News
Prez poll 2024: Sharply divided SLFP pulling in different directions
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Jaffna District SLFP parliamentarian Angajan Ramanathan yesterday (06) said that he would decide whom to support at the forthcoming presidential election depending on the response of independent candidate Ranil Wickremesinghe and SJB leader Sajith Premadasa to his proposals.
Lawmaker Ramanathan said so when The Island asked him what he would do as the solitary SLFPer elected under the hand symbol at the last general election held in August 2020.
Acknowledging that the 13 SLFPers who had been elected and appointed on the SLPP National List were divided over the party’s stance at the presidential poll, MP Ramanathan said that he recently handed over a set of proposals, based on aspirations of those living in the Jaffna electorate, to President Ranil Wickremesinghe.
MP Ramanathan said: “President Wickremesinghe, during his visit to Jaffna late last week visited my political office there. People’s proposals were handed over to him. The President responded positively. I’ll be handing over the same set of proposals to SJB leader today.”
Responding to another question, MP Ramanathan said that he wouldn’t discuss their proposals with other Jaffna-based political parties. “I have no intention to do so,” the Deputy Chairperson of Committees said.
Having unsuccessfully contested Jaffna on the UPFA ticket at the 2010 and 2015 general elections, Ramanathan first entered Parliament in 2015 on the UPFA National List. Ramanathan switched his allegiance to Maithripala Sirisena’s SLFP at the 2020 general election.
Meanwhile, a section of the SLFP led by General Secretary of the Party Dayasiri Jayasekera following lengthy deliberations has decided to back SJB leader Sajith Premadasa’s candidature at the presidential election.
The SLFP and SJB will finalize their agreement at the Waters Edge today (07). General Secretary of the UPFA Thilanga Sumathipala, too, has pledged his support to this endeavour.
Lawmaker Jayasekera told The Island that it would be a grave blunder on the part of those who enjoy ministerial perks to believe the voters would follow them.
Acknowledging that of the 14-member parliamentary group, the majority backed President Wickremesinghe’s candidature, the former Yahapalana Minister said those who voted for them wouldn’t be swayed and the party was confident of their continuous support.
MP Jayasekera pointed out that the SLPP secured a staggering 145 seats at the last general election, with the backing of the SLFP. Unfortunately, that party quite conveniently had forgottten the SLFP’s contribution and acted in such a brazen manner much to the disappointment of those who expected a genuine change.
“We are at crossroads,” MP Jayasekera said, urging the electorate to be mindful of President Wickremesinghe’s machinations. Whatever Wickremesinghe’s ministers say, voters should be aware of the danger in case the UNP leader won the election with the backing of an utterly corrupt section of the ruling party.
One-time SLFP Chairman and ex-General Secretary as well as current Senior Vice President Prof. Rohana Lakshman said that the party followed, what he called, a proper consultation process before reaching consensus on Premadasa’s candidature.
Prof. Lakshman said that he didn’t want to support Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe though the former leader Sirisena did so. “We had no option but to take a decision in the wake of the Election Commission declaring the date of the presidential election,” Prof. Lakshman said.
Asked whether the party considered fielding its own candidate after legal challenge against their original choice the then Justice Minister Rajapakshe, Prof. Lakshman said that they felt such a move as unrealistic due to post-Aragalaya realignment of political parties.
Both MP Jayasekera and Prof. Lakshman said that President Wickremesinghe, backed by the SLPP, posed a massive threat to the democratic system. Their project should be thwarted at any cost, they declared, urging the voters to rally around the SJB candidate.
Prof. Lakshman said that those who betrayed the party for ministerial portfolios and other perks and privileges squandered a golden opportunity to present a united face to the electorate. The bottom line is they treacherously held onto positions at the expense of the party, thereby undermined the very principles of the party, Prof. Lakshman said.
News
PM meets UN Resident Coordinator
A meeting between Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya and the United Nations Resident Coordinator in Sri Lanka, Marc-Andreé Franche, was held on the 20th of December 2025 at the Prime Minister’s Office.
During the meeting, Mr. Marc-Andreé Franche commended the swift coordination in which the Government acted to rescue affected communities and provide relief following the recent natural disaster situation faced by Sri Lanka.
Comparing experiences from other countries around the world, he noted that the level of international support Sri Lanka has received during such a disaster is exceptionally high. He further emphasized that he would utilize both his professional capacity and personal commitment to the fullest extent to ensure that Sri Lanka receives the necessary assistance.
Expressing appreciation for the continuous support extended by the United Nations to Sri Lanka, the Prime Minister stated that the role played by both the political authority and public officials in the field during this disaster management effort was exemplary. She highlighted that the collective and coordinated efforts of all parties from district leadership to the ground-level officials have become part in this success.
The Prime Minister also affirmed that the Government remains committed to properly managing the international assistance received and to rapidly restoring normalcy to the lives of people in the affected areas.
The meeting was attended by the secretary to the Prime Minister Pradeep Saputhanthri and Secretary to the Ministry of Education Nalaka Kaluwewa
[Prime Minister’s Media Division]
News
Suspension of Indian drug part of cover-up by NMRA: Academy of Health Professionals
President, Academy of Health Professionals, Ravi Kumudesh, yesterday (22), alleged that the National Medicines Regulatory Authority’s (NMRA) decision to suspend several batches of Ondansetron Injection USP 8 mg/4 mL (Batch Nos: OD24021E, OD25009E, OD25024E, OD25023E), following suspicions of patient complications, and a few reported deaths, seemed to be a bid to cover-up the latest public health sector crisis.
Kumudesh said so responding to The Island queries.
Kumudesh pointed out that the Chief Executive Officer of the NMRA, and other responsible officials of the Ministry of Health, were on record as having said that the alleged bacterial contamination in the medicine in question was based on laboratory test results generated at the Microbiology Laboratory of the National Hospital, Kandy.
He, however, emphasised that the Kandy facility lacked legally mandated facilities, validated systems, or regulatory accreditation required to conduct pharmaceutical sterility testing in accordance with internationally accepted regulatory standards.
“The Academy of Health Professionals is aware that the Microbiology Laboratory of the National Hospital, Kandy, does not possess the required facilities,” Kumudesh said, urging the government to come clean in this matter.
Kumudesh said the regulatory action taken by the political authority was aimed at deceiving the public, and theAcademy of Health Professionals had raised the issues with Health Minister Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa, Health Secretary Dr. Anil Jasinghe, NMRA head Dr. Ananda Wijewickrama and Director General Health Services (DGHS) Dr. Asela Gunawardena.
Kumudesh pointed out that the Kandy facility was meant to meet requirements within the Kandy National Hospital and not a world standard testing lab. Kumedesh sought an explanation as to how the suspended Ondansetron Injection had been administered on 13 December to a person warded at the hospital where NMRA head is based, a day after the NMRA decided to suspend it.
Public health sector trade union activist Kumudesh said that the Health Ministry couldn’t turn a blind eye to the disclosure that post-mortem reports of two persons, who allegedly died after being given the same medicine by the National Institute of Infectious Diseases, did not identify the medicine as the cause of death. According to him, the National Institute of Infectious Diseases administered the same medicine to patients, on multiple occasions, in the wake of the controversy.
Kumudesh said that it would be the responsibility of the government to ensure a comprehensive technical, legal, and administrative investigation into, what he called, Ondansetron affair. Having lambasted all previous governments of waste, corruption and irregularities, at the expense of the hapless public, the NPP couldn’t, under any circumstances, side-step the issue. “In the interest of transparency, regulatory credibility, and the protection of public health, this should be properly investigated,” Kumudesh said.
The crux of the matter was that the very basis of NMRA’s suspension of Ondansetron batches seemed to be irregular and questionable, Kumudesh said.
The Academy of Health Professionals, in its letter to Dr. Jayatissa, sought the Health Ministry’s response to the following questions: 1. Who requested the Microbiology Laboratory of the National Hospital, Kandy, to conduct sterility testing on this medicinal product?
2. Under what legal provisions was such a request made, and on what basis was the laboratory authorised to accept and perform such testing?
3. Who conducted the test, and who issued the report? Did those individuals possess the requisite professional qualifications, regulatory authorisation, and legal mandate to do so?
4. Did the laboratory possess the required infrastructure, validated testing systems, quality assurance mechanisms, and specialised training necessary to perform pharmaceutical sterility testing in compliance with regulatory standards?
5. If patient complications were attributed to microbial contamination, were all related materials—including syringes, IV lines, infusion fluids, and other associated devices—systematically tested? If not, on what scientific basis was it concluded that the contamination originated exclusively from the medicine?
6. Given that the NMRA is legally empowered to suspend a medicine as a precautionary measure, even without laboratory confirmation, when serious safety concerns arise, what was the justification for relying on an irregular and non-regulatory laboratory test instead?
Kumudesh stressed that Ondansetron, and nine other injectable medicines that had been suspended, were all ordered by the State Pharmaceutical Corporation (SPC) from an Indian manufacturer, Maan Pharmaceuticals.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
News
Dr. Jayatissa visits India amidst Ondansetron controversy
Amidst the ongoing controversy over the suspension of several batches of Indian manufactured Ondansetron Injection USP 8 mg/4 mL (Batch Nos: OD24021E, OD25009E, OD25024E, OD25023E) over safety fears, Health Minister Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa undertook a visit to New Delhi.
The Indian HC in Colombo said: ‘Dr. Jayatissa, the Minister of Health and Mass Media of the Government of Sri Lanka led a delegation to India from 17–19 December 2025 to participate in the 2nd WHO Traditional Medicine Global Summit held at Bharat Mandapam, New Delhi. The Summit was jointly organized by the World Health Organization and the Ministry of Ayush, Government of India.
The Summit was held under the theme “Restoring Balance: The Science and Practice of Health and Well-Being” and aimed to advance a global movement focused on restoring balance for individuals and the planet through the scientific understanding and practice of traditional medicine.
During the Summit, the Minister participated in the Ministerial Roundtable and delivered his remarks, highlighting Sri Lanka’s perspectives and rich traditions in Ayurveda and traditional healing.
During the visit, the Minister held bilateral meetings with Anupriya Patel, Minister of State for Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, and Prataprao Ganpatrao Jadhav, Minister of State (Independent Charge), Ministry of Ayush, Government of India. Discussions focused on strengthening cooperation in healthcare and traditional medicine, including regulatory collaboration, research linkages, and capacity-building initiatives.
On the sidelines of the programme, Minister Jayatissa also visited Apollo Hospitals to gain insights into the implementation of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) models and to explore best practices.
The visit reaffirmed the shared commitment of India and Sri Lanka to deepen collaboration in the fields of health and traditional medicine and to explore new avenues of partnership for the benefit of the people of both countries.’
-
Midweek Review6 days agoHow massive Akuregoda defence complex was built with proceeds from sale of Galle Face land to Shangri-La
-
News5 days agoPope fires broadside: ‘The Holy See won’t be a silent bystander to the grave disparities, injustices, and fundamental human rights violations’
-
News5 days agoPakistan hands over 200 tonnes of humanitarian aid to Lanka
-
Business4 days agoUnlocking Sri Lanka’s hidden wealth: A $2 billion mineral opportunity awaits
-
News6 days agoBurnt elephant dies after delayed rescue; activists demand arrests
-
Editorial6 days agoColombo Port facing strategic neglect
-
News4 days agoArmy engineers set up new Nayaru emergency bridge
-
News6 days agoSri Lanka, Romania discuss illegal recruitment, etc.
