Features
Impressions of Mahatma Gandhi, the Great Soul
by Dr. W.A. Abeysinghe
Over the past seven decades or so, interpretations of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, some of which are lopsided, half baked and controversial, have been many and manifold. My readers may feel rather baffled, if I disclose the fact that my studies, however humble and disorganized they may be, have commenced on far back as the latter part of the year 1958 in the last century. A jewel of a book entitled ” An Autobiography or the Story of my Experiments with Truth” (I possess up to date, though in tattered pages) which I bought at a book counter of Ananda Bhawan at Pettah, Colombo, having paid Rs.1.25 during my teacher training days at the G.T.C.Maharagama has been dated by me as 25-11-58. Simply count the many years past, since then – from 1958 in the last century to Corona ridden gloomy year of 2021 of the present century!
From the day I concluded reading the incomplete unfinished autobiography of the great Indian Sage, I remained ‘Gandhian’ in spirit, heart and soul, transcending all my later studies of Marxism – or rather, Marxism – Leninism – culminating my doubts about the so called communist utopia of a classless society annihilating the bourgeois after having established a dictatorship of the proletariat ! And now, one would be rather amused to witness how this so called dictatorship of the proletariat ended up having enthroned a heinous autocrat – corrupt to the core – in the garb of a Russian Tsar, in the emergence of a man called who dreams to build a Chinese Super Empire encompassing Asia and Africa, and a Castro type degenerated family rule which brought into being the poorest state in the whole of Latin America !
So that, as a man who witnessed all these upheavals and political changes of universal magnitude, my attraction toward ‘Gandhism’ ( if you pardon me for the term) has been unavoidable.
At a time when crude nationalism raises its ugly head in the form of racialism, communalism and many other “tribal manifestations”, in my own country the life and, most importantly, the death of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi emerges supreme in the history of mankind. Undoubtedly His death, was that of a martyr, in the compact sense of the word.
I sometimes feel that most biographers of Mahatmaji have opted to glorify his death, rather than his many-faceted political, social and reformist life.
Louis Fischer, a conscientious biographer of Gandhi, who met the great Mahatma twice – in 1942 and later, in June, 1946, begins his book with a vivid description of Gandhi’s assassination.
I quote the two opening paragraphs of Louis Fisher, verbatim:
“At 4.30 p.m., Abha brought in the last meal he was ever to eat; it consisted of goat’s milk, cooked and raw vegetables, oranges and a concoction of ginger, sour lemons and strained butter with juice of aloe. Sitting on the floor of his room in the rear of Birla House in New Delhi, Gandhi ate and talked with Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Deputy Prime Minister of the new government of independent India. Maniben, Patel’s daughter and secretary, was also present. The conversation was important. There had been rumors of differences between Patel and Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. This problem, like so many others, had been dropped into the Mahatma’s lap.
“Abha, alone with Gandhi and the Patels, hesitated to interrupt. But she knew Gandhi’s attachment to punctuality. Finally, therefore, she picked up the Mahatma’s nickel plated watch and showed it to him. ‘I must tear myself away,’ Gandhi remarked, and so saying he rose, went to the adjoining bathroom and then started towards the prayer ground in the large park to the left of the house. Abha, the young wife of Kanu Gandhi, grandson of the Mahatma’s cousin, and Manu, the granddaughter of another cousin, accompanied him; he leaned his forearms on their shoulders. ‘My walking sticks’, he called them.”
Gandhi felt completely relaxed with his “two walking sticks” and even joked with them.
“So you are serving me with cattle fare,” Gandhi said and laughed.
“Ba used to call it horse fare”, was Abha’s prompt retort.
“Ba” was their affectionate shortened name for Kasturba, Gandhi’s predeceased wife.
“Isn’t it grand for me to relish what no one else wants!” bantered Gandhi in the same jovial mood.
As many martyrs of history, Gandhi knew and even sensed that he would some day he assassinated. He didn’t fear death, for it was manifested number of times when he staged many a fast unto death. Really, he was even prepared for it.
As he was nearing the fateful day of January 30, 1948 Gandhi had once expressed thus.
“To die by the hand of a brother rather than by disease or in some other way, cannot be for me a matter of sorrow…. I would deserve praise only if I fell as a result of such an attack and yet retained a smile on my face and no malice against the doer….. All perpetrators should be won over through love.”
“Tomorrow”, he explained. “I may not be here”.
He was aware of the strengthening of the police guard on Birla House, but notwithstanding Home Minister Patel’s earnest request, Gandhi would not permit the police to search those attending the prayer meetings:
“If I have to die I should like to die at the prayer meeting. You are wrong in believing that you can protect me from harm. God is my protector.”
That was how he took death and admonished his massive following, accordingly.
On that fateful January 30th 1948, Patel and his daughter immediately left Birla House while Gandhi, a little vexed at being unpunctual, made his way to the prayer meeting. Leaning lightly on the two girls, walking briskly to make up for lost time, he mounted the six low steps up to the level of the prayer ground. As he took a few paces in the direction of the wooden platform on which he sat during services, the crowd opened to enable him to pass through, bowing to his feet as he went by. Gandhi took his arms off the girls’ shoulders and for a moment stood there smiling, touching his palms together in the traditional namaskar gesture. Just then, a stocky young man in a khaki bush jacket jostled through the crowd, roughly pushing Manu away, and when he was directly in front of Gandhi, he fired three shots at point-blank range. Mahatma’s hands, folded in friendly greeting, descended slowly. ‘He Rama (Oh, God),’ he murmured, and sighed softly as the frail old body fell to the ground. The assassin was overpowered after a short and fierce struggle, and the police quickly took custody of him.
As soon an Gandhi was pronounced “dead” by the doctors first to arrive at the Birla House was Patel, who had left his master a while ago. He managed an outward calm, despite the unexpected shock of his life. Then came Nehru, and he wept unrestrainedly by the side of his dead “Bapu”.
And among those others who arrived just then was Mountbatten, the Governor General of newly born free India and former viceroy. He had to push his way to the door through the growing crowd. Just then he heard someone shouting in a loud voice, “It was a Muslim, who did it.”
Mountbatten turned round and shouted back: “You fool! Don’t you know it was a Hindu?” Some in the crowd wanted it to be a Muslim, for they could then have a pretext to run a riot. Mountbatten’s spirited response with his characteristic presence of mind had a calming effect on the excited crowd. A member of the Governor-General’s staff remarked to him: “How can you possibly know it’s a Hindu?” Mountbatten replied: “I don’t. But if it is a Muslim we’re all finished, so it may as well be a Hindu.”
Mountbatten stood by the Mahatma’s body momentarily and then, seeing both Patel and Nehru together in the room, he acted with his instinctive sense of timing. He drew the two leaders aside and told them of his recent meeting with Gandhi, when the Mahatma had said how deeply he wished that they would resolve their differences. Nehru and Patel looked at each other, and then at Gandhi, who now lay before them on the floor, wrapped in his shroud of khadi. They moved towards each other and embraced in a gesture of reconciliation.
For a long time Manu and Abha cradled the dead Mahatma’s head on their laps, while the other women watched in silence or chanted verses from the Bhagavad Gita.
That was how Mahatma rose in death as a martyr for India’s unity.
But his death, was much more.
It was meant for the good of the entire mankind.
Never in modern history has any man been mourned more deeply and more widely.
“The light has gone out of our lives and there is darkness everywhere and I do not quite know what to tell you and how to say it. Our beloved leader, Bapu as we call him, the father of our nation, is no more,” Nehru announced the death of Mahatma Gandhi, in a hastily broadcast radio talk.
At the time Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi entered the Indian political scene, the Indian national movement was in a matured state. It was gaining momentum among the middle class Hindus and Muslims. But there existed a marked distance between the National Congress and the Indian peasantry.
Gandhi’s emergence in the national movement at that juncture, as Nehru described in his treatise The Discovery of India, was “like a whirlwind that upset many things.”
To quote Nehru:
“And then Gandhi came. He was like a powerful current of fresh air that made us stretch ourselves and take deep breaths; like a beam of light that pierced the darkness and removed the scales from our eyes; like a whirlwind that upset many things, but most of all the working of people’s minds. He did not descend from the top; he seemed to emerge from the millions of India, speaking their language and incessantly drawing attention to them and their appalling condition. Get off the backs of these peasants and workers, he told us, all you who live by their exploitation, get rid of the system that produces this poverty and misery. Political freedom took new shape then acquired a new content.”
Having fought for the liberation of the Indian community in South Africa, Gandhi returned to his native land on January 09, 1915. He brought along with him, two well sharpened political weapons – namely, passive resistance and non-corporation which during the later years of the Indian national struggle turned into Sathyagraha and a movement of civil disobedience against the British rule.
By about the dawn of the second quarter of the last century, Gandhi was the undisputed leader of the Indian national movement. Under his aegis, the national movement was geared not only toward Swaraj-home rule – but also to a wider moral, ethical and cultural movement aimed at reforming the primitive, illiterate and backward India into a vibrant new nation in the spirit of self-reliance and national awakening. His campaign of Kadhi and his struggle against untouchability and caste system should be viewed and interpreted in this context – that Gandhi was essentially a reformer.
Greatness of Gandhi lies in the fact that, unlike many other fighters for national independence the world over, he brought into being a reconciliation between political freedom and national reformation into one unified movement. His concept of future India was a far sighted and ever widening phenomenon.
The combination of Gandhi, the politician and Gandhi the reformer was remarkable indeed. To call him a saint – which is implicit in the epithet of Mahatma – does not reflect his true personality. His religious convictions and spirituality were an integral part of his personality. These attributes would, in time to come, totally eclipse the prevalent notion that Gandhi wrought the miracle of India’s freedom. Trite phrases like ‘Hindu saint’ and ‘Father of the Nation’ do not describe his true place in the history of human civilization.
Gandhi showed the world that the love of one’s people need not be inconsistent with the love of humanity. He strove to free the downtrodden from the shackles of injustice, slavery and deprivation. But he was also obsessed with the future of the entire human race. “There is no hope for the aching world except through the narrow and straight path of non-violence”, he wrote. “Milions like me may fail to prove the truth in their own lives; that would be their failure, never of the eternal law.”
When names of the giants of Indian independence movement are embedded in the fossils of history, Gandhi’s name shall shine for ever, for his humanist message of truth and non-violence.
Predictably, present US efforts at exercising suzerainty, as it were, over the rest of the West and outside are facing stiff challenges. The foremost counter-challenge to these hegemonic aims comes from the EU. Next in line is an Arab plan to reconstruct and develop the war-shattered Gaza Strip, in an outright rejection of President Trump’s ‘Middle East Riviera’ fantasy.
EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen was forthright and lucid recently in Europe’s decision to stand by Ukraine in the face of the Trump administration’s efforts to implement a so-called peace plan involving, among other things, the selling of Ukraine’s mineral rights to the US. As should be expected of an extreme Right wing US Republican regime, there are no pretensions here to be on the side of principled politics. On the other hand, monetary gain is the uppermost consideration for the regime.
The EU chief said: ‘We are living in the most momentous and dangerous of times. This is a moment for Europe, and we are ready to step-up.’ She had gone on to elaborate to the West on a ‘5 part plan to strengthen Europe’s defense industry and provide “immediate” military support to Ukraine.’
Right now, Europe cannot measure up to the US in terms of the quantity and monetary value of military assistance supplied to the Ukraine and other ‘trouble spots’ that matter to the West, but what is noteworthy is that Europe is losing no time in coming out with viable defense plans to support Ukraine in its wasting war with invasive Russia.
That is, Europe is very much on the ready with a ‘strategic plan’ to implement its international defense commitments with or without the US. It is aptly called ‘Re-Arm Europe Plan’ and is worth 800 billion pounds. In fact, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is already on record as having promised to deploy ‘boots on the ground and planes in the air’, if required, in defense of Ukraine’s sovereignty.
At present, though, there is recognition on the part of Europe and the US that they need each other for the achievement of their respective international policy aims but Europe’s defense plans for Ukraine amply demonstrate that, going forward, it would not be a question of Europe tamely falling in line with the US.
To express it bluntly, it would boil down to the US not going unchallenged in its efforts at exercising any suzerainty over the rest of the West.
Besides, the world is yet to be informed of any principal peace component in the US’ plans to end the Ukraine war. The sale of Ukraine’s strategic resources to the US does in no way equate with any peace plan which should not only involve Russia getting back to its internationally recognized boundaries with Ukraine but should also feature a recognition by Russia of Ukraine’s sovereignty or its right to self-determination. In the absence of such conditions, any purported peace plan would need to be dismissed as a farcical document.
In fact the Trump administration is right now providing the world with quite a few ‘laughs’. For instance, why should Ukraine be ‘grateful’ or ‘thankful’ to the US? If in the past the US provided military assistance to the Ukraine, it did so for strategic and other reasons that dovetailed with the US’ national interest. It was not a matter of the US bestowing any kindness on Ukraine.
Besides, President Trump cannot expect any excessive cordiality from a visiting head of government by ‘talking down’ to him, which is what the Trump administration did recently when Ukraine’s President visited the White House. Civility in bilateral relations, after all, is a two-way process.
As notable a challenge to the US as that being posed by the EU comes in the form of an Arab plan to take on the reconstruction and development of the Gaza in the event of some peace and stability descending on the region.
Arab leaders at an emergency summit recently in Cairo reportedly evolved a $53 billion reconstruction program for the Gaza, which is seen as outrivaling the US plan to ‘take over Gaza’ and turn it into a ‘Middle East Riviera’. Further, the Arab countries concerned are firmly opposing moves by the US to move out the Palestinian community from the Gaza for the furtherance of its fanciful project.
The latter development is doubly significant in view of the fact that the Arab plan also endorses the ‘Two State’ solution in the Middle East, which for most sensible sections, is the only path to a measure of stability in the region. If the Arab plan meets with wide acceptance, the next step for the Arab world would be to enlist Western support for it. Subsequently the difficult undertaking of getting Israel to agree to it should be taken on by concerned sections of the international community. It goes without saying that the plan should also satisfy the security needs of Israel.
Thus, it would not be a question of the US acting unilaterally or going ahead without being challenged in the implementation of its plans for the Ukraine and the Gaza. The sizeable opposition it would be facing on both fronts would require it to negotiate with the utmost insight with both the EU and the Arab world.
Moreover, there are ‘bread and butter’ issues that ought to stop the US in its tracks and make it think long and deep on the consequences of the cavalier course it is currently taking in international affairs. For instance, stock markets worldwide have been rattled by US plans to slam unacceptably high tariffs on exports from Canada, Mexico and China. Since these tariffs would not go unchallenged by the countries concerned, the world would need to brace for prolonged and destructive trade wars among the above countries which would have the effect of adding to the cost of living bill of citizens the world over.
Needless to say, excessive economic pressures are the ideal breeding ground for stepped-up social and political discontent anywhere. Considering the foregoing, the Trump administration would do well to bring a measure of perceptiveness and foresight to bear in its management of international affairs. Among other things, it would do well to rein-in its fatal tendency to dabble dangerously in populist politics.
By Jayasri Priyalal
Populism is a political approach that seeks to appeal to ordinary people who feel their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups, often creating an “us vs. them” mentality that divides society. During his first term, President Trump blamed various groups and factors, such as immigrants and unfair trade practices in China, where state subsidies distort markets, leading to cheap goods flooding American markets and impacting jobs and industries. President Trump was highly critical of the inefficiencies within US government institutions. He is determined to implement his economic strategy, known as MAGAnomics, to address these issues.
American exceptionalism was the mantra during President Donald Trump’s first term. Smaller governments for increased efficiency remain a myth as capital markets are heavily dependent on near zero interest funds. They do not come from private conglomerates as earned profits, but from the state-run financial agencies.
Mr. Donald Trump was elected as the 47th President of the United States of America, with “Make America Great Again” as his dominant campaign theme. He rose to political prominence as a populist, advocating for nationalist interests among Americans. Since taking office on January 20th, President Trump has issued numerous executive orders. Some of these decisions have been legally challenged at the time of writing this essay. The President’s office has been issuing executive orders at a rapid pace, possibly as an effort to “drain the swamp,” a promise he made during his first term.
Ruchir Sharma writes that the era of small government ended long ago, as the global financial assets are loaded with debt instruments and the real capital and stocks are only 30 percent of the financial assets. In his book What went Wrong with Capitalism, Ruchir Sharma forewarns about fake prosperity of giant corporations dominating the economy in a debt-pickled business culture. When stock market values of largest corporations cross US$ 3 trillion and fortunes of richest tycoons break US$ 200 billion, a bigger government must be the answer to balance the unrestrained financialisation, argues Sharma candidly. It will be too early to comment whether a strategic regulatory and state capture is underway in the hands of the super-rich in the second term of President Donald Trump.
The failed neo-liberal ideology built on the premise of privatisation of profits and socialisation social problems culture appears to be gaining ground in the name of efficiency once again. President Trump has set up a new agency -Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to increase efficiency and appointed billionaire, Elon Musk to head the agency. Wonder whether they have plans to close the Federal Reserve for minting money at neo-zero interest rates, and reduce the size of the government?
One significant action was the closure of USAID, which sent shockwaves through development agencies that relied on its funds to address the needs of the poor and marginalised. In the process, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and the Trump administration have uncovered many illicit operations within USAID, revealing hidden agendas. Media reports suggest there is evidence of USAID’s involvement in supporting the demonstrators of the Orange Revolution in Ukraine in 2004.
“History doesn’t repeat itself,
but it does rhymes” – Mark Twain
This write-up aims to analyse the historical trends of great leaders who have influenced human civilisation and how they demonstrated their leadership through either fear or courage. Fear and courage were the two key determinants that drove those leading and mobilising the masses for struggles for the common good. However, history reveals how leaders chose just and unjust causes to lead for better or worse.
The writer opines that the current extreme right-wing populist political trend seeks to reverse many of the progressive achievements’ humankind has secured. Far-right political movements are rallying with populist movements like those that existed in the pre-WWI era. Globalisation-driven neoliberal policies have widened inequalities across all social segments, benefiting only a handful of the super-rich at the expense of the larger portion of have-nots.
It appears that current frustrations are being capitalised on by the far-right populist movement to gain electoral success by dividing public opinion and sparking fear. This fear includes losing jobs and livelihoods to migrants from other countries and Americans losing their economic superiority to China. China’s technological achievements in AI and electric vehicle manufacturing, along with new geopolitical alliances outside the sphere of influence of northern hemisphere-controlled states, are casting doubts among electorates in Western democracies.
The antidote to fear is hope, which is being strategically utilised by far-right political movements in Europe, North America, and South America now. Therefore, populists are getting elected to govern the helpless and hopeless. Democracy is ineffective if the prevailing economy does not benefit most of the society. History demonstrates how the Weimar Republic in Germany collapsed in 1933, paving the way for World War II and bringing misery and hardship to mankind with the democratically elected Adolf Hitler coming to power.
Hitler and the Nazi regime unleashed an extreme right-wing doctrine, leading to the Holocaust, driven by the fear that Jews and migrants threatened the supremacy of the Aryan German race—a fundamentally misconceived belief. By embedding fear among the German population, the Nazi forces were able to act with a distorted sense of courage, driven by their misguided mission to make Germany great in Europe.
History reveals that the collapse of the Weimar Republic in Germany was due to economic problems, disdain for democracy, political polarisation, and international isolation. Are we witnessing any parallels in the 21st century? On February 23rd, 2025, Germans elected a new chancellor, and the far-right AfD gained the highest number of votes in history, securing the second-highest number of seats in the Bundestag, pushing the outgoing chancellor Olaf Scholz’s Social Democratic Party (SPD) into third place.
As Mark Twain famously asked, does history repeat itself or merely rhyme? In the current context, numerous economic policy uncertainties have left much of the population feeling helpless, hopeless, and frustrated. The neoliberal order that dominated for decades has widened inequalities not only in income and wealth but also in access to education and health services across communities.
Currently, it appears that the super-rich are stepping into state and regulatory capture, aligning with policymakers. Unelected Elon Musk now sits in President Donald Trump’s cabinet meetings. Will they team up to alleviate poverty and uplift the quality of life for marginalised people?
The Only Thing We Have to Fear is Fear Itself” – Franklin D. Roosevelt
President Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) led the US administration during the crisis of the 1930s. His New Deal policy package, which stimulated the sagging economy with increased government expenditure and saved jobs, ultimately turned the situation around. FDR defined courage as not the absence of fear, but rather the assessment that something else is more important than fear.
The emerging economic powerhouse, China, and its administrative system, the Communist Party of China, face geopolitical and economic challenges. Are they influenced by fear or courage in their response? President Donald Trump and his administration have challenged many of their trading partners by imposing conditions on trade and technological advancements. Is China responding to these tactics—such as increased taxes, economic sanctions, or manoeuvres regarding sovereign rights in Taiwan and Tibet—with fear or courage?
Throughout history, emperors, military dictators, and malevolent political leaders have demonstrated ruthless leadership based on false beliefs catalysed by fear, leading to devastating wars and human suffering. Among them are democratically elected leaders who soon transformed into ruthless dictators, such as Adolf Hitler in Germany, leading to World War II and the destruction of millions of innocent lives with immense suffering and bloodshed.
When analysing historical trends, a clear pattern emerges. In the 15th century, religious wars were fought under the false belief of spiritual superiority. From the 16th to the 18th century, imperialistic wars were driven by the perceived dominance of European civilisation and the spread of faith. Subsequent conflicts, including World War I, World War II, and the Cold War in the 19th and 20th centuries, were triggered by the monopolisation of natural resources, particularly energy, through colonisation.
The dominant ideologies that led to many human catastrophes during these wars were based on false beliefs, driven by fear and greed for the perceived benefits of the then-dominant ideology, industrial capitalism. It would be insightful to know whether the leaders who led these wars acted out of fear or courage. However, no research is needed to prove that great leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela acted with sheer courage and conviction. In contrast, Adolf Hitler’s leadership, fuelled by fear, led to mass ethnic cleansing in gas chambers, mobilising populism with an “us vs. them” mentality.
TikTok to Deepseek: China’s Courageous Technological Superiority
Now, the geopolitical battles revolve once again around trade wars. Are there dominant ideologies or false beliefs driving the uncertainties in the global economy as in the past? Has the monopolistic advantage derived through trade in services by the global north since the late 20th century come to an end? Can global communities still rely on the open market and free trade fundamentalism founded on a rules-based order?
It appears that China is now in Trump’s shop in America, and the rest of the world is making calculations about American and Chinese dreams for the greater good of humanity. It is wise to take stock, learning from history without leaving space for disastrous cyber or nuclear wars that could shatter the hope for shared prosperity for all.
According to the World Bank, 850 million people have been lifted out of abject poverty in China. By 1949, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) came into being, defeating all feudal and imperialist forces under the leadership of Chairman Mao Zedong. It appears that Chinese political leadership is working with courage and determination to transform the PRC into an economic powerhouse by 2049. Chinese ambitions and aspirations of achieving these goals cannot be deterred by mere threats of tariffs and sanctions, as they have countered all such measures fearlessly.
During his first term in office, President Trump targeted the Chinese telecommunications company Huawei, raising concerns about US national security. The global north rallied with the USA and kept Huawei out of bounds. President Joe Biden continued with the sanctions and then banned TikTok, citing security concerns once again. Furthermore, President Biden banned the export of advanced powerful chips to China by enacting the CHIPS Act. Amidst all these constraints, Deepseek has become a popular AI search engine, and President Donald Trump keeps dancing to TikTok videos despite a court order.
Wang Chuanfu, the founder of BYD, a Chinese electric vehicle maker, now dominates the markets, sending courageous signals to Elon Musk’s Tesla brand. President Deng Xiaoping, the father of China’s modernisation era, foresaw the advantage and superiority of China’s rare earth mineral deposits as early as the 1990s. China dominates rare earth minerals, controlling 87% of the global market. Naturally, this fear drives US presidents to search for rare earth and mineral deposits in Iceland and Ukraine.
Melloney Dassanayaka represented Sri Lanka at the Miss Universe 2024 pageant held in Mexico … and, what’s so special about her (unlike most of our pageant winners who get involved in frivolous activities, when they return from an international event, or during their reign), Miss Universe Sri Lanka is doing exactly what the 40th Mrs. World pageant winner, Tshego Gaelae, from South Africa, has ventured out to do for her country and her people.
Although our Queen wasn’t crowned Miss Universe 2024, she must be congratulated for impressing many in Mexico. Her live interview was well received. This is one of the bouquets that came her way …
“The humble Queen. This was my very first impression of Melloney from the moment I spoke with her. She embodies humility, but there is so much more to her than meets the eye. What makes me admire her even more is how she shatters stereotypes in Sri Lanka.
“Being a banker and a basketball player, she proves that women can excel in any field.
“Rooted in strength, the fire in her heart shows us that women are destined for greatness, just like her.”
And this is another compliment that she received …
“Dear Melloney. I have the great memory of how I met you. I was super nervous and you were having breakfast, super calm, but you took my hands, smiled and transmitted me a lot of calm by inviting me to your table and talking. Thank you for motivating me from that moment that I can achieve what I want to be. You are so funny smart, hardworking, sweet and kind.
“All your outfits were beautiful. Thank you for teaming up with me. You deserved rest after finishing your 15 steps checklist because you were the first on the team to finish them.
“I treasure the perfume you gave me, as well as the tea envelopes and, of course, having met you.
“Sending you many hugs and come back to Mexico whenever you want. Hoping to see you again for chilaquiles (authentic Mexican meal).”
Back home, Melloney is aready into quite a few projects.
She was involved with the Rotary Club, of Port City, in a project which took the form of a motor rally, held on 8th February, 2025.
The event was advertised as follows:
Exciting News! Join us at the Motor Rally to Save Little Hearts on Saturday, 08 February 2025, and meet Miss Universe Sri Lanka, Melloney Dassanayaka! Don’t miss this chance to support a noble cause and speak with our Event Ambassador and Beauty Queen. Limited slots available—register now for the Motor Rally!
Melloney says she is the Ambassador for this ‘Little Hearts’ project which helps facilitate the cardiac and critical care complex at the Lady Ridgeway Hospital.
The Endometriosis Support and Awareness Foundation (ESAF) had Melloney as their Special Guest at a five km run to bring awareness on endometriosis.
Our Beauty Queen is also supporting a few single-women-headed families, in Matara, to help pay their children’s school and tuition fees.
Melloney, who is an animal lover, added that she is looking forward to collaborate with an elephant conservation centre to help bring awareness on the ongoing issues.
“I was asked to do a photoshoot recently, in Sigiriya, on an elephant, but I couldn’t do it; honestly I broke into tears when I saw the elephant,” she said.
In conclusion, Miss Universe Sri Lanka said that her entire family enjoys reading The Island newspaper.
“The Island newspaper is a hit with my family.”
PNS Aslat departs island on successful completion of her visit
Former Minister Mervyn Silva remanded till 17th March
W. P. Senadheera appointed Secretary to the Ministry of Buddhasasana, Religious and Cultural Affairs
-
Latest News6 days agoSusantha Chandramali passes away at the age of 61
-
Features7 days agoDid Rani miss manorani ?
-
Features7 days agoElectoral reform and abolishing the executive presidency
-
News4 days agoLawyers’ Collective raises concerns over post-retirement appointments of judges
-
Features5 days agoSummary Justice is Indefensible
-
Editorial7 days agoErstwhile chums’ fake wrestling
-
Editorial6 days agoFrom ‘chits’ to ‘lists’
-
Business6 days agoSri Lanka strengthens protection for local products with launch of Geographical Indications Registry