Connect with us

Sports

Hathurasingha’s dismissal linked to Nasum incident, reveals BCB report

Published

on

Shakib captained Bangladesh in the 2023 Cricket World Cup

Former Bangladesh skipper Shakib al Hasan has accused Tamim Iqbal and former BCB cricket operation chairman Jalal Yunus of trying ‘to build a case’ to oust former coach Chandika Hathurusingha from the national team. Shakib alleges that they did so by leaking Hathurusingha’s altercation with Nasum Ahmed to the media.

The Bangladesh Cricket Board formed a three-member committee to assess their 2023 World Cup failure. According to the report of the committee, which was accessed by Cricbuzz, the reason for Hathurasingha’s dismissal was cited to be his altercation with Nasum Ahmed, a claim Hathurasingha recently denied while stating that he fled Bangladesh fearing for his life.

Between December 2023 and January 2024, the special committee conducted private one-on-one meetings with the following persons. It should be noted that all conversations were recorded and documented with the consent of those invited:

Cricketers – Mustafizur Rahman, Litton Kumar Das, Nasum Ahmed, Hasan Mahmud, Tanzim Sakib, Mahmudullah Riyad, Shakib Al Hasan (Bangladesh Captain at World Cup 2023), Tamim Iqbal (not part of the World Cup Squad)

Team Management & Coaching Staff – Rabeed Imam (National Team Operations Manager, World Cup 2023), Nicholas Lee (National Team Strength & Conditioning Coach), Chandika Hathurusingha (National Team Head Coach), Bayjedul Islam Khan (National Team Physio), Khaled Mahmud (National Team Director)

National Selection Panel – Minhazul Abedin (Chairman, National Selection Panel), Kazi Habibul Bashar (Member, National Selection Panel).

BCB Director – Mohammed Jalal Yunus (Chairman, Cricket Operations Committee, BCB).

“Handing over of captaincy at the eleventh hour was not ideal. The captaincy could have been announced before the Asia Cup. The Head Coach was unable to execute his duty properly due to inadequate time to prepare before the World Cup,” Shakib said in his recorded statement.

“The reason for the poor performance at the World Cup is the frequent changing of players. The media had also influenced this. Changes in the batting order had created problems and resulted in bad performance,” he said.

Shakib added that during the World Cup, division between Hathurusingha and other coaches were visible. “The current head coach (Hathurusingha) is good for the Bangladesh team. However, during the World Cup, the tension between the Head Coach and the other Coaches was visible. The formation of the World Cup team was alright. Any information related to a player’s injury must come from the physio, and not from the player,

“Confidential team information had been leaked. Any matter related to the team goes to the media which is harmful. The Team Director does not need to be present in team meetings,

“Caution should be exercised before appointing team assistants/team boys. They may pass confidential team information,

“Chairman cricket operations (Jalal Yunus) and Tamim Iqbal had called Nasum about the ‘slapping’ allegation and had leaked it to the media to build a case against the Head Coach so that he could be sacked”.

Major findings and revelations from discussions with National Team Members (Players, Coaches, Management):

– The strain in the relationship between the Head Coach and support staff was visible to everyone. However, the Head Coach and most players got along well in comparison.

– Most players had heard about an alleged incident involving the Head Coach and Nasum Ahmed during the match with New Zealand in Chennai, with the cricketer being the alleged victim. However, there were no eyewitnesses among the cricketers, and Nasum had not shared his side of the story with any responsible member of the management.

– The general understanding among team members was that it was a relatively minor issue at a tense moment in a match and had no adverse effect on the team. Strength & Conditioning Coach Nicholas Lee was the lone eyewitness and claimed to have seen the Head Coach ‘hit’ Nasum in the neck area.

– Nasum, who was a substitute fielder in the match, stated in his meeting with the committee that the Head Coach got angry at him for a supposed delay in getting something to the batsmen in the middle and pulled him by his shirt’s collar and hit him. He felt shocked and humiliated and only told selector Habibul Bashar about what had happened later. He appeared more concerned with the fact that the matter was leaked to the media when the team returned home, and he was worried about his social image.

– The Head Coach said he had no recollection of any such incident with Nasum. Nasum informed the Team Director that he felt the Head Coach’s attitude towards him was hostile in general.

– Team morale suffered most with the defeat against the Netherlands. From that point onwards, confidence took a nosedive. Players were mentally and physically exhausted due to the duration (46 days) of the event. Homesickness and fatigue were genuine concerns.

– Consistently failing to deliver with the bat in batting-friendly conditions was the main reason for underperformance. There were no complaints in terms of training facilities or the sincerity of the Head Coach, who was always available for guidance. The relationship between players and other members of the coaching staff was good.

– Players did not discuss the frequent changes in batting positions among themselves, and no one had expressed displeasure within the team about the batting order.

– The bonding between the players was good. However, there was a clear division in the coaching group. At one stage, the Head Coach became almost isolated. He and Bowling Coach Allan Donald were openly disagreeing on strategy planning, etc. Mutual respect was not present. The Fielding Coach Shane McDermott, who had heard that his contract may not be renewed post-World Cup, also appeared unhappy with the Head Coach who, for his part, could not resolve the issue and unify the coaches. This raised questions about his management skills. The other coaches and Technical Consultant S Sriram preferred to stay neutral. The rift among the coaches had a negative impression among team members.

– All the coaches, especially Nicholas Lee and Shane McDermott, were hard-working and were ever ready to help players out. However, the internal problems they were having had dampened their spirit.

– Only after reaching India did the squad feels that it was there for the World Cup. The issue with Tamim Iqbal’s sudden announcement of retirement and subsequent developments, including his omission from the World Cup team, the hurried declaration of Shakib Al Hasan as captain, and the constant criticism in the media had severely affected mental focus and preparation in the lead-up to the big event.

– Shakib Al Hasan was reluctant to take up the captaincy as he wanted to focus solely as a player in the event. The captaincy responsibility at such short notice did not allow Shakib to complete his preparations, and some physical issues, including a quad strain and vision complication, bothered him.

(Cricbuzz)



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Shafali 69 not out , spinners lead India’s rout of Sri Lanka

Published

on

By

Shafali Verma took 27 balls to bring up her fifty [BCCI]

A quick glance at the head to head record is enough to show the gulf between India and Sri Lanka in women’s T20Is. Despite that, the manner in which India have swept Sri Lanka aside two games in a row would have surprised watchers and the hosts alike. The story in the second T20I followed a similar script to the first. Once again, India’s spinners squeezed Sri Lanka’s middle order before one of their top-order batters made easy work of the chase.

Left-arm spinners Vaishnavi Sharma and N Shree Charani picked up two wickets apiece after Sneh Rana, in the XI in place of the indisposed Deepti Sharma, sucked out the momentum from Sri Lanka’s batting. If it was Jemimah Rodrigues’ half-century in the first game, Shafali Verma was at her brutal best in the second, finishing on an unbeaten 69 in just 34 balls, to help India get to the 129-run target at a run-rate close to 11 an over with 49 balls to spare.

India went 2-0 up at the end of the Visakhapatnam leg, with the next three games to be played in Thiruvananthapuram.

Sri Lanka were jolted in the opening over after being asked to bat. Vishmi Gunaratne’s uppish drive was caught by Kranti Gaud in her follow-through. Chamari Athapaththu then started the charge. After the defeat in the first game, she asked her batters to step up and find ways of scoring. She was intent on leading from the front. She used her feet against Gaud to slash her in front of point. Two balls later, Gaud almost got back at the Sri Lanka captain.

Charani, who dropped two simple catches on Sunday, misjudged Athapaththu’s slash and conceded a six. She charged in from the boundary line and then ran back, missed the ball completely despite a leap. Athapaththu blazed away with the field restrictions on, scoring 31 off 24 balls out of Sri Lanka’s 38 in 5.3 overs at that stage.

After her dismissal, Hasini Perera and Harshitha Samarawickrama continued to bat with high intent. They primarily scored square of the wicket and added 28 in the three-and-a-half overs. And then came the squeeze from India.

On a day she was newly crowned the No. 1 T20I bowler in the ICC rankings, Deepti missed a T20I for the first time since 2019 – after 92 straight games – because of a mild fever. Harmanpreet Kaur has often turned to her when in search of control, but on Tuesday, Rana fit into the role with ease.

Playing her first T20I in India since 2016 – she played 15 away from home in between – Rana’s first task was to stop a belligerent Athapaththu, and she delivered. She kept the Sri Lanka captain guessing with flight and dip before dismissing her. With Athapaththu itching to cut loose, Rana generously flighted one. It landed slightly shorter than Athapaththu expected because of the dip, and she ended up miscuing it to long-off.

Rana then returned with Perera and Samarawickrama scoring at a good tempo, bowled a maiden and that turned the tide. It allowed left-arm spinner Charani to slip in a few quiet overs, which resulted in Perera’s dismissal. Vaishnavi also returned to pick up her first international wicket, with Charani, who denied her in the first T20I by dropping a dolly at short fine leg, taking a simple catch at the same spot after Nilakshika Silva top-edged a sweep.

Sri Lanka hit 11 boundaries in the first nine overs, but could hit only two fours in the rest of their innings. They lost six for 24 to be restricted to a below-par total for the second game in a row, which was never going to challenge the hosts. Three run-outs for a second game in a row did not help matters either.

If Sunday was an opportunity missed by Shafali, she more than made up for it on Tuesday. She was happy to bide her time at the start, with Smriti Mandhana being the aggressor. Once Mandhana fell, caught at point in a bid to hit Kavisha Dilhari’s offspin inside out over the off side, Shafali took centrestage. Inoka Ranaweera’s left-arm spin with the field restrictions in place was just the tonic she needed.

Shafali hit Ranaweera for successive fours in the penultimate over of the powerplay – both by dancing down the track and lofting her over cover. She then took apart Athapaththu’s offspin, hitting here for 4, 6, 4 in the sixth over of the chase: first sweeping a short ball through backward square leg, then thumping a full ball straight into the sight-screen and then lifting one over extra cover.

With the in-form Rodrigues for company, there was no respite for Sri Lanka’s bowlers. Rodrigues also tore into Ranaweera, hitting her for two fours and a six as the left-arm spinner was taken for 31 in her two overs.

In an attempt to maintain the high tempo, Rodrigues holed out to long-on. Shafali soon completed her fifty from just 27 balls. She picked Shashini Gimhani’s left-arm wristspin from the hand and thumped her for back-to-back boundaries in a 12-run over that put India on the brink.

Sri Lanka earned a consolation when Malki Madara’s dipping yorker deceived Harmanpreet. But they knew, as Athapaththu conceded after the game, that the batters failed to make the helpful conditions count in successive games.

Brief scores:
India Women  129 for 3 in 11.5 overs  (Smriti Mandhana 14, Shafali Verma  69*, Jemimah Rodrigues 26, Harmanpreet Kaur 10; Malki Madara 1-22, Kavya Kavindi 1-3, Kavisha Dilhari 1-15) beat Sri Lanka Women  128 for 9 in 20 overs  ( Chamari Athapaththu 31, Hasini Perera 22,Harshitha Samarawickrama 33, Kavisha Dilhari 14, Kaushini Nuthyangana 11; Kranti Goud 1-31, Sneh Rana 1-11, Shree Charani 2-23, Vaishnavi Sharma  2-32) by seven wickets

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Sports

Life after the armband for Asalanka

Published

on

Stripped of the captaincy on the eve of a World Cup, Charith Asalanka finds himself skating on thin ice. Suddenly, runs are not just runs; they are legal tender. In a game that is brutally transactional, weight of runs is the only currency that guarantees a seat on the flight. The soft will curse their luck and sulk in the corner. The tough roll up their sleeves, take guard, and play the long innings.

History, as ever, offers a handy cue card. Take Arjuna Ranatunga. Axed as captain after the controversial 1991 tour of New Zealand, he was reduced to a mere batter for the 1992 World Cup. What followed was one of the great redemption arcs. A backs-to-the-wall knock at the Basin Reserve against South Africa, with Allan Donald huffing and puffing fire and then that audacious chase against Zimbabwe that rewrote the laws of possibility with the game’s first successful 300-plus pursuit. By the time the confetti settled, Ranatunga was back at the helm, having dragged Sri Lanka to glory almost single-handedly. Asalanka, a fellow left-hander, could do worse than study that script.

When Asalanka took charge of the white-ball sides last year, the sense was that destiny had tapped him on the shoulder. This was a leader in the making, groomed patiently by Sri Lanka Cricket for over a decade. An Under-19 captain, exposed through development squads and domestic leadership roles, he appeared primed to become an all-format captain in due course.

With the bat, particularly in ODIs, he often played the role of the fireman, dousing flames after collapses or steering run chases with a cool head. As a leader, he spoke well, kept the dressing room together and was generous with praise. But just as the talk turned to a long reign, the wheels began to wobble and then, slowly but surely, came off.

Asalanka began treating First-Class cricket like a contagious disease, scarcely turning out for SSC. That absence hurt. The country’s premier club slipped into Division Two, losing First-Class status for the first time in its storied history and his name was firmly in the dock.

Then came murmurs of a clique, largely made up of his Richmond College schoolmates, a charge that rarely ends well in any dressing room. The Asia Cup only deepened the scrutiny. His bowling changes were pedestrian, with holding Dunith Wellalage back for the final over against Afghanistan’s Mohammad Nabi standing out as a tactical misread. The feeling grew that he wasn’t squeezing the most out of his resources.

Pakistan was worse. He looked out of shape, which is never a good look for a captain and the runs dried up in T20 internationals.

When Dasun Shanaka, the man he had replaced, was installed as his deputy, the writing was on the wall in bold capitals. Asalanka, though, failed to read the signs. His brinkmanship in Pakistan, including threats to pull out of the tour, proved to be the final straw.

At 28, Asalanka is still young and this episode may yet prove a necessary dressing down. He is no villain. By all accounts, he is a humble bloke who has momentarily lost his bearings. It happens, particularly to young athletes thrust into leadership before they fully understand the traps that come with it. Right now, he needs support, a steady arm around the shoulder and the chance to rediscover his game.

There is little doubt about his value. Asalanka remains the country’s best finisher, not the sort who clears the ropes four times an over, but the kind who finds gaps, runs hard, rotates strike and before the opposition realises it, has them gasping for air. These are not the fireworks merchants who hog the highlights, but they are the players who win you matches quietly and consistently.

If he is to reclaim his place and perhaps the T20 armband again, the path is simple and unforgiving. Bat first, talk later. In cricket, as in life, nothing silences critics quite like runs on the board.

by Rex Clementine

Continue Reading

Sports

Dhammaloka Central College overall champs at Biyagama Swimming meet

Published

on

Overall Champs - Kelaniya Dharmaloka Central College Swimming team.

The Kelaniya Dharmaloka Central College swimming team won the Overall Championship at the swimming meet organised by the Biyagama Swimming, Diving and Life Saving Association and held at the Kiribathgoda Vihara Maha Devi Balika Vidyalaya Swimming pool recently.

The boys school championship was won by Mahara President College while the girls championship was won by Kadawatha Mahamaya Balika Vidyalaya. The mixed school championship was won by Kelaniya Dharmaloka Central College. The Club championship was won by Yakkala Wave Runners Swimming Academy.

Text and pics by DELGODA W.D.VITHANA

Continue Reading

Trending