Opinion
Cruelty to animals and lamentation of a fish
A kind request to the readers of this article, as it will be published in a website and in journals. The writer was born in Sri Lanka (Ceylon) and lived in Europe most of his adult life. Now back in Sri Lanka, this article is based on the observations made in Sri Lanka. I hope it will bring to the attention of many animal lovers irrespective of cultural differences.
I am trying to emphasise the suffering caused to animals by humans. For this I am using personification of a fish. I invite the readers to read this article with patience and finally get to the lamentation of a fish as you read on. Writers in Sri Lanka talk about animal rights, and quote the founders of religions. Mainly the Buddha. If these writers understand the most intricate and fundamental thing involved, I will be more than happy. But they don’t seem to be. In any case let me point out as far as I understand, the important aspects. Freedom from discomfort is the one that causes as much discussion as any of the freedom for animals as well as humans.
Recently even the editorials in the Sri Lankan newspapers commented on animal rights. As an animal lover from my childhood I was pleasantly surprised about the empathy expressed by the editorials of the well-known and well-read English newspaper in Sri Lanka. In Sri Lanka (supposed to be a predominantly a Buddhist Country, at least in theory), I find some writers paraphrase and publish Buddha’s teachings left, right and centre with their own photographs attached to the articles. If the Buddha was living, he would never allow his photograph to be printed in newspapers. I personally think it is egocentric and an insult to the Buddha. Intelligent readers want the facts and philosophy and not the writers’ qualifications with their photographs. After all they are not film stars.
The Buddha was a thinking person’s teacher. Buddhism is all about suffering and means of putting an end to it. I have side tracked here a bit as I was trying to give the topic more focus. Let me get back to the point. What the writers forget is the PAIN. Pain is the basis of all suffering. Whether it is psychological pain or physical pain to animals or humans. Doctors give pain killers. What is pain? Is it something verbally describable? We can never experience someone else’s pain. A mother can empathise with her only child’s pain. She can never experience the pain of her child.
So, let me state that pain is a complex experience involving sensory and emotional components: it is not just about how it feels, but also how it makes you feel. And it is these unpleasant feelings that cause the suffering we humans associate with pain. By definition we humans are animals. Nonhuman animals cannot translate their feelings to language that humans use in the same manner as human communication, but observation of their behaviour provides a reasonable indication as to the extent of their pain. Just as with doctors and medics who sometimes share. No common language with their patients, the indicators of pain can still be understood. The topic of animal consciousness is beset with a number of difficulties. It poses the problem of other minds in an especially severe form, because animals lacking the ability to use human language, cannot tell us about their experiences. Also, it is difficult to reason objectively about the question, because a denial that an animal is conscious is often taken to imply that it does not feel, its life has no value, and that harming it is not morally wrong.
The 17th-century French philosopher René Descartes, for example, has sometimes been criticised for providing a rationale for the mistreatment of animals because he argued that only humans are conscious. His famous saying “Cogito ergo sum”: I think therefore I am. This should be changed to I suffer, therefore I think. Many moons ago, when I was a kid, bullock cart was a means of transport for goods and people in Sri Lanka. I was a keen observer of these carts which passed my doorstep in Kandy. When the carter wanted to go faster it beats the bullock with a heavy stick. Poor animal must have thought that the place where he was at that moment in time make it painful and it was running to a safe haven imagining in its mind.
One of my teachers, Carl Sagan, the American cosmologist, points to reasons why humans have had a tendency to deny animals can suffer: Humans – who enslave, castrate, experiment on, and fillet other animals – have had an understandable penchant for pretending animals do not feel pain. A sharp distinction between humans and ‘animals’ is essential if we are to bend them to our will, make them work for us, wear them, eat them – without any disquieting tinges of guilt or regret. It is unseemly of us, who often behave so unfeelingly toward other animals, to contend that only humans can suffer. The behaviour of other animals renders such pretensions specious. They are very much like us.
People in many cultures do not like to be reminded of the connection between animals and meat, and tend to “de-animalize “meat when necessary to reduce feelings of guilt or of disgust. In the Western countries, I have seen meat is often packaged and served so as to minimise its resemblance to live animals, without eyes, faces, or tails, and the market share of such products has increased in recent decades; however, meat in many other cultures is sold with these body parts.
Lamentation of a Fish
Why was I born as a fish in this vast ocean? I cannot comprehend. But I presume that it may be due to my Karma during my cycle of re-birth. Some very strong tough men put a net round me while I was peacefully swimming. In addition to that they put a sharp thin object inside my throat, they called it a fishing-hook. I was so happily living in the water swimming with my family. I was destined to live there. But at the moment I don’t even have a drop of water. And I am suffering in the scorching hot sun. I just cannot bear the pain that the wound has inflicted in my throat. I feel that I am dying at times and come back to life again.
A rich man touched my body to feel my flesh to see that it was good enough for a meal. After satisfying himself he giggled happily and took me by paying a lot of money to the fisherman. I heard the rich man telling his friend “I am going to offer this fish as food to Mahasangha (Buddhist Monks) and collect enough merit for me to attain Nirvana (Ultimate salvation)”.
May I ask you good people who are reading my sorrowful story, “Why do you people fulfil your charitable deeds this way? Please tell me. I cannot understand how you can attain Nirvana (Ultimate salvation) by killing me and offering my meat to Mahasangha (Buddhist Monks). Taking my flesh by force is stealing. Don’t you realise it? Now after eating my flesh and satisfying their taste buds, the monks will preach the virtues of non-violence. These monks also will tell the participants that they (monks) will be passing the merits to those who are present in front of them and also to their dead relatives who are living elsewhere after re-birth. How can they do good deeds after gulping down a carcass?
Finally, you steal my flesh for your charitable deeds. You fulfil your taste buds by stealing and eating my flesh. Further, you pass on merit to others by eating and donating my flesh. The irony is after using and eating my flesh, you never think of passing even a little bit of merit to me as gratitude!!!
“Lamentation of a Fish”
was a Sinhalese poem- I am not aware of the author’s name. “Maluwakuge Andonawa”. I made an attempt to translate it to Sinhalese to suit this article here.
Sampath Anson Fernando,
Shenfield, England / Colombo,
Sri Lanka
Opinion
We do not want to be press-ganged
Reference ,the Indian High Commissioner’s recent comments ( The Island, 9th Jan. ) on strong India-Sri Lanka relationship and the assistance granted on recovering from the financial collapse of Sri Lanka and yet again for cyclone recovery., Sri Lankans should express their thanks to India for standing up as a friendly neighbour.
On the Defence Cooperation agreement, the Indian High Commissioner’s assertion was that there was nothing beyond that which had been included in the text. But, dear High Commissioner, we Sri Lankans have burnt our fingers when we signed agreements with the European nations who invaded our country; they took our leaders around the Mulberry bush and made our nation pay a very high price by controlling our destiny for hundreds of years. When the Opposition parties in the Parliament requested the Sri Lankan government to reveal the contents of the Defence agreements signed with India as per the prevalent common practice, the government’s strange response was that India did not want them disclosed.
Even the terms of the one-sided infamous Indo-Sri Lanka agreement, signed in 1987, were disclosed to the public.
Mr. High Commissioner, we are not satisfied with your reply as we are weak, economically, and unable to clearly understand your “India’s Neighbourhood First and Mahasagar policies” . We need the details of the defence agreements signed with our government, early.
RANJITH SOYSA
Opinion
When will we learn?
At every election—general or presidential—we do not truly vote, we simply outvote. We push out the incumbent and bring in another, whether recycled from the past or presented as “fresh.” The last time, we chose a newcomer who had spent years criticising others, conveniently ignoring the centuries of damage they inflicted during successive governments. Only now do we realise that governing is far more difficult than criticising.
There is a saying: “Even with elephants, you cannot bring back the wisdom that has passed.” But are we learning? Among our legislators, there have been individuals accused of murder, fraud, and countless illegal acts. True, the courts did not punish them—but are we so blind as to remain naive in the face of such allegations? These fraudsters and criminals, and any sane citizen living in this decade, cannot deny those realities.
Meanwhile, many of our compatriots abroad, living comfortably with their families, ignore these past crimes with blind devotion and campaign for different parties. For most of us, the wish during an election is not the welfare of the country, but simply to send our personal favourite to the council. The clearest example was the election of a teledrama actress—someone who did not even understand the Constitution—over experienced and honest politicians.
It is time to stop this bogus hero worship. Vote not for personalities, but for the country. Vote for integrity, for competence, and for the future we deserve.
Deshapriya Rajapaksha
Opinion
Chlorophyll –The Life-giver is in peril
Chlorophyll is the green pigment found in plants, algae, and cyanobacteria. It is essential for photosynthesis, the process by which light energy is converted into chemical energy to sustain life on Earth. As it is green it reflects Green of the sunlight spectrum and absorbs its Red and Blue ranges. The energy in these rays are used to produce carbohydrates utilising water and carbon dioxide and releasing oxygen in the process. Thus, it performs, in this reaction, three functions essential for life on earth; it produces food and oxygen and removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere to maintain equilibrium in our environment. It is one of the wonders of nature that are in peril today. It is essential for life on earth, at least for the present, as there are no suitable alternatives. While chlorophyll can be produced in a lab, it cannot be produced using simple, everyday chemicals in a straightforward process. The total synthesis of chlorophyll is an extremely complex multi-step organic chemistry process that requires specialized knowledge, advanced laboratory equipment, and numerous complex intermediary compounds and catalysts.
Chlorophyll probably evolved inside bacteria in water and migrated to land with plants that preceded animals who also evolved in water. Plants had to come on land first to oxygenate the atmosphere and make it possible for animals to follow. There was very little oxygen in the ocean or on the surface before chlorophyll carrying bacteria and algae started photosynthesis. Now 70% of our atmospheric oxygen is produced by sea phytoplankton and algae, hence the importance of the sea as a source of oxygen.
Chemically, chlorophyll is a porphyrin compound with a central magnesium (Mg²⁺) ion. Factors that affect its production and function are light intensity, availability of nutrients, especially nitrogen and magnesium, water supply and temperature. Availability of nutrients and temperature could be adversely affected due to sea pollution and global warming respectively.
Temperature range for optimum chlorophyll function is 25 – 35 C depending on the types of plants. Plants in temperate climates are adopted to function at lower temperatures and those in tropical regions prefer higher temperatures. Chlorophyll in most plants work most efficiently at 30 C. At lower temperatures it could slow down and become dormant. At temperatures above 40 C chlorophyll enzymes begin to denature and protein complexes can be damaged. Photosynthesis would decline sharply at these high temperatures.
Global warming therefore could affect chlorophyll function and threaten its very existence. Already there is a qualitative as well as quantitative decline of chlorophyll particularly in the sea. The last decade has been the hottest ten years and 2024 the hottest year since recording had started. The ocean absorbs 90% of the excess heat that reaches the Earth due to the greenhouse effect. Global warming has caused sea surface temperatures to rise significantly, leading to record-breaking temperatures in recent years (like 2023-2024), a faster warming rate (four times faster than 40 years ago), and more frequent, intense marine heatwaves, disrupting marine life and weather patterns. The ocean’s surface is heating up much faster, about four times quicker than in the late 1980s, with the last decade being the warmest on record. 2023 and 2024 saw unprecedented high sea surface temperatures, with some periods exceeding previous records by large margins, potentially becoming the new normal.
Half of the global sea surface has gradually changed in colour indicating chlorophyll decline (Frankie Adkins, 2024, Z Hong, 2025). Sea is blue in colour due to the absorption of Red of the sunlight spectrum by water and reflecting Blue. When the green chlorophyll of the phytoplankton is decreased the sea becomes bluer. Researchers from MIT and Georgia Tech found these color changes are global, affecting over half the ocean’s surface in the last two decades, and are consistent with climate model predictions. Sea phytoplankton and algae produce more than 70% of the atmospheric oxygen, replenishing what is consumed by animals. Danger to the life of these animals including humans due to decline of sea chlorophyll is obvious. Unless this trend is reversed there would be irreparable damage and irreversible changes in the ecosystems that involve chlorophyll function as a vital component.
The balance 30% of oxygen is supplied mainly by terrestrial plants which are lost due mainly to human action, either by felling and clearing or due to global warming. Since 2000, approximately 100 million hectares of forest area was lost globally by 2018 due to permanent deforestation. More recent estimates from the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) indicate that an estimated 420 million hectares of forest have been lost through deforestation since 1990, with a net loss of approximately 4.7 million hectares per year between 2010 and 2020 (accounting for forest gains by reforestation). From 2001 to 2024, there had been a total of 520 million hectares of tree cover loss globally. This figure includes both temporary loss (e.g., due to fires or logging where forests regrow) and permanent deforestation. Roughly 37% of tree cover loss since 2000 was likely permanent deforestation, resulting in conversion to non-forest land uses such as agriculture, mining, or urban development. Tropical forests account for the vast majority (nearly 94%) of permanent deforestation, largely driven by agricultural expansion. Limiting warming to 1.5°C significantly reduces risks, but without strong action, widespread plant loss and biodiversity decline are projected, making climate change a dominant threat to nature, notes the World Economic Forum. Tropical trees are Earth’s climate regulators—they cool the planet, store massive amounts of carbon, control rainfall, and stabilize global climate systems. Losing them would make climate change faster, hotter, and harder to reverse.
Another vital function of chlorophyll is carbon fixing. Carbon fixation by plants is crucial because it converts atmospheric carbon dioxide into organic compounds, forming the base of the food web, providing energy/building blocks for life, regulating Earth’s climate by removing greenhouse gases, and driving the global carbon cycle, making life as we know it possible. Plants use carbon fixation (photosynthesis) to create their own food (sugars), providing energy and organic matter that sustains all other life forms. By absorbing vast amounts of CO2 (a greenhouse gas) from the atmosphere, plants help control its concentration, mitigating global warming. Chlorophyll drives the Carbon Cycle, it’s the primary natural mechanism for moving inorganic carbon into the biosphere, making it available for all living organisms.
In essence, carbon fixation turns the air we breathe out (carbon dioxide) into the food we eat and the air we breathe in (oxygen), sustaining ecosystems and regulating our planet’s climate.
While land plants store much more total carbon in their biomass, marine plants (like phytoplankton) and algae fix nearly the same amount of carbon annually as all terrestrial plants combined, making the ocean a massive and highly efficient carbon sink, especially coastal ecosystems that sequester carbon far faster than forests. Coastal marine plants (mangroves, salt marshes, seagrasses) are extremely efficient carbon sequesters, absorbing carbon at rates up to 50 times faster than terrestrial forests.
If Chlorophyll decline, which is mainly due to human action driven by uncontrolled greed, is not arrested as soon as possible life on Earth would not be possible.
(Some information was obtained from Wikipedia)
by N. A. de S. Amaratunga ✍️
-
News3 days agoSajith: Ashoka Chakra replaces Dharmachakra in Buddhism textbook
-
Business3 days agoDialog and UnionPay International Join Forces to Elevate Sri Lanka’s Digital Payment Landscape
-
Features3 days agoThe Paradox of Trump Power: Contested Authoritarian at Home, Uncontested Bully Abroad
-
Features3 days agoSubject:Whatever happened to (my) three million dollars?
-
News3 days agoLevel I landslide early warnings issued to the Districts of Badulla, Kandy, Matale and Nuwara-Eliya extended
-
News3 days agoNational Communication Programme for Child Health Promotion (SBCC) has been launched. – PM
-
News3 days ago65 withdrawn cases re-filed by Govt, PM tells Parliament
-
Opinion5 days agoThe minstrel monk and Rafiki, the old mandrill in The Lion King – II
