Midweek Review
Destabilisation project: ACBC inquiry underway

By Shamindra Ferdinando
All Ceylon Buddhist Congress (ACBC) recently launched an inquiry into what it called a state of anarchy prevailing in the country.
An Independent Commission set up by ACBC has initiated a comprehensive probe in a bid to establish the circumstances leading to the eruption of public protests against President Gotabaya Rajapaksa and his unceremonious exit.
The retired Lieutenant Colonel who secured Office of the President with a staggering 6.9 mn votes at the 2019 presidential election fled the country in July 2022.
The seventh executive President quit within four months of the explosion of public anger outside his private residence in March last year possibly backed by external forces, in the wake of the disruption of all essential supplies consequent to unprecedented balance of payments and debt crises. Before Gotabaya Rajapaksa gave up political power, his government admitted bankruptcy. The ACBC intends to identify those responsible for the high profile ouster of a popularly elected President. The mandate of the commission will be dealt later.
The public protest campaign launched opposite Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s private residence at Pangiriwatte, Mirihana on March 31, 2022 quickly overwhelmed his government. The man who threw his weight behind the public protest campaign and openly encouraged the campaign succeeded Gotabaya Rajapaksa. The Parliament elected UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe on July 20, 2022 to complete the remainder of Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s five-year term.
The ACBC Commission mandated to carry out the task in six months consists of 21 members. Submissions can be forwarded to +94718645554, +94701439996 (both WhatsApp) and buddhistinfo380@gmail.com. Those who are interested in making submissions orally are advised by the Commission to obtain an appointment. Submissions can be made in Sinhala, Tamil or English.
Among the Commissioners is former Army Chief of Staff Jagath Dias, who retired in late Dec 2015 in the rank of Major General. Vijitha Ravipriya, former Director General of Customs is another member. Ravipriya, too, retired in the rank of Maj. Gen. before receiving the top government appointment. Ravipriya retired in January 2020. Dias, as the General Officer Commanding (GOC) of 57 Division tasked to liberate Kilinochchi gave his formation resolute leadership, whereas Ravipriya commanded Task Force 08 also on the Vanni front.
The Commissioners include Manohara de Silva, PC (member of the nine-member Committee that prepared a draft Constitution, which was discarded by the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government. The Draft Constitution was never made public), former President of the Bar Association U. R. de Silva, PC (Justice Ministry advisor during President’s Counsel Ali Sabry’s tenure as the Justice Minister), writer and political commentator Shenali Waduge and President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s Director General of Media Mohan Samaranayake. Samaranayake was moved to the Information Department to pave the way for Sirasa anchor Kingsley Ratnayake and Swarnavahini presenter Sudewa Hettiarachchi to run the presidential media. By the time protests erupted a year ago, Ratnayake, who received appointment as Presidential Spokesman, was not even in the country. He was overseas.
President Gotabaya Rajapaksa appeared to have failed to comprehend the rapid developments taking place. US Ambassador in Colombo Julie Chung’s response and interventions reflected the mood of the Western diplomatic community. The CIA Director William Joseph Burns’s February clandestine whistle-stop visit underscores the US support for the incumbent administration.
PMD’s response
The Gotabaya Rajapaksa, overwhelmed by evolving turmoil never bothered to make a genuine reassessment of the rapidly developing situation even after Pangiriwatte exploded on the night of March 31, 2022. The first press release issued by the Presidential Media Division (PMD) foolishly blamed it on extremists. A silly reference was also made to the Arab Spring-an organized uprising in the Arab world following initial protests in Tunisia. The PMD declared that the protest campaign organized with the help of social media platforms were meant to cause anarchy. Then PMD owed an explanation as to how it reached such a conclusion within 24 hours after the Pangiriwatte mayhem.
In fact, those who served the Rajapaksa government at different levels blamed the crisis on ill-fated decisions taken by former President Mahinda Rajapaksa and the ruling SLPP. Instead of examining the still developing crisis as part of the overall measures to address the issues at hand, various interested parties sought to interpret the developments in a way politically advantageous to them.
National Freedom Front (NFF) leader Wimal Weerawansa, MP, recently faulted war-winning President Mahinda Rajapaksa for the crisis. The former JVPer declared that Mahinda Rajapaksa set the stage for the catastrophe by bringing Basil Rajapaksa into parliament in 2021 at the expense of 20th Amendment to the Constitution and opportunity given to Namal Rajapaksa to enter parliament too early. Namal Rajapaksa entered parliament in 2010 at the age of 24.
Pavitra Wanniarachchi, who recently received a ministerial portfolio courtesy President Ranil Wickremesinghe said that they (SLPP) blundered by fielding Gotabaya Rajapaksa at the 2019 presidential election. She questioned the former Defence Secretary’s suitability to receive the SLPP nomination.
In the absence of a much needed parliamentary probe, ACBC should strive to ascertain the truth. The Commission consists of retired District judge Pearl Karaliyedde (Chairperson), Prof. Nimal de Silva, Prof. Malini Andagama, Lt. Gen. Jagath Dias (retd), one time Director General, Government Information Department Mohan Samaranayake, Maj. Gen. Vijitha Ravipriya (retd), U.R. de Silva, PC, Manohara de Silva, PC, ex-chairman YMBA Suren Abeygunasekera, lecturer and Dr. Dulip Palihawadana (Secretary to the Commission), former Foreign Service officer Gamini Munasinghe, Pani Wewala (formerly of the ‘One Country, One Law’ Presidential Task Force headed by Ven. Galagodaatte Gnanasara), Dr. L.M.K.Tillekeratne, Dr. Harsha Wijeyawardena, lecturer Chaminda Karunaratne, Senior DIG (retd) Lalindra Ranaweera, international and political affairs analyst Shenali Waduge, Dr. Narendra Pinto, Dr. Chandika Epikakaduwa, attorney-at-law Samitha Kalhara and Deputy Chairman of ACBC Roshan Madduage.
Perhaps, the Commissioners should obtain video footage of Central Bank Governor Dr. Nandalal Weerasinghe’s no holds barred attack on the utterly irresponsible parliamentary system of governance practiced here on August 31, 2022. There had never been a previous instance of a former CBSL Governor addressing MPs in parliament under such critical circumstances.
Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena presided over the meeting that was also attended by a section of the MPs. Referring to public protests that forced Gotabaya Rajapaksa out of Office a few weeks ago, Dr. Weerasinghe warned of a far worse situation unless political parties represented in parliament changed their ill-fated strategies.
The CBSL Chief’s warning was loud and clear. Do away with political strategies implemented at the expense of the national economy or be prepared to face the consequences. Unfortunately, political parties represented in parliament never bothered to take tangible measures on the basis of Dr. Weerasinghe’s advice.
The ACBC’s decision to investigate the overall developments should be appreciated.
Conspiracy or self-made disaster

(From Right) Dr. Dulip Palihawadana, who is the Secretary to the
Commission on the current political-economic and social crisis, retired
District judge Pearl Karaliyedde, Prof. Malini Andagama and Lt. Gen. Jagath Dias (partly covered)
There is no point in denying the fact that interested parties brazenly exploited the public protest campaign to achieve their objectives. None of those who genuinely expected a system change would have anticipated UNP National List MP Ranil Wickremesinghe replacing Gotabaya Rajapaksa under any circumstances. Whatever their objectives, the public protest campaign couldn’t sustain their project and a consensus between the ruling SLPP and Wickremesinghe sealed the fate of Aragalaya.
Within hours after parliament elected him as the eighth President, Wickremesinghe acted swiftly and decisively to chase out those who had been occupying the Presidential Secretariat. Wickremesinghe warned that street protests wouldn’t be tolerated. In spite of the absence of emergency, the military is always on hand to assist law enforcement authorities, in case they require muscle.
Those sincerely interested in knowing what really caused the explosion of public anger needs to understand underlying economic reasons and social realities. It would be easy to blame it all on Western conspiracies, Indian machinations, the JVP led Jathika Jana Balawegaya and breakaway JVP faction Frontline Socialist Party, NGO community, especially those recipients of foreign funds, and the Inter-University Students’ Federation. The current political-economic-social crisis should be examined taking into consideration the conduct of the executive, legislature and the judiciary.
Scrapping of time-tested provisions of Exchange Control Act (ECA) of 1953 in 2017 at the behest of yahapalana leadership is a case in point. The UNP and the breakaway UNP faction, the Samagi Jana Balawegaya never responded to accusations that the new Act enacted in 2017 resulted in exporters parking export proceeds running into billions of USD abroad. The issue at hand is whether someone in yahpalana government benefited by repealing the original Act that served the country well for decades. Yahapalana President Maithripala Sirisena cannot absolve himself of the responsibility as he as the head of the cabinet of ministers must have approved the cabinet decision on bringing in a new Act. It would be pertinent to ask the SJB leader as well as his senior colleagues like Lakshman Kiriella and Kabir Hashim whether they, too, backed the move to replace the Exchange Control Act. Perhaps, the yahapalana leaders never took it up at the cabinet level or there was never an open dialogue regarding the scrapping of the original Act.
Justice Minister Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapaksa has declared in parliament that funds parked overseas were sufficient to overcome the crisis. But, has he raised this issue with the President who is also the Minister of Finance.
The ACBC Commission can inquire into why Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s government failed to restore the original Act when the financial situation was deteriorating fast, especially with underground illegal money transfers were depriving the legitimate banks the remittances of our expatriate workers running into billions of dollars. Then cabinet minister Wimal Weerawansa is on record as having said that Basil Rajapaksa, in his capacity as the Finance Minister, dismissed Weerawansa’s plea to restore the time-tested provisions in the 1953 Act. Did Weerawansa make the same request from Basil Rajapaksa’s predecessor, Mahinda Rajapaksa, who held the finance portfolio, in addition to being the Prime Minister? Basil Rajapaksa re-entered parliament in the first week of July 2021 amidst political turmoil caused by the economic crisis.
The failure on the part of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa to seek IMF assistance remains a mystery. Having knelt before the IMF on 16 previous occasions, it wouldn’t have made any difference to seek yet another bailout package again. Was it part of the overall plan to create an environment necessary for the collapse of the Rajapaksa administration?
Matters to ponder
The Commission should carefully examine major ill-fated decisions, including the hasty ban on chemical fertiliser and agro chemicals that overnight caused massive fallout, import of carbonic fertiliser from China and liquid fertiliser from India as well as slashing of import duty on a kilo of sugar from Rs 50 to 25 cents. But, perhaps the focus should be on the abolishing of taxes that deprived the government as much as Rs 600 bn against the backdrop of a sharp drop in tourist arrivals consequent to 2019 Easter Sunday attacks and overall shrinking of economy due to Covid-19. Who advised the cabinet of ministers on abolition of taxes? Can that be part of a conspiracy? Maj. Gen. Ravipriya, who had been the DG, Customs, can explain how the Customs, Inland Revenue and Excise fared during the turmoil.
The abolition of the Exchange Control Act proved again the failure on the part of parliament in law making and public finance.
It would be really silly to blame NGOs when parliamentary watchdogs continuously point out the Revenue collection system conveniently failed to achieve targets due to mismanagement and corruption and frequent exchanges between the government and the Opposition reveal waste, corruption, irregularities and mismanagement at every level. Maybe the Commission should seek a clarification from Auditor General W.P. C. Wickremaratne why the Inland Revenue Department declined to share its agreement with a Singaporean company that installed a faulty system.
In terms of the mandate, the ACBC focus on (1) efforts to undermine and demean Buddhism by NGOs, separatist groups and non-Buddhist groups (2) funding made available by these groups for anti-Buddhist activities (3) manipulation of young Buddhist monks studying at higher education institutes thereby resulting in indiscipline and them disrobing (4) identify those who worked against ‘Sinhala Buddhist culture’ (5) what caused Ven. Maha Sangha and patriotic organisations to remain silent (6) incidents at the Galle Face on May 09, 2022, statements made by some interested parties therein and eruption of violence in many parts of the country, killings and damages to property. (Among those who addressed the Galle Face crowd on the particular day were Ven. Omalpe Sobhitha and Archbishop of Colombo Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith) (7) the circumstances leading to the disposal of constitutionally elected President and the conduct of the armed forces, law enforcement authorities and the intelligence services (8) Direct or indirect connection between Sri Lanka’s triumph over separatist Tamil terrorism and the public protest campaign that forced President Gotabaya Rajapaksa out of Office (treacherous failure on the part of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa government to use all available information, particularly confidential documents made available by Lord Naseby of the House of Lords despite the External Affairs Ministry being under a distinguished retired law professor, too, should be inquired into) (9) how successive governments contributed to current economic crisis by not adhering with Buddhist economic principles (10) conduct of some members of the judiciary during this period to establish how they contributed to the intensification of violence (This is obviously reference to the role played by the Bar Association of Sri Lanka during the tenure of Saliya Pieris, PC, as its President) (11) involvement of both public and private media in the destabilisation project and the role played by the owners of privately-owned media groups (12) influence exerted by narcotics dealers and users (13) the failure on the part of the incumbent government to take tangible measures against those who engaged in violence (14) the environment in which the adults were degraded (15) examination of developments relating to the destabilisation and cause of disorder and (16) address issues that hadn’t been dealt with. The commission intends to make recommendations.
All concerned parties need to shed their differences and adopt a common strategy to address the challenges faced by Sri Lanka. It would be pertinent to examine how the parliament neglected its primary responsibilities over the past several decades, thereby creating an environment that facilitated external interventions. It would be nothing but a grave mistake on the part of all concerned to believe the latest IMF bailout could restore normalcy when 16 previous such interventions failed. That is the ugly reality. Sri Lanka has been fully opened for external interventions. The developing crisis should be discussed taking into consideration the further increase in Sri Lanka’s debt since President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s ouster. The ousted President and those who led him on the wrong path cannot absolve themselves of the culpability for Sri Lanka’s predicament. Perhaps, the ACBC inquiry should pay attention to the unilateral cancellation of a Japanese funded light rail project in Sept 2020. That may help ascertain how the President was influenced by interested parties, thereby facilitating the destabilisation project.
Midweek Review
Raid on ‘Millennium City’ DMI safe-house:

A forgotten story (part 1)
Colombo High Court Judge Adithya Patabendi, on March 27, 2025, acquitted former ASP Kulasiri Udugampola, who had been indicted over the Kandy police raid on a safe house run by the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) at the Millennium City housing complex, Athurugiriya. The raid, conducted in the first week of January 2002, sent shock waves through the defence establishment. Delivering the judgment, 23 years after the raid, Patabendi declared that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Dec. 5, 2001 parliamentary election was conducted at the height of the war in the North. Having gained the upper hand in the battlefield, the LTTE was working on a Ceasefire Agreement with Norway. The country was in turmoil with President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga, who survived an LTTE suicide blast at the final rally of her Dec. 1999 presidential election campaign, struggling to overcome a sustained UNP offensive.
In the run-up to the Dec. 5, 2001 parliamentary polls, UNP leader, Ranil Wickremesinghe accused the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) of planning to assassinate him. The UNPer claimed that the DMI was training Tamil terrorists at the Panaluwa Army Testing Range to mount an attack on his campaign bus, as well as his political rallies.
The unprecedented accusation placed the war-weary Army in an extremely embarrassing position when it was actually turning tables on the enemy using its own tactics in areas considered by then as being off limits for security forces. The UNP, with no shame, brazenly exploited the made-up threat as the main Opposition party and its allies, including a treacherous section of the media, stepped-up pressure on the Army to no end.
On the instructions of Wickremesinghe, UNP Chairman Charitha Ratwatte and Deputy Chairman Daya Palpola wrote a hard-hitting letter to Army Commander, Lt. Gen. Lionel Balagalle warning that he would be held responsible ‘in the event of an unfortunate incident’. The UNP duo accused the Army chief of training personnel to engage in a destabilisation campaign against the UNP.
An irate Army Commander, Lt. Gen. Balagalle in reply addressed a letter to Ratwatte and Palpola dismissing their accusations. The Island, in a front-page exclusive headlined ‘Army chief says no truth in UNP claims,’ in its Nov, 11, 2001 edition that revealed the exchange between Army headquarters and Sirikotha.
The report was based on what Lt. Gen. Balagalle had told this writer the previous evening. The Army chief, himself a one-time head of the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI), said that there was absolutely no basis for the UNP allegation that a hit squad was undergoing training in the use of high explosives and thermobaric weapons to attack Wickremesinghe.
The UNP ignored the Army chief’s letter. The allegation was repeated throughout the campaign. The raid on the DMI safe-house should be examined against the backdrop of the exchange between the Army commander and Sirikotha.
It was somewhat reminiscent of the JVP tactic to tarnish all others who had ruled the country since independence as being A Grade crooks to come to power with a record majority they couldn’t have even dreamt of knowing their sordid past. The trick was to repeat a lie long enough with the help of Western funded international and local NGO quislings and the gullible masses believed it.
Amidst a furore over the UNP allegation that the Army conspired to assassinate Wickremesinghe, Army operatives blew up a truck behind enemy lines killing five LTTE cadres on Dec. 11, 2001. Then again, they destroyed an LTTE bunker, at the entrance to a base used by Karuna, in the Kokkadicholai area, on Dec. 21, 2001.
Although the Army had conducted a successful small group operation in the Batticaloa District, targeting a key LTTE operative identified as David, way back in 1992, there was no attempt on the part of the military to develop the capability further. But some officers had been keen to promote small group operations to weaken the LTTE and beat it at its own game.
Commenting on the elimination of David, a veteran in clandestine operations told the writer of the deep penetrations ops: “Three personnel took part in the targeted killing of David. They returned to base after achieving the given task. Such operations caused chaos in enemy territory which gave us the psychological advantage over them. We knew of the importance as well as the need to strike within the enemy-controlled areas, though a special strategy on clandestine operations was adopted only in 2001, almost a decade after the hit on David.”
Speaking on condition of anonymity, the soft-spoken official explained the circumstances under which the Army launched deep penetration units soon after one-time Director of the DMI Lionel Balagalle had been appointed Commander of the Army.
Balagalle couldn’t resist the temptation to explore the possibility of infiltrating areas outside government controlled regions to launch attacks. “It was a tremendous task. Those who volunteered to join the operation realised the risks they were taking. They were among the best and they courageously adopted the new doctrine, which enabled us to carry out targeted killings. It was nothing but a high risk operation, though it produced results. They had to curtail their movements, particularly in the Eastern Province, where we used Batticaloa as the centre of our operations.”
Then Brigadier Kapila Hendarawithana executed the operation in his capacity as Director of DMI.
The LTTE realised the danger. Within months after the launch of the first DMI raid in the Batticaloa District, the LTTE pushed for the suspension of the DMI operation. The February 23, 2002 Ceasefire Agreement (CFA), arranged by the Norwegians, included a clause which specifically dealt with DMI action. The CFA called for the suspension of operations behind LTTE lines. While the LTTE had been successful in its negotiations with the Norwegians and the then inept UNP government with Executive President Chandrika Kumaratunga reduced to more or less a figurehead, the DMI suffered a debilitating setback when that regime with hardly any feelings for our valiant fighting men risking their lives day and night, ordered a police raid on an Army safe-house used by a deep penetration team at Athurugiriya.
The UNP-led United National Front (UNF) emerged victorious at the Dec. 5, 2001 general election with 109 seats, while the defeated PA managed to secure 77 seats. The remaining seats were shared by the JVP (16), the TNA (15), the SLMC (5), the EPDP (2) and the DPLF (01).
Balgalle on ops behind enemy lines
It had been one of the bloodiest elections with the five-week campaign claiming the lives of almost 50 people, with the polls day massacre of a group of SLMC supporters at Udathalawinna being the single worst incident. This massacre carried out by troops attached to the Vijayaba Infantry Regiment (VIR) who had been brought to Kandy at the behest of de facto Defence Minister Anuruddha Ratwatte was used as an excuse by a vindictive UNP leadership to order the raid on the safe house used by the DMI situated at Millennium City, Athurugiriya, on Jan. 2, 2002, which changed the course of the conflict. The UNF cited intelligence reports that Anuruddha Ratwatte’s sons, wanted in connection with the Udathalawinna massacre, were taking refuge at Athurugiriya.
Had the UNP leadership been a little cautious, it would never have publicly accused the Army of an assassination plot. Lt. Gen. Balagalle discussed the issues at hand with the writer. Operating hit squads behind enemy lines had been a key element in the Army’s strategy to give it a taste of its own medicine, the Army chief said at that time, alleging the then Opposition had failed to grasp what was going on. The Island quoted Lt. Gen. Balagalle as having said: “Had they quietly raised the issue with us and sought a clarification without playing politics with national security, the Athurugiriya fiasco could have been averted. Even ex-LTTE cadres were brought in for operations along with valuable input from civilian informants. We were successful due to many reasons such as training from Pakistani instructors. We also accommodated troops from other fighting battalions to engage in operations behind enemy lines, though the Special Forces and Army Commandos spearheaded the campaign.”
At the time troops had been undergoing training in Pakistan, Balagalle functioned as Security Forces Commander, Jaffna.
The Athurugiriya raid ruptured relations between the UNP and the Army. It caused irreparable damage to national security. At the behest of the UNP, a section of the media, including the Colombo-based correspondents working for international news agencies, highlighted the Athurugiriya raid speculating the Army’s alleged involvement in anti-government activities. Investigating officers alleged that those who had been based at Athurugiriya were involved in the alleged attempt to assassinate Wickremesinghe. Subsequently, the DMI was accused of planning attacks in the city and its suburbs to sabotage the Norwegian-led peace process.
The UNP allegations had the desired impact in the wake of state television showing recovered items, which included 66 sets of LTTE uniforms, four thermobaric weapons, seven claymore mines each weighing 10 kgs, 10 claymore mines, each weighing one kg each, three T-56 assault rifles along with 400 rounds of ammunition, 10 anti-tank weapons, detonators, cyanide capsules, exploders, remote controlled devices and wire rolls.
While a section of the media lashed out at the Army, in a front-page exclusive headlined ‘Controversy over police raid on army officers Millennium City residence,’ on Jan 4, 2002, The Island revealed that a police team from Kandy, led by die-hard UNP loyalist, Kulasiri Udugampola, had raided an Army safe house. The raid also involved a team of CCMP (Ceylon Corps of Military Police).
In spite of both Lt. Gen. Balagalle and the then Director of DMI, Brigadier Kapila Hendawitharana (later served as Chief of National Intelligence, before quitting in 2015) reassuring the government of the legitimacy of operations undertaken by the DMI, the police was let loose on covert operatives. Regardless of Balagalle rushing Hendarawithana, who later figured in many controversies to the scene, Udugampola went ahead with the raid. The police had obtained permission from courts to search the premises.
Udugampola had the backing of the then Interior Minister, John Amaratunga. IGP Lucky Kodituwakku, though being convinced of the legitimacy of the DMI operation, couldn’t do anything. He was helpless.
Army takes firm stand
The Kandy police raided the safe house shortly after the officer-in-charge of the DMI operation had handed over part of their arsenal. Those involved in the hit-and-run operations in LTTE held-areas had returned to Colombo on Dec. 27, 2001, in the wake of the Wickremesinghe administration declaring its readiness to go ahead with a Norwegian initiative to sign a one-sided CFA clearly favourable to the LTTE. The Kandy police also accused the Army of planting two claymore mines targeting a UNP candidate along the Wattegama-Panwila road, in the run-up to the Dec. 5, 2001 polls.
The then security forces spokesman, Brig. Sanath Karunaratne emphasised that those who operated from Athurugiriya were involved in ‘Army duties’ (The Island Jan. 4, 2002). Regardless of protests by the Army, those arrested were taken away to the Narahenpita CMP headquarters before being transferred to Kandy. They were treated like criminals and held under humiliating conditions. Six of them, including an officer, were held in one room. For two weeks, the media reported all sorts of conspiracy theories.
Let me stress that the Athurugiriya betrayal, in a way divided the Army. An influential section of the Army obviously cooperated with the conspirators.
Those who had been arrested were held for almost two weeks before being granted bail. The police raid would never have been possible without an influential section within the Army cooperating with the political establishment to undermine a vital operation, which brought the LTTE under immense pressure.
The UNP and the police justified Udugampola’s raid. Asked whether he had used the safe house to accommodate his sons, one-time Defence chief, Anuruddha Ratwatte, candidly acknowledged that he hadn’t been among those who knew of the existence of that particular rear base, though the Army kept him informed of operations undertaken by the DMI. (Feb. 1 issue of The Island, 2002)
Marapana to the rescue
Then Defence Minister, Tilak Marapana, a one-time Attorney General, to his credit did not play politics with such an important issue and thwarted an attempt by the Kandy police to prolong the detention of DMI operatives using the provisions of the PTA to please their then political masters in the UNP. The bid to neutralize the DMI was made ahead of the signing of the CFA. The Wickremesinghe administration didn’t even bother to consult the armed forces and police top brass regarding the provisions of the agreement. Then Navy Commander, Vice Admiral Daya Sandagiri told the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) how then Defence Secretary, Austin Fernando, had bypassed them with regard to sensitive military issues.
Fernando, in an article captioned ‘The Peace Process and Security Issues’ (Negotiating Peace in Sri Lanka: Efforts, Failures and Lessons) admitted that the refusal on the part of the then government to consult the military had been a failure. Fernando said (page 42): “The military chiefs weren’t consulted in the drafting of the CFA. Of course, a casual opportunity was given to them to discuss the draft with Ministers of Defence (Tilak Marapana) and Constitutional Affairs (Prof. G.L. Peiris). This wasn’t considered adequate by them as they didn’t get an opportunity to discuss the CFA with their senior officers”.
The CFA declared that ACTIVITIES BY DEEP PENETRATION UNITS should be ceased along with the cessation of all military action. The LTTE wouldn’t have demanded a ban on DMI operations unless the group acknowledged the growing threat posed by DMI. The LTTE had been vulnerable to those hunting them in their own backyard. Obviously, the LTTE wouldn’t have bothered about the DMI had the latter been stalking Wickremesinghe in the run-up to the Dec. 2001 polls.
Retired Senior DIG Merril Gunaratne, who had been Defence Advisor to Wickremesinghe during the CFA, exposed the UNP leadership in his ‘COP IN THE CROSSFIRE.’ The first book of its kind, written by one-time Director General of Intelligence, revealed how the top UNP leadership took security issues lightly at the expense of the country as well as the party. Asked whether he had been involved in the operation to move the Kandy police against the DMI, Gunaratne told the writer at that time he categorically opposed the move. “I was convinced the PA government wouldn’t target Wickremesinghe, thereby allowing the UNP to benefit from the sympathy vote. Unfortunately, Wickremesinghe and his top advisors felt the Army was hell bent on destroying the UNP.”
Ex-LTTE’s among the slain
The Athurugiriya raid had a catastrophic impact on the armed forces, which experienced untold hardships due to miscalculations on the part of political and military leaders. Following the betrayal of the DMI, the LTTE unleashed a series of operations in the city, its suburbs and in the Eastern Province. Altogether, over 50 military personnel, Tamil informants as well as ex-LTTE cadres working for the Army, died at the hands of the LTTE as their identities were revealed owing to the raid on the army safe house. Wijayanadan Widyatharan, alias Vidya, of Sea Road, Navakkudah, was the first operative killed by the LTTE after exposure of the Athurugiriya operation. Vaidya was abducted on January 20, 2002, over two weeks after the raid.
The dead included two senior military officers, both killed in Colombo. Although the two military officials, holding the rank of Major and Colonel could have been on a hit list, regardless of the Athurugiriya fiasco, the LTTE exploited the situation to demoralise the Army. Daring operations directed at the DMI and police intelligence helped boost the LTTE’s image. The military was placed in an unenviable position as the suspension of the PTA effectively neutralised counter-measures directed at LTTE hit squads.
Inspector Dale Gunaratne, the then President of the Police Inspectors’ Association, was perhaps the only law enforcement officer publicly critical of the UNP’s response to the LTTE threat. (Having retired years ago, Gunaratne now serves as an Attorney-at-Law) Although his superiors reacted angrily, Gunaratne lashed out at the government for allowing the LTTE to exploit the CFA to its advantage. Citing the killing of Inspector Thabrew at the Dehiwela Police Station, in July 2003, IP Gunaratne alleged that the suspension of the PTA in keeping with the CFA was nothing but a grievous threat to those fighting terrorism. He kept on lambasting the UNP and his own superiors for not taking action to neutralise the LTTE threat. But the UNP was determined to salvage the crumbling peace process at any cost. For those at the helm of the government, the lives of security forces and police didn’t matter, as long as they believed the LTTE would remain in the negotiating process. Politicians felt whatever the provocations, the peace process should continue.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Midweek Review
Universal in a Catastrophe

Survivors of the South-East Asian tragedy,
Triggered by nature’s stern promptings,
Somehow reining-in suffocating sorrow,
Are leaving no unhinged stone unturned,
To salvage the remains of those held dear,
In fresh testimony of love’s staying power,
But it speaks well for the untouched majority,
That unstinted succor is pouring in,
To render some solace to the hapless,
Although no amount of fellow feeling,
Could make up for the wrenching sorrow,
Of parting from a priceless presence.
By Lynn Ockersz
Midweek Review
Batalanda and complexities of paramilitary operations

Former President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s recent combative ‘Head-to-Head’ interview with British-American Mehdi Hasan on Al Jazeera has opened a can of worms. As to why Hasan raised the Batalanda Presidential Commission report, during a 49-minute interview conducted at the London’s Conway Hall, with a clearly pro LTTE audience, remains a mystery. This must be yet another notorious way to show how even-handed they are as in the case of its coverage of Russia, China, Palestine or Ukraine for their gullible viewers.
Recorded in February and aired in March 2025, the interview is definitely the most controversial the UNP leader, who is also an Attorney-at-Law, ever faced during his political career; always used to getting kid glove treatment, especially after taking over the party in 1994.
The continuing public discourse on Batalanda should provoke a wider discussion on Sri Lanka’s response to separatist Tamil terrorism, since the cold blooded murder of Jaffna SLFP Mayor Alfred Duriappah, which signalled the beginning of the LTTE terror campaign that ended in May 2009 with the crushing military defeat of the Tigers on the banks of the Nathikadal lagoon, as well as two southern insurgencies in 1971 and 1987-1990.
As Nandana Gunatilleke (one time JVP General Secretary and ex-MP), Dr. Wasantha Bandara (ex-JVPer and close associate of the slain JVP leader Rohana Wijeweera), Indrananda de Silva (ex-JVPer, incumbent Central Committee member of Frontline Socialist Party [FSP] and ex-military photographer) and Uvindu Wijeweera (Rohana Wijeweera’s son and leader of Dewana Parapura) agreed during the recent Hiru ‘Balaya’ discussion, conducted by Madushan de Silva, the Batalanda operation was in line with the overall counter-terrorist/insurgency strategy of the then government.
The issues at hand cannot be discussed at all without taking into consideration the JVP terrorism that, at one-time, almost overwhelmed the UNP’s unbroken rule, since 1977, carried out while openly brushing aside most of the universally accepted genuine parliamentary norms. The country’s second Republican constitution, promulgated by the UNP regime with a 5/6 majority in Parliament, in 1978, had been amended no less than 13 times by the time they were finally ousted in 1995. This was mainly to facilitate their continuous rule. Unfortunately, all stakeholders have sought to take advantage of Batalanda, thereby preventing a proper dialogue. Quite surprisingly, none of the guests, nor the interviewer, bothered, at least, to make a reference to the JVP bid on President J.R. Jayewardene’s life in Parliament on the morning of July 18, 1987. At the time, JVPer Ajith Kumara, working in the House as a minor employee, hurled two hand grenades towards JRJ, with the then Prime Minister Ranasinghe Premadasa seated next to JRJ. While one government MP lost his life, several others suffered injuries, including then National Security Minister Lalith Athulathmudali, whose spleen had to be removed.
At one point, Gunatilleke declared that they assassinated UNP MP for Tangalle Jinadasa Weerasinghe on July 3, 1987, in response to the government killing well over 100 people, in Colombo, protesting against the signing of the Indo-Lanka accord on July 29, 1987. The parliamentarian was killed near the Barawakumbuka-Welangahawela bridge on the Colombo-Rathnapura-Embilipitiya Road. The UNPer was killed on his way home after having declined Premier Premadasa’s offer to make an SLAF chopper available for him to reach home safely.
Against the backdrop of MP Weerasinghe’s assassination and the grenade attack on the UNP parliamentary group that claimed the life of Keethi Abeywickrema (MP for Deniyaya), the government had no option but to respond likewise. The operation, established at the Batalanda Housing scheme of the State Fertiliser Corporation, constituted part of the counter-insurgency strategy pursued by the UNP.
Those who called Batalanda complex Batalanda torture camp/ wadakagaraya conveniently forgot during the second JVP inspired insurgency, the military had to utilize many public buildings, including schools, as makeshift accommodation for troops. Of course the UNP established Batalanda under different circumstances with the then Industries Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe providing political authority. Batalanda had been an exclusive police operation though the Army had access to it whenever a requirement arose.
Those who had been suddenly withdrawn from the Northern and Eastern Provinces, to meet the rapidly evolving security threat in the South, required accommodation. FSP CC member Indrananada de Silva had received unhindered access to Batalanda in his capacity as a military photographer and the rest is history.
As to why Indrananda de Silva switched his allegiance to the FSP should be examined, taking into consideration his previous role as a trusted military photographer, formerly a Lance Corporal of the Military Police. An influential section of the JVP, led by Kumar Gunaratnam, formed the FSP in April 2012 though it didn’t receive the much anticipated public support. Both Indrananda de Silva and Nandana Gunatilleke, who aligned himself with the UNP, found fault with the JVP-led National People’s Power (NPP) over its handling of the Batalanada issue.
Paramilitary operations
Paramilitary operations had been an integral part of the overall counter-insurgency campaign, directed at the JVP responsible for approximately 6,600 killings. Among those death squads were PRRA primarily drawn from the SLMP (Sri Lanka Mahajana Party) and SRRA (the socialist Revolutionary Red Army). PRRA had close links with the Independent Student Union (ISU) whose leader Daya Pathirana was slain by the JVP. The vast majority of people do not remember that Daya Pathirana, who led the ISU during the turbulent 1985-1986 period, was killed mid-Dec. 1989. The second insurgency hadn’t started at that time though the JVP propagated the lie that they took up arms against the UNP government following the signing of the Indo-Lanka peace accord on July 29, 1987.
In addition to PRRA and SRRA, the government made use of paramilitary groups, namely Kalu balallu, Ukkusso, Rajaliyo, Kaha balallu, Kola koti, Rathu Makaru, Mapila, Gonussa, Nee, Keshara Sinhayo, Le-mappillu and Kalu koti.
The UNP also involved some elements of Indian trained Tamil groups (not of the LTTE) in paramilitary operations. Such operations, that had been backed by respective Cabinet Ministers, were supervised by local law enforcement authorities. Paramilitary operations had been in line with psychological warfare that was meant to cause fear among the JVP, as well as the general population. Military operations that had been combined with paramilitary actions received the blessings of the political leadership at the highest level. In the case of Batalanda (1988-1990) President J.R. Jayewardene and Ranasinghe Premadasa knew of its existence.
Even after the eradication of the top JVP leadership, by Nov. 1989, police, military and paramilitary operations continued unabated. Former JVPers appearing on ‘Balaya’ agreed that counter-insurgency operations were actually brought to an end only after D.B. Wijetunga succeeded President Ranasinghe Premadasa after the latter’s assassination on May Day 1993.
After the LTTE resumed war in June 1990, just a couple of months after the withdrawal of the Indian Army (July 1987-March1990), the UNP authorized paramilitary operations in the northern and eastern areas. Members of TELO, PLOTE, EPRLF as well as EPDP were made part of the overall government security strategy. They operated in large groups. Some paramilitary units were deployed in the Jaffna islands as well. And these groups were represented in Parliament. They enjoyed privileged status not only in the northern and eastern regions but Colombo as well. The government allowed them to carry weapons in the city and its suburbs.
These groups operated armed units in Colombo. The writer had the opportunity to visit EPDP and PLOTE safe houses in Colombo and its suburbs soon after they reached an understanding with President Ranasinghe Premadasa. Overnight at the behest of President Premadasa, the Election Department granted these Tamil groups political recognition. In other words, armed groups were made political parties. The Premadasa government accepted their right to carry weapons while being represented in Parliament.
It would be pertinent to mention that thousands of Tamil paramilitary personnel served the government during that period. There had been many confrontations between them and the LTTE over the years and the latter sought to eliminate key paramilitary personnel. Let me remind you of the circumstances, the EPRLF’s number 02 Thambirajah Subathiran alias Robert was sniped to death in June 2003. Robert was engaged in routine morning exercises on the top floor of the two-storeyed EPRLF office, on the hospital road, Jaffna, when an LTTE sniper took him out from the nearby Vembadi Girls’ high school. The operation of the Norway managed Ceasefire Agreement (CFA) made no difference as the LTTE removed Robert who led the party here in the absence of leader Varatharaja Perumal, the first and the only Chief Minister of the North-Eastern Province.
In terms of the CFA that had been signed by Premier Ranil Wickremesinghe and LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran, in Feb. 2002, the government agreed to disarm all paramilitary personnel. Many wouldn’t remember now that during Premadasa’s honeymoon with the LTTE, the Army facilitated the LTTE onslaught on paramilitary groups in selected areas.
Muthaliff’s role
During the ‘Balaya’ discussion, the contentious issue of who shot JVP leader Rohana Wijeweera came up. Nandana Gunatilleke, who contested the 1999 Dec. presidential election. as the JVP candidate, pointing to an article carried in the party organ that dealt with Wijeweera’s assassination said that he wrongly named Gaffoor as one of the persons who shot their leader whereas the actual shooter was Muthaliff. The headline named Thoradeniya and Gaffoor as the perpetrators.
Declaring that he personally wrote that article on the basis of information provided by Indrananda de Silva, Gunatilleke named Asoka Thoradeniya and Tuan Nizam Muthaliff of the Army as the perpetrators of the crime. Thoradeniya served as Sri Lanka’s High Commissioner in the Maldives during the Yahapalana administration, while Muthaliff was killed by the LTTE in Colombo in late May 2005. The shooting took place at Polhengoda junction, Narahenpita. Muthaliff was on his way from Manning town, Narahenpita, to the Kotelawala Defence University.
The programme was told that the JVP had over the years developed close relationship with Thoradeniya while Indrananda de Silva accused Dr. Wasantha Bandara of duplicity regarding Muthaliff. How could you recognize Muthaliff, slain by the LTTE, as a war hero as he was actually one of the persons who shot Rohana Wijeweera, the latter asked.
At the time of his assassination, Muthaliff served as the Commanding Officer, 1 st Regiment Sri Lanka Military Intelligence Corps. The then parliamentarian Wimal Weerawansa was among those who paid last respects to Maj. Muthaliff.
At the time of Rohana Wijeweera’s arrest, Muthaliff served as Lieutenant while Thoradeniya was a Major. Indrananda de Silva strongly stressed that atrocities perpetrated by the police and military in the South or in the northern and eastern regions must be dealt with regardless of whom they were conducting operations against. The former JVPer recalled the Army massacre in the east in retaliation for the landmine blast that claimed the lives of Northern Commander Maj. Gen. Denzil Kobbekaduwa and a group of senior officers, including Brigadier Wijaya Wimalaratne, in early Aug. 1990 in Kayts.
Dr. Wasantha Bandara warned of the Western powers taking advantage of what he called false narrative to push for a Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
It would be pertinent to mention that the LTTE also used the underworld as well as some corrupt Army personnel in planning high profile assassinations. Investigations into the assassination of Muthaliff, as well as Maj. Gen. Parami Kulatunga, killed in a suicide attack at Pannipitiya, in June 2006, revealed the direct involvement of military personnel with the LTTE.
Indrananda de Silva disclosed that soon after Anura Kumara Dissanayake won the presidential election last September, the FSP, in writing, requested the JVP leader to inquire into killings during that period, including that of Rohana Wijeweera. The FSPer alleged that President Dissanayake refrained from even acknowledging their letter. Indrananda de Silva emphasized that Al Jazeera never disclosed anything new as regards Batalanda as he exposed the truth years ago. The former JVPer ridiculed the ruling party tabling the Batalanda Commission report in the wake of Wickremesinghe’s Al Jazeera interview whereas the matter was in the public domain for quite some time.
Indrananda de Silva and Nandana Gunatilleke exchanged words over the latter’s declaration that the JVP, too, was subjected to investigation for violence unleashed during the 1987-1990 period. While the FSPer repeatedly declared that those who carried out directives issued by the party were arrested and in some cases killed, Nandana Gunatilleke took up the position that the party should be held accountable for crimes perpetrated during that period.
The interviewer posed Nandana Gunatilleke the question whether he was betraying his former comrades after joining the UNP. Nandana Gunatilleke shot back that he joined the UNP in 2015 whereas the JVP joined UNP as far back as 2009 to promote retired Army Chef Sarath Fonseka’s presidential ambition even though he wiped out the JVP presence in Trincomalee region during the second insurgency.
JVP’s accountability
Nandana Gunatilleke is adamant that the party should accept responsibility for the killings carried out at that time. The former JVPer declared that Vijaya Kumaratunga (Feb. 16, 1988), first Vice Chancellor of the Colombo University (March 08, 1989) Dr. Stanley Wijesundera, Ven. Kotikawatte Saddhatissa thera (Aug. 03, 1988) and Chairperson of the State Pharmaceutical Corporation Gladys Jayewardene (Sept. 12, 1989) were among those assassinated by the JVP. SPC Chairperson was killed for importing medicine from India, the former Marxist aligned with the UNP said, while actor-turned-politician Kumaratunga’s assassination was attributed to his dealings with President J.R. Jayewardene.
According to Nandana Gunatilleke, except for a few killings such as General Secretaries of the UNP Harsha Abeywickrema (Dec 23, 1987) and Nandalal Fernando (May 20, 1988), the vast majority of others were ordinary people like grama sevakas killed on mere accusation of being informants. The deaths were ordered on the basis of hearsay, Nandana Gunatilleke said, much to the embarrassment of others who represented the interest of the JVP at that time.
One quite extraordinary moment during the ‘Balaya’ programme was when Nandana Gunatilleke revealed their (JVP’s) direct contact with the Indian High Commission at a time the JVP publicly took an extremely anti-Indian stance. In fact, the JVP propagated a strong anti-Indian line during the insurgency. Turning towards Dr. Wasantha Bandara, Gunatilleke disclosed that both of them had been part of the dialogue with the Indian High Commission.
It reminds me of the late Somawansa Amarasinghe’s first public address delivered at a JVP rally in late Nov. 2001 after returning home from 12 years of self-imposed exile. Of the top JVP leadership, Somawansa Amarasinghe, who had been married to a close relative of powerful UNP Minister Sirisena Cooray, was the only one to survive combined police/military/paramilitary operations.
Amarasinghe didn’t mince his words when he declared at a Kalutara rally that his life was saved by Indian Premier V.P. Singh. Soft spoken Amarasinghe profusely thanked India for saving his life. Unfortunately, those who discuss issues at hand conveniently forget crucial information in the public domain. Such lapses can be both deliberate and due to negligence.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
-
News5 days ago
Bid to include genocide allegation against Sri Lanka in Canada’s school curriculum thwarted
-
Sports6 days ago
Sri Lanka’s eternal search for the elusive all-rounder
-
News7 days ago
Gnanasara Thera urged to reveal masterminds behind Easter Sunday terror attacks
-
Sports2 days ago
To play or not to play is Richmond’s decision
-
News6 days ago
ComBank crowned Global Finance Best SME Bank in Sri Lanka for 3rd successive year
-
Features6 days ago
Sanctions by The Unpunished
-
Features6 days ago
More parliamentary giants I was privileged to know
-
Latest News4 days ago
IPL 2025: Rookies Ashwani and Rickelton lead Mumbai Indians to first win