wickremesinghe, Army operatives blew up a truck behind enemy lines killing five LTTE cadres on Dec. 11, 2001. Then again, they destroyed an LTTE bunker, at the entrance to a base used by Karuna, in the Kokkadicholai area, on Dec. 21, 2001.

Although the Army had conducted a successful small group operation in the Batticaloa District, targeting a key LTTE operative identified as David, way back in 1992, there was no attempt on the part of the military to develop the capability further. But some officers had been keen to promote small group operations to weaken the LTTE and beat it at its own game.

Commenting on the elimination of David, a veteran in clandestine operations told the writer of the deep penetrations ops: “Three personnel took part in the targeted killing of David. They returned to base after achieving the given task. Such operations caused chaos in enemy territory which gave us the psychological advantage over them. We knew of the importance as well as the need to strike within the enemy-controlled areas, though a special strategy on clandestine operations was adopted only in 2001, almost a decade after the hit on David.”

Speaking on condition of anonymity, the soft-spoken official explained the circumstances under which the Army launched deep penetration units soon after one-time Director of the DMI Lionel Balagalle had been appointed Commander of the Army.

Balagalle couldn’t resist the temptation to explore the possibility of infiltrating areas outside government controlled regions to launch attacks. “It was a tremendous task. Those who volunteered to join the operation realised the risks they were taking. They were among the best and they courageously adopted the new doctrine, which enabled us to carry out targeted killings. It was nothing but a high risk operation, though it produced results. They had to curtail their movements, particularly in the Eastern Province, where we used Batticaloa as the centre of our operations.”

Then Brigadier Kapila Hendarawithana executed the operation in his capacity as Director of DMI.

The LTTE realised the danger. Within months after the launch of the first DMI raid in the Batticaloa District, the LTTE pushed for the suspension of the DMI operation. The February 23, 2002 Ceasefire Agreement (CFA), arranged by the Norwegians, included a clause which specifically dealt with DMI action. The CFA called for the suspension of operations behind LTTE lines. While the LTTE had been successful in its negotiations with the Norwegians and the then inept UNP government with Executive President Chandrika Kumaratunga reduced to more or less a figurehead, the DMI suffered a debilitating setback when that regime with hardly any feelings for our valiant fighting men risking their lives day and night, ordered a police raid on an Army safe-house used by a deep penetration team at Athurugiriya.

The UNP-led United National Front (UNF) emerged victorious at the Dec. 5, 2001 general election with 109 seats, while the defeated PA managed to secure 77 seats. The remaining seats were shared by the JVP (16), the TNA (15), the SLMC (5), the EPDP (2) and the DPLF (01).

Balgalle on ops behind enemy lines

It had been one of the bloodiest elections with the five-week campaign claiming the lives of almost 50 people, with the polls day massacre of a group of SLMC supporters at Udathalawinna being the single worst incident. This massacre carried out by troops attached to the Vijayaba Infantry Regiment (VIR) who had been brought to Kandy at the behest of de facto Defence Minister Anuruddha Ratwatte was used as an excuse by a vindictive UNP leadership to order the raid on the safe house used by the DMI situated at Millennium City, Athurugiriya, on Jan. 2, 2002, which changed the course of the conflict. The UNF cited intelligence reports that Anuruddha Ratwatte’s sons, wanted in connection with the Udathalawinna massacre, were taking refuge at Athurugiriya.

Had the UNP leadership been a little cautious, it would never have publicly accused the Army of an assassination plot. Lt. Gen. Balagalle discussed the issues at hand with the writer. Operating hit squads behind enemy lines had been a key element in the Army’s strategy to give it a taste of its own medicine, the Army chief said at that time, alleging the then Opposition had failed to grasp what was going on. The Island quoted Lt. Gen. Balagalle as having said: “Had they quietly raised the issue with us and sought a clarification without playing politics with national security, the Athurugiriya fiasco could have been averted. Even ex-LTTE cadres were brought in for operations along with valuable input from civilian informants. We were successful due to many reasons such as training from Pakistani instructors. We also accommodated troops from other fighting battalions to engage in operations behind enemy lines, though the Special Forces and Army Commandos spearheaded the campaign.”

At the time troops had been undergoing training in Pakistan, Balagalle functioned as Security Forces Commander, Jaffna.

The Athurugiriya raid ruptured relations between the UNP and the Army. It caused irreparable damage to national security. At the behest of the UNP, a section of the media, including the Colombo-based correspondents working for international news agencies, highlighted the Athurugiriya raid speculating the Army’s alleged involvement in anti-government activities. Investigating officers alleged that those who had been based at Athurugiriya were involved in the alleged attempt to assassinate Wickremesinghe. Subsequently, the DMI was accused of planning attacks in the city and its suburbs to sabotage the Norwegian-led peace process.

The UNP allegations had the desired impact in the wake of state television showing recovered items, which included 66 sets of LTTE uniforms, four thermobaric weapons, seven claymore mines each weighing 10 kgs, 10 claymore mines, each weighing one kg each, three T-56 assault rifles along with 400 rounds of ammunition, 10 anti-tank weapons, detonators, cyanide capsules, exploders, remote controlled devices and wire rolls.

While a section of the media lashed out at the Army, in a front-page exclusive headlined ‘Controversy over police raid on army officers Millennium City residence,’ on Jan 4, 2002, The Island revealed that a police team from Kandy, led by die-hard UNP loyalist, Kulasiri Udugampola, had raided an Army safe house. The raid also involved a team of CCMP (Ceylon Corps of Military Police).

In spite of both Lt. Gen. Balagalle and the then Director of DMI, Brigadier Kapila Hendawitharana (later served as Chief of National Intelligence, before quitting in 2015) reassuring the government of the legitimacy of operations undertaken by the DMI, the police was let loose on covert operatives. Regardless of Balagalle rushing Hendarawithana, who later figured in many controversies to the scene, Udugampola went ahead with the raid. The police had obtained permission from courts to search the premises.

Udugampola had the backing of the then Interior Minister, John Amaratunga. IGP Lucky Kodituwakku, though being convinced of the legitimacy of the DMI operation, couldn’t do anything. He was helpless.

Army takes firm stand

The Kandy police raided the safe house shortly after the officer-in-charge of the DMI operation had handed over part of their arsenal. Those involved in the hit-and-run operations in LTTE held-areas had returned to Colombo on Dec. 27, 2001, in the wake of the Wickremesinghe administration declaring its readiness to go ahead with a Norwegian initiative to sign a one-sided CFA clearly favourable to the LTTE. The Kandy police also accused the Army of planting two claymore mines targeting a UNP candidate along the Wattegama-Panwila road, in the run-up to the Dec. 5, 2001 polls.

The then security forces spokesman, Brig. Sanath Karunaratne emphasised that those who operated from Athurugiriya were involved in ‘Army duties’ (The Island Jan. 4, 2002). Regardless of protests by the Army, those arrested were taken away to the Narahenpita CMP headquarters before being transferred to Kandy. They were treated like criminals and held under humiliating conditions. Six of them, including an officer, were held in one room. For two weeks, the media reported all sorts of conspiracy theories.

Let me stress that the Athurugiriya betrayal, in a way divided the Army. An influential section of the Army obviously cooperated with the conspirators.

Those who had been arrested were held for almost two weeks before being granted bail. The police raid would never have been possible without an influential section within the Army cooperating with the political establishment to undermine a vital operation, which brought the LTTE under immense pressure.

The UNP and the police justified Udugampola’s raid. Asked whether he had used the safe house to accommodate his sons, one-time Defence chief, Anuruddha Ratwatte, candidly acknowledged that he hadn’t been among those who knew of the existence of that particular rear base, though the Army kept him informed of operations undertaken by the DMI. (Feb. 1 issue of The Island, 2002)

Marapana to the rescue

Then Defence Minister, Tilak Marapana, a one-time Attorney General, to his credit did not play politics with such an important issue and thwarted an attempt by the Kandy police to prolong the detention of DMI operatives using the provisions of the PTA to please their then political masters in the UNP. The bid to neutralize the DMI was made ahead of the signing of the CFA. The Wickremesinghe administration didn’t even bother to consult the armed forces and police top brass regarding the provisions of the agreement. Then Navy Commander, Vice Admiral Daya Sandagiri told the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) how then Defence Secretary, Austin Fernando, had bypassed them with regard to sensitive military issues.

Fernando, in an article captioned ‘The Peace Process and Security Issues’ (Negotiating Peace in Sri Lanka: Efforts, Failures and Lessons) admitted that the refusal on the part of the then government to consult the military had been a failure. Fernando said (page 42): “The military chiefs weren’t consulted in the drafting of the CFA. Of course, a casual opportunity was given to them to discuss the draft with Ministers of Defence (Tilak Marapana) and Constitutional Affairs (Prof. G.L. Peiris). This wasn’t considered adequate by them as they didn’t get an opportunity to discuss the CFA with their senior officers”.

The CFA declared that ACTIVITIES BY DEEP PENETRATION UNITS should be ceased along with the cessation of all military action. The LTTE wouldn’t have demanded a ban on DMI operations unless the group acknowledged the growing threat posed by DMI. The LTTE had been vulnerable to those hunting them in their own backyard. Obviously, the LTTE wouldn’t have bothered about the DMI had the latter been stalking Wickremesinghe in the run-up to the Dec. 2001 polls.

Retired Senior DIG Merril Gunaratne, who had been Defence Advisor to Wickremesinghe during the CFA, exposed the UNP leadership in his ‘COP IN THE CROSSFIRE.’ The first book of its kind, written by one-time Director General of Intelligence, revealed how the top UNP leadership took security issues lightly at the expense of the country as well as the party. Asked whether he had been involved in the operation to move the Kandy police against the DMI, Gunaratne told the writer at that time he categorically opposed the move. “I was convinced the PA government wouldn’t target Wickremesinghe, thereby allowing the UNP to benefit from the sympathy vote. Unfortunately, Wickremesinghe and his top advisors felt the Army was hell bent on destroying the UNP.”

Ex-LTTE’s among the slain

The Athurugiriya raid had a catastrophic impact on the armed forces, which experienced untold hardships due to miscalculations on the part of political and military leaders. Following the betrayal of the DMI, the LTTE unleashed a series of operations in the city, its suburbs and in the Eastern Province. Altogether, over 50 military personnel, Tamil informants as well as ex-LTTE cadres working for the Army, died at the hands of the LTTE as their identities were revealed owing to the raid on the army safe house. Wijayanadan Widyatharan, alias Vidya, of Sea Road, Navakkudah, was the first operative killed by the LTTE after exposure of the Athurugiriya operation. Vaidya was abducted on January 20, 2002, over two weeks after the raid.

The dead included two senior military officers, both killed in Colombo. Although the two military officials, holding the rank of Major and Colonel could have been on a hit list, regardless of the Athurugiriya fiasco, the LTTE exploited the situation to demoralise the Army. Daring operations directed at the DMI and police intelligence helped boost the LTTE’s image. The military was placed in an unenviable position as the suspension of the PTA effectively neutralised counter-measures directed at LTTE hit squads.

Inspector Dale Gunaratne, the then President of the Police Inspectors’ Association, was perhaps the only law enforcement officer publicly critical of the UNP’s response to the LTTE threat. (Having retired years ago, Gunaratne now serves as an Attorney-at-Law) Although his superiors reacted angrily, Gunaratne lashed out at the government for allowing the LTTE to exploit the CFA to its advantage. Citing the killing of Inspector Thabrew at the Dehiwela Police Station, in July 2003, IP Gunaratne alleged that the suspension of the PTA in keeping with the CFA was nothing but a grievous threat to those fighting terrorism. He kept on lambasting the UNP and his own superiors for not taking action to neutralise the LTTE threat. But the UNP was determined to salvage the crumbling peace process at any cost. For those at the helm of the government, the lives of security forces and police didn’t matter, as long as they believed the LTTE would remain in the negotiating process. Politicians felt whatever the provocations, the peace process should continue.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

Midweek Review

Universal in a Catastrophe

Published

on

Survivors of the South-East Asian tragedy,

Triggered by nature’s stern promptings,

Somehow reining-in suffocating sorrow,

Are leaving no unhinged stone unturned,

To salvage the remains of those held dear,

In fresh testimony of love’s staying power,

But it speaks well for the untouched majority,

That unstinted succor is pouring in,

To render some solace to the hapless,

Although no amount of fellow feeling,

Could make up for the wrenching sorrow,

Of parting from a priceless presence.

By Lynn Ockersz

Continue Reading

Midweek Review

Batalanda and complexities of paramilitary operations

Published

on

Former President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s recent combative ‘Head-to-Head’ interview with British-American Mehdi Hasan on Al Jazeera has opened a can of worms. As to why Hasan raised the Batalanda Presidential Commission report, during a 49-minute interview conducted at the London’s Conway Hall, with a clearly pro LTTE audience, remains a mystery. This must be yet another notorious way to show how even-handed they are as in the case of its coverage of Russia, China, Palestine or Ukraine for their gullible viewers.

Recorded in February and aired in March 2025, the interview is definitely the most controversial the UNP leader, who is also an Attorney-at-Law, ever faced during his political career; always used to getting kid glove treatment, especially after taking over the party in 1994.

The continuing public discourse on Batalanda should provoke a wider discussion on Sri Lanka’s response to separatist Tamil terrorism, since the cold blooded murder of Jaffna SLFP Mayor Alfred Duriappah, which signalled the beginning of the LTTE terror campaign that ended in May 2009 with the crushing military defeat of the Tigers on the banks of the Nathikadal lagoon, as well as two southern insurgencies in 1971 and 1987-1990.

As Nandana Gunatilleke (one time JVP General Secretary and ex-MP), Dr. Wasantha Bandara (ex-JVPer and close associate of the slain JVP leader Rohana Wijeweera), Indrananda de Silva (ex-JVPer, incumbent Central Committee member of Frontline Socialist Party [FSP] and ex-military photographer) and Uvindu Wijeweera (Rohana Wijeweera’s son and leader of Dewana Parapura) agreed during the recent Hiru ‘Balaya’ discussion, conducted by Madushan de Silva, the Batalanda operation was in line with the overall counter-terrorist/insurgency strategy of the then government.

The issues at hand cannot be discussed at all without taking into consideration the JVP terrorism that, at one-time, almost overwhelmed the UNP’s unbroken rule, since 1977, carried out while openly brushing aside most of the universally accepted genuine parliamentary norms. The country’s second Republican constitution, promulgated by the UNP regime with a 5/6 majority in Parliament, in 1978, had been amended no less than 13 times by the time they were finally ousted in 1995. This was mainly to facilitate their continuous rule. Unfortunately, all stakeholders have sought to take advantage of Batalanda, thereby preventing a proper dialogue. Quite surprisingly, none of the guests, nor the interviewer, bothered, at least, to make a reference to the JVP bid on President J.R. Jayewardene’s life in Parliament on the morning of July 18, 1987. At the time, JVPer Ajith Kumara, working in the House as a minor employee, hurled two hand grenades towards JRJ, with the then Prime Minister Ranasinghe Premadasa seated next to JRJ. While one government MP lost his life, several others suffered injuries, including then National Security Minister Lalith Athulathmudali, whose spleen had to be removed.

At one point, Gunatilleke declared that they assassinated UNP MP for Tangalle Jinadasa Weerasinghe on July 3, 1987, in response to the government killing well over 100 people, in Colombo, protesting against the signing of the Indo-Lanka accord on July 29, 1987. The parliamentarian was killed near the Barawakumbuka-Welangahawela bridge on the Colombo-Rathnapura-Embilipitiya Road. The UNPer was killed on his way home after having declined Premier Premadasa’s offer to make an SLAF chopper available for him to reach home safely.

Against the backdrop of MP Weerasinghe’s assassination and the grenade attack on the UNP parliamentary group that claimed the life of Keethi Abeywickrema (MP for Deniyaya), the government had no option but to respond likewise. The operation, established at the Batalanda Housing scheme of the State Fertiliser Corporation, constituted part of the counter-insurgency strategy pursued by the UNP.

Those who called Batalanda complex Batalanda torture camp/ wadakagaraya conveniently forgot during the second JVP inspired insurgency, the military had to utilize many public buildings, including schools, as makeshift accommodation for troops. Of course the UNP established Batalanda under different circumstances with the then Industries Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe providing political authority. Batalanda had been an exclusive police operation though the Army had access to it whenever a requirement arose.

Those who had been suddenly withdrawn from the Northern and Eastern Provinces, to meet the rapidly evolving security threat in the South, required accommodation. FSP CC member Indrananada de Silva had received unhindered access to Batalanda in his capacity as a military photographer and the rest is history.

As to why Indrananda de Silva switched his allegiance to the FSP should be examined, taking into consideration his previous role as a trusted military photographer, formerly a Lance Corporal of the Military Police. An influential section of the JVP, led by Kumar Gunaratnam, formed the FSP in April 2012 though it didn’t receive the much anticipated public support. Both Indrananda de Silva and Nandana Gunatilleke, who aligned himself with the UNP, found fault with the JVP-led National People’s Power (NPP) over its handling of the Batalanada issue.

Paramilitary operations

Paramilitary operations had been an integral part of the overall counter-insurgency campaign, directed at the JVP responsible for approximately 6,600 killings. Among those death squads were PRRA primarily drawn from the SLMP (Sri Lanka Mahajana Party) and SRRA (the socialist Revolutionary Red Army). PRRA had close links with the Independent Student Union (ISU) whose leader Daya Pathirana was slain by the JVP. The vast majority of people do not remember that Daya Pathirana, who led the ISU during the turbulent 1985-1986 period, was killed mid-Dec. 1989. The second insurgency hadn’t started at that time though the JVP propagated the lie that they took up arms against the UNP government following the signing of the Indo-Lanka peace accord on July 29, 1987.

In addition to PRRA and SRRA, the government made use of paramilitary groups, namely Kalu balallu, Ukkusso, Rajaliyo, Kaha balallu, Kola koti, Rathu Makaru, Mapila, Gonussa, Nee, Keshara Sinhayo, Le-mappillu and Kalu koti.

The UNP also involved some elements of Indian trained Tamil groups (not of the LTTE) in paramilitary operations. Such operations, that had been backed by respective Cabinet Ministers, were supervised by local law enforcement authorities. Paramilitary operations had been in line with psychological warfare that was meant to cause fear among the JVP, as well as the general population. Military operations that had been combined with paramilitary actions received the blessings of the political leadership at the highest level. In the case of Batalanda (1988-1990) President J.R. Jayewardene and Ranasinghe Premadasa knew of its existence.

Even after the eradication of the top JVP leadership, by Nov. 1989, police, military and paramilitary operations continued unabated. Former JVPers appearing on ‘Balaya’ agreed that counter-insurgency operations were actually brought to an end only after D.B. Wijetunga succeeded President Ranasinghe Premadasa after the latter’s assassination on May Day 1993.

After the LTTE resumed war in June 1990, just a couple of months after the withdrawal of the Indian Army (July 1987-March1990), the UNP authorized paramilitary operations in the northern and eastern areas. Members of TELO, PLOTE, EPRLF as well as EPDP were made part of the overall government security strategy. They operated in large groups. Some paramilitary units were deployed in the Jaffna islands as well. And these groups were represented in Parliament. They enjoyed privileged status not only in the northern and eastern regions but Colombo as well. The government allowed them to carry weapons in the city and its suburbs.

These groups operated armed units in Colombo. The writer had the opportunity to visit EPDP and PLOTE safe houses in Colombo and its suburbs soon after they reached an understanding with President Ranasinghe Premadasa. Overnight at the behest of President Premadasa, the Election Department granted these Tamil groups political recognition. In other words, armed groups were made political parties. The Premadasa government accepted their right to carry weapons while being represented in Parliament.

It would be pertinent to mention that thousands of Tamil paramilitary personnel served the government during that period. There had been many confrontations between them and the LTTE over the years and the latter sought to eliminate key paramilitary personnel. Let me remind you of the circumstances, the EPRLF’s number 02 Thambirajah Subathiran alias Robert was sniped to death in June 2003. Robert was engaged in routine morning exercises on the top floor of the two-storeyed EPRLF office, on the hospital road, Jaffna, when an LTTE sniper took him out from the nearby Vembadi Girls’ high school. The operation of the Norway managed Ceasefire Agreement (CFA) made no difference as the LTTE removed Robert who led the party here in the absence of leader Varatharaja Perumal, the first and the only Chief Minister of the North-Eastern Province.

In terms of the CFA that had been signed by Premier Ranil Wickremesinghe and LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran, in Feb. 2002, the government agreed to disarm all paramilitary personnel. Many wouldn’t remember now that during Premadasa’s honeymoon with the LTTE, the Army facilitated the LTTE onslaught on paramilitary groups in selected areas.

Muthaliff’s role

During the ‘Balaya’ discussion, the contentious issue of who shot JVP leader Rohana Wijeweera came up. Nandana Gunatilleke, who contested the 1999 Dec. presidential election. as the JVP candidate, pointing to an article carried in the party organ that dealt with Wijeweera’s assassination said that he wrongly named Gaffoor as one of the persons who shot their leader whereas the actual shooter was Muthaliff. The headline named Thoradeniya and Gaffoor as the perpetrators.

Declaring that he personally wrote that article on the basis of information provided by Indrananda de Silva, Gunatilleke named Asoka Thoradeniya and Tuan Nizam Muthaliff of the Army as the perpetrators of the crime. Thoradeniya served as Sri Lanka’s High Commissioner in the Maldives during the Yahapalana administration, while Muthaliff was killed by the LTTE in Colombo in late May 2005. The shooting took place at Polhengoda junction, Narahenpita. Muthaliff was on his way from Manning town, Narahenpita, to the Kotelawala Defence University.

The programme was told that the JVP had over the years developed close relationship with Thoradeniya while Indrananda de Silva accused Dr. Wasantha Bandara of duplicity regarding Muthaliff. How could you recognize Muthaliff, slain by the LTTE, as a war hero as he was actually one of the persons who shot Rohana Wijeweera, the latter asked.

At the time of his assassination, Muthaliff served as the Commanding Officer, 1 st Regiment Sri Lanka Military Intelligence Corps. The then parliamentarian Wimal Weerawansa was among those who paid last respects to Maj. Muthaliff.

At the time of Rohana Wijeweera’s arrest, Muthaliff served as Lieutenant while Thoradeniya was a Major. Indrananda de Silva strongly stressed that atrocities perpetrated by the police and military in the South or in the northern and eastern regions must be dealt with regardless of whom they were conducting operations against. The former JVPer recalled the Army massacre in the east in retaliation for the landmine blast that claimed the lives of Northern Commander Maj. Gen. Denzil Kobbekaduwa and a group of senior officers, including Brigadier Wijaya Wimalaratne, in early Aug. 1990 in Kayts.

Dr. Wasantha Bandara warned of the Western powers taking advantage of what he called false narrative to push for a Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

It would be pertinent to mention that the LTTE also used the underworld as well as some corrupt Army personnel in planning high profile assassinations. Investigations into the assassination of Muthaliff, as well as Maj. Gen. Parami Kulatunga, killed in a suicide attack at Pannipitiya, in June 2006, revealed the direct involvement of military personnel with the LTTE.

Indrananda de Silva disclosed that soon after Anura Kumara Dissanayake won the presidential election last September, the FSP, in writing, requested the JVP leader to inquire into killings during that period, including that of Rohana Wijeweera. The FSPer alleged that President Dissanayake refrained from even acknowledging their letter. Indrananda de Silva emphasized that Al Jazeera never disclosed anything new as regards Batalanda as he exposed the truth years ago. The former JVPer ridiculed the ruling party tabling the Batalanda Commission report in the wake of Wickremesinghe’s Al Jazeera interview whereas the matter was in the public domain for quite some time.

Indrananda de Silva and Nandana Gunatilleke exchanged words over the latter’s declaration that the JVP, too, was subjected to investigation for violence unleashed during the 1987-1990 period. While the FSPer repeatedly declared that those who carried out directives issued by the party were arrested and in some cases killed, Nandana Gunatilleke took up the position that the party should be held accountable for crimes perpetrated during that period.

The interviewer posed Nandana Gunatilleke the question whether he was betraying his former comrades after joining the UNP. Nandana Gunatilleke shot back that he joined the UNP in 2015 whereas the JVP joined UNP as far back as 2009 to promote retired Army Chef Sarath Fonseka’s presidential ambition even though he wiped out the JVP presence in Trincomalee region during the second insurgency.

JVP’s accountability

Nandana Gunatilleke is adamant that the party should accept responsibility for the killings carried out at that time. The former JVPer declared that Vijaya Kumaratunga (Feb. 16, 1988), first Vice Chancellor of the Colombo University (March 08, 1989) Dr. Stanley Wijesundera, Ven. Kotikawatte Saddhatissa thera (Aug. 03, 1988) and Chairperson of the State Pharmaceutical Corporation Gladys Jayewardene (Sept. 12, 1989) were among those assassinated by the JVP. SPC Chairperson was killed for importing medicine from India, the former Marxist aligned with the UNP said, while actor-turned-politician Kumaratunga’s assassination was attributed to his dealings with President J.R. Jayewardene.

According to Nandana Gunatilleke, except for a few killings such as General Secretaries of the UNP Harsha Abeywickrema (Dec 23, 1987) and Nandalal Fernando (May 20, 1988), the vast majority of others were ordinary people like grama sevakas killed on mere accusation of being informants. The deaths were ordered on the basis of hearsay, Nandana Gunatilleke said, much to the embarrassment of others who represented the interest of the JVP at that time.

One quite extraordinary moment during the ‘Balaya’ programme was when Nandana Gunatilleke revealed their (JVP’s) direct contact with the Indian High Commission at a time the JVP publicly took an extremely anti-Indian stance. In fact, the JVP propagated a strong anti-Indian line during the insurgency. Turning towards Dr. Wasantha Bandara, Gunatilleke disclosed that both of them had been part of the dialogue with the Indian High Commission.

It reminds me of the late Somawansa Amarasinghe’s first public address delivered at a JVP rally in late Nov. 2001 after returning home from 12 years of self-imposed exile. Of the top JVP leadership, Somawansa Amarasinghe, who had been married to a close relative of powerful UNP Minister Sirisena Cooray, was the only one to survive combined police/military/paramilitary operations.

Amarasinghe didn’t mince his words when he declared at a Kalutara rally that his life was saved by Indian Premier V.P. Singh. Soft spoken Amarasinghe profusely thanked India for saving his life. Unfortunately, those who discuss issues at hand conveniently forget crucial information in the public domain. Such lapses can be both deliberate and due to negligence.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

Trending