Editorial
Rice can’t cushion fall

Thursday 19th January, 2023
The prospect of having to face an election always fills an unpopular regime with horror and has a sobering effect on self-important politicians intoxicated with power. The SLPP-UNP government has awakened to the fact that many people are starving, and something needs to be done urgently to help them. It has decided to provide 10 kilos of rice each, free of charge, to two million families per month for a period of two months. Technically, the proposed handout amounts to an election bribe in all but name, for the Cabinet decision thereon came after the Election Commission (EC) had initiated the process of conducting the local government (LG) elections. But only those with a callous disregard for the suffering of the poor will be able to bring themselves to oppose the distribution of free rice irrespective of the government’s ulterior motive.
Sri Lankan politicians have mastered the art of bribing voters with public funds. Never do they care to improve the people’s lot because poverty helps perpetuate the dependency culture, which promotes clientelist politics, where people exercise their franchise in return for personal favours and benefits funded by the general taxpayer, and not for the public good.
The amount of rice to be given to the needy free of charge is hardly sufficient for them to dull the pangs of hunger, and, most of all, they will get it only for a short period of time. But it is better than nothing. How does the government expect the poor to survive thereafter? More importantly, man does not live by rice alone, so to speak. The poor have other needs to satisfy. Electricity and water tariffs have gone through the roof and so is the price of everything else. Schooling is fast becoming a luxury that only the rich could afford, given the soaring prices of stationery, shoes, etc., and the escalating cost of transport. Supplementary tuition, which has become an integral part of the country’s education system, also costs every family with school-age children a tidy sum every month. One can only hope that there will not be an increase in the number of school dropouts among the poor.
The need for rationalising welfare expenditure cannot be overstated. One main cause of the current economic crisis was the politically-motivated cash handouts amounting to Rs. 5,000 each distributed as pandemic relief ahead of the 2020 general election. A great deal of money had to be printed to fund the project. Besides, taxes were slashed for political reasons; the government revenue dropped sharply and the cash handouts aggravated the economic crisis.
The UNP and the SLPP leaders are back to their old ways. They seem to think old tricks such as the distribution of handouts will help them regain lost ground on the political front. They are only hoping against hope.
****
The plot thickens
Secretary to the Ministry of Public Administration, Home Affairs, Provincial Councils and Local Authorities Neil Bandara Hapuhinna finds himself up the creek without a paddle, having overstepped his bureaucratic limits and sought to interfere in the affairs of the Election Commission (EC).
On 10 January, Hapuhinne, in his wisdom, chose to write to all District Secretaries informing them that the Cabinet wanted them to stop accepting deposits for the local government (LG) polls until further notice. But for the timely action taken by the EC to counter Hapuhinne’s move, the District Secretaries would have been confused and perhaps the process of conducting the LG polls would have been disrupted. Hapuhinne later withdrew his letter, claiming that he had only conveyed a Cabinet decision to the District Secretaries. The EC has given him just a slap on the wrist.
No less a person than Prime Minister Dinesh Gunawardena told Parliament, on Wednesday, that the Cabinet had taken no decision to interfere in the work of the EC. If so, why did Hapuhinne write the letter at issue? Who asked him to do so? These questions must not go unanswered, given the severity of his high-handed action. Former Minister of Justice and Constitutional Affairs Prof. G. L. Peiris has warned Hapuhinne that the latter has committed an offence punishable by three years in jail.
Hapuhinne, in his letter dated 10 January, refers to what he calls the Cabinet Secretary’s correspondence––No 23/misc (001)––and specifically states that the Cabinet, which met on 09 January asked him to direct the District Secretaries to stop accepting deposits for the LG polls. What Hapuhinne has done is far too serious for him to go unpunished. That the letter at issue was withdrawn immediately cannot be cited in extenuation of his offence.
JVP leader and NPP MP Anura Kumara Dissanayake, speaking in Parliament, on Wednesday, accused President Ranil Wickremesinghe and UNP MP Wajira Abeywardena of having got Hapuhinne to issue the letter in question. The EC should launch a fresh probe into Hapuhinne’s letter in the light of the Prime Minister’s statement in Parliament.
The Cabinet Secretary should be asked whether there was any correspondence between him and Hapuhinne on the matter at hand. If his answer is in the affirmative, then the EC will have to summon him as well, and call for an explanation. If his answer is in the negative, then stern action will have to be taken against Hapuhinne for falsifying information to override the EC and mislead the District Secretaries. It behoves the EC to get to the bottom of it, and Parliament, too, should do likewise.
Editorial
Trump in a china shop

Friday 11th April, 2025
US President Donald Trump has made another U-turn––a historic one. He has suspended unprecedented tariff hikes he announced the other day; he vowed that he would neither pause nor waive them under any circumstances. The 90-day tariff reprieve he has opted for has gladdened many hearts and made stock markets soar across the word, but a global recession is looming with a fierce tariff war between the US and China intensifying.
Trump has jacked up tariffs on all Chinese goods to a whopping 125%. China has stopped dilly-dallying and increased its tariff on imports from the US to 84%. The White House is reported to have said those who do not retaliate will be rewarded. Trump may have expected the Chinese leaders also to bow and scrape before him, asking for a tariff reduction.
Meanwhile, President Trump will have a hard time repairing relations with the traditional US allies in Europe. He did not mince his words, when he said, while announcing the new US tariffs, the other day, that many Americans thought Europe was a friend but it had actually ripped off the US. He has shown, albeit unwittingly, that Europe cannot trust the US as an ally. Besides, Der Spiegel, a German magazine once revealed that the CIA had been operating a global network of 80 eavesdropping centres, including 19 listening posts in Europe.
The White House has sought to help Trump save face; it has claimed that his flip-flop is part of a strategy to further US economic interests globally. But the truth is otherwise. Trump got cold feet as stock markets tumbled the world over, and protests erupted in the US itself against his new tariff policy. Initially, he, true to form, chose to dig his heels in, and even coined a new word to disparage the critics of his tariffs. On Truth Social, he called them ‘panicans’. He said: “The United States has a chance to do something that should have been done DECADES AGO. Don’t be Weak! Don’t be Stupid! Don’t be a PANICAN. Be Strong, Courageous, and Patient, and GREATNESS will be the result!” He also said, “Be cool! Everything is going to work out well. The USA will be bigger and better than ever before. On Monday, he announced from the White House that “we’re not looking at” a tariff pause …” He also bragged in a Truth Social post announcing the 90-day tariff pause, that “more than 75 Countries” had called US officials seeking to strike new trade deals. But it is clear that he had to bite the bullet and suspend the tariff hikes. The EU has put its retaliatory tariffs on hold, as a result.
The suspension of US tariff hikes has brought immense relief to the developing countries dependent on the US as a major export destination, but prudence demands that they continue with their efforts to formulate strategies to ensure the survival of their fragile economies in the worst-case scenario. They had better consider the tariff reprieve at issue only an interval in hell, as it were, and brace themselves for what is to come after three months.
Trump’s strategy of using tariffs to subdue the world has yielded some unintended benefits, the main being that it has prompted other nations, including traditional American allies, to realise the risk of being overdependent on the US as a trading partner, diversify their trade relations as well as exports, and, most of all, look for an alternative to the US. The on-going efforts to adopt an alternative international reserve currency is bound to gain a turbo boost from Trump’s abortive bid to leverage America’s hold on the global economy to undermine other nations.
The world owes President Trump a big thank you—not for jacking up US tariffs and then suspending them but for having revealed how far the US is ready to go to further its interests at the expense of the other nations, including its allies.
Editorial
Cushioning tariff shock

Thursday 10th April, 2025
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s letter to US President Donald Trump over the US tariff hikes has received much publicity. The NPP government is reportedly sanguine about a positive response from Washington to its request for lower tariff on Sri Lanka’s exports, especially apparels. Hope is said to spring eternal, and there is nothing wrong with being optimistic, but it behoves Sri Lanka to prepare for the worst-case scenario. President Trump’s mind is so elusive that it is not possible to predict his moves, much less guess what he expects the smaller economies to do if they are to qualify for US tariff reductions, if any. He is eyeing mineral resources in Ukraine in return for US military aid to that war-torn nation. Sri Lanka has no such resources to offer. Is the Trump administration trying to pressure it into going out of its way to help further Washington’s geostrategic interests in this part of the world?
China has retaliated by increasing tariffs on imports from the US thereby aggravating global economic uncertainty. Washington says its tariff increases are reciprocal, and therefore the countries affected by them may think they can gain relief by reducing duties on US exports. But the question is whether such action will help the US rectify its massive trade imbalance significantly. The demand for American exports will not increase substantially even if countries like Sri Lanka lower duties thereon, for factors such as cost and quality basically drive demand. Imports from the West, especially input materials, are not in high demand in the developing world because of the availability of cost-effective alternatives.
So, the Trump administration is likely to insist that apparel producing nations like Sri Lanka import commodities such as cotton fabric from the US so as to give a fillip to the American industries. This is what US Ambassador Julie Chung told former Minister Mano Ganeshan at a recent meeting, according to a report we published on 27 March. Such a move is bound to increase the cost of Sri Lankan apparels because US products are very expensive and will adversely affect the competitiveness of Sri Lanka’s apparels in the global market.
President Trump is hopeful that ‘jobs and factories will come roaring back’ because of the tariff hikes at issue, but he does not seem to have factored in the high cost of production in the US and increases in the prices of imports due to high tariff hikes. Tech analysts have pointed out that Apple iPhone prices would soar if they were to be made in the US, and even if the existing supply chains are maintained, their prices will increase substantially. The same may hold true for other commodities, whose prices remain low in the US at present owing to cheap labour and lax environmental laws in the other countries where they are produced.
The countries hit by the US tariff increases have adopted different strategies to cushion the blow from the drastic US action, which has led to a global stock market rout, and sparked protests in the US itself. India is seeking to strike more trade deals with other nations, according to Indian Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, who says such measures have become necessary in view of prevailing global uncertainty. Sri Lanka can learn from how India is trying to mitigate the impact of the US tariff hikes.
Prof. C. A. Saliya, a senior banker turned academic, has pointed out in his latest column, Out of the Box, in this newspaper that if the emerging economies get their act together, they may be able to turn disruptions caused by the isolationist, protectionist, and coercive US trade practices into an opportunity to diversify their exports and trade relations, invest in technology and undertake structural reforms to ensure their economic resilience.
Meanwhile, the formulation of Sri Lanka’s strategy to navigate the new US tariff regime should arise from a tripartite effort if it is to be effective. The government, industrialists and workers should be represented in discussions on the issue. It is high time trade unions shifted their focus from their demand-oriented activism to the pressing need to play a crucial role in protecting the domestic industrial sector. The government should do everything in its power to help industrialists keep costs manageable, ensuring the competitiveness of their products in the global market, and the captains of industry must carry out their export operations in a transparent manner without resorting to sordid practices such as parking most of their export proceeds overseas.
Editorial
Lies, damned lies, and political claims

Wednesday 9th April, 2025
Hardly a day passes in Sri Lanka without the government and the Opposition locking horns and trading allegations of deception, lying and corruption. Deputy Minister of Vocational Education Nalin Hewage, who is at the forefront of the government’s propaganda campaign against the ruling NPP’s political rivals, has caused quite a stir by making a false claim about Sri Lanka’s economic recovery process.
Politicians as well as their mistruths, half-truths and blatant lies are rarely, if ever, out of the news in this country. Politics is generally thought to be a web of deceit, intrigue and lies due to manipulation, horse dealing, dishonesty, power struggles, scandals, corruption and other negative factors it is often associated with.
It may not be fair to paint all politicians with the same brush and label them as liars; there are honourable men and women in politics. However, the general perception is that only the politicians following Machiavelli, who has argued that rulers sometimes have to resort to deception and lying, achieve success in Sri Lanka. This view is not without some merit if our experience with politicians’ claims is anything to go by.
Most Opposition politicians who were lucky enough to survive last year’s Maroon Wave, which swept the NPP to power with a steamroller majority, are lying through their teeth. Denying allegations of corruption against them, they make themselves out to be paragons of virtue, but they won’t account for their wealth. It has now been revealed that the SLPP politicians who lost some of their properties due to mob violence in 2022 falsified the estimates of their losses and obtained compensation far exceeding the actual damages. They also have the audacity to make absurd claims and insult the intelligence of the public. Prior to the 2019 presidential election, the SLPP propagandists claimed that a huge cobra had emerged from the Kelani Ganga and it was a miracle signalling the rise of their candidate to the presidency. When the first Treasury bond scam was committed in early 2015, most UNP parliamentary group members, some of whom are in the SJB at present, told blatant lies in a bid to cover it up.
Deputy Minister Hewage has come under a social media piranha attack, as it were, over his claim at a recent NPP local government election rally in Galle that when the NPP took over the reins of government, last year, Sri Lanka’s foreign reserves had plummeted to USD 20 million, and under the incumbent government they had increased to USD 6.1 billion. Interestingly, disappointed that his claim had not elicited a rapturous applause, Hewage faulted his audience!
Hewage is not alone in claiming that it is the incumbent government that put the economy back on an even keel. Almost all NPP leaders make that claim at political rallies. Besides, they have sought to grab the credit for the completion of some projects previous governments launched, such as the restoration of the Elephant Pass salt factory and the construction of a cold storage facility in Dambulla. What takes the cake is the NPP’s claim that the country has gained nothing since Independence.
It will be interesting to see the NPP’s reaction to Hewage’s claim, which continues to draw heavy criticism on social media. The CID is conducting a probe into SLPP National Organiser and MP Namal Rajapaksa’s law exam results. Going by the absurd claims made by the ruling party politicians, it looks as if the NPP government had to order an investigation into the educational qualifications of some of its own parliamentary group members, especially those who claim to be economic experts.
-
Business4 days ago
Colombo Coffee wins coveted management awards
-
Business6 days ago
Daraz Sri Lanka ushers in the New Year with 4.4 Avurudu Wasi Pro Max – Sri Lanka’s biggest online Avurudu sale
-
Features5 days ago
Starlink in the Global South
-
Business6 days ago
New SL Sovereign Bonds win foreign investor confidence
-
Features2 days ago
Sri Lanka’s Foreign Policy amid Geopolitical Transformations: 1990-2024 – Part III
-
Features5 days ago
Modi’s Sri Lanka Sojourn
-
Midweek Review2 days ago
Inequality is killing the Middle Class
-
Features4 days ago
Sri Lanka’s Foreign Policy amid Geopolitical Transformations: 1990-2024 – Part I