Connect with us

News

SL Anti-Terrorism Bill less draconian than one in Britain

Published

on

Dr Rajapakshe

– Justice Minister Rajapakshe

By Saman Indrajith

Justice Minister Dr Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe yesterday told Parliament that the provisions contained in the Anti-Terrorism Bill, presented to the House, were less severe and harsh than those in the counter terrorism laws in Great Britain.

Dr. Rajapakshe said so responding to a question raised by SLMC leader Rauff Hakeem, who asked the Minister to explain the changes the new Bill envisaging to be introduced to the Prevention of Terrorism Act.

Earlier in the day, the Minister presented the Bill to the House and Secretary General of Parliament Kushani Rohanadeera read out the Bill’s preamble: “Anti-Terrorism,— Bill to make provision for the protection of the National Security of Sri Lanka and the people of Sri Lanka from acts of terrorism, other offences associated with terrorism and certain specified acts constituting the offence of terrorism committed within or outside Sri Lanka; for the prevention of the use of Sri Lankan territory and its people for the preparation for terrorism outside Sri Lanka; to provide for the detection, identification, apprehension, arrest, detention, investigation, prosecution and punishment of any person who has committed an act of terrorism or any other offence associated with terrorism; for the repeal of the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act, No. 48 of 1979; and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.”

Responding to MP Hakeem, Minister Dr. Rajapakshe said: “The Prevention of Terrorism Act had many criticisms against it. In 2015, we started the process of bringing a new law under the name of Counter Terrorism Act. It was presented to Parliament and then challenged before the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court has issued its determination on the Counter Terrorism Bill.”

However, the then government had not been able to proceed with the Bill and following the Easter Sunday terror attacks, the proces had come to a halt. “In 2022, we resumed the process. We decided to bring about a new Act on the matter. We formulated a new Act, and it took one and half years because we allowed all stakeholders to express their views on this. We met with all Ambassadors and High Commissioners in this country and explained to them the content of this legislation. They also approved it.

“Thereafter we gazetted it and hoped to take it up in Parliament in November, but there were concerns that if we presented the Bill in the House, it would hinder the chances for people to go before the court against it because court vacation was to commence soon. There were requests from many parties to postpone it. As such, we delayed the process. Briefly I can explain some of the changes that we introduced. A court can convict a person on the basis of a confession. It is not recognized under the normal law of evidence. Yet it was possible under the special laws of the PTA.

It was the biggest criticism against the PTA. We have removed that and now it goes as per the normal law of evidence. The second issue of contention was that as per the existing law, the Defence Minister has the powers to issue detention orders. The Defence Minister can give a detention order for three months and he can also extend it.

There was a proposal that powers should be given to the DIGs. We now plan to give those powers to the Defence Secretary. As per the law to be introduced, the Defence Secretary can give a detention order for one month and if there is a need to extend that, then prior approval of a magistrate is needed. So, we brought the detention under the courts’ powers. In addition, the Human Rights Commission would be given powers to visit and inspect those under detention.

“We did not have a definition for the term terrorism. Though there is an internationally accepted definition for the term corruption there is no such definition for the term terrorism. Each country has defined it as per their needs and requirements. We have brought about a definition for the term terrorism which is quite similar to the definition in the Counter Terrorism Act in Great Britain. However, our definition is not as severe as the one in Great Britain.”



Latest News

486 dead, 341 missing, 171,778 displaced as at 0600hrs today [05]

Published

on

By

The situation report issued by the Disaster Management Center at 0600hrs today [5th December] confirms that 486 persons have died and another 341 persons are missing after the devastating weather conditions in the past week.

171,778 persons have been displaced and have taken refuge at 1,231 safety centers established by the government.

 

Continue Reading

News

Media slams govt.’s bid to use Emergency to silence critics

Published

on

Sunil Watagala

Media organisations have denounced Deputy Minister of Public Security and Parliamentary Affairs Sunil Watagala after he urged law enforcement authorities to use emergency regulations to take action against those posting allegedly defamatory content about the President and senior ministers on social media.

The Sri Lanka Working Journalists Association (SLWJA) yesterday issued a strongly worded statement condemning Watagala’s remarks, warning that they posed a direct threat to freedom of expression and media rights, particularly at a time when the country is struggling through a national disaster.

Watagala made the controversial comments on 2 December during a meeting at the Malabe Divisional Secretariat attended by government officials and Deputy Media Minister Dr. Kaushalya Ariyarathna. During the discussion, the Deputy Minister claimed that a coordinated effort was underway to spread distorted or false information about the disaster situation through physical means, social media, and even AI-generated content. He also alleged that individuals based overseas were contributing to such activity.

According to the SLWJA, Watagala went further, directing police officers present at the meeting to treat those posting such content “not merely as suspects but as offenders” and to take action against them under emergency regulations currently in force.

The SLWJA accused the government of abandoning the democratic principles it once campaigned on, noting that individuals who publicly championed free speech in the past were now attempting to clamp down on it. The association said this was not an isolated incident but part of a pattern of growing state pressure on journalists and media platforms over the past year.

It warned that attempts to criminalise commentary through emergency powers especially during a disaster constituted a grave violation of constitutional rights. The union urged the government to respect democratic freedoms and refrain from using disaster-related powers to silence criticism.

In a separate statement, Internet Media Action (IMA) also expressed “strong objection” to Watagala’s comments, describing them as a “serious threat to freedom of expression”, which it said is a fundamental right guaranteed to all Sri Lankan citizens.

The IMA said Watagala’s assertion that “malicious character assassination attacks” were being carried out against the President and others through social media or other media channels, and that such acts should attract severe punishment under emergency law, represented “an abuse of power”. The organisation also criticised the Deputy Minister’s claim that false opinions or misrepresentations whether physical, online, or generated by AI could not be permitted.

Using emergency regulations imposed for disaster management to suppress political criticism amounted to “theft of fundamental rights”, the statement said, adding that the move was aimed at deliberately restricting dissent and instilling fear among social media users.

“Criticism is not a crime,” the IMA said, warning that such rhetoric could lead to widespread intimidation and self-censorship among digital activists and ordinary citizens.

The group demanded that Watagala withdraw his statement unconditionally and insisted that freedom of expression cannot be curtailed under emergency laws or any other legal framework. It also called on the government to clarify its stance on the protection of fundamental rights amid increasing concerns from civil society.

Continue Reading

News

Cardinal calls for compassionate Christmas amid crisis

Published

on

Archbishop of Colombo

Archbishop of Colombo, Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith, has called on Sri Lankans to observe this Christmas with compassion and restraint, as the nation continues to recover from one of its worst natural disasters in recent memory.

In his message, the Colombo Archbishop has highlighted the scale of the crisis, noting that more than 1.5 million people have been displaced, while an “uncounted number” remain buried under debris in the hill country following landslides and severe flooding.

“It is a most painful situation,”

he has written acknowledging the difficulty of celebrating a season traditionally associated with joy while thousands are mourning lost loved ones, living in refugee centres, or left with nothing but the clothes they were wearing.

The Cardinal has urged the faithful to temper excessive celebrations and extravagance, instead focusing on helping those affected. “Celebrate, by all means, yes, but make it a moment of spiritual happiness and concern for the needs of those who suffer,” he said. “Assist as much as possible those who lost their loved ones, their homes, and their belongings.”

He has called for a Christmas marked by love, sharing, and solidarity, describing it as an opportunity to make the season “a deeply spiritual and joyful experience.”

Continue Reading

Trending