Connect with us

News

Media collective faults Speaker

Published

on

The Media Orgainsations Collective (MOC), comprising Sri Lanka Working Journalists’ Association, Free Media Movement, Sri Lanka Muslim Media Forum, Tamil Media Alliance, Sri Lanka Young Journalists’ Association, and South Asian Free Media Association – Sri Lanka Chapter, yesterday said Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena’s actions were “an obstruction to the right of journalists to report freely and also impinges on the right of the public to true and accurate information.”

MOC has in a statement requested the Speaker “not to contribute to the government’s efforts to suppress the media, using the powers and privileges of Parliament.”

The text of the statement issued by MOC: When Parliament met on February 08, Member of Parliament D. Weerasinghe cited an article in the Sunday Lankadeepa newspaper, dated January 28, 2024, headlined ‘Supreme Court amendments not in Online Safety Act; Opposition demands meeting of party leaders before Speaker signs it’ as having breached his privileges as a member who voted for the Bill and requested the Speaker to direct the Committee on Parliamentary Privileges to take appropriate action. In response, you stated the request would be presented to the committee as a question of privilege.

We,  as leading media organisations in Sri Lanka who are signatories to this letter,  wish to inform you that while being alert to the government’s contemptible efforts to use parliamentary powers and privileges to stifle media freedom, we unequivocally condemn all attempts to suppress people’s rights to know the truth by intimidating journalists.

The article published by Lankadeepa was not a news report based on false information. On the contrary, it was an attempt to inform the general public of serious and demonstrated shortcomings that were observed in the process of having the Online Safety Bill adopted.  This is a view shared by a majority of the general public.

Communicating the right information to the public is a social responsibility of the media. And in that context, the news article in question was fulfilling that responsibility. The media, civil society activists, trade union activists and the Opposition have, from the outset, urged you, as Speaker of the House, not to present the Bill in Parliament due to its numerous flaws. It is also a well-known fact that you have ignored repeated calls by the Opposition for a meeting of party leaders to discuss the Bill, both before it was brought up for debate and even after it was put up for debate.  Several leading organisations, including the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka, have also issued statements to the media detailing the flaws in the Bill and its process.

We, as leading media organisations, question how reporting on demands made by the Opposition regarding the Online Safety Act or any other Act, can be deemed a breach of parliamentary privileges of MPs. Our conviction is that the media has tried to report on the fundamental rights violation of the people in the hopes of rectifying it, not questioning the parliamentary powers and privileges of its members.  This is the role of the media.  This is fulfilling its social responsibility.

Your decision to refer the matter related to the news report to the Committee on Parliamentary Privileges is an unwelcome surprise.  However, we take this opportunity to inform you that we are keenly watching the government’s efforts to suppress the media using an obsolete law with no specific provisions for ‘trial and punishment’.

Your action is an obstruction to the right of journalists to report freely and also impinges on the right of the public to true and accurate information.

Therefore, we earnestly request you, as the Hon. Speaker not to contribute to the government’s efforts to suppress the media using the powers and privileges of Parliament.

We wish to remind you that we have strongly opposed and expressed our condemnation of instances where journalists were summoned or attempts were made to summon them before the Committee on Parliamentary Privileges in the past and that our stance hasn’t changed. We remain strongly opposed to and condemn any attempts to summon journalists before the Committee on Parliamentary Privileges for fulfilling their journalistic and social responsibility obligations.”

The statement has been signed by Duminda Sampath, President Sri Lanka Working Journalists Association, Hana Ibrahim Convener Free Media Movement, N.M. Ameen President Sri Lanka Muslim Media Forum, Sri Gajan President Tamil Media Alliance, Tharindu Jayawardane President Sri Lanka Young Journalists’ Association, and Lakshman Gunasekara President South Asian Free Media Association – Sri Lanka Chapter.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

CIABOC tells court Kapila gave Rs 60 mn to MR and Rs. 20 mn to Priyankara

Published

on

USD 2.3 billion Airbus deal

The Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) yesterday told the Colombo Magistrate’s Court that former SriLankan Airlines CEO Kapila Chandrasena had admitted delivering a total of Rs. 60 million in three instalments of Rs. 20 million each to the then President Mahinda Rajapaksa, and Rs. 20 million to Aviation Minister Priyankara Jayaratne. The funds were allegedly linked to the controversial Airbus aircraft deal.

Chandrasena, who was arrested on March 12 over bribery allegations connected to the deal, was further remanded until April 2 by Colombo Chief Magistrate Asanga S. Bodaragama. He was produced before court yesterday by prison officials.

Investigators say Chandrasena is accused of accepting a US$2 million bribe in the transaction and conspiring to secure a total of US$16 million. They also allege that €1.45 million was transferred to a bank account in Singapore.

Prosecutors told court that Chandrasena had created a shell company in Brunei in his wife’s name to channel the kickbacks into its Singapore account.

The case stems from a 2013 agreement in which SriLankan Airlines purchased 10 aircraft valued at US$2.3 billion. Court proceedings are ongoing.The court fixed the date for March 24 to consider evidence with regard to issue warrants for Priyanka Neomali Wijearatne and Shamindra Rajapaksa.

By AJA Abeynayake

Continue Reading

News

Opposition moves no-faith motion against Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody

Published

on

Kumara Jayakody

Opposition lawmakers yesterday handed over a no-confidence motion against Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody to Speaker Dr Jagath Wickramaratne over alleged irregularities in coal procurement, etc.

Chief Opposition Whip MP Gayantha Karunathilaka submitted the motion to the Speaker yesterday morning. It has been signed by Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa, members of the SJB, and several other Opposition representatives.

The motion accuses the Minister of failing to fulfil his primary responsibility of ensuring the procurement of adequate and high-quality coal for the Lakvijaya Coal Power Plant at Norochcholai. It states that such negligence in managing a critical national energy asset amounts to a serious breach of ministerial responsibility.

It further notes that the Minister has been formally charged before the Colombo High Court by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) under Section 70 of the Bribery Act. The charge relates to an alleged act of corruption during his tenure as Procurement Manager of the Ceylon Fertiliser Company Limited.

The Opposition maintains that the combination of administrative failures and pending legal proceedings undermines the Minister’s ability to hold office, warranting a vote of no confidence.

By Saman Indrajith

Continue Reading

News

NJC takes up cudgels on behalf of Sallay, who played pivotal role in combating terrorism 

Published

on

The National Joint Committee (NJC) has raised concerns over the arrest and detention of retired Major General Suresh Sallay, calling for due process and caution in handling sensitive national security matters.

Issuing a statement signed by Dr Anula Wijesundera, the NJC has said the former senior military officer served the country for decades in the armed forces and intelligence services during critical periods of the conflict against terrorism.

While acknowledging that all citizens are subject to the law, the Committee has stressed that due process, fairness and respect for institutions tasked with safeguarding national security must be upheld.

Full text of the statement: The National Joint Committee (NJC) expresses deep concern regarding the recent arrest and detention of Retired Major General Suresh Sallay under a detention order.

Major General Sallay served Sri Lanka for decades in the armed forces and in the intelligence services during some of the most challenging periods of our country’s struggle against terrorism.

While all citizens are subject to the rule of law, the NJC believes that due process, fairness, and respect for the institutions that safeguard national security must be upheld at all times.

Particularly troubling are reports that sensitive intelligence-related details, including references to intelligence structures and personnel, are being publicly discussed in ways that could compromise operational security. The exposure of intelligence methodologies or personnel in the public domain can place lives at risk and weaken the effectiveness of national security institutions.

Sri Lanka has already experienced the grave consequences of such actions in the past. The Millennium City incident in 2002 led to the exposure of intelligence operatives who had been working against terrorist networks. Following the disclosure of their identities, many of those officers became targets of retaliation by the LTTE, resulting in the tragic loss of numerous lives and the dismantling of critical intelligence networks at a time when the nation most needed them.

It is therefore imperative that lessons from that painful episode are not forgotten.

It is also important to recall that prior investigations and public records confirm that intelligence warnings regarding potential attacks were received in Sri Lanka before 21 April 2019. The tragic loss of life that followed was therefore not the result of an absence of intelligence, but rather the failure of responsible authorities to act effectively upon those warnings in time to prevent the attacks. The numerous Commissions and Committees have identified these individuals and recommended action against them.

Equally relevant to the current public discussion is the factual record that Major General Suresh Sallay was neither serving as the Head of the State Intelligence Service nor present in Sri Lanka at the time when the attacks took place.

The NJC urges all authorities involved in the present investigation to ensure that the legal process is conducted with the utmost professionalism, transparency, and responsibility, while safeguarding sensitive national security information.

At a time when Sri Lanka continues to face evolving security challenges, the morale and integrity of the armed forces and intelligence services must be protected. Public confidence in these institutions is essential to the safety and stability of the nation.

The National Joint Committee therefore calls upon all responsible stakeholders — including investigators, public officials, media institutions, and civil society — to act with caution and responsibility so that the pursuit of justice does not inadvertently undermine the very institutions entrusted with protecting the country.

Sri Lanka’s patriots must remain vigilant to ensure that the sacrifices made by our armed forces and intelligence officers are not disregarded, and that national security institutions are not weakened in ways that could endanger the country in the future.

Continue Reading

Trending