News
Many questions raised by medical experts on Sinopharm unanswered by its manufacturer

by Suresh Perera
The report of the advisory panel of medical experts, seen by The Sunday Island, raised some critical questions on the “safety, efficacy and immunogenicity” of the Sinopharm vaccine.
The report says there was no response from the Chinese manufacturer on how the vaccine induces antibodies (neutralizing antibodies and IgG antibodies to the SARS-CoV2) compared to the responses following natural infection. i.e. antibody responses induced by the vaccine in comparison to antibodies convalescent serum following natural infection. The manufacturer only provided seroconversion rates of the two vaccine arm.
The panel was of the view that it was important to find out if the immune responses elicited by the vaccine are adequate. All other vaccines showed a higher or an equal antibody response compared to natural infection.
There was also no answer provided to neutralizing antibody levels in those over 60 years of age in comparison to younger individuals. The manufacturer only provided Seroconversion rates of 18-59 and 60 but not the neutralizing antibody levels. It was vital to elicit a response to this to determine the immunogenicity of this vaccine in older individuals, the report said.
The following were the questions raised by the experts and the response given (or not given, as in some cases) by the manufacturer:
Q:
The lack of detectable SARS-CoV2 IgG antibodies 14 days after the first dose and also very minimal at 28 days (when they received the 2nd dose).
Answer
by the manufacturer: Higher titres of antibodies were induced following the second dose than the first.
(The panel observed that SARS-CoV2 inactivated vaccine produced by a different manufacturer, high levels of antibodies were seen at 28 days following a single dose. A good antibody response has been observed with the inactivated vaccines. inactivated polio vaccine after one dose, which is boosted by the second and third doses. The levels of antibodies following inactivated vaccines is lower but the levels are still detectable after a single dose).
Q:
Interim analysis of phase 3 data presented until October 31. There was no data after that. Can the follow up data be provided?
(Not answered)
(The panel noted that as the participants would have been followed after October 31, 2020, it would be important to have more safety and efficacy data. Such follow up data related to other vaccines have been made available through phase III clinical trials reports published in peer-reviewed journals).
Q:
Vaccine efficacy is claimed to be 76.06% and 78.01%. Were participants only followed up for an average period of 22 days after the second dose?
(Not answered)
Observation by Panel: Period of follow up is insufficient.
Q:
Efficacy data in 60 year old age group. The sample size inadequate to draw conclusions.
(Not answered)
Observation by Panel: Since this is the most vulnerable group for COVID-19 infection as well as severe disease, this data is required.
Q:
Was anyone with comorbidities included in the trial?
(Not answered)
Observation by Panel: Data required to determine efficacy and safety in those with comorbidities. In the exclusion criteria of the trial, it appears that all those with comorbidities have been excluded from study.
Q:
Phase 3 safety data. What were the side effects observed? Only the percentage of AE given and no breakdown of the type of side effects seen with the two vaccines. What are the type of grade 3 and 4 side effects observed and the proportion who experienced each side effect?
(Not answered)
Observation by Panel: Detailed information on types AEs is important to make an assessment on safety of the vaccine. The safety data should be available in an age-specific manner.
Q:
Some people had itching. Did anyone develop allergies or anaphylaxis? Rashes with itching? What are the ingredients of the vaccine? Does it have BSA or FBS? Since vero cells are known to be grown in FBS if there is contamination that might cause issues in those with beef allergy.
(Not answered).
Observation by Panel: As above.
Q:
How many were included in the analysis of immunogenicity? How many from all age groups? When reporting the GMTs of neutralizing Abs and binding antibodies, only median/mean have been reported. No idea about the range, IQR or SD.
(Not answered).
Observation by Panel: This information is critical to make an assessment of immunogenicity of the vaccine. The number of individuals in whom immunogenicity was evaluated is also important.
Q:
T cell studies. To show whether vaccine activates a TH1 response, rather than a TH2.
Manufacturer has noted that relevant studies have not been conducted.
Observation by Panel: In previous clinical trials on inactivated vaccines for measles and RSV, and also animal studies on SARS, a TH2 response caused organ pathology, including deaths, after infection with wild-type virus. This was attributed to a TH2 response, rather than the ideal TH1.
Latest News
Advisory for severe lightning issued for Sabaragamuwa, Central and Uva provinces and in Hambanthota district

The Natural Hazards Early Warning Centre has issued an Advisory for Severe Lightning for the Sabaragamuwa, Central and Uva provinces and in Hambanthota district.
The advisory issued at 02.00 p.m. today [07 April 2025] is valid for the period until 11.00 p.m. 07 April 2025
The public are warned that thundershowers accompanied by severe lightning are likely to occur at several places in for Sabaragamuwa, Central and Uva provinces and in Hambantota district. There may be temporary localized strong winds during thundershowers. General public is kindly requested to take adequate precautions to minimize damages caused by lightning activity.
ACTION REQUIRED:
The Department of Meteorology advises that people should:
Seek shelter, preferably indoors and never under trees.
• Avoid open areas such as paddy fields, tea plantations and open water bodies during thunderstorms.
• Avoid using wired telephones and connected electric appliances during thunderstorms.
• Avoid using open vehicles, such as bicycles, tractors and boats etc.
• Beware of fallen trees and power lines.
• For emergency assistance contact the local disaster management authorities.
Latest News
“Census of Population and Housing 2024” Report Presented to the President

The report of the “Census of Population and Housing 2024,” conducted by the Department of Census and Statistics, was officially handed over to President Anura Kumara Disanayake this morning (07) at the Presidential Secretariat.
This preliminary report has been prepared based on island wide data collected between October and December 2024.
The report provides details on Sri Lanka’s population, its growth and the distribution of the population across districts.
The information gathered through the census is vital not only for the government but also for other institutions in formulating policies and development plans essential for the country’s progress. Significantly, for the first time in the history of census-collecting in Sri Lanka, data collection was carried out using tablet computers and user-friendly mobile devices.
The event was attended by Deputy Minister of Finance & Planning, Harshana Suriyapperuma, Secretary to the President Dr. Nandika Sanath Kumanayake, Secretary to the Ministry of Finance Mahinda Siriwardana, Director General of the Department of Census and Statistics D.D.G.A. Senevirathne and several other officials.
Business
Central Bank Presents Annual Economic Review 2024 to President

The Central Bank of Sri Lanka today (07) presented its flagship publication, the Annual Economic Review for 2024 (AER 2024), to President and Minister of Finance, Anura Kumara Disanayake, highlighting the steady progress of Sri Lanka’s economic recovery following the country’s most severe downturn in recent history.
The report was officially handed over by Dr. P. Nandalal Weerasinghe, Governor of the Central Bank, during a special ceremony held at the Presidential Secretariat.
AER 2024 comprises four main chapters: Macroeconomic Developments, Conditions of the Financial System, Review of Central Bank’s Policies and Macroeconomic Outlook.
According to the Review, the Sri Lankan economy showed significant signs of recovery in 2024, following the deep economic crisis experienced two years ago. The recovery trajectory, though challenging, has been notably faster than that of many other debt-distressed countries.
Improvements in economic activity, a partial resurgence in purchasing power and reduced uncertainty are among the key positive indicators noted in the report.
The event was attended by Dr. Nandika Sanath Kumanayake, Secretary to the President, K. M. Mahinda Siriwardena, Secretary to the Treasury, Mrs. K. M. A. N. Daulagala, Senior Deputy Governor, Dr. C. Amarasekara, Assistant Governor, Dr. (Mrs.) S. Jegajeevan, Director of Economic Research and Dr. L. R. C. Pathberiya and Additional Director of Economic Research at the Central Bank Dr. V. D. Wickramarachchi.
[PMD]
-
Business17 hours ago
Colombo Coffee wins coveted management awards
-
Features2 days ago
Starlink in the Global South
-
Business3 days ago
Daraz Sri Lanka ushers in the New Year with 4.4 Avurudu Wasi Pro Max – Sri Lanka’s biggest online Avurudu sale
-
Business4 days ago
Strengthening SDG integration into provincial planning and development process
-
Business3 days ago
New SL Sovereign Bonds win foreign investor confidence
-
Sports5 days ago
To play or not to play is Richmond’s decision
-
Features2 days ago
Modi’s Sri Lanka Sojourn
-
Sports4 days ago
New Zealand under 85kg rugby team set for historic tour of Sri Lanka