Connect with us

News

‘Exodus of officers from SIS after 2015 played significant role in its inability to prevent Easter attacks’

Published

on

By Rathindra Kuruwita

A large number of senior intelligence officers had left the service after 2015 and that had caused the inability of the service to prevent the Easter Sunday attacks, former acting Director of the SIS, retired ASP Parakrama Lankapura told the PCoI investigating the Easter Sunday attacks on Wednesday night.

Lankapura said that producing an experienced intelligence officer was as difficult and resource intensive as producing a diplomat and that losing senior officers affected the intelligence services.

The witness said that the State Intelligence Service (SIS) had the ability act upon the foreign intelligence report on 20 April 2019, warning of a terrorist attack the following day and deploy its own officers in civvies.

Lankapura said that after learning that National Thowheed Jamaat (NTJ) leader Zahran Hashim and his associates could launch a terrorist attack, the SIS could have informed hotels and churches of it. He said that SIS had various divisions that had cultivated contacts in almost all institutions and through such divisions it could have warned the Archbishop of Colombo, Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith and hotel owners.

“Institutions such as the Criminal Investigations Department, the Terrorism Investigation Division and the Directorate of Military Intelligence could have also been notified as soon as possible. This information could have been disseminated through the media. Never in our history have we waited for others to do such things. The SIS is capable of carrying out operations.”

Lankapura also said that the SIS should have informed all senior officers of the imminent attacks and if anyone could not be contacted, SIS officers should have gone to their homes and inform them.

The witness was then cross examined by President’s Counsel Shamil Perera, appearing for the Archbishop of Colombo. Lankapura was asked if the warning sent on 04 April 2019 about an imminent attack by a foreign agency was reliable. Lankapura said the SIS had maintained files on Zahran and several other suspects mentioned in the intelligence report. The SIS already knew that Zahran and his associates were extremists, he said.

“Given this, it is doubtful if then Director of the SIS, Senior DIG Nilantha Jayawardena, who has years of experience, had sought advice from the then Chief of National Intelligence, Sisira Mendis on the intelligence information,” the witness said.

Jayawardena earlier said after receiving the report on 04 April 2019, he had asked Mendis for his advice.

Lankapura said that he had decided to retire at the age of 53 due to pressure from Jayawardena and two other officers had also resigned from the SIS for the same reason. He said that although he had worked as Jayawardena’s Personal Assistant, the latter had not shared intelligence information with him sufficiently.

Later, Attorney-at-Law Madu Jayathilake appearing for Jayawardena, cross- examined the witness.

 

Jayathilake:

“How many promotions have you received during your time at the Police?”

Witness:

“I received about four promotions.”

Jayathilake:

“Do you accept that the SIS sent only five intelligence reports on extremism to the relevant departments during the period from 2009 to 2015?”

Witness:

“I deny that. Intelligence reports are sent by the Director, and I was not the Director at that time.”

Jayathilake:

“You said that the intelligence information received about the Easter Sunday bombings could have been disseminated through the media. Did you take action to do so when the intelligence information received that there could be a bomb attack on the Temple of the Tooth Relic?”

Witness: “I don’t remember. I can make a statement only after studying the files.”

Jayathilake:

“Can you tell me of any instance where the SIS told media about an imminent attack?”

Witness:

“I can’t say off hand.”

Jayathilake then suggested that Lankapura had been continuously chastised by his superiors for his inefficiency. The witness denied this claim and said that Jayawardena had to appoint five people to do what he had done.

Jayathilake told Lankapura that his replacements had sent about 300 intelligence reports about Zahran and his associates within a year, the witness said that he was not aware of it.

Jayathilake:

“Did you know that the SIS had informed the relevant authorities that Zahran and his group were involved in extremist activities in Wanathawilluwa and Mawanella areas.”

Lankapura replied that he had no knowledge of what had happened since he left the SIS.

Jayathilake further asked the witness if he accepted that the SIS had established foreign relations with only five countries before 2015 and had established relations with 25 countries after Jayawardena became its Director. In reply, Lankapura said that he did not accept that.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

486 dead, 341 missing, 171,778 displaced as at 0600hrs today [05]

Published

on

By

The situation report issued by the Disaster Management Center at 0600hrs today [5th December] confirms that 486 persons have died and another 341 persons are missing after the devastating weather conditions in the past week.

171,778 persons have been displaced and have taken refuge at 1,231 safety centers established by the government.

 

Continue Reading

News

Media slams govt.’s bid to use Emergency to silence critics

Published

on

Sunil Watagala

Media organisations have denounced Deputy Minister of Public Security and Parliamentary Affairs Sunil Watagala after he urged law enforcement authorities to use emergency regulations to take action against those posting allegedly defamatory content about the President and senior ministers on social media.

The Sri Lanka Working Journalists Association (SLWJA) yesterday issued a strongly worded statement condemning Watagala’s remarks, warning that they posed a direct threat to freedom of expression and media rights, particularly at a time when the country is struggling through a national disaster.

Watagala made the controversial comments on 2 December during a meeting at the Malabe Divisional Secretariat attended by government officials and Deputy Media Minister Dr. Kaushalya Ariyarathna. During the discussion, the Deputy Minister claimed that a coordinated effort was underway to spread distorted or false information about the disaster situation through physical means, social media, and even AI-generated content. He also alleged that individuals based overseas were contributing to such activity.

According to the SLWJA, Watagala went further, directing police officers present at the meeting to treat those posting such content “not merely as suspects but as offenders” and to take action against them under emergency regulations currently in force.

The SLWJA accused the government of abandoning the democratic principles it once campaigned on, noting that individuals who publicly championed free speech in the past were now attempting to clamp down on it. The association said this was not an isolated incident but part of a pattern of growing state pressure on journalists and media platforms over the past year.

It warned that attempts to criminalise commentary through emergency powers especially during a disaster constituted a grave violation of constitutional rights. The union urged the government to respect democratic freedoms and refrain from using disaster-related powers to silence criticism.

In a separate statement, Internet Media Action (IMA) also expressed “strong objection” to Watagala’s comments, describing them as a “serious threat to freedom of expression”, which it said is a fundamental right guaranteed to all Sri Lankan citizens.

The IMA said Watagala’s assertion that “malicious character assassination attacks” were being carried out against the President and others through social media or other media channels, and that such acts should attract severe punishment under emergency law, represented “an abuse of power”. The organisation also criticised the Deputy Minister’s claim that false opinions or misrepresentations whether physical, online, or generated by AI could not be permitted.

Using emergency regulations imposed for disaster management to suppress political criticism amounted to “theft of fundamental rights”, the statement said, adding that the move was aimed at deliberately restricting dissent and instilling fear among social media users.

“Criticism is not a crime,” the IMA said, warning that such rhetoric could lead to widespread intimidation and self-censorship among digital activists and ordinary citizens.

The group demanded that Watagala withdraw his statement unconditionally and insisted that freedom of expression cannot be curtailed under emergency laws or any other legal framework. It also called on the government to clarify its stance on the protection of fundamental rights amid increasing concerns from civil society.

Continue Reading

News

Cardinal calls for compassionate Christmas amid crisis

Published

on

Archbishop of Colombo

Archbishop of Colombo, Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith, has called on Sri Lankans to observe this Christmas with compassion and restraint, as the nation continues to recover from one of its worst natural disasters in recent memory.

In his message, the Colombo Archbishop has highlighted the scale of the crisis, noting that more than 1.5 million people have been displaced, while an “uncounted number” remain buried under debris in the hill country following landslides and severe flooding.

“It is a most painful situation,”

he has written acknowledging the difficulty of celebrating a season traditionally associated with joy while thousands are mourning lost loved ones, living in refugee centres, or left with nothing but the clothes they were wearing.

The Cardinal has urged the faithful to temper excessive celebrations and extravagance, instead focusing on helping those affected. “Celebrate, by all means, yes, but make it a moment of spiritual happiness and concern for the needs of those who suffer,” he said. “Assist as much as possible those who lost their loved ones, their homes, and their belongings.”

He has called for a Christmas marked by love, sharing, and solidarity, describing it as an opportunity to make the season “a deeply spiritual and joyful experience.”

Continue Reading

Trending