News
EU court upholds LTTE ban
By Sujeeva Nivunhella
reporting from London
The LTTE has lost its legal battle in the European Court against the proscription imposed against the group by the European Union.
Judgment of the case LTTE v EU Council (T-160/19) was delivered by a panel of judges comprising S. Gervasoni, President, L. Madise and P. Nihoul (Rapporteur) last week.
The European Political Subdivision of the LTTE was represented by A. van Eik and T. Buruma, while the Council of the European Union (EU) was represented by B. Driessen and S. van Overmeire.
The UK government, which proscribed the LTTE on March 29, 2001, also supported the European Union’s stance of maintaining the LTTE’s proscription. Representing the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland were solicitors F. Shibli, S. McCrory and P. Nevill.
During the hearing, it was mentioned that the British Home Secretary took into account the attacks by the LTTE in January 2000 which had taken place in Colombo, Morawewa and Vavuniya (Sri Lanka) and had resulted in fatalities and injuries, including civilian fatalities and injuries, before the proscription.
The decision to maintain the proscription in June 2014 by the Home Secretary was on the basis that the group existed and retained a military capability and network coupled with the intent to conduct terrorist attacks in the future if it is perceived to be in the organization’s interest to do so.
Despite the military defeat of the LTTE in 2009, their international fundraising and revival capacities remained, the Home Secretary observed. This was notably evidenced by a number of incidents that had revealed international connections to LTTE-related individuals.
The Home Secretary came to his decision after consulting with the entire government, intelligence services and police authorities which was later subject to a review and approval by the two chambers of the UK Parliament.
Among the terrorist acts discussed in the case were ‘the dismantling in Malaysia in May 2014 of [an] LTTE-related cell that led to the seizure of propaganda materials and an amount of foreign currency. Considering the material in question, Malaysian law enforcement authorities have investigated and confirmed the attempt to revive the LTTE activities’.
‘The dismantling in Sri Lanka in 2014 of a cell led by Kajeepan Selvanayagam (alias Gobi, a former member of [the LTTE] intelligence wing) with the recovery of stashed arms. Police officers were shot at during the operation and one of them injured. Gobi was later killed during a subsequent confrontation with the army. Twenty six suspects were arrested and so far four have been convicted’.
‘The foiled conspiracy in January 2017 to assassinate M.A. Sumanthiran, Member of the Parliament. Explosives and other peripherals were recovered from some of the suspects who are so far indicted before the High Court of Colombo. The linkage with [the LTTE] can be established by the fact that the same suspects are also prosecuted for disseminating propaganda material in support of the LTTE’.
The judges ordered the European Political Subdivision of the LTTE to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and ordered the UK government to bear their costs.
Latest News
486 dead, 341 missing, 171,778 displaced as at 0600hrs today [05]
The situation report issued by the Disaster Management Center at 0600hrs today [5th December] confirms that 486 persons have died and another 341 persons are missing after the devastating weather conditions in the past week.
171,778 persons have been displaced and have taken refuge at 1,231 safety centers established by the government.

News
Media slams govt.’s bid to use Emergency to silence critics
Media organisations have denounced Deputy Minister of Public Security and Parliamentary Affairs Sunil Watagala after he urged law enforcement authorities to use emergency regulations to take action against those posting allegedly defamatory content about the President and senior ministers on social media.
The Sri Lanka Working Journalists Association (SLWJA) yesterday issued a strongly worded statement condemning Watagala’s remarks, warning that they posed a direct threat to freedom of expression and media rights, particularly at a time when the country is struggling through a national disaster.
Watagala made the controversial comments on 2 December during a meeting at the Malabe Divisional Secretariat attended by government officials and Deputy Media Minister Dr. Kaushalya Ariyarathna. During the discussion, the Deputy Minister claimed that a coordinated effort was underway to spread distorted or false information about the disaster situation through physical means, social media, and even AI-generated content. He also alleged that individuals based overseas were contributing to such activity.
According to the SLWJA, Watagala went further, directing police officers present at the meeting to treat those posting such content “not merely as suspects but as offenders” and to take action against them under emergency regulations currently in force.
The SLWJA accused the government of abandoning the democratic principles it once campaigned on, noting that individuals who publicly championed free speech in the past were now attempting to clamp down on it. The association said this was not an isolated incident but part of a pattern of growing state pressure on journalists and media platforms over the past year.
It warned that attempts to criminalise commentary through emergency powers especially during a disaster constituted a grave violation of constitutional rights. The union urged the government to respect democratic freedoms and refrain from using disaster-related powers to silence criticism.
In a separate statement, Internet Media Action (IMA) also expressed “strong objection” to Watagala’s comments, describing them as a “serious threat to freedom of expression”, which it said is a fundamental right guaranteed to all Sri Lankan citizens.
The IMA said Watagala’s assertion that “malicious character assassination attacks” were being carried out against the President and others through social media or other media channels, and that such acts should attract severe punishment under emergency law, represented “an abuse of power”. The organisation also criticised the Deputy Minister’s claim that false opinions or misrepresentations whether physical, online, or generated by AI could not be permitted.
Using emergency regulations imposed for disaster management to suppress political criticism amounted to “theft of fundamental rights”, the statement said, adding that the move was aimed at deliberately restricting dissent and instilling fear among social media users.
“Criticism is not a crime,” the IMA said, warning that such rhetoric could lead to widespread intimidation and self-censorship among digital activists and ordinary citizens.
The group demanded that Watagala withdraw his statement unconditionally and insisted that freedom of expression cannot be curtailed under emergency laws or any other legal framework. It also called on the government to clarify its stance on the protection of fundamental rights amid increasing concerns from civil society.
News
Cardinal calls for compassionate Christmas amid crisis
Archbishop of Colombo, Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith, has called on Sri Lankans to observe this Christmas with compassion and restraint, as the nation continues to recover from one of its worst natural disasters in recent memory.
In his message, the Colombo Archbishop has highlighted the scale of the crisis, noting that more than 1.5 million people have been displaced, while an “uncounted number” remain buried under debris in the hill country following landslides and severe flooding.
“It is a most painful situation,”
he has written acknowledging the difficulty of celebrating a season traditionally associated with joy while thousands are mourning lost loved ones, living in refugee centres, or left with nothing but the clothes they were wearing.
The Cardinal has urged the faithful to temper excessive celebrations and extravagance, instead focusing on helping those affected. “Celebrate, by all means, yes, but make it a moment of spiritual happiness and concern for the needs of those who suffer,” he said. “Assist as much as possible those who lost their loved ones, their homes, and their belongings.”
He has called for a Christmas marked by love, sharing, and solidarity, describing it as an opportunity to make the season “a deeply spiritual and joyful experience.”
-
News5 days agoWeather disasters: Sri Lanka flooded by policy blunders, weak enforcement and environmental crime – Climate Expert
-
Latest News6 days agoLevel I landslide RED warnings issued to the districts of Badulla, Colombo, Gampaha, Kalutara, Kandy, Kegalle, Kurnegala, Natale, Monaragala, Nuwara Eliya and Ratnapura
-
Latest News6 days agoINS VIKRANT deploys helicopters for disaster relief operations
-
News2 days ago
Lunuwila tragedy not caused by those videoing Bell 212: SLAF
-
Latest News6 days agoDepartment of Irrigation issues Critical flood warning to the Kelani river basin
-
Latest News3 days agoLevel III landslide early warnings issued to the districts of Badulla, Kandy, Kegalle, Kurunegala, Matale and Nuwara-Eliya
-
News6 days agoCountry reels under worst weather in living memory
-
Editorial6 days agoNeeded: Action not rhetoric
